T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1182.1 | WHAT??!!?? | NRADM::CONGER | | Tue Mar 15 1988 12:05 | 20 |
|
Where does this woman live? (ie her own home, a retirement
complex, etc.) The information you give is not too clear. I
know there are organizations (Purina is one, I think) that advocate
owning of companion pets by the elderly. Studies have shown that
the pets lower blood pressure, and theoretically make the owner
healthier.
I know of at least on nursing home (Westboro) that has a `mascot'.
In this case, it is a dog owned by one of the staff members, and
it is brought in periodically to visit the patients. He is even
given the run of the floor where the minimum care patients reside.
If the state allows pets to visit nursing homes, why wouldn't they
allow the elderly to own them as well?
I realize that you are looking for more information yourself,
but I have never heard about what you've reported. Do you think
you can give *us* a little more info?
|
1182.2 | | GLINKA::GREENE | | Tue Mar 15 1988 12:27 | 21 |
|
Yes, we need more information. Unfortunately, this woman
probably will not be able to force the <insert landlord or
housing agent here> to let her keep another cat. IF she
is fortunate enough to live in low-cost elderly housing
that was subsidized with Federal funds, then she must be
allowed to keep a pet. But otherwise, unless her lease
specifically allows it, she might not be able to. And a
landlord could change the terms when the annual renewal is
done. Sometimes people keep pets against the rules of their
lease, but they run the risk of being "caught" and then face
the decision of whether the move or to place the pet(s)
elsewhere. Tricky business, unless the lease specifically
allows the pets and specifies that they may stay in the
future... I assume this lady does not own her own home.
BTW...does anyone know of any existing Federally subsidized
elderly housing? I remember reading about this new requirement,
but I have never seen or heard of such a place actually existing!
Penelope
|
1182.3 | it began about two years ago... | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Tue Mar 15 1988 12:31 | 20 |
| re.1
Them woman on the news report was a resident of a housing project
for senior citizens in Boston.
I recall this situation being brought up about two years ago whne
a small group of senior citizens protested that they were not allowed
to have pets in any of the housing developments for senior citizens.
There were several talk shows which covered this situaion then and
a woman who was the leader in the anti-pet campaign suggested that
a good companion could be a goldfish!!!!
Here in Marlboro I met a woman in a restaurant who lives in one
of the senior citizen developments and she told me through a stream
of tears that her cat ,"mittens" had passed away and she was not
allowed to replace him and the lonliness was killing her, that was
over a year ago that I met this woman.
So, the Bill I am trying to learn about is in connection with this
protest that happened back then, and I was very thrilled to see
that it had more supporters now and I would like to add my support.
I hope I made the situation a bit clearer
Fran
|
1182.4 | Panel Ok's House Bill... | NAC::LACOUR | | Tue Mar 15 1988 14:42 | 36 |
| I saw the same news report and almost started crying myself. I
couldn't imagine life without my boys.
The way it works as I understood it, is that about 4 years ago,
the Federal law changed allowing small pets in federally subsidized
senior housing. However, according to the news report, state laws
are slow in changing and this particular bill has already been vetoed
in MA for I think the last 4 years.
I have an article here from today's Boston Globe. I'll reprint
it (without permission) - it does not specify the House Bill #.
***********************************
PANEL OK's BILL ON PETS FOR ELDERLY
A legislative panel gave unanimous approval yesterday to a bill
that would allow residents of state housing developments for the
elderly to keep pets.
Priscilla Mehuen, a 14-year resident of state housing for the
elderly, testified that a pilot program in which residents can keep
pets has been successful. Mehuen said the program "has helped a
number of residents...they seem less depressed and less unhappy."
Marion Powers, the head of the Wayland Housing Authority, agreed.
"After a lifetime of independence," she said, "having a pet that
depends on you can give you back a sense of usefulness. ...To deny
a lonely old person the companionship of a pet would be a great
injustice."
The bill has been filed on Beacon Hill since 1983, the same
year the federal government amended its standards to allow pets,
but has never been acted on. The bill, which was approved by the
Legislature's Housing and Urban Development Committee, now goes
to the full House.
|
1182.5 | praying | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Tue Mar 15 1988 15:10 | 6 |
| I'm praying that they have the sense and compassion to pass this
Bill!!!
I feel helpless not knowing how to offer my support.....
Fran
|
1182.6 | Let's start a letter-writing crusade! | OBSESS::JENSEN | Your ad here | Wed Mar 16 1988 13:39 | 14 |
| If anyone can find out the number of this bill, please let us know.
I would love to write to my rep in support of it.
My grandmother was in a nursing home that had a "mascot" cat. It
belonged to the activities director, I think, and basically lived
in her office. This woman actually had a screen door on her office
so that the cat could watch the comings-and-goings in the hallway
when it didn't have free run of the place!
It added a warm, homey, and humorous touch to an otherwise sterile
and somewhat depressing environment!
Joanne
|
1182.7 | Renters with Pets Organization - CADPO | LYMPH::SWANT | Can't get away from basics | Wed Mar 16 1988 18:15 | 28 |
| CADPO
(Citizens Against Housing Discrimination for Pet Owners, Inc.)
Dept. CF, P.O. Box 9
North Hollywood, CA 91603-0009
($10 annual fee)
The following is excerpted, without permission, from: Cat Fancy,
April 1988, p. 14, "Serving Animals" by Susan Easterly.
CADPO is an organization begun six years ago by Lucille
Hoyne (then 76), a resident who became concerned that so many
people in her area were forced to give up their pets to find a
decent place to rent....
CADPO's primary goal is to change the all-too-common "No
Pets" policy among rental housing owners to "Welcome with
Qualifying Pets!"
CADPO's partial checklist:
o Is your pet spayed or neutered?
o Is the animal current on inoculations?
o How is the cat litter handled?
o Is the owner willing to pay an additional pet deposit?
Might this help you renters out there including the elderly?
Julie
|
1182.8 | | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Thu Mar 17 1988 12:10 | 4 |
| RE.7
Very helpful information!
thank you
|
1182.9 | Not a bill now | POOL::MURPHY | Is it Friday yet? | Wed Apr 20 1988 14:00 | 16 |
| I just called my congressman's office here in Nashua, NH and inquired
about this "bill". It is no longer a bill but a "National Federal
Law" and anyone falling into the elderly or handicapped category
may keep their pet. This happened in 1983 and I requested a copy
of a letter done in 1985 about the law.
My Mom is in a nursing home and they have a "resident pet rabbit"
(French Lop). They also encourage families and friends to bring
in their "well-behaved" pets for the residents to pet. My toy poodle,
Cookie, is a regular visitor there now and I've seen many other
folks come in with their dogs and cats. I'm planning to bring one
of my 3 cats in soon (the other two would panic I think but not
"D.P. Gremlin" :-) )
Pat
|
1182.10 | wonderful! | BPOV09::GROSSE | | Wed Apr 20 1988 14:36 | 11 |
| re.9
That's wonderful News!!!!!
I wonder what the exactly it was that I saw on the news that
evening, I am sure they talked about the need for a "bill" to
be passed for the elderly to keep their pets who lived in federally
funded housing projects, but this seems inconsistent with it being
a National federal Law......
I hope the law never changes as when I am one day one of the elderly
I wouldn't make it very long with a kitten to cuddle.
Fran
|