T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4741.1 | My 2 cents worth | DACT6::COLEMAN | ULTRIX-ee in Training | Wed Jun 19 1991 13:55 | 29 |
| I think that the household pet category should include ALL
cats! Even if it could be considered in the purebred category!
(As your example stated -- the straight-earred scottish
fold). I have 2 "household pets" -- they are NPB (no particular
breed). I would show them, but one was declawed, and the other
is on the "pudgy" side. I bought a Korat to show -- and if
I had decided to spay her, I would still show her in the
"Premier" class. I heard a judge say that it's difficult to
judge household pets, cause there is no "standard". So,
having a cat that 'could' be in Champion/Premier class,
and is in household pet, is NOT be judged for its traits. The
judge stated that he judged household pets on their cleanliness,
care, and personality. If it hissed, or showed other signs
of "unfavorable" behavior, he wasn't going to consider it.
So, to make a long story short, I don't think they should
change it.
By the way, isn't the annual meeting in Philadelphia, not
Pittsburgh? I'm going to be attending a TICA show in Pittsburgh
this weekend (my mom lives near there -- decided to go to a TICA
show and see what's it like) and I met the entry clerk at the
last CFA show I was at (York, PA). She said alot of the CFA
people were going to be there, because the annual was in Philly.
Am I wrong/?? Did they change the location, cause if they did,
I'd LOVE to attend!
Cheryl,
Gracie, Charlie & Shanti
|
4741.2 | more thoughts | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Jun 19 1991 14:18 | 22 |
| It is in PA, might be Philly. I didn't pay that much attention since I
wasn't attending this year. Our club sent a delegate to carry our vote
to the annual. If you ever do get a chance to go, grab it! It is very
interesting to see the way CFA works.
CFA's members are it's clubs. Each club gets one vote, so, before you
can cast your club's vote, your club has to vote on how it will vote
(does that make any sense?) Our club was split evenly on this issue,
so we decided to let our delegate hear the arguments from the floor,
and then decide which way the club will vote. Sometimes, the arguments
from the floor can really change your position on the issue. People
bring up things that your club may not have thought of.
I agree with you though, a hhp is judged on cleanliness, health,
personality, grooming, etc. Not on a standard. That is why pet
quality purebreds should be allowed in hhp class. The class is really
for the owner, not the cat themselves. I think that a person that
shows in hhp is showing how well they care for their cats, and how much
pride they have in their cats. A person can show these things with
either mixed breed cats or purebreds.
Jo
|
4741.3 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Jun 19 1991 14:48 | 12 |
| Forgot to mention, next year's CFA annual will be in Seattle, WA for
those interested in attending. I am making plans now. I usually have
trouble getting there, since it is always held in June, and that is
when my boss likes to take *his* vacation time.
The 1993 Annual meeting will be held in San Antonio, TX.
The 1994 Annual meeting will be held in Traverse City, MI.
The 1995 Annual meeting will be held in San Diego, CA.
Jo
|
4741.4 | '93 and '95 | DACT6::COLEMAN | ULTRIX-ee in Training | Wed Jun 19 1991 14:59 | 9 |
| I'm going to spend the next couple years getting my cattery
started -- getting 'myself' WITH the cats, together, etc. So,
I'm going to shoot for the 93 and 95 Annual. Hopefully, by
then, we'll get accepted into a club (since we're 'new' to
all of this)!
I'm curious to hear how this HHP thing works out!
Cheryl
|
4741.5 | well, maybe I don't agree... | TYGON::WILDE | why am I not yet a dragon? | Wed Jun 19 1991 17:18 | 19 |
| uh...well, I hate to go against the tide here, but I kinda think that the
purebred (recognizable as a distinct breed) cat may have an unfair advantage
in the HHP category. After all, the judges are more "used" to seeing pure
bred cats, and they might have just the tiniest bias towards them...don't
you think?
Bear in mind that I have never shown a cat in any category and I'm not sure
that this is true, but I think I can understand where the happy HHP owner
is coming from....Of course, in the case of a straight-eared fold, most of
them would "pass" for a cute "unplanned" bred cat...unless, as Jo says,
the other HHP owners showing that day knew different and reported it.
At any rate, don't the pedigreed cat owners have showing categories for both
whole and neutered cats? If that is so, why show a purebred in a category
other than these two? It seems to me that if the cat cannot be shown in
a normal purebred category, maybe it shouldn't be shown....
Oh well, I think they are all beautiful...and I even like the hissing and
growling ones...shows "character"....at least, that is what Hannah tells me.
|
4741.7 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Jun 19 1991 17:43 | 46 |
| Diane brings up good points, some of which have been brought up by some
hhp owners that show in the hhp catagories. The main issue here seems
to be with straight-eared folds and tailed manx and cymrics. Lots of
hhp people get mad when these types of cats are shown in hhp class.
