[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference misery::feline_v1

Title:Meower Power is Valuing Differences
Notice:FELINE_V1 is moving 1/11/94 5pm PST to MISERY
Moderator:MISERY::VANZUYLEN_RO
Created:Sun Feb 09 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jan 11 1994
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5089
Total number of notes:60366

4289.0. "Lead in canned pet food?" by CUPMK::PHILBROOK (Customer Publications Consulting) Mon Jan 07 1991 11:03

    The following is taken from the Jan. 8, 1991 issue of Family Circle
    magazine:
    
    "In our September 25 issue, we alerted you to the hazards of
    lead-soldered seams in canned food. Good news from The National Food
    Processor's Association: Less than 3% of the 21 billion cans used for
    food are lead soldered. Your risk of consuming fruit juices or tomato
    products packed in these cans is minimal since most lead-seamed cans
    are only used to package dry products or pet foods. Leaching of lead is
    not a problem with dry goods."
    
    Anyone care to take a stab at the percentage of lead-soldered seams
    used on pet food cans? I wonder how much of a problem this really is?
    
    Mike
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
4289.1letter to Family CircleCUPMK::PHILBROOKCustomer Publications ConsultingMon Jan 07 1991 11:0430
I've sent the following letter to Family Circle:
    
Reader Mail Department                                       January 5, 1991
Family Circle
110 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10011

Dear Family Circle:

In "Circle This" of your Jan. 8, 1991 issue you follow up on a Sept. 25 story
regarding lead-soldered seams in canned food. You state that our risk of
consuming products in lead-soldered cans is minimal since most of the nearly
700,000 (3% of 21 billion) lead-soldered cans are used for dry foods and pet
foods.

This may seem like a minimal risk to the human population, but just how many of
these 700,000 cans are used for pet foods? My two dogs eat canned pet food and
I am quite concerned for their safety as a result of your report.

Please don't create a false sense of security by stating that a mere 700,000 
cans is a minimal risk to people while cavalierly implying that pets don't 
count. Please follow up with The National Food Processor's Association once 
again to determine the risk of exposure in canned pet foods. Those of us who
are pet lovers and owners will surely appreciate your help.

Sincerely,



Michael Philbrook
4289.2CRUISE::NDCPutiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313Tue Jan 08 1991 07:221
    Well said Phil!
4289.3CUPMK::PHILBROOKCustomer Publications ConsultingTue Jan 08 1991 09:433
    Thanks, only my name isn't Phil -- it's Mike!
    
    Mike
4289.4CRUISE::NDCPutiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313Wed Jan 09 1991 07:501
    oops.....Sorry Mike.  I'm only good with cat names ;-)
4289.5CUPMK::PHILBROOKCustomer Publications ConsultingWed Jan 09 1991 10:561
    Meow :+)