T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3893.1 | No thanks | ASABET::CUNNIFF | | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:18 | 13 |
| I have a feeling that we've said enough on the subject already.
read 2261, 3875, and some of the following: (from DIR/TITLE=BREED)
352 USHS01::MCALLISTER 13-OCT-1986 71 Ask the breeders...
1147 ATEAM::DOIRON 29-FEB-1988 16 ??BREEDING??
1173 AIMHI::TOMOLONIS 11-MAR-1988 4 BREEDING
1655 TWEED::R_SICILIANO 12-AUG-1988 7 Question on "Breeding"
3184 ARCHER::HAYES 29-DEC-1989 1 I need some advice on Breeding!
I, for one, don't want to go down that rathole again right now.
jack
|
3893.2 | thank you jack | SANFAN::BALZERMA | | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:37 | 1 |
|
|
3893.3 | one question. | FORTSC::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Fri Aug 10 1990 15:18 | 46 |
| I will ask one question of the base noter. With all the cats and kittens
killed each year because there are no homes for them, why would you encourage
ANYONE to breed cats for ANY PURPOSE other than to improve the
physical and mental strength of the breed as a whole? If people want family
pets, they can get them from the paper, from the shelter, from the neighbors...
anywhere. Assuming that you care about cats, how can you encourage any
breeding that is not well planned to be to the advantage of the kittens to
be born? "Backyard" breeders aren't performing a service to the breed,
they aren't even performing a service to the prospective owners who get
these kittens....as several noters of this conference cat attest after losing
pets they dearly loved due to genetic defects in the kittens. I suspect any
one of these people would have been willing to pay a great deal more money
to have a healthy long-lived pet.
Your justification of the amateur breeder is extremely short-sighted. If
a breeding cannot benefit the breed as a whole, and lead toward healthier
kittens, there is no justification for it. Period. There is virtually
no breed of cat that does not harbor the potential for genetic defect...
it is the nature of the limited gene pool required to get a specific
"type" to breed true. Knowing that, noone should attempt to breed without
carefully planning each litter. To do less is to betray the animals
themselves. Amateurs who spend the time and money to get to know their
breed, the available bloodlines, the defects/shortcomings of each, and
to pay for the breeder cats, and the continuing veternarian care required to
keep the cats and kittens in optimum health will not be able to offer
any kitten at a "bargain" price. The reason these backyard breeders offer
bargain prices is because they don't spend the money to take care of their
cats properly or breed their cats carefully - if they did, they wouldn't
be able to offer bargain prices.
I don't know any reputable breeder who breaks even with his/her cattery.
They all have vet bills approaching $1000.00 hanging over their heads.
They all work at jobs to support themselves, their families, and their
cattery. If you purchase a kitten from a reputable breeder, you aren't
defraying the cost of getting that kitten into the world...the mom cat
has undergone months of preparatory vet care before being bred, her
food has been carefully supplemented to increase her chances of a healthy
pregnancy. She has undergone continued vet care during the pregnancy
and the kittens have been thoroughly examined by the vet. Shots have
been administered, ear mites and worms have been avoided. The cat and
kittens are healthy. The daddy has been carefully selected to have
a good genetic mix with the female - yes, to delivery beautiful kittens,
but equally important, to delivery healthy babies. No cat is beautiful
if it isn't healthy. This all costs money that the backyard breeder isn't
willing to pay. If the kitten purchased from a backyard breeder is
healthy, you are lucky. It wasn't planned to be. It just happened.
|
3893.4 | Agree with .3 | GVA02::CEHRS | | Mon Aug 13 1990 04:48 | 3 |
| Well said .3!
Martha
|
3893.5 | I disagree....... | BOOVX1::MANDILE | | Mon Aug 13 1990 11:34 | 24 |
| Well, I have to disagree...about the "rathole" part, that is.
This is an important issue to us animal lovers, and getting
many differing opinions is a valuable learning tool, at the
very least. I read most of the notes pertaining to breeding,
and there really is not much clarification of the subject(s)
being discussed, just a lot of "flaming". What's wrong with
this being a note that explains the pros & cons without the
flaming, name calling, finger pointing, etc.? Some plain
facts & details would help, not hinder at this point.