But, there is not a class that these cats can be shown in currently.
So then, are they to be barred from competition altogether?
HHP's are judged on their beauty, personality, health and grooming. If
anything, an apparent purebred would be at a disadvantage, since the
judge might be tempted to compare that cat to the standard for it's
breed. The judge just may think that the cat being shown in the HHP
class is such a poor example of it's apparent breed that they are
biased *against* that cat. But, truth be told, judges enjoy judging
hhp's because they can pick whichever cat they like best. With no
standards or rules to follow. Plus, I like to give the judges more
credit than that. Most have a lot of integrity.
The proposed change would turn all the hhp exhibitors into cat show
police by allowing them to turn in exhibitors who show their pet
quality purebreds in hhp class. That would be the only way to be sure
that this rule was being carried out, since hhp's do not enter a
registration number on their entry forms and CFA cannot track them.
Also, there are lots of purebred cats that cannot be shown in one of
the three CFA catagories for purebred cats. Not every kitten a buyer
produces will be good enough to show or breed. Most of my pet quality
Birman kittens could not be shown in CFA due to gloving faults. This
is not a conformation problem, but a color problem, yet it would barr
them from competition in any of the three catagories of purebred
competition. I do not encourage my kitten buyers to show their pet
quality kittens unless I feel that that kitten could compete well in
the Premiership class. But, there are other breeders that do encourage
them to show in HHP class.
Anyone have any comments on any of the other issues? What about
changing the finals to top 15 format. I voted against that one since
it didn't indicate if that was for all show formats or just for the 450
count format. If the rules were changed to top 15 for all formats,
those clubs holding one day, 225 count shows would be burdened with
extra expense that was unnecessary. The cost of the extra rosettes
would be great, the time it would take for all judges to award 15 in a
final would be greater, and I feel it would dilute the win in a smaller
show.
Jo
|
4741.8 | | SCRUZ::CORDES_JA | Set Apartment/Cat_Max=3 | Wed Jun 19 1991 18:17 | 26 |
| I don't think I like the idea of changing to the top 15. In the
HHP class there have been many times when there weren't enough
cats to even award 10 ribbons. I know it's much different for the
pedigree classes. I think it would be an added burden in time for
the judges and money for the clubs to have to provide all those
extra ribbons.
As for apparent purebreds in the HHP class. I'm not against it.
I think Jo Ann is right in her point about it possibly being a
hindrance to them/being judged against the standard for their breed
instead of as a HHP. I find showing to be political enough without
adding reasons for other HHP owners to be turning in their competitors
to the "Purebred Police".
When I am showing, I show exclusively in the HHP category. There
have been shows where there have been a large number of apparent
purebreds competing in HHP class. It is a little annoying when you
know they are probably purebreds and they are also walking away with
all the best HHP ribbons but, as long as the cat is happy, healthy
and reacting well to the judges and showing I can't see any reason to
prevent them from being shown in HHP...unless someone plans to create
a whole new showing category for these cats. After all, when you get
right down to it, they're pets too and they (in most cases) do live
in the house...
Jan
|
4741.9 | you shouldn't have asked mhj... :') | SANFAN::BALZERMA | | Wed Jun 19 1991 18:36 | 31 |
|
- I do not feel that cats with pedigrees should be shown in the HHP
class. If they cannot be shown in Championship, Premiership or the
AOV Class then I do not feel they should be shown at all. A "poor"
example of a cat of breed should not be shown in HHP because that is
the only place there is a chance of "winning".
- As far as Top 10 vs. Top 15 I feel that Top 15 is appropriate in the
450 count shows. The Revelers show at the Cow Palace pops into mind.
With the count and the quality of the exhibitors I feel Top 15 in
all Classes in a show like this is appropriate.
- On the Best, 2nd Best and 3rd Best Champion I'd vote yes on that one.
- I also think that Best of Breed etc., should be awarded in the
Premiership Class. Seems to me that is in there somewhere also for
a vote? Obviously if there is only 1 cat then it is meaningless, but
when you have even 2 I feel the distinction should be made. I would
LOVE to know how the judges would rate the Birmans in Premiership out
here. They are gorgeous and should be recognized and be ranked in their
breed category. Because they are spayed or neutered does not make them
any "less" deserving than a whole cat for the recognition of Best of
Breed, etc.
- And while I am spouting off I still say Exotics should be in the
Persian Class and LH Exotics should be eligible for competition in
all claasses.
