T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
654.1 | ok, fire away!! I'm ready!! | VIDEO::MORRISSEY | Naughty girls need love too | Thu Sep 07 1989 10:41 | 48 |
|
Do I dare?
Well here goes.....
Of course I thought the performance by Jon and Richie was great.
I'm glad to see that Richie is coming more into the spotlight.
I think and hope that on the next album he will sing lead on
a song or two.
I don't think that Living Colour is that great that they deserved
as many awards as they got.
I don't like The Cult, The Cure or the Stones so I switched the
station when they were on...(go ahead.... :-) )
I was glad to see Paula Abdul got a lot of awards and beat out
Bobby Brown.... I can't stand him!
I loved seeing George Michael (ok, now knock off the laughing!!)
Madonna was good, but her "grabbing" herself and her two sidekicks
were a bit much.
Cher has a lot of guts....after her vid being banned after certain
hours I would have thought she would have worn something else.
And Andrew Dice Clay!! He should just kiss his career goodbye!
I couldn't believe he did that!! I heard on the news this morning
that MTV was not happy with him. He told them he would clean up
his act and he did not use those jokes during the rehearsal.
Not cool.
I don't like Tom Petty but the duet with him and Axl was pretty
good. But NOT Heartbreak Hotel....
All in all I enjoyed it I guess.....(although you probably couldn't
guess that from my note huh?)
Also, I have never once seen Neil Young's video that won for video
of the year!!
JJ (who is probably going to get a ration of s**t for this note!!)
|
654.2 | ??? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | If U No So Much,Why U Work Here? | Thu Sep 07 1989 10:46 | 6 |
|
What exactly did Dice do??? Say???....
B.A.....6:30 comes early....
|
654.3 | | USCTR1::KGALLANT | Peccavi... | Thu Sep 07 1989 10:46 | 18 |
| Well, by the time I got home last night, I was so busy packing
to go away that I forgot they were even on!! Did someone tape
the show so I can borrow it to take a peek at what I missed?
>>I don't think that Living Colour is that great that they deserved
>>as many awards as they got.
I didn't particularly care for Living Colour all that much
when they first came out but I'm starting to like them more
and more. (How many awards did they win anyway?)
>>I was glad to see Paula Abdul got a lot of awards and beat out
>>Bobby Brown.... I can't stand him!
HAHAHA!! That should deflate his ego a bit!! (8
Tigga~~~~
|
654.5 | my comments | HAZEL::STARR | DJ Bag Man and the Condom Crew | Thu Sep 07 1989 11:15 | 48 |
| Well, I ony caught the last hour or so (I also forgot that it was on), but
here are my observations:
re: Bon Jovi and Richie Sambora
I thought they were really good! But you can really see that Jon is trying to
become the Springsteen of the 90's - singing his big hits as acoustic numbers,
telling little stories about his friends and when he was grwoing up, etc. Like
J.J., I was glad to see Richie in the spotlight - he sang better than Jon
(although Jon's voice was in better shape than it usually is).
re: The Rolling Stones
I was suprised at how good they sounded - at first I thought they were
lip-syncing! My only regret is that they did "Mixed Emotions" - I would have
preferred hearing an older song from them.
re: Paula Abdul
I was sorta touching that she was so moved by winning the awards. YOu could
tell that she really appreciated the honor (unlike someone like Madonna). And
I must admit, she looked pretty cute, too!
re: Cher
I still think she's disgusting!
re: Andrew Dice Clay!!
He told a bunch of rude jokes (some of his nursery rhymes), and also used
words like b*tch and sh*t. But I didn't think it was *that* uncool. Although
I'm not a big fan of profanity on TV (when you know kids are watching), I do
sorta applaud his "break-the-rules" attitude. I just think there may have been
a better way to demostrate it. But at least he didn't compromise his act for
the TV Gods.
re: Tom Petty
Well, I happen to like Tom Petty, so I was pretty happy to see him. I thought
they sounded good, and was suprised that Axl's harmonies sounded so good.
re: Neil Young
I love it!!! The video they banned from MTV won Best Video of the Year!!!!