For instance:
Fact: There is a serious overpopulation problem here in the
U.S. of kittens/cats/puppies/dogs. 1989 Nationwide
statistics are that 13 million had to be destroyed.
(Info from MSPCA 1989 pamphlet on animals turned into
(all) shelters across the U.S.)
Myth: Having a litter of kittens/puppies before you spay your
female cat or dog is better for them.
Sometimes this way gets the point across easier.
L-
|
3893.6 | An example of amateur breeding | DEMON::MURPHY | | Mon Aug 13 1990 12:18 | 30 |
| A "good" example of amateur breeding can be found in note 415.790.
<<< Note 3893.5 by BOOVX1::MANDILE >>>
-< I disagree....... >-
Well, I have to disagree...about the "rathole" part, that is.
This is an important issue to us animal lovers, and getting
many differing opinions is a valuable learning tool, at the
very least. I read most of the notes pertaining to breeding,
and there really is not much clarification of the subject(s)
being discussed, just a lot of "flaming". What's wrong with
this being a note that explains the pros & cons without the
flaming, name calling, finger pointing, etc.? Some plain
facts & details would help, not hinder at this point.
For instance:
Fact: There is a serious overpopulation problem here in the
U.S. of kittens/cats/puppies/dogs. 1989 Nationwide
statistics are that 13 million had to be destroyed.
(Info from MSPCA 1989 pamphlet on animals turned into
(all) shelters across the U.S.)
Myth: Having a litter of kittens/puppies before you spay your
female cat or dog is better for them.
Sometimes this way gets the point across easier.
L-
|
3893.7 | a good example of finger pointing | ALLVAX::LUBY | DTN 287-3204 | Mon Aug 13 1990 12:54 | 10 |
|
re: .6
>>> A "good" example of amateur breeding can be found in note 415.790.
Was that really necessary? This note was set up to avoid the
finger pointing, etc. Why do you feel it necessary to point
fingers at that noter??
Karen
|
3893.8 | Pros and Cons please | WILLEE::MERRITT | | Mon Aug 13 1990 13:20 | 13 |
| I strongly agree with .5 There is alot of information that
could be shared with a person who is thinking of becomming a
breeder. the more info shared would.. help them make a good decision.
There are alot of pros and cons to just about everything...and I
would think we could spell them out without going after someones
juggler vein. To date...I have yet to see the PROS to this topic.
I am not a breeder...because I have weighed the pros and cons and
made my decision.
Sandy (Tamba, Poco, and Barkley)
|
3893.9 | Not finger pointing, just an example | DEMON::MURPHY | | Mon Aug 13 1990 13:21 | 20 |
| Excuse me, Karen, did I say something wrong? This note is supposed to
be for information on amateur breeding and that recent note certainly is
a good example of amateur breeding.
Pat
<<< Note 3893.7 by ALLVAX::LUBY "DTN 287-3204" >>>
-< a good example of finger pointing >-
re: .6
>>> A "good" example of amateur breeding can be found in note 415.790.
Was that really necessary? This note was set up to avoid the
finger pointing, etc. Why do you feel it necessary to point
fingers at that noter??
Karen
|
3893.10 | Additional note to .5 - MIS threw me out! | BOOVX2::MANDILE | | Mon Aug 13 1990 14:05 | 13 |
| I had to log off before I really had a chance to finish
the last suggestion I wanted to make on .5.
I wanted to suggest that examples/definitions of amateur breeding,
breeding for profit, breeding to better the breed,
results of overpopulation, etc. be entered here so that an all
around knowledge could be gotten on the pro's/con's of breeding,
period.
However, I would rather that no references be made to any notes
in the file, to avoid causing any hurt feelings.
L-
|
3893.11 | | ALLVAX::LUBY | DTN 287-3204 | Mon Aug 13 1990 15:54 | 11 |
|
>>>that recent note certainly is a good example of amateur breeding.
