Conference back40::soapbox

    
    and this rates its own note because....
    
    

	Dethpicable.  Jutht dethpicable.

>                      <<< Note 854.1 by BARSTR::JANDROW >>>

>    and this rates its own note because....

	    My guess would be that he thinks he's making
	    a point of some sort.

    
    

    >My guess would be that he thinks he's making
    >a point of some sort.
    
    My guess is you'd be right.

    
    well, i hope he's not relating this to the 63 year old mother. i still
    don't understand its own topic either. Perhaps, -mr. bill will be kind
    enough to explain.

    
    mr bill is attempting to swing the pangolin the other way.
    

   it's so fiendishly clever, isn't it?  frothingly, bubblingly clever.

    8)

    Mr. Bill,
    
    You should have set this with a 9-year-old (current youngest to bear a
    full-term child that I know of)  In any case yeeeeesh!  

    
    	Well, the shoe's on the other hand now ... isn't it, Meg?
    
    	Imagine how many years she'll be able to spend with her child ...
    	she'll only be 80 when the kid is 71!!
    

    Doubtful Shawn,
    
    Early menarche and childbirths are related to ovarian, breast and
    uterine cancers.  Ovarian and aggressive breast cancers tend not to
    respond well to therapies that we have available today.  
    
    meg

    At least the odds are with the mother that she'll live to see 
    her child become an adult.
    
    That and she won't be able to collect social security until after the 
    mother begins working;-)
    
    Find the Father, and make him pay for 20 year...and proscute him
    to the full extent of the law...
    
    JMHO
    
    John Wisniewski

>   it's so fiendishly clever, isn't it?  frothingly, bubblingly clever.
    
    He's a regular legend in his own mind.

    
      I'm not sure I can do this - Di says I can't encrypt good.
    
      So, what IS the record for youngest human mother ?
    
      bb

    
    billbob, see .9  hth, nnttm

    I believe the youngest mother in question was in Chile or some other
    South American country.  Thankfully our natiaonal morals are still
    intact. 

    >Thankfully our natiaonal morals are still intact. 
    
     Where's the "damning with faint praise" note?

    Oh that "mother?"  I think she was 6, and had a pituary tumor that
    caused precocious menarche.  Her brother was the "father" of the child.  
    
    No youngest, I know of in the US is 9, which is plenty young enough to
    make me yak.  How could someone even be interested in a body that size,
    let alone be willing to risk killing her with the strains of pregnancy
    as well as a growing body?  
    
    Children under the age of 15 have a VERY high level of C-sections, as
    they don't have the pelvic capacity for full term vaginal deliveries.  
    
    meg

    
    
    	pelvic capacity....agagagagagag...:)
    
    

    Really funny, until you realize that either the babies head gets
    crushed or the mother and baby are inseperable through to death without
    surgical intervention.

    
    	"Pelvic capacity" is definitely a kindler, gentler way of saying
    	what she could have said.
    

    Any of you einsteins about pelvises and childbirth want to explain how
    to get a 7 pound baby through a bony aperture that will handle a 4
    pounder at best?
    
    I am not talking about the vaginal orrifice, it has lots of capacity to
    stretch.
    
    meg

Yep.  Man-size, it is.

    
    	Speak for yourself, Tiny.
    

    She'll be straining for a bastard.

    .23  Hey!!

    
    
    	relax, Meg. Didn't mean to step on yer toes. Just tryin' to lighten
    the mood a bit. I won't do that again...:)
    
    

    Jim, you basically did nothing wrong.

    Jim,
    
    My problem is that I have no sense of humor when it comes to children
    being put at risk by adults, and less of one when people make light of
    it.  Face it, a sexually matyure 9-year-old is still a child by any
    definition.  Procreation is the last thing they should be doing at that
    age.  
    
    meg

FWIW, my friend the high-risk OB once helped an 11-year-old deliver a baby.

    
    sexually mature and 9 year-old do not belong in the same sentence.

    No shift Sherlock.  
    
    However some kids that age are now pubescent.
    
    Top of the food chain can be a dangerous place with some chemicals that
    are dumped into te web now
    
    meg

    
    	my eyes read .30 as
    
    FWIW, my friend the high-risk OB once helped deliver an 11-year-old baby.   

I was going to say let the OB deliver the baby and get the 11 year old
out of the way, but I didn't. (well now I did) I mean the mother should
have a professional, not a child help her.

  .34  yah, that's what i was gonna say too. 

    >FWIW, my friend the high-risk OB once helped deliver an 11-year-old baby.   
    
     That's astounding. How did the mother manage to carry it around all
    those years? Did it reach puberty before it could talk or what?