| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 670.1 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Mar 04 1996 10:33 | 3 |
| > Australian politics is turned upside down.
So they're in sync with us northern hemisphere types?
|
| 670.2 | | GENRAL::RALSTON | Fugitive from the law of averages | Mon Mar 04 1996 18:58 | 1 |
| So, did it immediately become winter?? :)
|
| 670.3 | | BSS::SMITH_S | the rude dude | Mon Mar 04 1996 19:07 | 1 |
| Why can't we all live in happy anarchy?
|
| 670.4 | | BSS::PROCTOR_R | A wallet full of ones | Mon Mar 04 1996 19:09 | 3 |
| > Why can't we all live in happy anarchy?
Go look at the battle raging in 21.* for some possible reasons....
|
| 670.5 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Don't like my p_n? 1-800-328-7448 | Mon Mar 04 1996 19:10 | 3 |
|
Sounds like a SOAPBOX party after a few rounds at the bar.
|
| 670.6 | hic! | BSS::PROCTOR_R | A wallet full of ones | Mon Mar 04 1996 19:18 | 3 |
| > Sounds like a SOAPBOX party after a few rounds at the bar.
|
| 670.7 | | GIDDAY::BURT | DPD (tm) | Mon Mar 04 1996 21:09 | 5 |
| I've not yet heard how the "Natural Law Party" polled. They're a group who
promote "yogic flying".
\C
|
| 670.8 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Walloping Web Snappers! | Mon Mar 04 1996 22:42 | 5 |
| Boy, Australia sounds a lot like Canada. We have the natural law party
complete with yogic flyers.
I would imagine the Australian conservatives are like Canadian ones,
left of American Democrats.
|
| 670.9 | | GIDDAY::BURT | DPD (tm) | Mon Mar 04 1996 23:30 | 3 |
| The _best_ sounding party I heard of was a few years ago for an election in
Canberra. The voters were presented with a group called (something like)
"the sun ripened warm tomato party".
|
| 670.10 | | EVMS::MORONEY | In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded... | Tue Mar 05 1996 10:54 | 1 |
| We have the Natural Law Party in the US as well.
|
| 670.11 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Walloping Web Snappers! | Tue Mar 05 1996 10:55 | 1 |
| But are they as liberal as ours?
|
| 670.12 | | EVMS::MORONEY | In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded... | Tue Mar 05 1996 11:14 | 2 |
| I don't think they rate on the conservative-liberal scale. They seem to be
just plain whacko.
|
| 670.13 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Walloping Web Snappers! | Tue Mar 05 1996 11:21 | 3 |
| Seem? SEEM?
8^)
|
| 670.14 | | 33797::HALLR | God loves even you! | Tue Mar 05 1996 11:54 | 1 |
| wouldn't that be WACO?
|
| 670.15 | and I include "both sides" in the definition | EVMS::MORONEY | In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded... | Tue Mar 05 1996 12:53 | 5 |
| re .14:
Waco was different whackos.
|
| 670.16 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Owl-Stretching Time! | Tue Mar 05 1996 14:15 | 4 |
| There're some of those Natural Law types over here, too. They're a bunch of
nutters.
Chris.
|
| 670.17 | ye olde naturally verry silly party of owl stretchers | CSSREG::BROWN | Common Sense Isn't | Wed Mar 06 1996 08:31 | 2 |
| but does Oz have would-be politicos with names like Jello Biafra,
Nun of the Above and Prophet Atlantis...
|
| 670.18 | | CHEFS::COOKS | Half Man,Half Biscuit | Wed Mar 06 1996 11:48 | 5 |
| Is Jello Biafra a politician then??
I quite liked his pop group the "Dead Kennedys",and still wear the
t-shirt "In God We Trust,Inc". Admitedly only round the house,though.
|
| 670.19 | | TROOA::BUTKOVICH | running on empty | Tue Mar 12 1996 17:44 | 2 |
| Paul Keating will be missed - he was a sex god (according to reliable
sources)
|
| 670.20 | | BSS::PROCTOR_R | Wallet full of eelskins | Tue Mar 12 1996 17:46 | 6 |
| > Paul Keating will be missed - he was a sex god (according to reliable
> sources).
taught him everything he knew about being a sex god.
{quiet, modest cough}
|
| 670.21 | | BSS::SMITH_S | the rude dude | Tue Mar 12 1996 17:55 | 3 |
| Personally, I'm registered as a Libertarian. It just seems so perfect
and idealistic. Are their parties similar abroad?
|
| 670.22 | *8) | BSS::PROCTOR_R | Wallet full of eelskins | Tue Mar 12 1996 21:14 | 20 |
| > <<< Note 670.21 by BSS::SMITH_S "the rude dude" >>>
> Personally, I'm registered as a Libertarian. It just seems so
> perfect and idealistic. Are their parties similar abroad?
==========================================================================
and just WHAT does that have to do with being a sex god?
lissen, we're off the subject of politics, and onto the good stuff.
STAY ON THE RATHOLED SUBJECT!!
sheesh.
you people are SO easily sidetracked...
Now: back to the sex god training:
5pm @ Slick's Bar.. bring dollar bills and low expectations.
|
| 670.23 | | GIDDAY::BURT | DPD (tm) | Tue Mar 12 1996 22:22 | 8 |
| Paul Keating? Sex god? Only if you're seriously into necrophilia. Euuughhhh!
Blecch. Erk. The guy looks like an undertaker (or one of the clients) who is
in need of a really good wash. One of the oily types. The cartoonists loved
him though - and he was a good clothes horse (nice suits etc).
Euuw. I still feel all icky at the thought.
\C
|
| 670.24 | | SCASS1::EDITEX::MOORE | GetOuttaMyChair | Wed Mar 13 1996 01:14 | 5 |
|
Considering the topic headers, I think strings 670 and 671 are so
related as to be combined.
;^)
|