Well Pat, I guess it depends on your point of view. In my view, it
wasn't a good example and thus I thought you were being sarcastic
when you said "good" example. The quotes implied the sarcasm. Sorry
for misinterpreting but I still feel that individual noters should
be left out of this discussion until they choose to involve themselves.
Karen
|
3893.12 | I'm ducking... | SALSA::PARKS | | Mon Aug 13 1990 19:37 | 34 |
| I realize I am taking a chance of being YELLED at by writing this note,
but here goes...
I agree with both points of view.
THERE ARE DEFINATELY TOO MANY DOGS AND CATS IN THE U.S.
And SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE. We took on the responsibility for the
lives of these animals as soon as we domesticated them, but are we God?
Do we have the right to say what is better for the breed?
Our way of determining what is best is definatly not nature's way of
"the fittest survive".
I would not have been able to afford my schnauser puppy from a "reputable
breeder". I instead got her from a mom and pop breeder.(She is a great puppy,
by the way).
RE: .3 The healthiest cat I've ever seen was an indoor moggie.
It's all very confusing to me.
We definately need to educate people about the situation, but who's to say
who's right about who to breed? If the breeders are really worried about
over-population, why don't they quit breeding, leaving more strays with
homes and letting nature take care of who survives?
(not my opinion, just a thought. PLEASE don't flame me. I'm just
trying to show the breeders that there are other ways to look at this.)
I think we all agree that there is a problem that needs to be solved.
I don't think the solution is in attacking people who do different, but
in educating them on the situation and then we all need to do our part.
Becky
P.S. These are opinions only and are not meant to attack or offend
ANYONE!!!
|
3893.13 | bad news about breeding | TYGON::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Mon Aug 13 1990 21:03 | 75 |
| re: the all-too-frequent accusation of "attacking someone" because the
information offered is not what the requestor WANTS to hear...
In my opinion, it is much more important to list the real negatives associated
with breeding kittens or puppies rather than list the obvious benefits. It is
easy to imagine a cute litter of kittens or puppies, all healthy, and the money
that people will pay to buy them. It isn't always easy to understand that
there are problems to deal with when breeding:
1) The prevailing attitude by many who want to start breeding
cats or dogs is that they will "make some money" at it. This
isn't valid. It means the individual is
generally unwilling to pay for vet visits, vaccinations, etc.
that are important. Yes, often everything goes just
fine with the animal pregnancy and kittens/puppies are born with
no obvious problems in spite of limited or no vet care.
However, they also can go terribly wrong; females attempting
to give birth can die, whole litters can die, kittens/puppies
can be born with defects like the condition in which a
kitten's/puppy's heart doesn't "grow-up" with the body of the
animal (sometimes seen in purebred cats and dogs, often Birmans
and Siamese - dobermans and labs), and kittens/puppies can die
from diseases they get from other animals in the environment.
2) People think that the cute little kitten/puppy will still be a
cute bigger kitten/puppy when she/he matures sexually. They
are not prepared for the real transition the animal undergoes;
such as a "complete" change in personality, development of
extremely "unattractive" behaviors which are normal sexual
behavior for the animal. Males become aggressive and territorial,
females often become extremely and continually vocal. Both
males and females "forget" housebreaking. Both males and females
"spray" their territory. The male will get into fights with
any other male in his territory, whole or not, whether they used to
be friends or not. He must be isolated from other animals.
In some cases, the animals can be very "touchy" and should not
be around small children - they can bite and scratch when
annoyed. If they aren't actively breeding they are generally
annoyed.
3) Although it is wisest to wait until the female is fully
mature physically before allowing breeding, the female becomes
sexually mature long before physical maturity occurs.
This means that the female will be in "season" repeatedly
before she can breed. In some cases, a female will continually
cycle in heat with only a week or two between cycles - this
is particularly common in cats. During this time, the female
must be isolated. Whole males will hear her call and smell her
scent for miles around and they will come to the "call of the
wild" unless the area in which she is confined is kept closed
up..not necessarily a healthy or attractive option in the summer.
