[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
| Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
| Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
|
| Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5568 |
| Total number of notes: | 21492 |
5474.0. "shutdown(): should it complete pending calls?" by EDSCLU::JAYAKUMAR () Tue Apr 29 1997 12:15
Hi,
<Also cross posted ::PATHWORKS, for the DECnet Winsock2 implementation>
Can you pls, share with me as to what is the expected behaviour of shutdown()
on a stream UCX socket?
My understanding was, when shutdown(fd, SD_BOTH) is issued on a connected
socket (TCP), it not only prohibits any more send()s or recv()s on that socket
but also completes any outstanding recv()s with an appropriate error code.
But the documentation only says further sends and receives are disallowed, but
doesn't say anything about a pending call.
Should I expect (or not expect) an outstanding recv() to complete when
shutdown() is called from another thread?
Thanks
-Jay
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines
|
|---|