[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference orarep::nomahs::dec_data_distributor

Title:The Replication Option for Rdb
Notice:Product renamed to Replication Option for Rdb
Moderator:BROKE::PROTEAU
Created:Wed Mar 02 1994
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:287
Total number of notes:1231

279.0. "DDAL$STOP_TR_MON cluster wide" by itvms1.it.oracle.com::GTACCHIN (Giovanni Tacchini) Tue Apr 15 1997 10:04

hi all,

the  "$RMU/CLOSE/ABORT/WAIT DDAL$TRANSFER_DATABASE" in DDAL$STOP_TR_MON.COM
generate close database cluster wide.

I have a cluster with 2 vax. The first system perform @DDAL$STOP_TR_MON.COM,
the 2nd receive:

15-APR-1997 07:48:30.53 - received cluster-wide CLOSE FORCEX request
  - for database "DSA0:[SYS3.SYSCOMMON.SYSEXE]DDAL$TR_DB.RDB;1"
  - starting forced-exit shutdown of database "DSA0:[SYS3.SYSCOMMON.SYSEXE]DDAL 
    - "%RDMS-F-OPERCLOSE, database operator requested database shutdown"
  - sending image force exit to process 6080022C
  - database shutdown waiting for active users to terminate

after few second the ROR monitor in then 2nd system is OFF. 
Why? 
I suppose that is "expected behaviour" but is "mandatory"?
Why the ROR shutdown on the 2nd node should be invasive on the first node?

ciao
GIovanni
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
279.1Fixed in version 7.0BROKE::PROTEAUJean-Claude ProteauTue Apr 15 1997 12:1711
    
    Giovanni,
    
    The answer, from my point of view, is that it shouldn't.  That is why I
    fixed this in version 7.0 of the Replication Option.  If it were a
    simple correction, we'ld have made the change in version 6.0 as well,
    but ...
    
    Ciao,
    
    Claude
279.2Ok...itvms1.it.oracle.com::GTACCHINGiovanni TacchiniTue Apr 15 1997 12:285
thank, ciao

GIovanni