YEAH!!!! (And its a great video, too!)
cat
|
654.6 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | i'm alive....and dead | Thu Sep 07 1989 12:09 | 41 |
|
Arsenio was FLAMING with Andrew Dice Clay.....I would have dragged him of the
stage...he was DISGUSTING!
I lost all respect (what little I had) for Madonna...she was a bit too
egotistical for my tastes.
I HATE PAULA ABDUL!!!! Don't get me wrong...I love her music, and I think
she deserved every award she got, but I stopped counting at 23 for her
Reebock commercials. <PUKE!> I'll never be able to hear that song again.
Bobby Brown's voice was TERRIBLE live. Goes to show what computer's can do
for you.
Robert Smith (The CuRE) looked scared to death being up there....but those
puppy dog eyes of his made me melt (he really is cute under all that makeup).
They were really bad compared to when I saw them in concert on Monday night.
Jon and Richie (sp?).... Wonderful! I really enjoyed the duet...I was
really impressed with Jon's dedication of the song....I think the guy has
talent (as does Richie), and I think that anyone that says he doesn't is
just jealous... :-)
Tom and Axl. WONDERFUL! (Axl looks gross in a beard, though). The
harmonizing of the two voices gave a really interesting sound to the
music. They looked good together, they all played good together.
Duff's comment about Metallica was *WAY* outta line (evidently Metallica
won the category in the Grammys and Gn'R won it here?) Anyway, I thought
it was wicked tacky.
Most of the performances were great except for Bobby Brown's.
BTW...for those of you that missed it LIVE, they played it again right
afterwards, and I believe it will be on another night this week.
WAY TO GO Neil Young! I thought all the other nominees for best video
were trash....not even in the running.
/wildkat
|
654.8 | I no understand... | LASHAM::JOYCE_A | The Cashpoint Cowboy | Thu Sep 07 1989 12:16 | 5 |
|
All these previous replies mean nothing to us Brits who don't
get MTV! What category did GnR win? What did Duff say?
Andy
|
654.9 | | VIDEO::MORRISSEY | Naughty girls need love too | Thu Sep 07 1989 12:17 | 6 |
|
Yeah, I forgot about the FYC's...
I can't stand them either....the lead singer gives
me the eebie jeebies.
|
654.10 | THIS IS ONLY MY VIEWS | NEEPS::IRVINE | Bob Irvine @EDA | Thu Sep 07 1989 12:48 | 23 |
| RE.6
"Robert Smith (The CuRE) looked scared to death being up there....but
those puppy dog eyes of his made me melt (he really is cute under all that
makeup)."
I don't really want to start a discussion but.....
<SET MODE=FLAMING>
Robert Smith of the Cure is about as cute as getting your finger
nails pulled out! (IMO)
He was interviewed on MTV Europe and had some really sarcastic things
to say about Metal and those of us who love it. Basically it sounded
to me as if he has finally realised that people love R&R, and couldn't
stand the "END OF THE WORLD IS HERE" type monotonous vocals that
he has.
<SET MODE=FLAMELESS>
RE.7
I get MTV in Scotland...... (on cable)<insert wicked grins>
Bonzo
|
654.11 | Duff accepting an award on behalf of Metallica | ERROR::CERQUA | EDGE Development | Thu Sep 07 1989 15:15 | 6 |
| Duff was COMPLIMENTING Metallica! He basically said, "Guns n' Roses
is accepting the Heavy Metal award for Metallica after the "screwup"
at the Grammies." At the Grammies, Jethro Tull won the award for Best
Hard Rock/Heavy Metal.
- Paul
|
654.13 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | i'm alive....and dead | Thu Sep 07 1989 17:10 | 12 |
|
RE: .11
Is that what happened? I only caught the word "Metallica" and then heard the
crowd booing and the deathly look on Arsenio's face.
If he was complimenting Metallica, that's great! :-) but that's not what it
seemd like happened....and i couldn't hear what he said. Metallica was
nominated, right?
