T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2766.1 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Sat Aug 12 1989 12:26 | 3 |
| What's this? Can I get a copy? Would someone mail me one? My
mailstop is UCT. Thanks.
|
2766.2 | | HABS11::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Sat Aug 12 1989 17:53 | 3 |
| I'll send you one Monday. Want it autographed?
Gary
|
2766.3 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Sun Aug 13 1989 11:39 | 2 |
| Don't you mean, do I want 18 pawprints on it...Thanks.
|
2766.4 | | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Mon Aug 14 1989 08:52 | 4 |
| I want a copy too please!!!! MR03-1/N17. I'll take autographed
or unautographed....
Nancy DC
|
2766.5 | Maybe you could charge for pawprints too...
| HABS11::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Mon Aug 14 1989 09:46 | 10 |
| I'll send you one too, but...
Elaine -
Could you take over satisfying your adoring fans? I know I blew the whistle,
but you're the one who's going to get rich on the royalties 8')
Please send me a mail, and let's work out the percentages.
Thanks...Gary
|
2766.6 | How about Colorado Springs? | GENRAL::BALDRIDGE | Now it's Summer!!! | Mon Aug 14 1989 11:22 | 5 |
| Perhaps someone could send a copy out to Colorado Springs (CXO1-2/E29)
and I can figure out a way to share it with others here.
Chuck
|
2766.7 | Worth the Reading! | FSHQA2::RWAXMAN | A Cat Makes a Purrfect Friend | Mon Aug 14 1989 12:18 | 7 |
| I have a copy! Great article -- very nicely done!!
Congrats, Elaine -- I'll get your autograph at the Framingham Show!
/Roberta
|
2766.8 | Thanks for them nice words!! | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Mon Aug 14 1989 13:47 | 17 |
| You guys.....
Thanks for them nice words! Needless to say, I'm feeling a tad
'exposed' these days!
ok, I'll grab a few copies and mail 'em, although I should let
the whistle blower have the honor!!!
I feel doubly lucky - being owned by 18 wonderful furfaces - and,
having someone as good as Cindy Gerry to learn the trade from.
She is a very sharing person - it makes me feel good to know that
I'll be learning the business the 'right' way - producing very
healthy babies! Thanks Cindy !! and Thanks to all my hairy kids!!
and a big thanks to all of you for all the support you all provide
in this file! our sharing benefits all felines.
E.T.
|
2766.9 | Maybe someone could type in the article? | WONDER::SKALTSIS | Deb | Mon Aug 14 1989 13:56 | 1 |
|
|
2766.10 | I have it too! | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | | Mon Aug 14 1989 14:19 | 10 |
| It pays to have friends in the right place... Anne Wifholm, who
has two of my Birman babies, knew that I would be interested and
sent me a copy of the article. I thought it was very well done,
and it stressed some great points, spaying/neutering, and responsible
breeding. Congrats to Elaine, and thanks for being part of such
an informative article.
Also, thanks to Anne for sending me a copy!
Jo
|
2766.11 | and will the real E.T. stand up? | MAMIE::IVES | | Mon Aug 14 1989 16:34 | 13 |
| I suppose someone could type the article but, it would loose something
not being able to see E.T. surrounded by real furfaces and trophies,
and her HHP walking up the front of her like she was saying, "Hey
Mom you only did all the work while it was my beauty that got the
hardware."
I see E.T. every day and she has a constant red face from blushing
in humility about the article. (Hey E.T. copy it and bring it to
the cat show's with you and a lot of the DECies could pick it up
there.)
Barbara
|
2766.12 | I'll bring some to Framingham as long as you don't flash them around | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Mon Aug 14 1989 18:19 | 12 |
| re: 11 You are (red) right!
I can bring some to Framingham if anyone wants one.
Actually, I kinda liked the picture of Katenka in the
lower left corner !! I really could have lived a long
time without the one of me. Thank you all - I get
more support from you all than the people in my group.
What I'm saying, is that I'm very thankful this file
exists - the understanding is priceless!
E.T.
|
2766.13 | | BSS::DAHLGREN | | Mon Aug 14 1989 18:23 | 5 |
| Hi E.T.!
Yes, be sure some make it out to Colorado Springs!
-- Ed
|
2766.14 | ok ! | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Mon Aug 14 1989 18:42 | 4 |
| Hi Ed, sure - will do - tomorrow, I'll grab some from the caf
and mail 'em. Thanks for asking!
E.T.
|
2766.15 | | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Tue Aug 15 1989 08:45 | 4 |
| E.T. are you coming to the cookout in Braintree? If so, bring
some copies to that too :-)
Nancy DC
|
2766.16 | Me too! | GLINKA::GREENE | Cat Lady | Tue Aug 15 1989 10:17 | 3 |
| And don't forget several copies for Manchester this weekend!