- O.K., I'm done now..... ;')
|
4741.10 | | TENAYA::KOLLING | Karen/Sweetie/Holly/Little Bit Ca. | Wed Jun 19 1991 19:15 | 6 |
| Another vote for letting all the babies in the Household pet class,
EXCEPT I don't believe a cat should be entered in both that and the
categories for purebreds. Someone doing that is just being piggy about
ribbons, while someone with a true "pet quality" purebred should
have access to the household pet category.
|
4741.11 | lots of good points being brought up | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Jun 19 1991 20:03 | 30 |
| Cats cannot transfer back and forth between HHP class and any of the
other classes at a CFA show. That would be against show rules.
Marlene, you are right, the decision of whether or not to award best of
breed in kittens and premiership is also one of the resolutions. Our
club voted in favor of it. This one has been up before the board three
times now and hasn't passed. Well be interesting to see what happens
this time. That format works well at the regional qualifiers and the
invitational, why not at all shows?
There was also a resolution to lift the moratorium on new clubs.
There is also a resolution that clubs may voluntarily submit judging
evaluations on approved CFA judges. Currently, the clubs can only
evaluate judges that are up for advancement, and then only when called
on to do it. This rule change would allow clubs to do evaluations on
all judges at any time. I think this is a good idea.
There are also a couple of resolutions having to do with getting CFA to
take a stand on the anti-breeding legislation, but these are not worded
correctly and probably will have to be withdrawn for that reason. We
will see.
Oh, almost forgot the biggee...
RESOLVED....All CFA judges and elected and appointed officials shall be
subject to biannual cattery inspections to assure that all animals in
their custody are being cared for in a humane manner...
Jo
|
4741.12 | | JUPITR::KAGNO | To cats, all things belong to cats | Wed Jun 19 1991 22:19 | 16 |
| I'm a bit confused. In CFF, there is a class specifically for apparent
purebreds. I don't know if this pertains to pet quality purebreds with
papers or any cat that qualifies as an apparent purebred. Does CFA not
have a class like this?
I am in agreement with Marlene on the point of not showing pet quality
purebreds in the HHP class. My definition of a pet quality cat is one
that falls short of the desired standard and should not be shown. I
also feel that showing pet quality purebreds could bias the judges into
choosing a specific cat simply because they have a fondness for it's
particular breed.
Ditto on the best of breeds added to kitten and premiership class. I'd
like to see that motion passed as well as the third best
champion/premier spots.
|
4741.13 | | SONATA::MCCURDY | | Thu Jun 20 1991 14:04 | 29 |
| I have agree with Marlene here,, I was going to say the same thingsm,
but she beat to it. Preschie is shown as an AOV IN CFF AND CFA, as
she is a "longhaired exotic". In TICA she is shown as a Persian..
In CFF they do give her rosettes,, and I believe she accumulates
points towards national wins( someoone jump in here if I do not
phrase that right). In CFA she is given only the the blue and black
flat ribbons. I also think that long haired exotics should be shown
as Persians..
As far a showing in general. I asked MAMACIN for her permission
to enter Preschie. And Cindy explained to me, that she thought
that would be ok. I invited her up to visit me, and see
Preschie close up , she had seen tons of photos..!!!!
Cin came up to visit.. and I asked her how she felt about
that.. Cin said and I quote.. well I will say ok, but
she is not to be entered in the HHP CLASS, you can show
show her as an AOV in CFF, and in TICA in the alter class,
and if you want CFA also as an AOV. And then Cin explained
what an AOV is etc. I did the same thing with Kissy..
I asked Cin if she felt it would be ok to show her,, and
she has said ok and she felt that Kissy would be ok at a tica
show or CFF show, but she felt that Kissy is not what
CFA is looking for, and thats fine with me.. I'm gonna
love 'em anyway.... Of course as we all know the lovely MS Preschie
is enjoying "showtime", smirk, grin giggle.. Cin and I are convinced
she knows the difference between the shows we have brought her to.
she really "hams it up tica, she is quieter at CFF... and at
the 1 cfa show we did,, as I said" look Preschie,,, neato blue
and black ribbons.,," she just "ignored " me.. smirk, grin giggle..
Kate, Happy, Preschie(hmm,. I like big rosettes better,,) Kissy.
|
4741.14 | SE Folds in AOV classes - not in CFF | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Thu Jun 20 1991 15:49 | 53 |
| I had sent off a mail message to Jo about the basenote and then
decided I might as well just enter the mail here since it says
it all.
I have NOT read the 13 replies yet.
I also want to remind people that the first Scottish fold was a
white BARN cat - a Moggie.
Here are my thoughts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was just reading your basenote about the CFA meeting and haven't had
a chance to read through the 13 replies that were there. Just wanted
to drop you a line on SE scottish folds.
They CAN be shown as AOV's in CFA, but my reaction is "why bother". I took
Angel to one show. Most of the judges ooh'd and aah'd over her and gave her
the default first place blue ribbon and that was it.