/kath
|
654.19 | MTV Video Music Awards | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Ghastly ghoulish apparitions | Thu Sep 07 1989 22:04 | 80 |
| Ok, I've been pretty busy today and I wanted to say a few things about
the show, sorry to get in on this late.
I've only watched bits and pieces of it, as we were having band
practice and it was being taped I wasn't paying attention, but we did
stop a couple of times and watch. No comments on the quality of my
bands practices please, this was a very unusual one and not everyone
was there. The TV is not usually on and we don't usually stop for
those trivial type distractions.
To be the show got off to a bad start with Madonna up there dancing
around and feeling herself off within the first five minutes. She's
revolting. Her little diatribe just before introducing George Michael
(gag) was about the most disgusting exhibition of egotistical excess
I've ever seen.
I was pleased to see that Living Colour got a bit of recognition. They
are an excellent band and I thought that they seemed to really
appreciate the honor, as did Paula Abdul. Now, I don't care for
Paula's music, I'll turn it off whenever I can, but she did seem fairly
genuine. (but the Reebok commercials *were* too much)
Perhaps I misread Duffs intentions, but I thought that his comment on
Metallica and the Grammys was an insult. I have it on tape so I'll
have to watch it again. I thought that it was interesting that Izzy
wasn't there/didn't go up with them. I could just hear them saying
"Sorry Izzy couldn't be here tonight, he's in jail for peeing on a
plane". ;^)
I thought that Def Leps performance was pretty lame, but the Stones
sounded remarkably good. The highlight performance for me was The Cure
(sorry Bonz...I like 'em). I had to turn my head away (to retain my
dinner) when Bobby Brown performed. Naturally the mute was on for
that.
I also muted Bon Jovi and Richie, but the part I heard Richie sounded a
lot better then Jon. I think Alans right, they're trying to be the
Stringbean of the '90s. Since I don't like Bruce S, I don't like the
stuff they're doing toward that end either.
Andrew Dice Clay...hmmm. He was incredibly offensive regardless of
what media he was on but his choice of material was especially poor for
prime time public TV. I might (and have) watched him on HBO or
something at a different time, but I thought that routine was totally
inappropriate in that context. I hear that MTV offered a public
apology for his performance and has stated that he will never again
appear on MTV (like he'd been on there a lot before anyway, huh?). I
didn't notice, did they cut his monologue when they played the show
back the second time?
Speaking of comedians, that whiny guy with all the ailments (Richard
Lewis?) really bombed! I almost felt sorry for him, but didn't because
I hate that routine so much. Arsenio should have cut that poor guy off
before he made such a big fool of himself.
I thought that Axl sounded completely awful when doing those two songs
with Tom Petty. I like Petty (although not the song that he did or the
Elvis tune especially). Axl needs to learn a new dance too...
Overall it was about what I expected...another pulp awards show that
rewards those with better choreography then musical talent. The only
thing I was really thankful for in that show was the absence of that
disgusting female that Kurt Loder has had with him the last few times
I've seen him.
re: Whoever put in that Jethro Tull comment a few notes back
While you are fully entitled to your opinion on the band, the
discussion in *this* note has nothing to do with them. Nobody was
"picking on them", they did not need your defense. Why do you feel you
must interject your rude, abrasive comment here? Please don't put
irrevelant notes into a discussion. If you want to discuss Jethro Tull
or praise them or whatever, there is a note specifically for that
purpose. Don't try to cause trouble in here.
re: those that responded to the Jethro Tull comment
Please don't encourage this type of thing.
GH
|
654.20 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | i'm alive....and dead | Fri Sep 08 1989 02:19 | 18 |
| Greg>> Axl needs to learn a new dance too...
You're kidding, right? Axl can move like that ANYDAY for
me... He can move better than any HM guy I've seen.....Those
HIPS! <whew! is it getting hot in here?> :-)
One more thing...I was *REALLY* impressed with DJ Jazzy Jeff
and Fresh Prince. When they accepted their award, they said
(paraphrased) "this is a dream. So, kids, lay off the drugs
and the alcohol and, with ambition this dream can be yours.