Pennie
|
2766.17 | | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Tue Aug 15 1989 17:02 | 8 |
| re:15
Gee, Nance, I can't make it that date - sorry!! I'll try
mailing some out and bring some to Framingham - just don't
flash them around - I feel weird enough - we don't need
the whole fancy to know about this!
E.T._very_redfaced
|
2766.18 | | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Wed Aug 16 1989 08:43 | 3 |
| Hey I got mine! I got mine!!!!! (Thanks)
E.T. Can I have your autograph??? ;-)
|
2766.19 | | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Wed Aug 16 1989 10:44 | 11 |
| re: 18
Nance, you are a hoot !! ok. I sent a bunch out yesterday -
they are in plain yellow unmarked unidentifiable envelopes!
It sure is wonderful to see that so many folk love cats the way
we do! I've been hearing lots and lots of nice stories about
people that have saved kittens and then gone on to have them
spayed and neutered - these are the stories that are music
to all our ears!
E.T.
|
2766.20 | | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Wed Aug 16 1989 14:58 | 10 |
| Ya, Its great to know we're not alone and not the minority
we sometimes feel we are. I had someone once tell me that I
was directly responsible for her rescueing an abandoned collie
because I had rescued a kitten. She said I set a good example!
Makes me feel so good I could cry!
Well, now gang. I have a bribe to get folks to my cookout ;-)
Congrats E.T.!
Nancy DC
|
2766.21 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Wed Aug 16 1989 21:10 | 3 |
| I got mine today. Thanks! Which baby is which in the picture?
Especially that wonderful one standing on your lap.
|
2766.22 | | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Thu Aug 17 1989 13:37 | 15 |
| re: 21
Well, let's see - the baby standing on my lap is Paskenka Shelton
ZhivagoCat - red classic boy - he is really something! In person
he really shines and is so red with a wonderful pattern and an
incredible purrrrsonality -and I do mean PURRRR - he even sings
when he sleeps! He is just sweeter than sugar.
Lara The Lady ZhivagoCat is standing up with paws on my knee. And
to Lara's right is Katenka Dolly ZhivagoCat and above sort of
crawling around the trophies is Terror my Rex baby boy ! The rest
of the crew was a little further back and didn't quite make it in
the picture - space was limited.
E.T.
|
2766.23 | Can I have one too?????? | DNEAST::ESTES_CRYS | Nature's Beauty Is The Cat | Thu Aug 17 1989 19:10 | 5 |
|
If you still have the article, would you send some to me so I can pass
them out here in Maine.
Mail Stop - ASO/6KB Crystal Estes
|
2766.24 | Me too?? | HDLITE::FEASE | Andrea Midtmoen Fease | Fri Aug 18 1989 09:02 | 5 |
| E.T. -
I'd love to see it. Mail Stop MRO4-1/H16. Thanks!
- Andrea
|
2766.25 | | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Fri Aug 18 1989 09:57 | 3 |
| Sure thing - they are 'in the mail' - thanks for asking!
E.T.
|
2766.26 | | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Fri Aug 18 1989 17:05 | 3 |
| Just got my copy today! Beautiful cats!
Deb
|
2766.27 | | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Fri Aug 18 1989 17:15 | 4 |
| Thanks, Deb! too bad my black boys didn't make it in - I think
they look like your babies!!
E.T.
|
2766.28 | rat hole alert | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Fri Aug 18 1989 17:29 | 5 |
| Probably, and not to get into too much of a rat hole, but I've noticed
that the black ones seem to photograph better against dark backgrounds
than light backgrounds. Anyone else noticed this?
Deb
|
2766.29 | more than you wanted to hear about photographing | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | | Fri Aug 18 1989 17:40 | 22 |
| When I do my sealpoint Birmans on dark backgrounds, we lose the
ears and tail in the background. One thing that I have done though
is to put some vaseline on their faces to help bring out the features
in the photo. Sometimes the dark faces come out like big, dark
blobs. You can't see the features.
Now I usually have the seals done on Mauve or medium blue and that
seems to work okay. I used a Beige color for Limoges and didn't
like the effect.
I have also noticed that you kind of have to consider the cats "colors"
when choosing the background. Blue points have a cool tone to the
color, and should be photographed on colors that have a cool tone.
Seals, on the other hand, are a warm toned color, and really need
to be done on warm toned backgrounds. I made this startling discovery
after paying a fortune to have Kalliste photographed on a silver
background (the photographers suggestion). Yuck, Yuck, Yuck!!!!
The silver really washed out his nice warm coloring and made him
look half dead.