My major comment as a fold breeder is that a rule prohibiting the showing
of a SE fold as a HHP would hurt the fold breeders. SE folds are NOT
elibible for championship or any titles and they can't be finalled. So
where's the fun of showing. For breeders its important to bring the SE's
that will be bred out to be shown - but even that isn't going to happen
very much with the current way AOV's are handled in CFA - but there's no
other reason to bring out a SE fold in a purebred class.
I don't see that SE folds have any real advantage over other HHP's. Most
folks can't tell the difference anyway. HHP's are supposed to be judged
on different qualities than the purebreds so the SE folds shouldn't have
any headstart over the other moggies.
SE folds can't be shown AOV in CFF either right now. We tried to get that
changed last year and the resolution failed because folks are afraid we
will push for championship status.
CFF handles its AOV's differently and if CFA did something similar, perhaps
folks would be more interested in showing their SE folds as AOV's. In CFF,
the AOV's have a separate class and the competition is similar to the regular
classes with best, second best etc being awarded in the finals. They do
not have titles, but at least they can get rosettes. Now, I'm not sure if
they can be neutered or not in the AOV classes. I suspect not. Which opens
up another whole can of worms. We want to encourage people to neuter their
pet cats.
At least where SE folds are concerned, I would definitely vote AGAINST such
a resolution and argue very strongly against it.
Nancy DC
|
4741.15 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:07 | 10 |
| Is this a work around.......
As a breeder, even if I've registered the litter, if I don't
provide the necessary papers then the cat can't be registered.
That would be around the "can't be registered as a purebred".
If they still exclude such cats then they'll have to exclude
the apparent purebreds that come from shelters etc and have no
papers even tho they may be purebred.
Nancy
|
4741.16 | Worst Case Scenario | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:07 | 75 |
|
CFA does not have a hhp class for apparent purebreds. In fact, they
don't do much for hhp's as it is.
Also, though I never encourage my pet buyers to show their pet quality
Birmans in CFA, I feel that if a person has a pet quality purebred and
wants to show it, they should be able to. I showed my mixed breed cats
in the hhp class for many years, and have been exposed to the
competition in that class. I have witnessed cases of apparent
purebreds in these classes, and no it did not bother me one bit. The
nice thing about hhp class is that it is supposed to be for every cat,
young, old, large, small, skinny, fat, mixed breed or apparent
purebred. The class is supposed to be fun! How fun can it be when an
entire group of cats will be banned from the class? Or when exhibitors
will be policing each other?
CFA has many show rules already, and some are unenforceable. Why
create more show rules that are unenforceable?
Consider this worst case scenario. Say a person enters their pet
quality purebred in their first CFA show, and mistakenly enters the
hhp class. That person goes to the show, is shunned by his/her fellow
exhibitors, and then after the show, someone reports that this person is
in violation of the show rules. CFA calls a hearing at their next board
meeting, the person in question does not show up to defend herself cuz
the board meeting is in Texas and she lives in California, and besides,
she doesn't know that she has done anything wrong!! Anyway, the board
finds her guitly of violating show rule number such-and-such, and they
discipline her by banning her from CFA shows for one year! This kind of
thing happens. That is what the normal disciplinary action is, a
suspension of all CFA services for a period of a year. So, now we have
a case where a person innocently entered a show, looking for fun and
friendship from others who share her love of cats, and in doing so
violated a show rule that she didn't know existed and was banned from
further participation in CFA.
Let me also say, that apart from the discipline part of my scenario,
this really happened at a show. I had met this woman at a show, she
was a spectator, and she told me that she had a Birman that she got as
a pet. She started coming to all the shows, asking questions about the
Birmans, and showing me pictures of her cat. Well, about a year and a
half later, she bought another Birman, this one a show quality. She
decided to enter the cats in a show, and asked me for my evaluation.
I saw the cats, and told her that the one that she bought as a pet was good
enough to show in premiership too, and that she should enter them both.
When she went home to fill out the forms, she got confused, and entered
the one that she got as a pet in the Household Pet catagory, because
the word Pet threw her off.
When she got to the show, I noticed the error, and tried to change it
with the master clerk. I was told that you could not transfer a cat
from HHP to the championship classes, under any circumstances (there is
a show rule for that, wouldn't you know it). Anyway, her choices were
to leave him in the HHP class for the day, or pull him and be out the
$50 entry fee. She decided to show him, since she wanted to see how he
would act before entering another show. The HHP exhibitors treated her
badly, some made open comments about the fact that he was a purebred,
and this hurt her feelings. The judges didn't final him, who knows
why. I handled the cat myself, and he was in magnificent condition.
It could have been that he was very obviously a purebred Birman.
There is no way to know for sure, but the day was not a good one for
this lady.
Anyway, to then have her be disciplined for having made an error would
have been adding insult to injury in my opinion. This person has
continued to show, but not in the HHP class. She would probably not
show her mixed breed cat in the HHP class if you paid her to do it.