You will be up here."
I loved it.....
/kath
|
654.21 | | PFLOYD::ROTHBERG | Anyone else wearing 'quitters'? | Fri Sep 08 1989 02:31 | 8 |
|
Did ADC do his normal act or something? What did
he do exactly? Nobody has answered that yet!
(Maybe .5 Alan did, but I didn't feel like
reading through the whole note, other than that,
I read everything else ...)
|
654.22 | | YODA::MCCARRON | I knew Capt. Tuttle better than him. | Fri Sep 08 1989 02:31 | 7 |
|
I took the comment about Metallica as a compliment.
What I remember them saying was something like, "We're accepting
this for Metallica, because they were ripped off at the Grandma's".
Paul
|
654.23 | From what I saw... | YODA::MCCARRON | I knew Capt. Tuttle better than him. | Fri Sep 08 1989 02:40 | 8 |
|
Re: Rob
He did a few (2?) new nursery rhymes and some of the old ones.
He did a couple of heavy girl jokes along the line of stuff he's done
before. Different jokes but same ideas.
Paul
|
654.24 | | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Fri Sep 08 1989 03:10 | 13 |
| I took Duff's comment as a compliment to Metallica too, the booing
was probably from the die hard G 'n R fans that wanted them to keep
it ....
Jethro Tull ... I agree with what Mr. House said ... sheesh ...
ADC's jokes ... I taped it and haven't seen that part yet, I'll
have to check it out when I get home. I'm a sucker for fat chick
jokes anyway (it should be a law that fat chicks CANNOT wear tank
tops with or wiithout a bra ... peeeeuke !).
Scary
|
654.25 | Writeup in today's Boston Globe | ERROR::CERQUA | EDGE Development | Fri Sep 08 1989 08:47 | 5 |
| There's a pretty good writeup of the show in today's Boston Globe (for
what it's worth, he took the Metallica comment as a compliment, too).
It's got a complete list of the award winners.
- Paul
|
654.26 | looked like the IZ to me | PARITY::RANDERSON | | Fri Sep 08 1989 09:25 | 9 |
| A few back someone mentioned that they were wondering where Izzy of
Guns 'n' Roses was. I thought he was the guy on the black Les Paul
during Axl's and Tom Petty's set. If someone has it taped maybe they
could take a closer look and confirm/deny this. It sure looked like
him. Tom Petty has only one guitar player and he was quite evident at
the front of the stage.
the bomb
|
654.27 | | HAZEL::STARR | DJ Bag Man and the Condom Crew | Fri Sep 08 1989 11:33 | 9 |
| > A few back someone mentioned that they were wondering where Izzy of
> Guns 'n' Roses was. I thought he was the guy on the black Les Paul
> during Axl's and Tom Petty's set.
I thought the same thing, so you're not the only one!
cat
P.S. Rob, you shoulda read my note - I did answer that question! 8^)
|
654.29 | Izzy Was There | MAIL::SCOTTR | Don't Shoot..Shoot.....Shotgun | Fri Sep 08 1989 16:59 | 5 |
| Acordding to a report that i heard on headline news yesterday Izzy
was there, and he and Vince Neal got in a fist fight backstage over
what described as a personal matter.
Rock Brigador
|
654.35 | You METAL lovers are SO SENSITIVE... | KDCFS1::FREEMAN | | Mon Sep 11 1989 17:40 | 21 |
| Well, I'm reeeeeaaaallly sorry if I've hurt some of your HEAVY METAL
feelings, but I'm a little fed up with all these minor weights nicking
Jethro Tull not only on the tube but in this here conference (if
you care to examine your backnote on the Grammys). And who made
you King o' the Conference anyway? If you're so into the metal thing,
how come you get all upset when someone does a little hacking on
YOUR favourite artist? Wimp,wimp,wimp,wimp,wimp,and so on....
