| Title: | DEC TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS |
| Notice: | Note 2-SSB Kits, 3-FT Kits, 4-Patch Info, 7-QAR System |
| Moderator: | ucxaxp.ucx.lkg.dec.com::TIBBERT |
| Created: | Thu Nov 17 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5568 |
| Total number of notes: | 21492 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1893.1 | Re-Try Failed Send? | HAGELN::MyTH | M. T. Hollinger | Thu Mar 16 1995 13:24 | 12 |
| 1893.2 | I'll try | VARESE::CORGNATI | Fri Mar 17 1995 05:04 | 24 | |
| 1893.3 | Early Warning Is Good | HAGELN::MyTH | M. T. Hollinger | Fri Mar 17 1995 14:00 | 14 |
| 1893.4 | set proto tcp/param=nodestunre or some such | PAMSIC::STEPHENS | Wed Mar 26 1997 09:50 | 11 | |
re .3
>However, that said, we're considering a switch, for a future version of
>UCX, which would cause all ICMP destination unreachable messages to be
>quietly discarded, rather than delivered to the application.
Has this switch been implemented?
Thank you,
Bruce
| |||||
| 1893.5 | set protocol icmp/nounreachable | PAMSIC::STEPHENS | Wed Mar 26 1997 14:07 | 13 | |
re:4
Hello again, Does the switch:
set protocol icmp/nounreachable
provide the quite discard of the ICMP destination unreachable messages
to the application?
Thank you,
Bruce
| |||||
| 1893.6 | PAMSIC::STEPHENS | Tue Apr 01 1997 12:42 | 9 | ||
Hi Bruce,
re: 4, NO, this switch is still on the wish list.
re: 5, NO, the set protocol icmp/nounreac is for sending only
I's OK to talk to yourself,
as long as you don't say 'HuH?' :-)
Bruce
| |||||