T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3609.1 | So mad I missed the keys. | FILTON::GLOVER_P | Tangled Mothballs!!? | Thu May 17 1990 09:43 | 24 |
|
I can handle looking for ages,phoning,buying papers.
I can handle the 100 and 1 questions about my life.
I can handle the questions about where I live.
All of this is understandable but when I'M asked to* donate* �10
per kitten to a charity I get a bit annoyed as I would have given
a contribution but I will not be dictated to as to how much by a
charity AND THEN being told, after I've driven out to get them that
were not eligable to have kittens because" YOU will not be there
to play with them once an hour all day as you work!!!!!" I see red!!!
WHat do these people want???????? Since when do I play with any
kitten on the hour every hour? Thats why we chose to get two so
they have company,along with the other three. Sure I'll go home
lunchtimes to make sure there O.K. and feed them but for crying
out loud. I mean, I've only had cats for 20+ years so I must have
been doing it wrong all the time, right?
<flame off... cooler now.>
Phil.
|
3609.2 | I think I can explain part of that... | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Thu May 17 1990 09:49 | 20 |
| Requiring the owner to be around all day seems rather unrealistic
to me too, Phil.
regarding the donation, however, that is standard practice at shelters
in the US. Its done for a number of reasons - 1. anyone who can't or
won't pay a "small" donation to the shelter might not be able to afford
the vet's bills, or is perhaps not dedicated enough to the cat's
welfare. 2. There are those unsavory creeps who take cats/dogs and
sell them for research. My understanding is that they only get around
$20-$30 per animal so requiring a donation of about that amount makes
it unprofitable for them. 3. The costs of shots, FLV testing,
Neutering etc is VERY high and the shelters really need the money.
Hope that helps explain that issue anyway. You've got to remember that
these people don't know you, nor your dedication to your FFM's (Feline
family members) and they need some way of sorting the good cat parents
from the bad ones. The donation is just one method of learning about
this person.
Nancy DC
|
3609.3 | | FILTON::GLOVER_P | Tangled Mothballs!!? | Thu May 17 1990 10:03 | 23 |
| Sure Nancy, I can go for that but these people wanted to come out
and see the house,meet the other cats.She didnt run a shelter either.
She only had 4 kittend in her own house. The cats protection Leugue
put me in touch with her and as I said I dont mind all the questions
but having to play with them once an hour all day long? Thats the
only reason she didnt want us to have them!!!
Weve spent a lot on new litter, trays, toys,and have an appointment
set-up with the vet to check them over you name it weve arranged
it. And with all the space and safety we can give them they couldnt
go to a better home. You'd think I was trying to adopt a child
by this womans attitude. I'd happily give 50 quid a kitten but I
dont like being told how much I have to give. Thats not a charitble
institution.Shes selling them.And as such should advertise them
for sale. O.K. Shed lose her charity status but people have to abide
by the rules. How do I know shes not putting the money in her own
pocket? She gets alot of money from charity events let alone selling
kittens.
OOOOOOOHHHHHH I'M mad!!!!!
Phil.
|
3609.4 | Thumbs down to "them" too! | XNOGOV::LISA | | Thu May 17 1990 10:21 | 15 |
| Phil,
The CPL don't sell (or give for that matter) you the kitten. You are
just allowed to adopt it. Its still theirs. Wierd! I decided not to
have anything to do with them cos I don't like their attitude either.
A friend of mine was turned down by them - she lives miles from busy roads
etc. They turned her down because they thought the 2 that she wanted
to adopt would suffer from a lack of other feline company. I just think
they want to keep all those kittens to themselves!
I'll keep my eyes peeled for you, but you're right - there really
aren't that many kittens to had in the UK!
Lisa.
|
3609.5 | | JJLIET::JUDY | Wild Child | Thu May 17 1990 10:46 | 12 |
|
Phil
(trying to lighten up the mood a bit)
I know of three adorable kittens....unfortunately they're
feral and live at the Pelican Resort in St. Maarten. =)
So sad that you can't find kitties to love and on that island
there are kitties with no one to love them!!
JJ
|
3609.6 | | FILTON::GLOVER_P | Tangled Mothballs!!? | Thu May 17 1990 10:47 | 7 |
| >>> I know of three adorable kittens....unfortunately they're
>>>>>> feral and live at the Pelican Resort in St. Maarten. =)>
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
:-))
|
3609.7 | flame on/off | CGOO01::LMILLER | hasten slowly | Thu May 17 1990 12:28 | 12 |
|
I know how you feel - I was turned down by the RSPCA in Staines (or
somewhere near by- Wraysbury?) because I lived in a flat! Honest to
God - I was soooooooo cross - (I already had one cat and wanted a
companion). I even owned the flat! I am afraid I lost my cool - and
told the old biddies what I thought of them and that they could whistle come
donation time. Needless to say I found an ideal kitten (6 months
old) and she is still with me today as is the original one - 11 years,
and more bonus point air miles than most people I known, later.