When Tull was touring the world and laying down the framework for
future metal/classic/folk/rock groups, the guys in Motley Crue were
probably still busy being a nuisance to their grade school
teachers, and while I can appreciate what the metal genre has to
offer to music it is obvious that a lot of the people in this
conference are ignorant to all but a very narrow band in the total
music spectrum.
RF
RF
|
654.36 | chill | RICKS::MINARDI | Feel it... POWERSURGE | Mon Sep 11 1989 17:54 | 17 |
| re.35
Yeah, so Jethro Tull is an old band. So what?
You're probably right about a few HM fans being fans of a narrow
spectrum of music, but if you're generalizing, then you are definitely
mistaken. Look in the note that lists the conference contributors
favorite non-metal musicians.
Jethro Tull gets respect in here, as I'm sure they do
in HM band circles, but NOT as a heavy metal band (at least in
my, and a lot of other folks' books).
When they were voted best HM band at the Grandma's, it was
kind of funny, because they aren't even considered a HM band!!
That's the big deal. Relax... I think YOU are being a bit
of what you are accusing us of.
/Motorbreath...Metallica is HM, Tull is, well, whatever it is.
|
654.37 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Epileptic Seaguls 1-0!!! | Mon Sep 11 1989 18:13 | 26 |
| re .35 Tull is an old band.
Sure they are, real old in fact. I'm sure you think they have great
songs. I can appreciate that. Personally, I have never liked *any*
Jethro Tull song. I also never liked the old Boston Celtic teams that
were winning championchips when Magic Johnson and James Worthy were
bugging their gradeschool teachers. What about Chuck Berry, or Buddy
Holly or any of the early pioneers of rock? Were they not actually
paving the way for Tull while Tull was bugging their gradeschool
teachers? Like .36 said, Tull winning "Best Heavy Metal Band" is a
joke. They were certainly not the best heavy metal band last year. It's
like Mike Schmidt getting voted to the all-star game even though he
didn't deserve it this year. I think the award was given out by people
like you who seem to have this fetish for the past. Maybe they deserved
some sort of award in the past but certainly not this year. I am also
not one of the sensitive ones who get offended every some one flames
metallica or anyone else. There are Tull fans in this file that I'm
sure would be happy to discuss their music with you.
Hope this helps
the devil dog.
p.s. you still haven't said why...
|
654.39 | really don't mind if you sit this one out | CSCOA3::THOMPSON_R | but what about pointed sticks? | Tue Sep 12 1989 03:22 | 5 |
| Well, JT was never really much of a HM band, but boy could Ian write
some lyrics. Still one of my favorite bands, even tho' they haven't
done much lately..
-rt
|
654.40 | one more time... | PARITY::RANDERSON | | Tue Sep 12 1989 10:24 | 17 |
| I think it's been mentioned before but since few of you seem to
have seen it ;^)
Tull did not win the grammy for best Heavy Metal Band. They won the
grammy for best Heavy Metal/HARD ROCK album, namely, "Crest of a
Knave". Whether you agree with this or not, the real argument here
should be that the grammys would be better off with two separate
awards, one for Heavy Metal and one for Hard Rock. Tull would qualify
under hard rock in most people's books. I doubt that the people who
pick the grammy winners know enough about the subtleties of rock music
to make the distinction, however. I tend to ignore all types of award
shows, they seldom deal with reality in the first place. Don't let
them bother you.
the bomb
|
654.41 | | ASAHI::COOPER | Insert Heavy Metal phrase here.... | Tue Sep 12 1989 10:35 | 5 |
| To quote Eddie Murphy...
"What have you done for me lately !?!"
jc
|
654.42 | They all sell-out in time | KDCFS1::FREEMAN | | Tue Sep 12 1989 12:46 | 22 |
| AH HA! This is the question. What is the distinction between hard
rock and heavy metal. Personally, I feel it is a matter of evolution
and what came first. When JT was in it's infancy, blues was all
the rage in America and Britain. Groups had to do music which fell
into this category. But, as Ian Anderson (front man for Tull) explained
it: "I got tired of borrowing the black man's riffs and decided
to delve into my own cultural background". Where would metal be
today if all the Jimmy Pages and Tony Iommis of the world had just kept
hammering out the same old blues patterns?