Her experience was that bad. Anyway, she also now has a Norwegian
Forest Cat and very happily shows her in the AOV class.
Geez, I don't know why I rambled on like this. Sorry this was so long.
:^)
Jo
|
4741.17 | great debate! | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:40 | 15 |
| Ken and I were talking about this hhp thing at lunch today and I came
up with another angle. What if someone adopts an apparent purebred (or
possibly purebred) cat from a shelter or humane society. Though that
person holds no papers on the cat, would that can be banned from hhp
class? How would anyone be able to tell if an apparent purebred was
able to be registered or not. As Nancy said, that leaves the loophole
of her not registering her SE folds.
I think that this rule could cause a lot of dissention amoung the
exhibitors, and could lead to very unsportsmanlike behavior. I sure
hope it doesn't pass. I will let you guys know as soon as I hear what
happens this weekend.
Jo
|
4741.18 | | USDEV1::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Thu Jun 20 1991 18:48 | 31 |
| Let me take a second and point out some differences between the way
CFF handles HHP's and the way CFA does. As someone already pointed
out, ?Roberta I think, CFF has a subclass of HHP called apparent
purebred. This class, as I understand it, is for cats that appear
to be purebreds but do not have papers, or for purebreds with a fault
of somesort. They are judged separately from the other HHPs. SE folds
would NOT be judged in this category however.
Also, CFF registers its HHP's and keeps track of points. HHPs earn
titles of Companion, Grand Companion and Master Grand Companion and
HHP awards the top HHP awards for the year just as it does for the
purebred classes.
Most breeders do NOT want a substandard purebred of their breeding to
be shown even in the altered classes. For them, I would think the
apparent purebred class would be fine.
So for shows with a large enough HHP class have separate classes for
apparent purebreds and regular HHP's. For smaller shows then you'd
have to put them all together.
I understand that the HHP folks want a class to themselves and I
honestly don't know how I feel about registered purebreds being shown
HHP with the exception of SE folds and tailed Manx's.
BTW - THERE IS ALSO NO WAY TO SHOW A TAILED MANX IN CFF. This year
the manx breeders are re-introducing the request to change the AOV
rules in CFF to allow SE folds and tailed manx's because of their
importance to the breeding programs. For those who don't know,
you never breed two tailless manx's. So the tailed manx is 1/2 the
manx breeding program, just like the SE fold.
|
4741.19 | | USDEV1::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Thu Jun 20 1991 18:51 | 1 |
| type - that should have read CFF awards top HHP awards for the year.
|
4741.20 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Thu Jun 20 1991 19:06 | 35 |
| I understand your points Nancy, but I think that there is a flaw in
your argument. If we are willing to allow SE folds and tailed Manx,
then we will have to allow other purebreds as well. You can not have
half a rule. It is either all or none.
Also, if CFF has a class for apparent purebreds or purebreds with some
sort of faults, why do they keep the SE folds out of that class? In
this instance, isnt the fact that the ears are straight and not folded
a fault against the fold standard? I do not understand that
distinction.
As it is, I don't think that CFA does enough for it's household pets.
I would like to see resolutions that change that. Trouble is, not
enough household pet people are involved in CFA clubs, or take the time
to become involved in the workings of CFA. Household pet class is an
important part of CFA, and in a lot of cases, it is the public's
favorite class, and may be their introduction to the cat fancy as a
whole. That is another reason why I feel it is important to not
exclude any cat from showing in household pet class.
The current show rules currently define household pet class as being
for "any domestic kitten or altered cat entry not otherwise eligible".
The definition goes on to say that household pets are to be judged
separately from all other cats, solely on beauty and condition.
I like the idea of giving hhp's titles or having something that they
can work towards. Our region currently awards top 10 regional awards
to the ten highest scoring household pets each year. It wasn't until
we elected a new regional director that the household pets gained some
recognition in our region.
Jo
|
4741.21 | | SCRUZ::CORDES_JA | Set Apartment/Cat_Max=3 | Thu Jun 20 1991 22:15 | 4 |
| I like the idea of working towards titles in the HHP class. I miss
having something to work for now that the Morris Award is gone.
Jan
|
4741.22 | | TENAYA::KOLLING | Karen/Sweetie/Holly/Little Bit Ca. | Thu Jun 20 1991 22:24 | 2 |
| What happened to the Morris Award?
|
4741.23 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:36 | 27 |
| re: .20 - Actually, I'm not sure about the flaw part. Maybe Holly
can fill me in since she's more involved with CFF (clerking) than I
am.
I also don't consider straight-ears on folds or the presence of a tail
on Manx's to be a "fault". I would classify fault as something like
kink in tail or stiff tail. I would also put in folded ear cats with
poor earsets into the apparent purebred class. It was my understanding
that a breed standard is used in that class but again, I don't know
alot about it.
