T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1077.1 | What is the error code? | BROKE::ABUGOV | | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:21 | 13 |
|
Hi Claudia,
It is supported to have V2 on the client side. A quick thing to look at
would be AUTHORIZE parameters and SYSGEN parameters to make sure the
ACMS process has more then the interactive process that works. There
are significant additional resources required by ACMS that wouldn't
show up in the interactive environment. What error message are you
seeing?
Thanks,
Dan
|
1077.2 | SQLCODE -1 | ORAREP::VAXRIO::63198::CSANTOS | Claudia Nogueira - CSC/Brazil | Wed Jul 10 1996 08:53 | 9 |
|
It just returns SQLCODE -1... We will try increasing quotas...
Thanks
Claudia
|
1077.3 | some more information | ORAREP::VAXRIO::63198::CSANTOS | Claudia Nogueira - CSC/Brazil | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:13 | 11 |
|
Some more information... They have the ACMS servers
defined with DCL AVAIABLE clause (they used to have this problem
when using the VAX, that clause did solve the problem). Now
that they are using a AXP and new version, should it still be
used, would there be any compatibility problem??
Thanks once more
Claudia
|
1077.4 | No ACMS expertise here... | BROKE::ABUGOV | | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:25 | 12 |
|
Hi Claudia,
I'm sorry, my lack of ACMS expertise is a real hinderance in answering
these questions. Could it be that there are logical names or some such
that need to be seen by the ACMS server process? I'm not sure what DCL
AVAILABLE gets you, but if they had a similar problem without it on VAX
then I would think it would be required for AXP.
Sorry I'm not more help,
Dan
|
1077.5 | DCL_Available is required on alpha also | BROKE::ALAWLER | | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:24 | 23 |
|
DCL_Available simply maps DCL into the ACMS 'server procedure'
process context. It was added in acms V3.3(?) to allow calls to
Vida For DB2 from within ACMS server procedures.
Your question isn't clear, but I'm assuming you just rebuilt
the Task Group on alpha with no changes, in which case,
DCL should already be present there as well. (IF not, then
this would indeed cause the error.)
Do you see any specific errors in ACMSATR or ACMSSWL?
To the best of my knowledge, DCL_AVAILABLE worked correctly
on ACMS V4.0 on alpha without any tuning changes, but you might
want to check the release notes (or check with somebody in ACMS
land to be sure.)
-al
|