Jo (who has spent lots of time and bucks analyzing these things)
|
2766.30 | Oh Boy!! A rathole!!! My cue!! | DCSVAX::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Fri Aug 18 1989 17:40 | 11 |
| > Black cats against black background...
And there's a good reason!! Most modern cameras and lighting systems
of the type typically used for that type of non-studio photography
try to 'average' out the light in a given scene. Soooo, if you
put a black cat in front of a white background, the camera will try
to interpret the whole thing as 18% grey (neutral). The white gets
darker, and so does the cat which was dark to begin with.
Edd (who actually just felt like saying HI to all the cat people
he hasn't noted with for what seems like ages...)
|
2766.31 | | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Fri Aug 18 1989 18:07 | 5 |
| I never tried Niky or the twins (all three are solid black cats)
against a BLACK background, just a DARK background. Are you saying that I
should try using a black background (as opposed to a dark brown)?
Deb
|
2766.32 | non-scientific survey | IOWAIT::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Fri Aug 18 1989 18:57 | 10 |
| A totally non-scientific report:
When I photograph all-black Sam, he usually looks like a furry alien with
heartburn - a large lump of fur with glaring yellow eyes. The only time
I've gotten a good photo of the boy, I had light behind me, a flash
on the camera, 200 ASA film AND a brown background....mind, I didn't
like the brown so much, but obviously I am on the right track here with
the darker background....now, if I can just get Sam to lay on a nice
red background...or maybe green....I know! I'll let him think it's a
special dress on which I simply CANNOT tolerate cat hairs...
|
2766.33 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | | Fri Aug 18 1989 20:29 | 12 |
| Question for all you camera buffs.
If the camera averages out the color, what happens when the points
of the cat are seal (black) and the body is white? I need to know
how to work this problem out, as well as the blue eyed demon eyes
problem.
I have had a couple of my cats photographed on dark blue, but lost
the ears and the tail in the background. And that was a professional
cat photographer.
Jo
|
2766.34 | Feline Foto Fun | WEFXEM::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Sat Aug 19 1989 10:00 | 27 |
| Assuming you have a camera that allows for manual adjustment of the
controls governing exposure (or a light meter), one way to get yourself
into the ballpark is to expose for something that *is* neutral grey.
18% grey cards can be purchased in most any photo-supply store. (I
have a T-shirt that's practically the right color, I just point at
myself!)
Once you've determined the proper exposure for neutral grey, do NOT
allow the camera to 'auto-expose'. Some of the newer 'point and shoot'
cameras don't allow this. I don't like them.
When photographing a dark object against a dark background, it's often
desireable to have a low intensity light positioned above and just
slightly behind the subject in order the 'break' the subject from the
background. This can be tricky with cats, as all the little hairs
sticky up can cause a furry halo along the top of the cat. (C'mon, be
honest, does any cat really deserve a halo?) Karen Luby's picture of
Bandit as a kitten is a good example of the halo.
Don't use a camera mounted strobe. We're all familiar with the demon
eyes caused by shining a lite directly into cat eyes.
"Bracketing" is a good way to hedge your bets. Figure out your proper
exposure and then take extra exposures 1/2, 1, and 1 1/2 stops over
and under.
Edd
|
2766.35 | Copies for Colorado Springs | GENRAL::BALDRIDGE | Now it's Summer!!! | Mon Aug 21 1989 12:55 | 10 |
| I received 5 copies in the mail today, so I have 4 to share with
others in Colorado Springs. Please call me at DTN 522-2697 or
send me E-Mail with your mail stop and I'll send one on to you.
GENRAL::BALDRIDGE
FIRST COME - FIRST SERVED !!
Chuck
|
2766.36 | | WR2FOR::CORDESBRO_JO | | Mon Aug 21 1989 13:10 | 15 |
| Ed,
Thanks for the tips. Unfortunately, I have a Canon Sure Shot automatic
everything camera. The only thing that is does allow me to do is
to adjust shutter speed, and to prefocus if I want. So far, my
best shots are taken with a telephoto lens, with prefocus, on a
light background, with natural light. This is difficult to achieve
since the perfect natural light is in my bedroom at 3:00 in the
afternoon. Of course, I am here at that time.
Looks like I need a new camera. Have to put that on my christmas
wish list. Any suggestions for a complete novice of a good 35mm
camera?
Jo
|
2766.37 | one camera recommendation | IOWAIT::WILDE | Ask yourself..am I a happy cow? | Mon Aug 21 1989 17:03 | 17 |
| > Looks like I need a new camera. Have to put that on my christmas
> wish list. Any suggestions for a complete novice of a good 35mm
> camera?