SE folds and Tail'd manxes do NOT fit the breed standard and that's
where the problem is. They can't compete in any class that uses
the breed standard - championship, alter. The current AOV rules
don't say anything about tail or ears, just eye and coat color, and
coat length.
Kate - Does the AOV class distinguish between alters and intact cats?
You show Preschie as and AOV in CFF don't you?
IF the AOV rules are changed to allow intact or altered, SE folds and
Manx's with tails then I wouldn't oppose the rulling brought up in the
basenote. I don't know as I would support it however, for the other
reasons that have been brought up.
Nancy
|
4741.24 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:39 | 5 |
| re: my last paragraph - that's in CFF I'm talking about.
In CFA, I'd want to see the judging of AOV's handled differently
because there's no fun in showing as its currently done.
Nancy
|
4741.25 | | JUPITR::KAGNO | To cats, all things belong to cats | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:15 | 19 |
| How can a cat in the apparent purebred class be judged against a
standard when the judge probably won't be exactly certain what he or
she is looking at?!
Jo brought up a point that I was going to mention about apparent
purebreds being shown in the HHP class. I would love to show Taja once
as a HHP and see how he does. However, he so closely resembles a
purebred I'm not sure how well received his presence would be. He is a
siamese cross with no papers. I would hate to be penalized because of
this. He is such an adorable cat with a very unique look. It would be
a shame if I were banned from showing him simply because he looks like
a purebred. (I could see the siamese breeders now "policing" me for
bringing such a PET QUALITY specimen into the show hall!! :^) )
I think it's a dumb rule and as Jan pointed out, there are enough
politics associated with showing and if this motion were passed, I'm
afraid it would only be more fuel for the fire. As Jo said, showing
HHPs is supposed to be fun -- let's keep the fun in it!
|
4741.26 | Just thought of something | DACT6::COLEMAN | ULTRIX-ee in Training | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:59 | 42 |
| Here's something interesting I just thought of...
About 2 years ago, a woman I used to work for bought 2 scottish
folds -- with 'show potential'. Her and her husband bought these
cats as 'household pets'. The husband plans on showing one of
the folds -- and will probably do so in a household pet class,
because he doesn't want to get caught up in what he calls the
"politics" of people with purebred cats. (That's ANOTHER
rat hole -- ). They also just recently bought an American
Shorthair, which again, they are thinking of showing, and
will probably do so as a household pet.
Even though I think people should be able to show a purebred
cat (such as tailed Manx, SE scottish fold) IMHO I think there
ARE people that would be putting their cat in the household pet
category JUST BECAUSE they think they'd win! (The scottish folds
parents are GrCH -- I'm not sure about the Am. Shorthair).
NOW, there's one thing they did, and didn't realize that this is
a DEFINITE 'no no' in showing cats -- they got them declawed. (Of
course, that's ANOTHER rat hole...). HOWEVER, they were told that
there are cat associations that ALLOW declawed cats? (I don't know
of any, though).
But, just think. There are probably people out there that would
put their purebred in JUST BECAUSE they thought they would beat out
your typical cat! I'd much rather have my Gracie compete against other
Korats, to see the quality of cat I have. Additionally, I've met SUCH
NICE PEOPLE (breeders, etc.) at shows! And for household pet people,
I've loved almost all the ones I've met! Their cats, though not purebred,
are beautiful!
I feel that most people who buy purebreds and have ANY intention of showing,
will do so in the appropriate classes. I know there are some that won't, but
I didn't invest the money I did in Gracie (or the money I WILL be expending
to start my cattery) to have her in a household pet category!
I didn't mean to ramble, but I'm getting on "both" sides of the fence now.
However, I still stand with my initial statement -- any cat should be allowed
in HHP in CFA, since the rules are different for purebreds.
Cheryl, Gracie, and my 2 'non-showing' HHP, Charlie & Shanti
|
4741.27 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Fri Jun 21 1991 13:01 | 19 |
| Nancy the AOV rules in CFA do state that the class is for SE folds,
tailed Manx, and other breeds that do not meet the standard either
coatwise, colorwise, or sexwise. Interestinly enough, the CFA
definition for AOV does not exclude altered cats. But, altered AOV's,
kittens, and whole AOV's would all compete against each other within
their breed. They are only broken down by breed in the AOV class.
In the case of the couple mentioned in the last note who bought two
cats with show potential and planned to show them in household pet
class, that sounds like an example of someone who could compete in the
premiership class but would rather show as a household pet. Since the
cats are declawed now, that excludes them from competition in CFA in
any class, household pet or otherwise. They may be allowed to compete
in household pet class in another association, but I think that all cat
associations ban declawed cats from championship competition. I may be
wrong about this though. Those noters who show heavily in other
associations may be able to verify this for us.