There will be loud and continuous fights in the owner's yard
while the males attempt to determine the "dominant" male.
These animals don't watch a clock, even though we humans do.
These animals inflict real injury on one another, which means
other pets belonging to the owner are at risk from these
unwelcome males. The female should not be bred for a period
of time after she has been pregnant. She will cycle in heat
whether she should have kittens or not.
4) Once a litter is born, the mother must be watched carefully.
Some females are not good mothers and will not tend or nurse
their young. Some have even killed their young (although more
common for dogs than cats, it happens in both species). The
male may kill the young if allowed near them. Other pets in
the home may kill the newborn young if allowed near them. This
means the female must be protected, watched, isolated. If
she begins delivery, she must not be left alone.
I'm sure breeders can offer even more bad news. Before anyone begins breeding,
they need to understand these negatives - and be prepared. In some cases,
once the cat/dog has reached sexual maturity and developed unattractive habits,
these habits aren't easily broken even if the animal proves to be unacceptable
as a breeder and are neutered/spayed. That's why some purebreds end up at
animal shelters.
|
3893.14 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Tue Aug 14 1990 09:02 | 20 |
| re: .13 - very good points. I'd like to also add that one must
be prepared for the "thundering herd" stage. This is when the kittens
run around the house like little demons getting into absolutely
everything! This means needing a kitten room or cage for them. Right
now we let the kids run around the house when we're home and aside
from knocking things over and generally being underfoot, they're
pretty good. But young kittens can also be destructive.
Also, depending upon what breed you chose you may have the issue
of what to do with the less desireable kittens. For example, when
you breed scottish folds - not a recommended breed for the new
breeder - only some of the kittens will have folded ears. What do
you do with the others that look very much like any kitten in any
shelter when they're little?
So I'd say choice of breed deserves alot of thought also.
Also note that the presence of intact males and/or females in your
house may prompt your neutered cats to break litterbox training too.
Nancy DC
|
3893.15 | you get what you pay for | FRAGLE::PELUSO | PAINTS; color your corral | Tue Aug 14 1990 09:54 | 27 |
| Before this forum, I thought pet store pets were cute, breeders.....
whats the difference between backyard and the pro's? A cat is a cat,
right?
Wrong! I have learned about the impact and difference of the above
statements. I agree, some noters were hard on the non-conformists,
but their points got across to me. I think the facts have to be presented
(the truth hurts) as is, not sugar coated, and toned down.
I have been burned 'big time' by buying an animal without looking into
the facts. In fact, I am very gun shy about buying another. However,
if and when I do, I will make sure of the breeders reputation, I will
look at offspring [ dispositions, health, conformation]. I do not want
to get stuck again.
I think `amature breeder' should be clearer defined. Is it one who is
starting to get into breeding, but has an experienced, professional
breeder to guide them, or is the the person who decides to breed to
make a few bucks?
Sure, backyard breeders are doing a *great* service by providing the general
public with apparant purebreds.....but if they don't care about
breeding the best, I certainly would not want one of those animals, who
know what problems will arise later on.......it just is too big a risk.
Michele & Nippa
|
3893.16 | people don't seem to consider this | FRAGLE::PELUSO | PAINTS; color your corral | Tue Aug 14 1990 09:57 | 5 |
| p.s
When buying an animal/purebred animal, the actual cost of the animal
is negligable.....it's the upkeep that gonna cost you $$$$ in the long
run.
|
3893.17 | Some more thoughts | FSHQA2::RKAGNO | | Tue Aug 14 1990 11:50 | 36 |
| Well said, Michele.
As you all know, I have lost two wonderful purebred cats in the past 2
years. Even though I know my breeder had the best intentions when she
began, she had no one to guide her through the trials and tribulations
of what breeding entails. The woman she purchased her cats from took
the money and only offered advice when asked for it. She had
experienced lethal health problems with her cats and that information
was never passed along to my breeder, nor did she herself think to ask
about it. Yes, she is showing her Ragdolls and they carry some pretty
impressive titles in both TICA and ACFA. She has also bred the Ragdoll
Fanciers Club Ragdoll of the Year two years in a row. Well, BIG DEAL!
