| Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
| Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
| Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
| Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5568 |
| Total number of notes: | 21492 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5144.1 | some hints | UTRTSC::KNOPPERS | Oswald Knoppers | Tue Jan 21 1997 21:52 | 11 |
| 5144.2 | TRAMP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Thu Jan 23 1997 13:56 | 4 | |
| 5144.3 | IFDEV.C error message after protection cleanup | ODIXIE::RREEVES | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:13 | 16 | |
After checking all the protections and eliminating them as a problem
I still cannot get SNMP to answer a request . The log file
UCX$OS_MIBS.LOG contains the error message:
ucx$os_mibs.exe WARNING IFDEV.C;1 line 253: Unexpected error in iosb,
reading interface IFREQ data (QIO).
I've talked to several specialist from the CSC about this error and the
best they can come up with is that this is due to having two IP
addresses assigned to the same LAN card. One address is 128.227.61.101
and the other is 128.27.61.102. I have tried getting SNMP information
from both addresses and receive the same error message.
Other IP services seem to work fine to both addresses Telnet FTP and
SMTP should this inhibit SNMP from working correctly ?
Any thoughts ?
| |||||
| 5144.4 | a wee-bit more info. | CSC32::J_MORTON | O8-OO-2b || ! 2b | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:53 | 42 |
Hi,
I dialed in and had a look at this. We got it working [briefly] by
turning on IP forwarding and then killing the existing esnmp process.
Here's what the interfaces and routing look like:
Interface IP_Addr Network mask Receive Send MTU
WE0 128.227.61.102 255.255.255.0 989309 570562 1500
WEA0 128.227.61.101 255.255.255.0 54230 117094 1500
LO0 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 50 434 65535
DYNAMIC database
Type Destination Gateway
AH 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
AN 0.0.0.0 128.227.61.1
AN 128.227.61.0 128.227.61.101
AN 128.227.61.0 128.227.61.102
We found that if we stop the ucx$esnmp process and send a request
it works once, maybe twice, then the ucx$os_mibs process goes way
with:
$ type UCX$OS_MIBS.LOG;13
ucx$os_mibs.exe WARNING IFDEV.C;1 line 253: Unexpected error in iosb,
reading interface IFREQ data (QIO).
Ray was doing the query of .102 when this occured.
Is this a valid interface configuration?
Ray (onsite) will try this with only one interface and let
us know the results.
Thanks,
Jim
| |||||
| 5144.5 | UTRTSC::KNOPPERS | Oswald Knoppers | Wed Feb 12 1997 02:27 | 6 | |
> Is this a valid interface configuration? Looks fine to me. Oswald | |||||
| 5144.6 | I think this is ok | ODIXIE::RREEVES | Sat Feb 15 1997 14:26 | 2 | |
I think we support to IP addresses on the same physical interface .
Everything else seems to work fine (Telnet,ftp, SMTP) .
| |||||
| 5144.7 | Was there more? | UCXAXP::GRADY | Squash that bug! (tm) | Mon Feb 17 1997 09:46 | 6 |
I suspect there's more error message than that. Specifically, it
should show exactly what the unexpected IOSB error code was....which
might help understanding why it failed...
tim
| |||||