Also, in Tulls most successful years, there were no TV awards shows
for groups to appear on. All there was was Midnight Special and Don
Kirshners Rock to showcase the latest talent. The heavy groups
then were considered underground and received no airplay or at least
very little. Big players like Genesis, King Krimson and Yes made
it on word-of-mouth only. Just like Metallica did when they were
starting off. This whole awards show business has taken them all
out of the realm of mystery and imagination and into the world of
common commercialism. Who wudda thunk? James Hetfield on my TV along
with Pepsi and other consumer products....
RF
|
654.43 | Why are we debating such OLD NEWS anyway? | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Ghastly ghoulish apparitions | Tue Sep 12 1989 16:51 | 16 |
| re: .35
In my previous reply, I was not objecting to giving an award to Jethro
Tull so much as I was objecting to the manner in which you voiced your
opinion.
As far as Jethro Tull getting that award; I don't think they deserved
it because the Grammy is a yearly thing and while JT has put out some
good music in the career, I personally thought that the album they put
out that year was VERY weak compared to their other material, and
especially weak when compared to the other nominees for that award.
There was some powerful music put out last year, why not award some of
it rather then a lame attempt at a come-back from a good but long
dormant band?
gh
|
654.44 | | USCTR1::KGALLANT | Stormy little world shaker... | Tue Sep 12 1989 17:40 | 9 |
| >> it because the Grammy is a yearly thing and while JT has put out some
>> good music in the career, I personally thought that the album they put
>> out that year was VERY weak compared to their other material, and
>> especially weak when compared to the other nominees for that award.
Thank you, Greg. Once again you've read my mind. (8
Tigga~~~
|
654.56 | Here's what I remember...for what it's worth. .02 | BUFFER::GOLDSMITH | I'm a Sun King baby! | Tue Sep 19 1989 14:20 | 29 |
| Alright, now that we're back on track, I thought the show was just a
hair better than lame.
With the exceptions of the Cure, who I thought were pretty cool, and
sounded the best there.
I have to say the Cult was good, because they were. Actually, they
were just alright. Ian's voice was off a little bit.
Bon Jovi actually were good. They sounded good, and were just hanging
out, being cool.
As for bad performances, that pretty much leaves everyone else.
Def Leppard, who were great when I saw them on Hysteria, really sounded
terrible, and the new song is bad.
I can't stand Tom Petty, and Axl just couldn't help him.
Bobby Brown sounded terrible.
Madonna sounded alright, but she's a pathetic excuse for a person.
The Stones were lame.
That's all I can remember. I thought it was good that they didn't have
the whole show overdubbed. If they actually had the bands playing, it
probably would have been a lot worse. That just left it up to the
vocalists to carry the band.
I also thought that G&R's dedication of their only award was cool to
Metallica. G&R don't win that many awards, and for them to give it
away was a good gesture.
That's about it.
Steve
|
654.57 | Watched it again (can you believe it) | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Does a bear wear a funny hat? | Tue Sep 19 1989 16:02 | 24 |
| Well, I watched this again paying a little more (or is that "little
more"...) attention this time. Thank goodness I was able to fast
forward through the commercials and crappola, 'cause that was about 90%
of the show.
I thought that of the performances, I enjoyed The Cure the most.
I thought that The Cult was really good too (makes me wanna go buy a
Les Paul). The Stones were pretty good and pretty much the rest was
either poor or not to my taste. Axl sounded purely awful.
I couldn't tell if the other guitar player with Petty and all was Izzy
or not, they never really showed him. Could have been though.
I didn't think that Robert Smith looked scared at all.
I now reconsider my first impression about what Duff said about
Metallica. It was definately a complement. I think the reason that I
didn't think so before was that Metallica was also nominated for the
award that GnR won.
Gotta go, just wanted to drop this here quickly.
