[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
|
Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5568 |
Total number of notes: | 21492 |
5262.0. "UCX 4.1 SMTP mail not forwarding -- %UCX-E-SMTP_CFERROR" by CSC32::R_WILLIAMS () Fri Feb 21 1997 18:41
Hi,
I have a customer in the USA that is having problems with sending mail
to a user in Tokoyo. The mail comes in as HOST::USER and the user has
his mail forwarded via SMTP to the Tokoyo site. He was getting a
%UCX-E-SMTP_CFERROR error with the mail being sent. This used to work
with 4.1 on this system. UCX 4.1 for VAX/VMS is the other node in his
cluster and he has no problem with mail forwarding to Tokoyo. I looked
in the debug log file and could not see where the failure was occuring.
SMTP just seemed to stop processing the mail request. The mail forward
did seem to have a very long mail address line. Not sure if this could
be the problem or not.
Your inputs are appreciated.
Thanks,
-Rick
+++++
SYSTEM> ucx sho ver
Digital TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V4.1
on a AlphaServer 2100 4/275 running OpenVMS V6.2
SYSTEM> sh log *smtp*
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"MAIL$PROTOCOL_SMTP" = "UCX$SMTP_MAILSHR"
"UCX$SMTP_ENABLE" = ".1.."
SYSTEM> ucx sho serv smtp/full
Service: SMTP
State: Enabled
Port: 25 Protocol: TCP Address: 0.0.0.0
Inactivity: 5 User_name: UCX_SMTP Process: UCX$SMTP
Limit: 10 Active: 0 Peak: 1
File: SYS$SPECIFIC:[UCX_SMTP]UCX$SMTP_RECV_STARTUP.COM
Flags: Listen
Socket Opts: Rcheck Scheck
Receive: 0 Send: 0
Log Opts: Acpt Actv Dactv Conn Error Exit Logi Logo Mdfy Rjct TimO Addr
File: SYS$SPECIFIC:[UCX_SMTP]UCX$SMTP_RECV_STARTUP.LOG
Security
Reject msg: not defined
Accept host: 0.0.0.0
Accept netw: 0.0.0.0
SYSTEM> ucx sho confi smtp
SMTP Configuration
Options
Initial interval: 0 00:30:00.00 Address_max: 16 NOEIGHT_BIT
Retry interval: 0 01:00:00.00 Hop_count_max: 16 RELAY
Maximum interval: 3 00:00:00.00 HEADERS
Timeout Initial Mail Receipt Data Terminate
Send: 5 5 5 3 10
Receive: 5
Alternate gateway: CTAS1.AIGFPC.COM
General gateway: CTAS1.AIGFPC.COM
Substitute domain: HIDDEN, aigtk.aigfpc.com
Zone: aigtk.aigfpc.com
Postmaster: UCX_SMTP
Log file: SYS$SPECIFIC:[UCX_SMTP]UCX$SMTP_LOGFILE.LOG
Generic queue Queues Participating nodes
UCX$SMTP_AIGTK0_00 1 AIGTK0
SYSTEM> sh log *inet*
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"UCX$INET_DOMAIN" = "aigfpc.com"
"UCX$INET_HOST" = "aigtk0"
"UCX$INET_HOSTADDR" = "137.100.144.11"
SYSTEM> ucx sho interface
Packets
Interface IP_Addr Network mask Receive Send MTU
WF0 137.100.144.11 255.255.240.0 3138953 2829949 4348
LO0 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 1 1282 65535
SYSTEM> set def sys$specific:[ucx_smtp]
SYSTEM> sh log/table=* *smbsrvshr*
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"SMBSRVSHR_TV" = "SMBSRVSHR"
SYSTEM> sh que *smtp*/full/all
Generic server queue UCX$SMTP_AIGTK0_00
/GENERIC=(UCX$SMTP_AIGTK0_01) /OWNER=[SYSTEM] /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S)
/SCHEDULE=(NOSIZE)
Server queue UCX$SMTP_AIGTK0_01, idle, on AIGTK0::, mounted form DEFAULT
/BASE_PRIORITY=4 /DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /OWNER=[SYSTEM]
/PROCESSOR=UCX$SMTP_SYMBIONT /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S)
Generic server queue UCX$SMTP_AIGTK2_00
/GENERIC=(UCX$SMTP_AIGTK2_01) /OWNER=[SYSTEM] /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S)
/SCHEDULE=(NOSIZE)
Server queue UCX$SMTP_AIGTK2_01, idle, on AIGTK2::, mounted form DEFAULT
/BASE_PRIORITY=4 /DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /OWNER=[SYSTEM]
