T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4193.1 | shots | AGNT99::HOUCK | | Wed Nov 21 1990 09:31 | 11 |
| I brought my kitty, Roo, to the vet on Monday for her second set of
shots...she still has to have one more Dec. 11th. She comes into
contact with two other cats who haven't had their shots; this gets me
mad but I can't be home all the time to make sure she's isolated.
Anyway,, the vet told me the shots are only 85% effective against FelV
virus.
And I agree, it is expensive!!
Cheryl
|
4193.2 | I vote Yes for shots | PROSE::GOGOLIN | | Wed Nov 21 1990 10:25 | 39 |
| I have mixed feelings about feline leukemia shots, but my 5 indoor-only
cats get them anyway. I lost 2 cats to this terrible disease; the first
one, Nikki, had the disease when I took her in as a stray but showed no
signs of illness for 2 years. Fel. leuk. shots were not available at
that time anyway. The second cat, Fuzzy Wuzzy, tested negative when I
got him as a kitten. Fel. leuk. shots *were* available then but I
figured since he and my other cat were indoor-only they should be safe.
Fuzzy developed fel. leuk. just before his third birthday. I asked the
vet how Fuzzy could have gotten the disease. He said Fuzzy probably had
FELV when I got him but that the virus was not in his blood but "hiding"
elsewhere in his body (organs?). I guess it's possible that one of other
cats could have been carriers of the disease, but it's been over 2 years
since Fuzzy's death and no one else has gotten it. It's very strange.
Anyway, I had 3 other cats besides Fuzzy; only Cubby had had fel. leuk.
shots, at the request of the people I adopted him from. The vet
recommended that Cubby and Misty be tested then and again 3 months
later (Junie was elderly and diabetic; the vet said not to do him).
Fortunately, they were both negative, and Misty then got the series of
shots. Now, any new cat I adopt is tested and gets vaccinated.
> However, each shot is $21. And the series is 2 shots. That's $84 of
> "insurance". I think that the cost seems quite high.
Not to mention that the shots are not 100% effective. That is, even
though your cats have the complete set of shots there is a chance they
could still get the disease. And if they don't get the shots they might
never get the disease. There are still a lot of unanswered questions
about FELV. If cost is your main concern, all I can tell you is that
when Fuzzy was dying I would have paid ANYTHING to make him better.
Having him put to sleep was one of the saddest things I've done in my
life.
This is your decision, but I recommend getting Snuzzy and Double
vaccinated ASAP, especially since they're going to be in contact with
other cats. They could still develop the disease, but you would know
that you did everything possible to prevent it.
Linda, Misty, Cubby, Tobie, Tweetie, and Peanut
|
4193.3 | it might be $84 this year, but what about next, and the next.... | TOMLIN::ROMBERG | how long 'til the next holiday? | Wed Nov 21 1990 12:02 | 2 |
| Don't forget that even after the initial series (be it 2 or 3 depending on the
vaccine) you still need the booster every year.
|
4193.4 | Here's what WE do... | JAWS::MCDONOUGH | | Wed Nov 21 1990 12:27 | 33 |
|
I had a kitten that tested Neg...we had her immunized, kept up the
shots, and she died at the age of 3 from FeLV.... Vet said she also
probably had the disease---most likely in the bone marrow where it
wouldn't show up in the test.
We currently have 5 cats...1 of them tests Positive every time we've
had her tested---another was tested as Positive as a kitten. We have
had ALL FIVE immunized. We don't even have them tested anymore...just
giv'em the immunization. It won't HURT to have the shot if they test
Positive, and recently I've read a few articles that indicated that in
some cases the immunization actually triggers the cat's immune system
and they begin to test negative.
I look at it this way: If the three that tested Negativ and have had
the immunization are in the 85% that DO become immunized, then no
problem. If not, they will likely get the damned disease anyway, or
already have it. The two that tested Positive, if the immunization DOES
help the immune system to get activated, GREAT... If not, they are also
going to get the damned disease.
My oldest Positive is about 10---we've had her for 6 years, and the
only thing she's ever had is a sniffle now and then. The little one--MY
"Special" sweetie, "Cookie", is about 2 now, and she is also very
healthy to date. We're hoping they both are simply "carriers" and the
other three are very healthy currently, and have been since we got
them.
I realize that this disease is a "crap shoot" with the current level
of prevention/cure, but we do what we can and hope... The shots cannot
hurt...and MAY prevent the disease..
John Mc
|
4193.5 | | AIMHI::SJOHNSON | | Wed Nov 21 1990 13:33 | 9 |
| I know quite a few cats that have died from this disease. Many of them
close friends or family. My 2 cats are vacinated against this. The
shots also have to be updated yearly (just 1 shot though). My vet also
stresses that you should not wait more than 3 weeks before getting the
2nd shot.
My opinion - have it done!
Sonia
|
4193.6 | my experiences | PARITY::DENISE | And may the traffic be with you | Wed Nov 21 1990 15:17 | 15 |
| I have watched 3 of my most beloved die painful, long deaths from
FELV. Having them all put to sleep was the most painful thing you
can imagine. I still relive all three incidents in my mind all the
time. You never really get over it. If I had had them all immunized
back then, at least I would feel I had done all I could to prevent it,
even if the shots aren't 100% effective. You live with the guilt,
whether its really anything to be "guilty" about or not.
I have 9 cats now, and they are ALL immunized. Cost or not, at least
I'm trying to prevent such devastation from happening again. $21
sounds like a bargain compared to losing your loved ones, and having to
watch them suffer. My cats are "indoors" too, but someone germs seem
to be able to find their way around. FELV is actually getting to be
quite common I guess.
Denise
|
4193.7 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds DTN:297-2313 | Mon Nov 26 1990 08:27 | 12 |
| I'll take the 85% effectiveness over alternative anyday. The
$84 is a one time expense. After that is just $42 every year
to get the boosters. That's $3.50 per month. That seems a small
price for the protection. Its certainly cheaper than the cost
for medical bills should one or both of them contract the disease
and as others point out, if they should still contract FELV you
can feel that you did all you could to prevent it. What's that
worth?
My opinion also is to get the shots.
Nancy DC
|