T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
205.1 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | prepayah to suffah | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:47 | 1 |
| Texas, teaching high skule fizziks.
|
205.2 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | brain cramp | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:54 | 6 |
|
is it legal for a non-digital person to be peeking at digital stuff
like this???
|
205.3 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | aspiring peasant | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:55 | 1 |
| No
|
205.4 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | G��� �t�R �r�z� | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:56 | 1 |
| AS long as it's not restricted or has a warning, no.
|
205.5 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | Barney IS NOT a nerd!! | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:57 | 1 |
| Yes Raq! Like this conference is highly proprietary!!!! Hohoho
|
205.6 | Kall the Kops ! | GAAS::BRAUCHER | | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:18 | 5 |
|
Mods, mods - Red Alert ! - Intruders. Must sterilize. We're
insecure...
bb
|
205.7 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | brain cramp | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:22 | 11 |
|
funny, jack...i was serious. i realize that this is not a very
sensitive notesfile (just noters), but it is digital's notesfile, and
if we as employees can't express our feelings about other company's or
products without violating some p&p, i didn't think it'd be ok for
non-digital employees (not counting the contractor, because they have
been 'okayed', so to speak) to log on via someone one else's account...
|
205.8 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | Barney IS NOT a nerd!! | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:47 | 9 |
| I realize that and am just teasing. You'll notice for example that an
obscure noter will come in once in awhile...somebody unfamiliar who
will usually have a fettish about wearing women's undies...
9 out of 10 times it's a security person temping. They have access to
all of it. If the company allows this, then then must not be too
worried about it!
-Jack
|
205.9 | | HAAG::HAAG | Rode hard. Put up wet. | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:37 | 12 |
| as i was told by darch some years ago.
if you're not a current employee or on contract work you are NOT
allowed access to most DEC computing resources. this was discussed at
length when some guy let his wife type some replies a few years ago.
something like...
hi, i'm janie, so and so's wife.....blah blah blah..
can't do that and it shouldn't be allowed here. it'll only draw the
attention of the network gestapo.
|
205.10 | | CSOA1::LEECH | annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum | Tue Dec 20 1994 17:24 | 3 |
| >network gestapo
...and they are out there...watching...waiting...ready to....
|
205.11 | Contractors need not give a rat's ass about DEC. | SCAPAS::GUINEO::MOORE | I'll have the rat-on-a-stick | Wed Dec 21 1994 01:28 | 10 |
| I suppose I'll have to get off, then. Having cut my teeth on VMS 1.0
and having spent almost 20 years working on DEC machines, and finally
walking in the door here, I had better leave, because I'm a contractor
for DEC. I must therefore not give a hoot about my department's
revenues, or my fellow DEC employees. I'm just here to steal your
secrets (and also, to unload upon your simpering little soul).
Pardon me, get a life.
|
205.12 | | HBFDT2::SCHARNBERG | Senior Kodierwurst | Wed Dec 21 1994 04:49 | 21 |
|
To get this clear then,
this topic (and this entire conference for that matter) is
*NOT*
open for visitors to sign in.
*BUT*
Digital employees or contractors who have the pleasure of being visited
by a former boxer are encouraged to post greetings in here on
behalf of said former boxer. And to ease things up a little, it is
*not required*
for these people being visited to sign their notes. They may even
write in direct speech what the visiting ex-boxer dictates to them,
granted Digital Noting rules are not violated (see P&P 6.54 or
something).
Heiko
|
205.13 | Huh? | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Wed Dec 21 1994 08:17 | 6 |
| re: .11
Barry, what's got your gizzards in an uproar? I just re-read the string and
don't see where anyone said that contractors weren't welcome in NOTES.
Bob
|
205.14 | | HAAG::HAAG | Rode hard. Put up wet. | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:27 | 9 |
|
>Barry, what's got your gizzards in an uproar? I just re-read the string and
>don't see where anyone said that contractors weren't welcome in NOTES.
me neither. all i saw was statements, some mine, that people who were
neither employees or contractors are forbidden by dec policy from
accessing some dec resources. notes and the network are including in
those resources.
|
205.15 | | SIERAS::DAY | | Wed Dec 21 1994 14:38 | 8 |
| "Green eyed lady" getting grouchy in your old age.