Greg
|
654.58 | I hate MTv | BOSHOG::KELLY | I dont look like Jani lane (WARRANT) | Wed Sep 20 1989 04:08 | 6 |
|
What did Duff say about METALLICA????
KB ( I like to be different_
|
654.59 | | ROSBIF::PHILIPPA | | Wed Sep 20 1989 05:40 | 7 |
|
I think Duff actepted an award on behalf of Metallica because they
should have won it last year.....
or summit like that.
Flip
|
654.60 | Here's the story...Once upon a lame awards show... | BUFFER::GOLDSMITH | I'm a Sun King baby! | Wed Sep 20 1989 13:33 | 20 |
| Here is what happened to clear all the speculation up once and for all!
In the Grammy awards earlier this year, Metallica was nominated for
best heavy metal/hard rock album, along with Jethro Tull, Jane's
Addiction, and Iggy Pop.
Jethro Tull won the award (although in my own opinion, that was one of
Tull's worst albums) and now everyone's upset because they think anyone
should have won except J.T.
FYI: Next year's Grammy's will have separate categories for Heavy Metal
and Hard Rock.
During the MTV Awards (which is what we're talking about, remember?)
Metallica, G&R and some other bands were nominated for best metal
video, which G&R won. When accepting their award, Duff definetly
complimented Metallica by saying that they are dedicating their award
to Metallica because they should have won at the Grammys.
Simple, eh?
Steve
|
654.61 | | UPWARD::HEISER | tune it or die | Mon Sep 10 1990 17:18 | 27 |
| From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: clari.news.music
Subject: Winners at the 1990 MTV Music Video Awards
Date: 7 Sep 90 05:27:15 GMT
Priority: major
Best female -- Sinead O'Connor, ``Nothing Compares 2 U.''
Best group -- B 52s, ``Love Shack.''
Best new artist -- Michael Penn, ``No Myth.''
Best video from a film -- Billy Idol, ``Cradle of Love'' from ``Ford
Fairlane.''
Best dance video -- M.C. Hammer, ``U Can't Touch This.''
Best choreography -- Janet Jackson and Anthony Thomas for ``Rhythm
Nation.''
Best direction -- David Fincher for Madonna's ``Vogue.''
Best video -- Sinead O'Connor, ``Nothing Compares 2 U.''
Best male -- Don Henley, ``The End of the Innocence.''
Best metal/hard rock -- Aerosmith, ``Janie's Got A Gun.''
Best rap -- M.C. Hammer, ``U Can't Touch This.''
Best post-modern -- Sinead O'Connor, ``Nothing Compares 2 U.''
Breakthrough video -- Tears For Fears, ``Sowing the Seeds of Love.''
Best special effects -- Jim Blashfield for Tears For Fears ``Sowing
the Seeds of Love.''
Best art direction -- Martin Lasowitz for B52s ``Love Shack.''
Best editing -- Jim Haygood for Madonna's ``Vogue.''
Best cinematography -- Pascal Lebeque for Modonna's ``Vogue.''
|
654.62 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Waiting for my Kuwaiti Vacation | Tue Sep 11 1990 10:19 | 9 |
| I know this may be a dumb question but...
HOW DA HELL CAIN SH*THEAD O'CONNER WIN BESTEST VIDEO?????
That may as well have been Suzanne Vega singinng Puka.'Cept Vega's vid
had more imagination to it. The music world truly weeps after some of
the travesties on the eMTyV awards. What a sham!
|
654.66 | Huh? | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Tue Sep 11 1990 15:52 | 6 |
| Skinhead got best video?? For which one?
Wierd. I like her music and all, but I thought both of the videos I've
seen were pretty lackluster.
gh
|
654.67 | | RAVEN1::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:11 | 6 |
| I think her music is acceptable, but take away the Aural Exciters,
Harmonizers and other F/X and she probably can't sing worth pea-soup.
I hate MTV for doing this to us.
jc (Sinead O'Conner indeed)
|
654.68 | | JJLIET::JUDY | the boomerang zone | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:52 | 9 |
|
re: coop
I think you're right. On top of winning three awards, she
performed too. I thought it was terrible.