THREE of their brothers and sisters have already died of genetic heart
defects, and now she is learning the hard way how serious breeding live
animals really is. It is not a "fly by night" endeavor, and every
novice breeder should have an experienced, knowledgable mentor to
guide them in their program.
To further back Michele's last statement, obtaining the purchase price
for my Ragdolls was the easy part. I am STILL paying back a loan for
the cost of both cats at the time of their deaths, which is TWICE the
amount of the purchase price. I was only reimbursed the purchase price
for Shelby, my first Ragdoll; Kirby was the "replacement" kitten for
Shelby. I was too emotionally drained to fight for the cost of the vet
bills, and knew my breeder would never have bred the parents had she
known what was behind them. It's too bad we both had to learn the hard
way. For her, repaying the financial cost was easy, but repaying the
emotional part was impossible and that was hard to deal with.
At the time of my purchase, I didn't know enough about choosing a
breeder and she didn't know enough about breeding. And we both got
very hurt by our lack of knowledge. You can bet neither of us will
ever be making that mistake again!
--Roberta
|
3893.18 | "Old fashioned cats" | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Wed Aug 15 1990 08:51 | 20 |
| I would also like to see a definition of amateur breeder as I'm not
sure where I fall. I'm very new to breeding and have alot to learn
but I'm trying to breed responsibly.
I also wanted to say that I don't have trouble with breeders who
are breeding responsibly and may be breeding types of cats that
are currently not in fashion. For example, the "apple-head siamese"
or the "sweet faced persians". With the exception of CFF which has
just created a class for the traditional siamese (I believe) there
is no way any apple-head siamese would do anything at a cat show.
I don't think that necessarily means that this style of cat should
not be bred, responsibly, if there are people who would prefer this
type. Also, I think many people would prefer a much less extreme
persian - the style that might not do so well at cat shows. These
are "old fashioned" styles of cats that were the winners at the shows
10 years ago. If the lines are sound then I don't think there's
anything wrong with this.
Opinions?
Nancy DC
|
3893.19 | Well, I'm confused about old vs new... | BOOVX2::MANDILE | | Wed Aug 15 1990 12:31 | 25 |
| What I don't understand is the changing of the "breed style"
as in "old fashioned" vs "new edition". i.e. the "apple-head"
vs the "wedge-head" siamese, etc., according to what is the
current fad. I can remember persians with semi-normal faces,
too, but now they have faces so flat to actually cause eye/breathing
problems. A siamese, or persian, or whatever, should not be
"re-structured" to meet what is currently in fashion. Do the
judging standards change from year to year, or do the standards
set back in the beginning(?) hold? I am very confused by this
as I remember the looks of cats at catshows about 20+ years ago.
(This also goes for horses and dogs, too. But maybe not as much)
All the siamese had the same "look", so did the persians, the burmese,
the abbysinians, etc. Not, however, how they look now.
Of course, there are a lot of what I call "man-designed" breeds,
such as a "ragdoll", which are crosses of certain breeds, and are
given, for want of a better word, special classifications.
This doesn't change a breed, only creates a new one. This I think
is a facinating thing, to try to create a "New Breed". But the
trial & error must output many "imperfect" kittens a.k.a.
overpopulation.
Like I said, I'm very confused with the "changes". Can anyone
shed some light about this?
L-
|
3893.20 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:38 | 14 |
| There is a discussion about breed standards and how they are set
elsewhere in this file. Check the keywords for more info.
A glance throught the CFA yearbooks of ten years ago will show you
that the changes in Siamese and Persian head types occured quite
a long time ago, perhaps more than 10 years ago. The look that
these breeds have now is not a current fad. Unless the definition
of current includes a 25-30 year span.
I think that to renew the discussion of whether or not breeders
have ruined the Siamese and the Persian would be to beat a dead
horse. This topic has come up many times before.