"TOO SLOW" - I see you good to see you again.
"HAAG" - I Still didn't find out ...Where's BUBBA?
I would apologize for starting this dispute...but, I remember how this
conference goes...
Bye all,
Beauregard
|
205.16 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | brain cramp | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:26 | 17 |
|
>>"Green eyed lady" getting grouchy in your old age.
not at all...first of all, i am not old. second, i wasn't complaining.
i was simply asking a question. if we can't say the 'f' word, how come
people not currently working for digital in some capacity can jump in
and note.
you seem to be the grouchy one...
>>>Bye all,
don't let the door hit you on the way out... :>
|
205.17 | | POWDML::LAUER | Had, and then was | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:32 | 5 |
|
Hey, wait a minute. What in the world does not saying the f word have
to do with noting in a conference?
Non sequitur alert! Non sequitur alert!
|
205.18 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | too few args | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:34 | 6 |
|
>> Hey, wait a minute. What in the world does not saying the f word have
>> to do with noting in a conference?
they're both related to policy, presumably
|
205.19 | 8^) | POWDML::LAUER | Had, and then was | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:35 | 2 |
|
Weak! Weak!
|
205.20 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | too few args | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:37 | 3 |
|
you sound like the little vole that lives in our kitchen
|
205.21 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | G��� �t�R �r�z� | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:39 | 1 |
| You need a Great Horned Owl, Di.
|
205.22 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | brain cramp | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:40 | 9 |
|
yes, lady di has it correct...policy is policy...and if i am going to
get my knuckles rapped for typing a r/o, then you-know-who shouldn't be
noting...
to quote billyjean...'fair is fair'...
|
205.23 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | too few args | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:42 | 4 |
|
where were you two weeks ago, when everybody was asking
me what i needed?
|
205.24 | | POWDML::LAUER | Had, and then was | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:43 | 2 |
| And who, pray tell, is billyjean, other than not Michael Jackson's
lover?
|
205.25 | Helen Slater, in "The Saga of Billy Jean"... | LJSRV2::KALIKOW | SERVE<a href="SURF_GLOBAL">LOCAL</a> | Wed Dec 21 1994 22:29 | 5 |
| 'Scuse me, I'se off to the "Most Boinkable" note... after I takes me a
nice cooooold showahhhh...
|-{:-)
|
205.26 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | brain cramp | Thu Dec 22 1994 07:53 | 13 |
|
actually, she was in the movie "the legend of billy jean"...pat
benetar's song "invincible" was basically the "theme", for a lack of a
better word...(i am so glad you knew that, drdan.... :>)
and lady di, i have been here right along, and i still don't know what
you need...
-raq
|
205.27 | | RDGE44::ALEUC8 | | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:07 | 3 |
| arrghhh !!!! i'm off to the "most boinkable" topic aswell ......
ric
|
205.28 | Fragged. | SCAPAS::GUINEO::MOORE | I'll have the rat-on-a-stick | Fri Dec 23 1994 01:28 | 6 |
| .13, .14
It's end of quarter and I probably misread something. Just fragged out
as usual. No offense.
|
205.29 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:18 | 19 |
|
Hi, Folx!
This is NOT Laura Piggot, nor is it Joan, Tom or Phil!
So, when are you 'muricans finally gonna ban guns, anyway??? ;^)
I'll be in and out, quite in violation, for the next hour or so.
Shhhhh! Don't tell anyone!
What's all this I hear about sex in the classroom? I'm opposed to that
sort of thing!
A little later...
!joan
|
205.30 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Don't like my p_n? 1-800-328-7448 | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:22 | 4 |
|
Joan, you're only opposed to sex in the classroom if you're not
invited. 8^)
|
205.31 | que pasa? | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:28 | 3 |
|
8-> tell us _everything_!
|
205.32 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | pack light, keep low, move fast, reload often | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:30 | 1 |
| Intruder Alert! Intruder Alert! Canadioid detected!
|
205.33 | :^) | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:32 | 2 |
| Why, !Laura ! So nice to hear from you!
|
205.34 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:32 | 10 |
|
The movie industry wants me, Nestle does not. I'm planning on handing
out a few resumes this afternoon; hopefully, there'll be a few more
bites before I have to break down and take the movie job.
