T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3066.1 | The new AJs are monstrous | ROADKL::HALL | Euripides pants, Eumenides pants | Wed Apr 12 1995 16:32 | 35 |
| Just a coupla thoughts on the Gibsons.
I have a J45 that I bought new in 1967. I thought at the time that it
was a monstrous guitar, but hey, I was 14. It's a good instrument, but
not great, and certainly no match for its Martin counterpart, the D-18.
However, I have played at least one J45 that had great sound, so I know
there have been some very respectable J45s. One of the things mine has
is an adjustable bridge, that is, the bridge has screws on either end
of the saddle to adjust the action. This, I believe, is the Kiss of
Death for the sound, and one of these days I'm going to get around to
replacing the bridge with a solid one, hopefully making a world of
difference.
For comparison's sake, I've owned a D-18, and currently play a Martin
HD-28 and a little Taylor 412 (which I love).
John Ramsey's Folklore Center in Colorado Springs carries new (Bozeman)
Gibsons, and I've played at least two rosewood Advanced Jumbos down
there that are among the best I've ever played, including prewar
Martins and Collings. They ain't cheap; they've been priced between
$2100 and $2700, but out of the box they can stand up to the prewar
Martins, and are probably well worth the price.
Why don't I buy one? Besides the price tag, I mean? This is
embarrassing, but the problem is that it's not a Martin, Collings,
Santa Cruz, etc. These are GREAT guitars, but I just can't past the
fact that it's a Gibson. I know, it's pretty silly, and there are
other folks who are looking past the name and getting for their sound.
Who knows, maybe some day I'll grow up, or they'll make an AJ with a
natural top. Yeah, that's it... It's that sunburst finish.
OK, back to something productive...
Charlie
|
3066.2 | Black sheep of the acoustic world | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed Apr 12 1995 22:47 | 18 |
| Daddy's Junky Music in Shrewsbury, Mass had an advanced jumbo reissue
hanging on the rack for several months, and sold it for $800. I could
kick myself for not buying it while I had the chance.
Amazingly enough, I hear the same thing from many dealers about Gibson
Flat-tops. Music Emporium will sell Gibson acoustics, but no one that
works there will touch one. They all prefer Mahtins. The same goes
for Fiddler's Choice, The Village Fret Shop (NH White Mountins region)
and several other well-known dealers in vintage instuments. Just
between you and me I'm glad. This attitude keeps prices within the
reach of mere mortals like me.
It's about time someone noticed this note. It's going on a week since
I entered it. People have far more interesting things to discuss is my
guess. :^o
Mark
|
3066.3 | the good-ole 60's | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed Apr 12 1995 23:04 | 12 |
| One other thought. Gibson Guitars made during the 60 and 70's were
generally built like trucks (ie: thick tops and heavy bracing).
I believe this was done to reduce the amount of warantee repairs.
As a results, these instruments are not as loud, or responsive
as the older models, or the newer models which are based on the old
designs. J45's seem to vary widely from one instrument to the next.
The best of the bunch are great instruments.
Mark
|
3066.4 | another fan | BABAGI::MORIN | | Thu Apr 20 1995 09:52 | 8 |
| Gibson flat tops are still my favorites. I have a 1940 J-55 that I'll
be buried with (unless the Television takes up too much room). After
having my everyday guitar crunched by unknown assailants(1964 SJ), I
bought a Martin D-35 as a replacement, and, after careful
consideration, I'm going to make a lamp out of it, sell the lamp, and
buy another Gibson.
Robin
|
3066.5 | Recycle it! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Tue Apr 25 1995 10:47 | 6 |
| Have you considered having the damaged Gibson acoustic repaired?
If you're not planning on fixing it, howzabout selling it to me?
How extensive was the damage?
Mark
|
3066.6 | Gibson Rarities | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Thu Jun 08 1995 11:05 | 19 |
| I have a couple more fun facts to add to this string.
Regarding the LC Century Model, back in the 30's when the Century
Model was introduced in honor of the City Of Chicago's 100's
anniversary, Gibson also introduced the Archtop guitar version, as
well as a Century model Mandolin. All 3 had the same cosmetic
appointments. At the time, you could buy a "Century Set" which
included all 3 instruments.
Regarding the Nick Lucas model acoustic, when the Nick Lucas model
was introduced (I believe it was late 1920's, Depression era) it
was the most expensive guitar model on Gibson's entire price list.
Obviously very few people could afford to buy one of these guitars.