Jo
|
3893.21 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | set home/cat_max=infinity | Wed Aug 15 1990 19:05 | 6 |
| The discussion about Breed Standards is in note 2293 for those looking
for more information about how breed standards are created, or
modified. That note also lists the requirements for becoming a
breed council member in your chosen breed.
Jo
|
3893.22 | some definitions, perhaps? | TYGON::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Thu Aug 16 1990 15:48 | 69 |
| Another thing to remember about breed standards....those of us in the USA
often think that the first siamese or persian cat we saw 20 - 25 years
ago was the "real" way the cats should look. Often, the cats were changed
from the original look when brought to the USA from other countries - probably
because the breeders could not find a large enough gene pool to assure healthy
kittens. They may have bred "out" to another cat breed occasionally in order
to expand the gene pool and prevent the degradation that will eventually
occur if the gene pool is too limited. I know that is what happened to the
dogs my parents used to breed when I was a child, weimerarners. That was
30 years ago, so it isn't well known today, nor willing admitted by anyone
involved with the breed. What breeders are currently doing in many cases
is bringing the USA cats back into line with the international standards.
Having said that, I want to go on record as not liking the wedge-head siamese
(look starved and mean to me) OR the current persian/exotic shorthair
(these cats look like their underwear is WAY TOO TIGHT at best, sneering at
everything - and the peke-faced models are sad, uncomfortable-looking
distortions in my opinion). However, I recognize the international standards
are in line with what is being bred.
re: definition of "amateur breeder" .vs. any other kind. I propose that
there are actually 4 kinds of pet animal breeders:
1) The "professional" breeder - for my purposes, this is the
breeder actively involved in cat shows, breed standards negotiations
within the cat show circuit, and actively involved in not
only breeding pure-bred cats, but breeding "better" pure-breds
of the chosen breed. These are the folks that worry about the
genetic mix of a breeding, and they are the folks that have
determined "the rules" for beeding healthy kittens...for instance,
professional breeders learned the hard way that breeding two
Scottish Folds with folded ears was a genetic mistake, and they
also learned the rules for breeding manx cats without genetic
flaws. They are also the folks that can spend a fortune to
purchase a potential breeder cat, only to neuter or spay the
cat if the potential is not realized, rather than breeding
herds of "pet quality" kittens or even kittens who may have
life-threatening genetic defects. We cat-lovers owe these folks
a lot...without their input, our knowlege of cat care and cat
nutrition would be much more limited than it is.
2) The "amateur" breeder - this is the person starting out to become
a professional breeder. This person either learns from the
pros and begins to uphold a standard, or he/she desintegrated
into...
3) The "backyard" breeder - this is the person who doesn't know,
and doesn't care, about the standards for the breed. He/she
wants kittens to sell, hoping to make money. This person will
buy cats that "look" like the breed of choice, breed kittens
providing the minimum level of care for both breeder and the
litter of kittens, and sell them at "bargain" prices. The breeder
female is often bred to death in this environment, throwing litter
after litter until complications set in and she dies, taking a
litter with her. The only advantage to this type of breeder is
that they tend to stay "small", having a few breeder females
and one male in most cases. These folks like animals, but they
are ignorant of their proper care and they choose to remain
ignorant because they want to "save money".
4) The "kitten farmer" breeders - these are your criminals that
warehouse cats in deplorable conditions, breeding for volume
head-count of kittens and selling exclusively to pet stores.
They breed both pure-breds and american short-haired cats.
A backyard breeder can turn into a kitten farmer, but the farmer
is usually a coldly calculating individual who plans to get
"big" from the start. These people do not like animals, they see
them as a means to an end.
|
3893.23 | | FSHQA1::RKAGNO | | Thu Aug 16 1990 16:24 | 6 |
| RE: .22
I like those definitions a lot!! They sum up my feelings in a
nutshell.
|
3893.24 | Talk about your sweeping generalizations! Holy cow .22, you can't be serious... | LEDS::OBRIENR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 16:54 | 20 |
|
re .22
I would agree in general, with your definitions with the exception
of 3 (backyard breeders). What a load of crap. To suggest that
ANYONE who breeds cats and doesn't fall into the first or second
category is some kind of an idiotic, immoral, unfeeling monster
is moronic.