My "big" camera (not just point and shoot) is an olympus. I recommend
the cameras and the lenses. They are not cheap, but the OM-2 is good
for automatic and manual override (I think that is the model - I have
an old OM-1 which is manual only) so you can have the best of both
worlds...and the camera/lens are smaller than the CANNON, NIKON, etc
brands. When I have my telephoto lens on the camera, I really appreciate
the smaller, LIGHTER, size.
I would also look into a couple of lights for your purposes, Jo, as you
have lots of little babies to take pictures of ...8^}. I'm working on
getting my own lights so I don't have to use the attached flash anymore...
although, I really liked the flourescent turquoise that Sam's and Nick's
eyes turned when I photographed them...
|
2766.38 | go for the Olympus | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Tue Aug 22 1989 08:48 | 20 |
| re: camera - I too recommend the Olympus. I have an OM77-AF with
a manual override. Unfortunately, Manual overrides have shutter
priority-meaning that you can't adjust the aperture. I also have
an old Minolta SRT-101 which is a totally manual camera and takes
FABULOUS pictures. I've never really gotten along with the fancy
computerized bounce flash I have to go with it and blew a whole
roll of film when we first got Dundee. That's when I got frustrated
and bought the Olympus.
How do you like that - spent $400 just to take pix of the cats!
(that includes a lifetime service contract from Underground &
the 35-70mm zoom lens)
The advantage of the Minolta, tho is that I can do things like
take pix of fireworks!
My best picture of Isis (all black) is one taken outside in bright
sunlight against the green background of the grass. The picture
was enhanced by the fact that her pupils were constricted giving
her vivid gold eyes!
Nancy DC
|
2766.39 | Pentax is good too | SWAT::COCHRANE | Like a Cheshire Cat, your smile remains in my nightmares | Tue Aug 22 1989 09:59 | 15 |
| I have a Pentax MX which is totally manual. I'm not really
sure if you can buy them anymore, as most today are automatic
with manual override. I like Pentax very much, and have gotten
very good pictures with the camera, although my friends complain
it takes me forever to take a picture ;-).
With the lighting, you might try a flash with a movable head,
so you can bounce the light off the ceiling or other flat, white,
non-reflective surface. This will help prevent "demon eyes" in
blue-eyed cats. If the flash isn't movable, avoid having the
cat look directly at the camera. A linen cloth draped over
the flash and secured with an elastic cuts the glare, but doesn't
eliminate it entirely.
Mary-Michael
|
2766.40 | Thanks! | HDLITE::FEASE | Andrea Midtmoen Fease | Tue Aug 22 1989 10:43 | 8 |
| Re. a few back
E.T. -
Just received the article. What gorgeous cats! Paskenka looks
somewhat like my orange tabby, Loki! Wait'll I show him that tonight!
- Andrea
|
2766.41 | Auto-anything??? Yuck-o-rama... | WEFXEM::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Tue Aug 22 1989 14:04 | 11 |
| My cameras are all Pentax K-1000s. Fully manual, small, light, and
built so solid you can hammer nails with them. And cheap, ~$100 for
the body only.
There are lots of bodies out there with fabulous bells and whistles,
but I've never heard anyone say a bad word about these cameras. They
are a very good value.
Pentax SMCT optics are also very highly touted.
Edd
|
2766.42 | Olympus | USEM::MCQUEENEY | Bob McQueeney | Tue Aug 22 1989 16:30 | 8 |
| Another vote for the Olympus line. I have an OM-10 which I
purchased in '81, still takes great pictures. Aperture preferred,
with a manual override setting. Decent machine for the price (around
$350 back then, including UV filter, hot-seat flash unit, leather
case).
McQ
|
2766.43 | Thank-you!!!!!!! | DNEAST::ESTES_CRYS | Nature's Beauty Is The Cat | Tue Aug 22 1989 19:25 | 11 |
|
I just recieved the article. Your cats are beauties. Good luck in your
plans to become a breeder.
Thank-you
Crys
P.S. If anyone in Maine wants one of these articles, please let me
know. E-Mail DNEAST::ESTES_CRYS
|
2766.44 | | CRUISE::NDC | Nancy Diettrich-Cunniff-I wanted it all | Wed Aug 23 1989 08:49 | 6 |
| re: cameras - the problem with the manual cameras - and the reason
why I bought the AF to go with my Minolta, is that by the time I
get the picture set up the cats are long gone! I needed something
quicker. Of course the best is our Camcorder! I have tapes of
Dundee as a kitten playing in the shredded newspaper that my ceramic
pieces had been packed in. :-)
|
2766.45 | and now, back to cameras | PENPAL::TRACHMAN | ExoticSH=Persian in Underwear | Wed Aug 23 1989 10:57 | 7 |
|
re: not cameras
Thanks folks! glad you enjoyed the article!!
E.T.
|