T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
345.1 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Specialists in Horizontal Decorum | Fri Mar 17 1995 13:48 | 81 |
| Some digital format comments:
DAT: sampling rate: 32, 44.1 and 48kHz. Not all units support
all sample rates.
tape format: 4 mm, cassette
run time: up to 2 hours
copy prot: required on "consumer decks", easily defeated
or not installed on "professional decks"; one
digital copy allowed, but a bit is set in the
data stream disabling multiple generations
(digital copies of copies). Uses a mechanism
called "Serial Copy Management System" (SCMS),
which was endorsed by the RIAA after their
mechanism was rejected (which involved making
a "hole" in the frequency response that would
get progressively worse in each generation.)
compression: None
main
manufacturer: Sony for consumer apps; the Panasonic DA3700 is
the most popular deck currently in use in
recording studios and professional apps.
DCC: sampling rate: fixed 44.1
tape format: standard cassette, modified to utilize high-
density metal-particle tape; with appropriate
"knock-outs" added to the case to indicate
format type.
run time: 90 minutes
copy prot: none
compression: Lossy. See description of algorithm below.
main
manufacturer: Philips; most common consumer product is
by Marantz. Format has largely been a bust,
even though suitably equipped recorders
can also play standard audio cassettes.
MD: sampling rate: fixed 44.1
run time: 60 minutes
copy prot: none
compression: Lossy.
main
manufacturer: Sony; Minidisk player recorder available
in "Walkman" sized unit. Has not made a
big splash in the consumer market, and has
no presence in professional applications.
Lossy compression (used by both MD and DCC) analyses the
frequency content of the signal. This produces a two
dimensional array of frequency and amplitude. Below a
certain amplitude threshold, the frequency information
is considered insignificant. This information is discarded
from the table. Using Huffman encoding, the table is
then further reduced. The player reproduces the input
signal by decoding and expanding the table.
A panel of "Golden Ears" was assembled by Studio Sound
magazine (a professional audio engineering magazine
published in the UK). The panel concluded that MD and
DCC were inadequate for all professional applications.
The consumer response has not been much better.
However, the same compression techniques are being applied
to the MPEG and MPEG II standards and many movie titles
with digital soundtracks (with lossy compression) are
likely to be available on the CD-ROM format in the near
future.
-b
|
345.2 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Specialists in Horizontal Decorum | Fri Mar 17 1995 13:57 | 12 |
| Oops... forgot some information in -1. If there's an advantage
to MD, it's that the media is "random access" (like a CD).
No waiting for tape for forward or rewind to access points.
The media format of MD is similar to a 3.5" floppy, but
slightly thicker.
Also, one of the advantages of DCC is that there's a lot
of "user bits" on the media, which can be used to do some
very nice indexing... like putting the title of the track
in each track, etc.
-b
|
345.3 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | bouncy bouncy | Fri Mar 17 1995 14:56 | 2 |
| So, the copy guard stuff lets you copy things once? After that you
can't?
|
345.4 | | SMURF::BINDER | vitam gustare | Fri Mar 17 1995 15:05 | 4 |
| Re .3
Correct. Units containing the copy-protection circuitry will refuse to
copy a tape that has the "I'm a copy" bit set.
|
345.5 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | bouncy bouncy | Fri Mar 17 1995 15:20 | 1 |
| What if you are recording something from a CD?
|
345.6 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Specialists in Horizontal Decorum | Fri Mar 17 1995 15:33 | 22 |
| SCMS applies _only_ to digital copies. Some consumer DAT products won't
allow you to make digital copies at all... of course you're always
welcome to make as many "analog" copies as you want.
On the consumer decks that do support digital copying, but also
have SCMS, the input from the CD player would have the SCMS
bit clear, so you can make a copy of the CD. However, the
DAT deck will write the SCMS bit as it stores the data to tape,
disallowing you from making a 2nd generation digital copy of
the tape. First generation copies are always OK.
On "professional" DAT decks, the SCMS bit is neither checked
or generated.
On my "semi-pro" DAT deck (a Tascam DA30), there is a jumper
on the circuit board which you cut to disable SCMS... and
Tascam frequently includes the instructions for doing this
operation in their newsletter... but because anyone can walk
in off the street and buy a DA30, they have to leave the SCMS
intact by default.
-b
|
345.7 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Specialists in Horizontal Decorum | Fri Mar 17 1995 17:17 | 17 |
| Just another random comment about tape formats:
DAT, like VCRs, use helical scan, i.e. moving heads. This
allows for greater data capacity without compression, but
with some reduction in mechanical reliability.