JJ
|
654.70 | Not that unusual | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:58 | 6 |
| You'd be surprised how many vocalists sound absolutely terrible without
effects. It's amazing how much they add.
Try and picture Ozzy without that chorus on this voice...
gh
|
654.71 | | PNO::HEISER | rock solid! - a rockumentary | Wed Sep 12 1990 16:00 | 4 |
| In the old days, you could tell who played studio games with their
voice by seeing them live. Technology has brought back the guess work.
Mike
|
654.72 | | RAVEN1::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Sep 12 1990 16:19 | 4 |
| You should hear me sing Little Teaser without delay, compression and
chorus ! Sounds like a cat fight ;) !
jc
|
654.73 | How to make the hear REALLY shine ... | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Thu Sep 13 1990 02:48 | 10 |
| Hey, but now most bands use the same techno-stuff live ... no
difference.
Check out the MUSIC file sometime and listen to all the pro-shinehead
fans rave about her. To each his own though ... but could you imagine
(uh, this is for guys, and some adventuresome girls ...) waking up next
to her after throwing a good drunk the night before. Yeah .. I can
picture Jack Daniels yak running into her ears ... 8^)
Scary ... yeah, that is pretty Scary indeed.
|
654.74 | | MEGA::GOLDBERG | | Thu Sep 13 1990 09:18 | 4 |
|
I've seen Ozzy live twice, he sounds fine.
F.
|
654.75 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | Liquor and Poker | Thu Sep 13 1990 09:50 | 7 |
|
Okay, so now we have it...
Sinbad O'Conner is really Ozzy Osbourne with a skull cap on!!
Wagagagagagagaga!
|
654.76 | | BINKLY::MINARDI | Love is a vampire drunk on your blood | Thu Sep 13 1990 12:40 | 4 |
| Actually I think Skinbag's face is beautiful... the hair thing, well...
it's not much worse than someone wearing a wig, is it?
/Motorbreath..right Rob?!??! ;^)
|
654.77 | It's always there | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Thu Sep 13 1990 14:11 | 13 |
| re: Francine
It wasn't a qualitative statement. Whether you like how it sounds, I
was just saying you *never* hear Ozzy sing without a chorus on his
voice, live or otherwise. He's technologically dependent.
I personally think he's got a great rock & roll voice, but he sounds
totally different without effects processing his voice. Listen to him
on the old Was Not Was album "Born To Laugh At Tornadoes" where he did a
guest spot on one song. You can't even recognize his voice there
because you're used to hearing it with that chorus.
gh
|
654.78 | no flames, but you can't compare Ozzy and Sinead! | MEGA::GOLDBERG | | Thu Sep 13 1990 14:35 | 11 |
|
Well I'm not mad or anything..
i can't remember the concerts too well but I thought he was singing
by himself..
IMO Ozzy live even if the just talks to the crowd is fine with me!!
what about early Sabbath?
F.
|
654.79 | I agree, no comparisons here | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Thu Sep 13 1990 15:27 | 17 |
| I wasn't comparing Ozzy's music with Sinead's (clearly they're so
wildly different that any attempt at comparison would be pointless),
just saying that they both make heavy use of effects on the vocals,
that's all.
Someone a few notes back said they didn't like Sinead because her
vocals sounded processed. I just pointed out that practically everyone
uses vocal processing these days and that makes a signature sound for
many singers (like Ozzy, Peter Gabriel, and others). It's not a bad
thing IMO. I like effects on vocals. Personally I never noticed it
that much on Sineads, but I don't listen to her music that much.
I'd have to go back and listen, but I *thought* that even the old
Sabbath stuff sounded that way. Could be wrong on that though.
gh
|
654.80 | I hate the chorus effect | FASDER::AHERB | Al is the *first* name | Sun May 12 1991 13:03 | 4 |
| Listen to Black Sabbath's LIVE AT LAST. There is no effects on his
voice.. There is some cheap distortion on the guitar that causes
feedback when Iommi is not playing it
|