Title: | The Replication Option for Rdb |
Notice: | Product renamed to Replication Option for Rdb |
Moderator: | BROKE::PROTEAU |
Created: | Wed Mar 02 1994 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 287 |
Total number of notes: | 1231 |
hi all, the "$RMU/CLOSE/ABORT/WAIT DDAL$TRANSFER_DATABASE" in DDAL$STOP_TR_MON.COM generate close database cluster wide. I have a cluster with 2 vax. The first system perform @DDAL$STOP_TR_MON.COM, the 2nd receive: 15-APR-1997 07:48:30.53 - received cluster-wide CLOSE FORCEX request - for database "DSA0:[SYS3.SYSCOMMON.SYSEXE]DDAL$TR_DB.RDB;1" - starting forced-exit shutdown of database "DSA0:[SYS3.SYSCOMMON.SYSEXE]DDAL - "%RDMS-F-OPERCLOSE, database operator requested database shutdown" - sending image force exit to process 6080022C - database shutdown waiting for active users to terminate after few second the ROR monitor in then 2nd system is OFF. Why? I suppose that is "expected behaviour" but is "mandatory"? Why the ROR shutdown on the 2nd node should be invasive on the first node? ciao GIovanni
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
279.1 | Fixed in version 7.0 | BROKE::PROTEAU | Jean-Claude Proteau | Tue Apr 15 1997 12:17 | 11 |
Giovanni, The answer, from my point of view, is that it shouldn't. That is why I fixed this in version 7.0 of the Replication Option. If it were a simple correction, we'ld have made the change in version 6.0 as well, but ... Ciao, Claude | |||||
279.2 | Ok... | itvms1.it.oracle.com::GTACCHIN | Giovanni Tacchini | Tue Apr 15 1997 12:28 | 5 |
thank, ciao GIovanni |