Jo
|
4741.28 | he's a cutie!!! | SANFAN::BALZERMA | | Fri Jun 21 1991 13:08 | 11 |
|
.25 - Roberta I would show Taj in the HHP in a minute! While he is
obviously a Siamese cross I cannot see how they could think he would
be a pet quality Siamese. With the shape of his head, the breadth of
his chest and his overall boning it appears obvious to me that he
has a "cobby cat" in his line. I bet you that he would clean up
big time.... :')
|
4741.29 | Go for it! | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Fri Jun 21 1991 13:25 | 9 |
|
I agree with Marlene, show him Roberta. I don't think that they would
consider him an apparent purebred since his only relation to siamese
would be his color. The rest of him does not conform to the show
standard for siamese. The genes for point color have been present in
the general cat population for centuries, so it is very likely that a
cat showing point color is not of purebred parents.
Jo
|
4741.30 | | JUPITR::KAGNO | To cats, all things belong to cats | Fri Jun 21 1991 13:43 | 2 |
| Thanks, girls! You talked me into it. :^)
|
4741.31 | | SANFAN::BALZERMA | | Fri Jun 21 1991 13:58 | 7 |
|
For lack of not knowing what note to ask this in I'll do it here
since we have been discussing both organizations. What geographical
area does CFF cover? How far West does it come? CFA, TICA, ACFA are
coast to coast. Does CFA stop at the Mid-West area?
|
4741.32 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Fri Jun 21 1991 14:22 | 6 |
| I think you mean does CFF stop in the midwest area? I have only seen
one ACFA show announcement out here. I don't think that they have a
large following on the west coast. We have mostly TICA and CFA, with
CFA being most dominant.
Jo
|
4741.33 | | SONATA::MCCURDY | | Fri Jun 21 1991 15:29 | 6 |
| Nancy, Nope, MS Preschie has been altered, also Mulligan ( a solid
himmy ) was also shown as a whole cat in the AOV CLASS,as well the
as the very nice British shorthair.. um I think his name was Edward..
.
Kate, Happy, Preschie(aov, alter, persian.. I want my rosettes.NOW)
Kissy..
|
4741.34 | | SONATA::MCCURDY | | Fri Jun 21 1991 15:49 | 28 |
| Post script: I have also shown Preschie as an AOV in CFA as well.
we made on appearance last year at the show in Salem N.H.
We did have a good time,, and she was the only AOV there..
Everyone said some very nice things about her..!!! she eenjoyed that
part, but I could tell that she was disappointed that she only
got small ribbons ,,instead of rosettes.
Let me relate a story to you.. I still to this day, speak
occasionally with Allison (HRHS BREEDER), and she about
freaked out, when I told her I had entered Preschie as an AOV
in a CFA show.. ( and she has seen pictures of her). Her
Philosphy is that " all of us who breed, occasionally
produce an AOV, but we do not want to draw attention
to that in a cfa show hall. She was really freaked out when
I told her I had Cin's permission, and that MAMACIN carried
Preschie down the main aisle of the show hall that day,
for her very 1st ring.. and for every ring after that,, she
was right there with me and Preschie,, and gave her hugs
and kisses... and told her GOOD GIRL,,pretty girl,,
Allison also does not believe in exotic longhairs being
shown as persians either..!! she is very traditional in
her value set, but she was just amazed that MAMACIN would
let me show Preschie , as Preschie was sold to me as a pet,,
and Allison never let anyone show any of the animals she
sold as pets.... So I think that everyonr has their
own opinions on what should be what.. I enjoy showing
Preschie,, but this a hobby.. and I am going to love
her anyway.. rosettes or no rosettes..!!!
Kate
|
4741.35 | | COASTL::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Mon Jun 24 1991 08:58 | 33 |
| re: Declawed Scottish folds - You can show them in TICA. I believe
ACFA will also let you show declawed cats.
I would disagree, however, with showing them in the HHP class. If they
are a good example of the breed standard, i feel they belong in the
Alter class. There are politics in EVERY class, including HHP so you
aren't going to get away from it by going HHP. The alter class is
definitely more fun than the championship class. Personally, I
think these folks will open themselves up to much more hostility
by showing good purebreds in the HHP class.
Also, in CFF, you MUST register a cat as a HHP to show HHP and once
that's done you can't switch the registration to purebred. Of course
since CFF doesn't allow declawed cats in any class its a moot point.
The point is, that if the cats are already registered as purebreds
then they may not be able to register them HHP.
re: .34 - AOV's - I differ with Allison's attitude 100%. I am sure
that is due, in part, to the fact that when ALlison breeds two persians
she gets a litter of persian kittens. When manx and fold breeders
produce a litter a percentage of the kittens may not be recognizable
as folds or manx's to the "average" person because they lack the most
unique trait of the breed. That doesn't make them undesireable pets.