DCC, on the other hand, uses the standard "fixed head" in
a cassette, although there are more "tracks" and the tape
only moves in one direction.
BTW - I would like to correct an earlier statement; since
the tape can only move in one direction, I believe the
longest DCC run time is 45 minutes (unless they allow
use of 120 minute tapes which are discouraged in regular
cassette mechanisms).
-b
|
345.8 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Fri Mar 17 1995 18:37 | 12 |
| > DAT, like VCRs, use helical scan, i.e. moving heads. This
> allows for greater data capacity without compression, but
> with some reduction in mechanical reliability.
Would it be possible to briefly describe how this works without
getting too technical? I.E. how does "helical scan, i.e. moving heads"
allow for greater data capacity on a linear tape? Is it like the
data is in a short frequency sine wave with lots of skinny blips
on the tape? (I don't know how well I described what I was thinking
of but it is a serious question.)
|
345.9 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Specialists in Horizontal Decorum | Fri Mar 17 1995 19:50 | 7 |
| Jack,
The head is a cylinder that rotates at approximately 45 degrees
to the tape path, at fairly high speed. Think of a cross-section
of tape; the head "spins" over this area, writing side-ways.
-b
|
345.10 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Fri Mar 17 1995 20:18 | 13 |
| Does that mean that the data path looks like -
----------------------------------------------------
\ \-\
\ \ \ etc. in a "serpentine" fashion so that at any
\_\ \_ linear point along the tape, "N"
-----------------------------------------------------
^
N
there can be more than one bit of data?
|
345.11 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | bouncy bouncy | Fri Mar 17 1995 22:17 | 6 |
| Yes, Jack that's it.
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
|
345.12 | | LJSRV2::KALIKOW | TechnoCatalyst | Sat Mar 18 1995 18:09 | 7 |
| Another big advantage of that format is that the speed relative to the
tape of the record/playback head(s) is far higher because of the
resultant speed of tape transport vector-added to helically-scanned
head(s). This allows for far higher frequencies to be recorded by a
given head gap. I learned most of what I know about tape-recording
technologies during the Watergate Tape analysis...
|
345.13 | | SMURF::BINDER | vitam gustare | Mon Mar 20 1995 11:07 | 14 |
| .10, .11
Not quite serpentine fashion, Jack. Your piccie shows the track going
downward, then along, then back upward. It doesn't do that - all scans
are downward. The gap scans once across the tape, then spins across an
empty time when it's being whirled arount to line it up for the next
pass. The angle of scan is a lot shallower than 45 degrees - it's more
like aobut 15 degrees. The mechanism pulls a loop of tape out of the
cassette and inserts the head assembly into that loop; the oxide is
therefore on the inside of the tape, not on the outside as it is with
ortdinary cassettes. With the loop, there's a very short time when the
gap is not in contact with the tape.
-dick
|
345.14 | | CSOA1::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Fri Jul 14 1995 10:49 | 1 |
| DVD is coming soon! (I hope)
|
345.15 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:03 | 5 |
| just picked up a new one for the new kitchen...had to shell out few
extra bucks at the "Country Furniture Store for a stand the wif wanted
to go with the new kitchen...BTW, this prolly belongs in the tth, but
since we got our new kitchen, the wif has been cookin up a storm and i
prolly put on 5 lbs in the past month...can't keep up w/the leftovers
|
345.16 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Hindskits Velvet | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:04 | 1 |
| A new one what?
|
345.17 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:05 | 1 |
| a new piece of home entertainment hardware...whcha thunk
|
345.18 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Hindskits Velvet | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:07 | 3 |
| Oh, well, I don't want to hear about your sex life.
|
345.19 | | POWDML::HANGGELI | Little Chamber of The Counter King | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:07 | 8 |
|
Oh, home entertainment hardware. I've seen those at Spencer's Gifts
and in the back of {cough} magazines.
And you got one for your wife? Hmm.