I wore a suit today. Clever disguise, eh? ;^) Didn't fool Nestle,
though. :^(
!joan
|
205.35 | | BIGQ::SILVA | Benevolent 'pedagogues' of humanity | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:32 | 3 |
|
Hi !Joan.... sniff..... I miss ya.... sniff... :'-(
|
205.36 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Don't like my p_n? 1-800-328-7448 | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:32 | 7 |
|
I didn't know this note existed, so I went back and read the ent-
ire string of replies. Raq was sure trying to be a pain in the
butt about non-employees reading NOTES.
8^)
|
205.37 | | SOLVIT::KRAWIECKI | Too many politicians, not enough warriors. | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:33 | 9 |
|
I'm sure the moderators have already been in contact with the offending
party and further violations of Digital's Policy will immediately
cease...
I feel better knowing they did... yes I am...
|
205.38 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | mz morality sez... | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:33 | 1 |
| !joan! what's cookin' !?
|
205.39 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:35 | 8 |
|
Ohhhh yeah...the mods came down on me like a boot
stomping on a human face...FOREVER!
;^)
Someone should fire me.
|
205.40 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | memory canyon | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:39 | 2 |
| Actually, someone should give Laura a spanking. As a mod, I will
volunteer. Spare the rod, spoil the .. well, whatever. ;-)
|
205.41 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:40 | 6 |
|
> The movie industry wants me, Nestle does not.
i thought you had a certain star quality about you.
and Nestle has enough sweet things already. ;>
|
205.42 | needs a bit of counterbalancing acidity | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | memory canyon | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:41 | 1 |
| a bit cloying, particularly on the finish
|
205.43 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:41 | 5 |
|
.41
<SWOON!>
|
205.44 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | memory canyon | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:42 | 1 |
| tramp
|
205.45 | | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:43 | 1 |
| <- !Joan's doing Chaplin?
|
205.46 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:44 | 4 |
|
Laura has been bound with duct tape, and so is blameless in this
transgression, though she is now easily spanked!
|
205.47 | | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:44 | 5 |
|
>> -< needs a bit of counterbalancing acidity >-
a good task for you then, mr. lemony-mid-mouth ooh er.
|
205.48 | <== .46 ==< | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | memory canyon | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:45 | 2 |
| In that case, no need to wait for me to arrive. Give her the what for,
and report back.
|
205.49 | | SCASS1::BARBER_A | got milk? | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:45 | 1 |
| Mark, you're quite a name-caller.
|
205.50 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:46 | 5 |
|
>a good task for you then, mr. lemony-mid-mouth ooh er.
HAR! :^)
|
205.51 | | TROOA::PIGGOT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 11:59 | 8 |
|
Okay, well...goodbye, again! Talk to you all as soon as I get
an e-mail address.
;'^}
!joan
|
205.52 | | GRANPA::MWANNEMACHER | be nice, be happy | Wed Jan 24 1996 12:30 | 4 |
|
Cheers, Joan.
|
205.53 | | GAVEL::JANDROW | Partly To Mostly Blonde | Wed Jan 24 1996 13:34 | 6 |
|
<insert deb's raspberry here> on you shawn. with all due respect to
!joan and "keith", my question way back then was a valid one.
|
205.54 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Don't like my p_n? 1-800-328-7448 | Wed Jan 24 1996 14:12 | 6 |
|
I didn't say you were wrong, I just said you were being a pain
in the butt.
8^)
|
205.55 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Captain Dunsel | Wed Jan 24 1996 14:16 | 15 |
|
Hmmm, what's all this then?
/
/
(=)
|
|
|
|
|
|
205.56 | | SMURF::BINDER | Eis qui nos doment vescimur. | Wed Jan 24 1996 14:54 | 1 |
| Looks like a really long-handled labrys.
|