There are lots of responsible backyard breeders; many who read this
file. They don't deserve that kind of characterization. I suspect
many backyard breeder know as much, and care as much, about cats
as ANYONE in this conference.
Because you don't agree with them, is not a reason to trash their
intelligence and motives.
Have a nice day,
Ron O.
|
3893.25 | | FRAGLE::PELUSO | PAINTS; color your corral | Thu Aug 16 1990 18:03 | 5 |
| I like your definitions Dian, they are exactly how I would have worded
them. Thanks! :*)
M&N
|
3893.26 | read before leaping... | TYGON::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Thu Aug 16 1990 19:51 | 30 |
| If the breeder takes time to learn about the species and the breed of cat
he/she is working with, then he/she is an amateur breeder...and that is not
an insult. The breeders WHO DO NOT KNOW, AND DON'T BOTHER TO LEARN are
"backyard breeders"...and yes, I accuse them of being ignorant, inconsiderate,
and irresponsible.
A distinction you obviously missed because you didn't read what was written,
but what you EXPECTED to be written.
With cat population what it is, and with so many cats left without homes,
and KILLED BECAUSE NOBODY WANTS THEM, there isn't any valid reason to
breed cats except to attempt to improve a breed. Look at our own "available
for adoption" note if you doubt this...so many beautiful, loving, adult
cats are out there looking for homes, destined to be KILLED when turned
over to shelters, because everyone wants a kitten - and so many seem willing
to dispose of a cat. I am, quite frankly, sick to death of people who pay
$50.00 for a special breed of kitten without papers and breed a
few litters of kittens to sell cheap....to anyone with the asking price,
whether they are responsible or not, whether they show any indication
of willingness to make a committment to the cat - FOR THE LIFETIME of the cat.
Then the kittens grow up and end up in shelters or advertised in the
newspapers, or at the vet's office, or just "thrown away". I spend every
spare cent I have and a great deal of time attempting to rescue these cats...
It is heartbreaking. The backyard breeders are the PRIMARY source of the
purebred strays/rejects out there...and if they are insulted because I call
them ignorant, so be it. Reputable, INFORMED breeders have "return clauses" in
their contracts and they screen prospective cat owners to attempt to weed-out
the casual buyers...and they take back their cats if the owner doesn't
want the cat...and they take proper care when breeding...and they cannot
sell kittens cheap. Period.
|
3893.27 | Maybe I missed something... | LEDS::OBRIENR | | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:15 | 19 |
|
Not to belabor the point, but there are knowledgable, responsible,
caring cat lovers who will occasionally breed their pets. They
have no intention of becoming 'professional' breeders; by your
definition that makes them 'backyard' breeders.
I think part of the problem here is that is unfair to attempt to
pidgeonhole all cat fanciers, and I understand that I started it,
in an attempt at clarifying my opinions. In retrospect, I realize
it was a mistake.
The bottom line is that every breeding situation has to be evaluated
on it's own merit. It may come as shock to some of you folks, but
it's not that unusual to find a 'professional' breeder who is guilty
of the same practices you condemn the 'backyard' breeder for. On the
other hand I have dealt with 'backyard' breeders who I wouldn't
hesitate to recommend to prospective cat owners.
Ron O
|
3893.28 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:45 | 5 |
| re: .27 - perhaps there are those folks who only fall into the
"amateur breeder" category. They do their best but don't want
to get into breeding extensively so they never progress to the
professional level.
Nancy
|
3893.29 | | WILLEE::MERRITT | | Fri Aug 17 1990 13:37 | 36 |
| I have owned cats my whole life and have never experienced the
wonderful joy of seeing kittens born and the proud mom taking such
great care of her babies. I do know that some experiences
aren't wonderful and it could be expensive...but to this day I still
feel I have missed out on a wonderful part of kitty life.