Brave of you to share that with us, Ronnie.
|
345.20 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:08 | 2 |
| looky, hindskits, I was talking about new telly, not whachubeen
receiving in the brown unmarked wrappings :-0
|
345.21 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:09 | 2 |
| now Miss Deb is jumpin' in on top of me...I was talkin 'bout a lousy
telly
|
345.22 | | POWDML::HANGGELI | Little Chamber of The Counter King | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:09 | 4 |
|
I never 8^o!
|
345.23 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:09 | 2 |
| besides, what kind of stand can u get at the country furniture store
for the stuff u guys r talkin' about
|
345.24 | | POWDML::HANGGELI | Little Chamber of The Counter King | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:10 | 4 |
|
A hands-free facial massager! What a concept.
|
345.25 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:11 | 1 |
| i dare to ask...what sizes do they come in?
|
345.26 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Hindskits Velvet | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:11 | 1 |
| Hands free for what?
|
345.27 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:13 | 1 |
| I dunno, Skits, but I like the entertainment part...
|
345.28 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:25 | 2 |
| It gets so bawdy in here during the evening ....
|
345.29 | | USAT05::HALLR | God loves even you! | Wed Feb 28 1996 22:25 | 1 |
| Thanks for joing this strange pahrty, Jack
|
345.30 | | ACISS2::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Wed Mar 27 1996 08:51 | 19 |
| Just read about a new subwoofer being put out by Sunfire (ala Mr.
Carver). Supposed to be "flat to below 18Hz" and can "reproduce any
frequency between 18Hz and 120Hz at 110dB SPL in a typical listening
room". According to the reporter who listened to it as CES: "He's not
kidding. The killer bass track we auditioned left us looking for
a hiden monster module - which didn't exist."
It's called the True Subwoofer. It is only an 11" cube, which used 2-
7- inch drivers in a push-pull configuration. It is powered with a
servo-controlled 2700 (!...possibly a typo??) watt amplifier. It has a
36dB- per octave low pass that can be set anywhere from 40 to 120Hz.
Price? $1,095. I may have just found the perfect subwoofer for my
system, should it sound half as good as it specs out. Now, all I need
is a house to put it in. 8^)
[This topic has been dormant for a while, so I thought I'd enter
something...this is one of my favorite subjects, after all. 8^)]
|
345.31 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Mar 27 1996 08:54 | 7 |
| > Now, all I need is a house to put it in. 8^)
And, if that wasn't a typo, I hope the house is next to your very own
hydroelectric plant.
Now, can you help Mz_Debra with her speaker problem?
|
345.32 | | POWDML::HANGGELI | Little Chamber of Full Body Frisks | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:00 | 4 |
|
Yeah 8^(!
|
345.33 | | ACISS2::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:26 | 1 |
| Okay Mz_Debra...the stereo doctor is in. Please give me the details...
|
345.34 | | SOLVIT::KRAWIECKI | tumble to remove burrs | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:28 | 4 |
|
I wonder of stereo-geeks wear socks with their sandals..?
|
345.35 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Keep hands & feet inside ride at all times | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:31 | 1 |
| Say again?
|
345.36 | | SOLVIT::KRAWIECKI | tumble to remove burrs | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:34 | 4 |
|
I wonder of stereo-geeks wear socks with their sandals..?
|
345.37 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Alrighty, bye bye then. | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:41 | 2 |
| stereo geeks always wear jeans, a t-shirt (faded) and jogging shoes,
although they never jog.
|
345.38 | | ACISS2::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:46 | 11 |
| .34
Not this one. I am a stereo geek AND a master of fashion.
.37
I also jog/run.
8^)
|
345.39 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Alrighty, bye bye then. | Wed Mar 27 1996 09:55 | 3 |
| There are always anomalies. But Steve, you know what I'm talking about.
Besides, if you were a real stereo geek, you wouldn't be working for
Digital.
|
345.40 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | The Recall of the Wild | Wed Mar 27 1996 10:09 | 9 |
|
Sounds like a nice sub, Steve.
Push-pull ... that's a face-to-face Isobarik set-up, right?
I had built a pair of mid/low-bass push-push Isobarik boxes for
my GTI [for about $160 total, using RS 8" poly drivers] but they
were stolen out of the car. I was not happy.
|
345.41 | | ACISS2::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Wed Mar 27 1996 10:56 | 19 |
| .40
I can relate to the car gear getting ripped off...yes, I can.
That's why I now drive a junker (with no stereo) and am working on my
HOME theater/stereo setup.
Getting ripped off twice is enough for me...
re: push-pull set up
Actually, it isn't a face-to-face isobarik set-up. The picture shows
the speaker cone facing outward. It is likely a set-up with one woofer
mounted on both the front and back, facing outward, wired out of
phase. This is not the only possibility, but given the size of the
cabinet, it makes the most sense.
-steve
|
345.42 | :-) | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Wed Mar 27 1996 11:24 | 6 |
| Steve,
I fully expect you to be called on the carpet in WM about this
extravagant purchase next time you reply to the welfare note...
daryll
|
345.43 | | ACISS2::LEECH | Dia do bheatha. | Wed Mar 27 1996 12:56 | 1 |
| 8^)
|