/PROCESSOR=UCX$SMTP_SYMBIONT /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S)
MAIL> show forward/user=ikemoto
IKEMOTO has mail forwarded to SMTP%"[email protected]"
MAIL> show forward/user=nakagawa
NAKAGAWA has mail forwarded to SMTP%"[email protected]"
++++
Failed return mail message:
==========================
From: UCX_SMTP
To: UCX_SMTP
CC:
Subj: Returned mail
---- Transcript of session follows ----
%UCX-E-SMTP_SNDERROR, Error detected while sending mail to SMTP%"MAILER-DAEMON@a
igtk0.aigfpc.com"
-MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user !AS
---- Recipients of this delivery ----
SMTP%"[email protected]" (bounced)
---- Unsent message follows ----
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 18:16:54 +0900
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Subject: Returned mail
---- Transcript of session follows ----
%UCX-E-SMTP_SNDERROR, Error detected while sending mail to <[email protected]
.com>
-MAIL-E-LOGLINK, error creating network link to node !AS
---- Recipients of this delivery ----
<[email protected]> (bounced)
---- Unsent message follows ----
Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: by aigtk0.aigfpc.com (UCX V4.0 AXP);
Mon, 21 Oct 1996 18:16:49 +0900
Received: by ctas1.aigfpc.com; (5.65/2.0/07Oct96-0541PM)
id AA04870; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 05:18:50 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 05:18:50 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 aigtk0.msmail.aigfpc.com (smtpl)... 550 Host unknown
554 <[email protected]>... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answe
r from name server)
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from aigtk0.aigfpc.com by ctas1.aigfpc.com; (5.65/2.0/07Oct96-0541PM)
id AA04519; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 05:18:50 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 18:16:18 +0900
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (KANEKO)
To: [email protected]
Subject: test
X-Vms-To: NAKAGAWA
X-Vms-Cc: KANEKO
todoita??
================== RFC 822 Headers ==================
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 08:01:02 +0900
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: UCX_SMTP
Subject: Returned mail
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5262.1 | | CFSCTC::SMITH | Tom Smith MRO1-3/D12 dtn 297-4751 | Sat Feb 22 1997 14:35 | 10 |
| > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> 550 aigtk0.msmail.aigfpc.com (smtpl)... 550 Host unknown
> 554 <[email protected]>... 550 Host unknown
> (Authoritative answer from name server)
Have you looked at the DNS and BIND configurations? From outside
aigfpc.com, none of those host names is listed in the DNS database, but
all of them return MX records pointing to uu3.psi.com.
-Tom
|
5262.2 | | CSC32::R_WILLIAMS | | Sat Feb 22 1997 16:35 | 8 |
| Tom,
Both systems in this cluser have the same name server. We did taka a
look and one node can send mail with no problem and the other node just
started having this problem last week. Not sure what the real problem
is.
-Rick
|
5262.3 | | CFSCTC::SMITH | Tom Smith MRO1-3/D12 dtn 297-4751 | Sat Feb 22 1997 22:06 | 37 |
| I missed something in .0.
I think all the information you need is contained in the received
headers and error text of the bounced message (as it almost always is).
The problem is likely to be in the sendmail configuration on ctas1,
but something is consistently replacing the first token after the "@"
with "aigtk0" and leaving the rest of the domain alone.