They still have alot to offer and I want to educate the general
public who has never heard of a straight-earred fold.
I think Angel is one of the most beautiful cats I've ever seen -
(maybe I'm biased ;^) - partially due to her "fold" characteristics.
So I want people to know about straight-earred folds and I want
them to recognize SE's as the purebreds that they are.
Nancy
|
4741.36 | | SONATA::MCCURDY | | Mon Jun 24 1991 10:47 | 25 |
| Nancy, I also disagree with Allison for what is worth. She thought/
still thinks that Ms Preschie is very nice.. but she also
feels that she is not a "real Persian". She remembers MAMA CIN
was when Cin was showing Fire, and the 1st question she asked
me was is Preschie related to Fire?.. when I said yes, she is
Fire great granddaughter.. her response was." geez.. ".. She also
does not think TICA is so hot.. even though HRH was shown primarily
in CFA.. she also did CFF with her, when she had a cat that was not
CFA material".. of course HRH used to "act up" at CFF shows..
remind me th next time I see you to tell you about a few of them.
smirk, grin , giggle . I personally like TICA, and CFF. I have
no real opinion on CFA..except to say that they were very nice
to Preschie.. and they said some very nice things about her..
I also agree that the alter class is fun.. and also showing
AOV is fun as well.. speaking of shows is anyone going to
the TICA show on 5-7 in peabody.. I will be there on
the 6 th and 7th with MS Preschie and MAMACIN will be there
on the 7th.. I am waiting on Kissy.. as she just finisshed up
her last round of kitten shots, and she still needs to finish
up her last 2 feline leuk shots.. I am thinking of bringing
her to the mansfield show in August.. to get her used to it..
smirk, grin, giggle.. of course I may have to put a jungle gym
in her show cage,, as she is quite the climber geesch..|!!!
Kate, Happy, Preschie, and Kissy..( whats with this cage business
anyway..)
|
4741.37 | | SCRUZ::CORDES_JA | Set Apartment/Cat_Max=3 | Mon Jun 24 1991 14:45 | 11 |
| Re: .22
Did anyone answer this? Did I miss the answer.
Karen,
To the best of my knowledge, I belive the Morris Award was
discontinued. However, I don't remember any of the details on
why. Maybe Jo Ann can remember.
Jan
|
4741.38 | The Morris Award | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Mon Jun 24 1991 17:00 | 6 |
| The Morris Award was sponsored by 9-Lives Cat Food, and they simply
decided to cut the program. It was their own program, run completely
by the 9-Lives folks and not by CFA or any of the other associations,
and cost them quite a bit each year to run.
Jo
|
4741.39 | update on the annual | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Fri Jun 28 1991 12:33 | 18 |
| I have heard bits and pieces from folks returning from the annual.
Still don't have the whole scoop, probably won't until our next cat
club meeting.
Anyway, the top 15 finals resolution did not pass. Neither did the 3rd
best champion resolution.
The big one that did pass was the awarding of Best and Second Best of
Breed in kittens and premiers!! That new rule will go into affect on
May 1, 1992. They will also be awarding Best Premier in the premiership
class by breed, so you won't have to rely on finals to get your grand
points.
Will let you know when I hear anything else. The folks that I talked
to did not have all the resolutions marked, so couldn't tell me if the
hhp one passed.
Jo
|
4741.40 | great change!!!! | SANFAN::BALZERMA | | Fri Jun 28 1991 13:11 | 8 |
|
.39 - All right! I am so pleased that BOB and 2nd Best for kittens
and Premiers passed! it's about time! :')
Jo, I can understand why the Top 15 resolution didn't pass, but do you
know why the 3rd Best Champion resolution didn't make it? What was the
line of thinking?
|
4741.41 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Fri Jun 28 1991 14:40 | 8 |
| Probably something along the lines of it would make granding too easy.
They probably felt that if they added 3rd best champion, they would
have to up the points needed to grand.
Will get the full report from our delegate when we have our next cat
club meeting.
Jo
|
4741.42 | update on the CFA annual | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Tue Jul 02 1991 13:33 | 17 |
| I finally got the scoop on the household pet resolution, it did not
pass!
Also, the Best of Breed for kittens and premiers did not pass by a
2/3rds margin, so it may not become a new show rule. Since the
required margin was not won, the board of directors of CFA get to
decide whether to pass the rule or not. There is a lot of opposition
from judges, master clerks and clerks on this resolution. The judges
met at the judges seminar at the annual and came up with some
recommendations that should go into effect if the board adopts this
resolution. Those recommendations include lowering the count from 225
to 200 for one day 4 ring shows, and 2 day back to back shows; and
changing the required start time of shows from 9:00am to 8:00am. :^(
Only time will tell what the board will decide to do with this one.
Jo
|