[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
|
Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5568 |
Total number of notes: | 21492 |
5435.0. "Why does LPD server need to check lpd client with name server?" by BRSDVP::KNEUTS (Erwin Kneuts DTN 856-8726) Tue Apr 15 1997 05:50
Hello,
Could someone comment on following LPD behaviour?
This is a reformat of my entry 5357, as it was unclear. I' ll try to produce a
clear story here, hoping for more response.
UCX 4.1 ECO 1 on vms 6.1:
1) LPD client sends .cf and .df file to LPD server.
.cf file contains, among other info, the name of the client.
LPD client has an entry for LPD server in host database.
2) LPD *server* (ucx$lpd_queue process) contacts DNS server, supposedly for
backtranslation of incoming client IP address.
When DNS server not available, time-out after 3 minutes, and
print job completes. During these 3 minutes the UCX$lpd_queue process
has a BG device in the busy state. LPD job remains executing for 3 minutes,
so lpd server is limited to 20 jobs an hour.
Why do we need the backtranslation, as the info is in the .cf file?
If the back translation is needed for security reasons, then I would expect
no completion at all, otherwise it does not make sense.
The discussion in 374.* suggests this is expected behaviour.
My customer wants to get rid of this behaviour, as it is a potential cause of
problems, and the behaviour as such does not bring added value as far as we
understand.
OR, the lpd request is rejected with a clear error message,
OR the lpd request is accepted and printed right away.
Thanks for your comments.
Erwin
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|