Linda
|
3609.8 | | SUBURB::ODONNELLJ | | Thu May 17 1990 13:54 | 11 |
| I've never heard of having to donate a fixed fee before. When we
got Oliver we were invited to make a donation, but we were not obliged
to do so. They did ask a number of questions, just to make sure
that he would be well cared for, but we expected that anyway.
We got him from Brittan's Farm in Wokingham and the only request
they did make was that we let them know how he was getting after
a few months - I believe this was more of a friendly interest rather
than checking up on us.
I think it is a shame that these charities have behaved in such
a high-handed manner, but I suppose they do have to be careful that
the cats don't end up in a lab somewhere.
|
3609.9 | | SUBURB::ODONNELLJ | | Thu May 17 1990 15:14 | 5 |
| And, by the way, when I donated an amount (it was a bit more than
�10), the lady said I needn't give that much! I had to insist, and
point out that caring for all the cats, dogs, foxes, rabbits etc
that they had at the Centre costs a lot.
So where does that leave your lady's demand for �10 per kitten?!!
|
3609.10 | Hang in there - there's a kitten for you | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Fri May 18 1990 08:18 | 25 |
| Phil -
I'm not sure whether this woman has a "control fetish" or is just
real insecure about placing the kittens and is being over-protective
but in either case, you are right, she was out of hand.
As far as fixed fee's go that seems to be standard practice with the
shelters I've talked to at the cat shows. I know Kitty Angels charges
$50 per cat and some of the other ones charge $25-$40. When I
adopted Bumpy & Mao from the MSPCA, some 10.5 years ago the fee was
$5 for a spayed cat (Bumpy) and $35 for an unspayed one (Mao). The
deal was that I could either have Mao spayed free at Angel Memorial
Hosp (which I did) or have her done elsewhere and get a $30 refund
when I brought in the spay certificate.
The point is, the fees were fixed. Now I also brought my poor
Kathryn there for disposal and they asked for a donation without
making any specification as to amount. I remember I gave them $5.
I didn't have much money at the time.
I suspect that the cat overpopulation problem is so bad over here
that even tho the shelters screen and DO turn people down, they are
more anxious to place the cats. I know its a real pain for you, Phil,
but isn't it nice to know there's a place where its hard to find
unwanted kittens.
Nancy DC
|
3609.11 | Would you give a cat to this man? | IOSG::THOMPSONR | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be | Fri May 18 1990 09:53 | 25 |
| Pity you didn't need a kitten 2 months ago when little Charlotte
wandered into my husband's office and set up base there! Eventally we
took her to the CPL and I was quite pleased with them - but then I was
on the giving end - not the receiving. I gave a 10 pound donation,
though it certainly was not mentioned (though probably because I was
GIVING the kitten, not adopting it).
At the time I was very concerned about her welfare as she had obviously
been through a lot. My guess is that they believe that since most of
the kittens/cats they recieve have come from traumatic/unknown
backgrounds, they want to ensure as much as possible that the animals
will never be short of love again. I think if you see it in that light
it doesn't seem too unreasonable. I was delighted when I was told
that, 2 days later, they had found a home with a young couple (no other
cats incidentally) and their 3 year old daughter. I was also comforted
by the knowledge that they didn't live near a main road and that
Charlotte wouldn't be left on her own all day (this is very definately
hypocrytical of me since both me and hubby work and Sophie and Henri
are on their own for most of the day - but they do have each other).
So I can understand your frustration, but on the other hand, you can't
blame them for making these rules if they know that they can place the
kittens/cats in what they think are the best environments for them. If
they can't find homes and they *still* stick to these rules, then I
think it's going a bit far.
|
3609.12 | | CLYPPR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Fri Jun 22 1990 10:00 | 16 |
| The Nashua Humane Society asked $35 each for my two, $20 refundable
when they were neutered or returned prior to neutering time. ($15
non-refundable for any reason.) When I got them neutered, I got $20
back. I called several times for the other $20 and never got it.
I know they need money and I'd be happy to donate but I place a high
value on honesty and competence, one of which is lacking so I will
not make them any contributions... but I digress.
Their rules state that they can inspect your home and take the animals
back if the place is not proper. I have heard of their refusing to
allow someone to have an animal for several reasons including "No, your
last cat was killed in the road." Which I didn't think was fair,
either.
Ed, Calvin, Hobbes, Ginger, Spook, and one to be named later...
|
3609.13 | | CRUISE::NDC | Putiput Scottish Folds - DTN: 297-2313 | Tue Jun 26 1990 08:53 | 12 |
| >I have heard of their refusing to allow someone to have an animal
>for several reasons including "No, your last cat was killed in the
>road." Which I didn't think was fair, either.
I would agree with you if the person was going to keep the new cat
indoors. However, if the person intended to make the new cat
indoor/outdoor then I think the humane society is fully justified
in its position. If one cat was killed in the area then others
could be as well.
Nancy DC
|