| Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
| Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
| Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
| Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5568 |
| Total number of notes: | 21492 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5072.1 | NETRIX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Wed Jan 01 1997 14:21 | 1 | |
| 5072.2 | PPP with VMS not with UCX | BACHUS::ROELANDTS | Wa d'es ma da ve ne stuut | Thu Jan 02 1997 02:25 | 9 |
| 5072.3 | Alpha only | UTRTSC::KNOPPERS | Oswald Knoppers | Thu Jan 02 1997 02:47 | 22 |
| 5072.4 | DNAS support PPP | UTRTSC::GROOT_R | Ronald de Groot | Thu Jan 02 1997 05:54 | 3 |
| 5072.5 | PPP Support in UCX | ipng.ucx.lkg.dec.com::CARSON | Pete Carson, Networks for OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Jan 02 1997 10:19 | 19 |
| 5072.6 | thanks | TAVENG::ZVI | Thu Jan 02 1997 10:47 | 3 | |
| 5072.7 | Tunneling? | CRLRFR::BLUNT | Tue Feb 25 1997 15:02 | 9 | |
Sort of a reference to .5, does Multinet still provide a tunnel for a
DECnet circuit? We had one setup ast a customer site, but nobody
bothered to check on the areas in use, so naturally we became unpopular
for a while. It worked quite well, from what I recall... If they
still do this, then wouldn't that provide the mechanism to tunnel
DECnet in IP packets over PPP (provided that they do PPP/SLIP).
bob
| |||||
| 5072.8 | Is PPP on UCX/VMS needed or Term server enough? | NYOSS1::ZAMORA | Edgar - DTN 352-2486 | Thu Apr 03 1997 17:56 | 10 |
I understand that some terminal servers support PPP. My question is
does UCX/VMS need to have the PPP support too in order for a customer
to access, through PPP, some application on VMS that uses PPP, let's
say for example a Web server.
TIA.
edgar
| |||||