First, however, I don't entirely understand this about the SMTP
configuration:
Zone: aigtk.aigfpc.com
Since there's really nothing _inside_ the domain aigtk.aigfpc.com, this
causes _all_ mail to be relayed to CTAS1.AIGFPC.COM unless it's
addressed to [email protected]. Nothing is sent direct to anywhere,
_including_, possibly, mail addressed to [email protected].
Looking at the received headers and the error message confirms that the
"Host unknown" is, in fact, generated by ctas1.aigfpc.com, and that
it's probably because "[email protected]" was changed to
"[email protected]" somewhere. You need to:
a) look at the sendmail configuration on ctas1.aigfpc.com to see if
it's been hacked to do something funky, and
b) figure out why they're relaying everything there in the first place.
The errors that follow that (preceed it in the bounce message) have to
do with trying to send back to "[email protected]". Is "kaneko",
in fact, a local user? Where is his mail forwarded? The one after that
has to do with trying to send mail back to
"[email protected]", which should have been
"[email protected]" - the same problem as the original
error.
-Tom
|
5262.4 | | CSC32::R_WILLIAMS | | Sun Feb 23 1997 01:23 | 7 |
| Thanks Tom for you analysis. What is bazaar about this mail is that
mail only has problems with just 2 users on the remote node. Other
users are getting mail from the one system. I did not see anything
strange in their mail folder. I was just trying to figure out why 2
users are having this problem.
-Rick
|
5262.5 | | CSC32::R_WILLIAMS | | Sun Feb 23 1997 01:27 | 3 |
| Also, if mail is sent directly to the SMTP% address, instead of coming
in through DECnet and being forwarded via SMTP%, then it delivers fine.
I was trying to figure out what could cause this strange behavior.
|
5262.6 | | CFSCTC::SMITH | Tom Smith MRO1-3/D12 dtn 297-4751 | Sun Feb 23 1997 12:55 | 20 |
| Well, this is just personal opinion (based on some experience), but
without a lot of knowledgeable tailoring of the sendmail configuration,
a VMS<->UNIX mail connection is least troublesome if DECnet is used to
forward from VMS->UNIX and SMTP is used to forward from UNIX->VMS.
Which may be another way to say that UNIX/mail11v3/sendmail is a bit
easier to tune as an SMTP<->DECnet gateway than VMS/VMSmail/UCX.
Things like "SMTP%" can screw up many garden-variety sendmail address
re-writing rules as can nested quotes resulting from multiple protocol
translations. In addition, most VMS software grew up in a DECnet-only
environment, so it tends to be happiest with DECnet addresses, and most
UNIX software tends to be happiest with SMTP addresses.
However, why this particular configuration is doing exactly what it's
doing can only be answered by examining the sendmail logs and
sendmail.cf on the UNIX host and/or by parsing some of the incoming
addresses using "sendmail -bt" to see how the addresses are being
rewritten by what rules.
-Tom
|
5262.7 | Solved....thanks. | CSC32::R_WILLIAMS | | Mon Feb 24 1997 19:47 | 25 |
| Tom,
Thanks for your diligence with this. I asked the customer to work with
the DECnet folks and sure enough, it was a DECnet issue. I will enter
the extracts from that discussion for historical purposes.
Thanks again.
-Rick
[analysis] - Joe's been working on this about a week, and the ucx
people found that this wasn't even getting to ucx..
he has a two node cluster, vax and alpha, with a common uaf file. the
mail from a system to a vax user that has forwarding to smtp%....set up
works, but sending to the alpha, same user gets the error message...
I finally found that he was using default decnet access, and we tried a
directory to vax:: and axp:: and found that the axp directory returned
an error about the directory not being found.....
the uaf record for decnet pointed to sys$sysroot:[decnet] and was there
on the vax, but not on the alpha. We created one on the alpha and now the
mail is going fine..
|