Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5568 |
Total number of notes: | 21492 |
I have a large customer with a cluster of alphas currently running VMS 6.2 and soon upgrading to 7.1. He wants the Alphas to provide NFS file serving to Win 95 and WNT PCs. He is planning on using Chameleon32 as the NFS client and server on NT. His initial testing indicates this is slower than serving thru Pathworks. Is this a resaonable/dependable thing for the customer to do? Any Horror stories and things to not do? How does NFS file serving performance compair to Pathworks serving? Anything better to use than Chameleon32? Thanks
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|