When we got Poco who is a beautiful three colored kitty with alot
of spirit...both my hubby and I thought long and hard whether we
wanted her to have one litter before being spayed. Even though
deep down we wanted to do let her have a litter....what made us
change our mind was:
o I would have interrogated (to death) any person who would have
wanted to take a kitty to ensure they were going to a good
home. Probably so bad...they wouldn't want the kitty after
that.
o And if we found the right home...I get so attached I would
have cried for days after it left and would want updates on
how the kitty was doing.
o And if we couldn't find the right home...I know I would have
kept each and everyone of them no matter how expensive it is.
My point here is that if I ever do decide to let any new kitty of
mine have ONE litter....I do not consider myself IRRESPONSIBLE OR
NON CARING as long as I take the responsiblity to find the kitties
a good home (my standards are real high) or keep them myself.
I really do feel I have missed out on a wonderful part of my babies
lives. Even after reading all note files about breeding.
Sandy (Tamba, Poco, and Barkley)
|
3893.30 | One size fits some.... | BOOVX1::MANDILE | | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:14 | 6 |
| Re-.22 - I liked your definitions-I think they apply!
Re-R.O. think generalization, not stereotype!
L-
|
3893.31 | there's a responsible way to have this experience | MAZE::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:24 | 15 |
| re: .29
Your attitude about the kittens and potential foster parents is very common
among the professional breeders I know. (You've done a reasonable job of
describing my wife, for example.)
A way for you (or anyone) to get their feet wet breeding would be to do so
under the guidance of someone knowledgable. You could then get appropriate
guidance about what would be a good breeding, and coaching through the
birthing process, and a safety net in case something goes wrong.
We have worked this way with some people. After trying it, some have
decided that it wasn't for them, others have decided to persue it.
Ray
|
3893.32 | what is professional? | CSSE::CST | Isn't that a moon cat? | Fri Aug 17 1990 16:36 | 14 |
| Nancy,
I would like to feel that I am being professional about my working with
my cats. I don't know how many I will end up with and how far I will
go to show (probably not to CA any time soon). I work closely with the
woman I got my cat from and discuss all sorts of things. As Ray said
she is there to guide me. Does this mean I am not professional? I
would like to think that I am because of all the time, money, thought,
preparation I put into this "hobby". Perhaps not. What would you
consider the professional level?
Karen, Ruby, Stinky, Wing
PS Of course the people like Cin who have been doing it forever are
ones that I feel are at this level too.
|
3893.33 | there is nothing wrong with an amateur | TYGON::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Fri Aug 17 1990 17:35 | 23 |
| as the person who proposed the descriptions, I would consider someone who
works with others to select and breed the best possible examples of the
breed, who spends the time/money for the medical/nutritional care necessary
to prepare the female to bear young and assures the appropriate medical
care for both mother and offspring, to be "professional" in their approach
to breeding. Lets face it, the standard defintion for "professional",
that the individual MAKE money at the task, doesn't really work with breeding
cats or dogs....the overhead is great enough that you can probably manage
to "break even", but to make money, you'd have to BE a licensed vet...
Besides, the amateur who is working to learn about the chosen animals, and
the breeding of these animals is not to be sneered at. I think that someone
who is serious about breeding will eventually get involved, at some level,
with the establishment and maintenance of "quality" standards for the
chosen breed...it's sorta a natural progression of understanding the
standards and determining whether they are good or bad for the health
and well-being of the animals. Most folks participate through work with/for
the shows and competitions or by joining breed-specific clubs. The simple
truth is that you NEED to "have your ear to the ground" concerning defects
and diseases that are discovered for your chosen breed or species, treatments
for and prevention of diseases, and ESPECIALLY the vulnerabilities inherent
to the breed or certain blood-lines of the breed...and the best way to keep
up on these things is to KNOW other breeders.
|
3893.34 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Mon Aug 20 1990 09:09 | 7 |
| I guess I just meant that there are some folks who will breed a
few litters under the guidance of a good breeder following all the
guidelines of responsible breeding but never get into showing heavily
or building a cattery reputation. They will do it for the experience
and produce healthy, beautiful kittens, and then retire.
No insult intended.
Nancy
|