The few people that did often requested custom options be added.
Original Nick Lucas guitars are quite rare, and the ones that have
custom features are generally one-of-a-kind. For this reasons, prices
are very high (ie: $10k and higher).
Mark
|
3066.7 | Another Gibson joins the herd. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:07 | 20 |
| As a mentioned in the Guitar Show string, I picked up a Gibson LG1
this weekend at the New England Guitar Show. The dealer was asking
$500 for it, and I aquired it by trading 2 other instruments.
This guitar was made in 1966. It features all-mahagony construction
with a solid spruce top, sunburst finish, skinny neck, and kluson
plate-mount tuners. It is sized like a Martin 000. A lot of people
don't like 60's Gibsons because of the skinny necks, but for certain
playing styles the skinny neck comes in handy. Overall, the guitar
is in very good condition, plays great, and was a good instrument
to aquire. The weak link on this guitar (and many acoustics from this
era) is the bridge. Believe it or not, Gibson used plastic bridges
on these instruments. The bridge was screwed down to the top from
inside. A friend of mine has converted a few of these to Rosewood
bridges and it makes for a huge improvement. He has already agreed
to upgrade this one for me. Despite the plastic bridge, the guitar
has very good tone. I can't wait to hear it with a Rosewood bridge.
Later, Mark
|
3066.8 | J45 fever. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Nov 27 1995 09:47 | 31 |
|
For the last couple of weeks, I've had in my possesion, a brand
new Gibson J45 reissue model. It belongs to a friend of mine. He
offered to sell it to me, but I'm trying to work a trade instead.
This is a reissue of the late 40's J45 complete with the banner
headstock and a special anniversary label inside the body. It is
of course sunburst, with a nice chubby neck and beautifully grained
spruce top. The sides and back are very nice mahagony with a medium
redish-brown finish. This guitar comes with the most outrageous
hard-shell case I've seen from Gibson. The case is dark brown on the
outside with a Gibson/Montana logo. The inside is lined with purple
fuzzy material.
This guitar plays very well, although the strings are a bit stiff.
It has a perfect low-end growl without being too boomy. I've played
a few other new J45's that were not the reissue model, and they
did not grab me like this guitar. The only feature on this guitar
that doesn't appeal to me is the kluson tuners with trapazoid buttons.
Original J45's had plate-mount klusons with white oval buttons. I can
always swap tuners to make it look a little more like the original.
This is a very minor nit, but it means a lot to an old-time J45
loyalist. The trapazoids are a little too fancy for the humble J45.
I offered to trade both the Gibson Blues King, and the LG1 for this
J45. I figure one great guitar is better than 2 so-so guitars. The
J45 would definately get played a lot more than either of the others.
This would also free up a little more space in my home studio. I'll
keep you posted on the outcome. Stay tuned!
Mark
|
3066.9 | Acoustic bracing. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:07 | 32 |
|
One subject I didn't touch upon in the base note is bracing. This
is a non-trivial matter when it comes to acoustics. There are 3
basic forms of bracing used on acoustic guitars...ladder, X, and
Fan. Ladder bracing is found on the less expensive guitars. It
provides a sturdy support structure for the top, but it does not
allow maximum vibration, and therefore tends to dampen the top
resulting in a muffled sound. X bracing is found on more expensive
models including most Martins, Guilds, Gibsons, and other top-line
models. It provides the needed support for the top, but does not
dampen the top nearly as much as ladder bracing. Fan bracing allows
for maximum top vibration, but does not offer much structural strength,
therefore it is not used on steel-sting guitars. Is is mainly only
found on classical (nylon-string) guitars.
Ladder bracing is found on the lower line Gibson models including
the LG0 (mahagony top), and LG1.
X-bracing is found on most of Gibson's top models including the
J45, AJ, L2, LG2, J200, etc.
Gibson has made very few classical guitars over the years. These
are the only fan-braced Gibsons you're likely to find.
The same principles hold true with respect to archtops. I suggest
you consult Danny Weber's note (1016) for details on arch top bracing.
When I have more time, I'll talk about acoustic guitar sizing.
Mark
|
3066.10 | 12 strings? | SLBLUZ::BROCKUS | Who is John Galt? | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:45 | 26 |
| I have a Gibson B-45-12, twelve string, S/N 155xx
It's a georgous piece of work. I only wonder what it sounds like.
It was purchased, new, by my father in about 1967. He didn't get to
play it much, and he died in 1968. It sat in the same closet in the
same house for 27 years, with air conditioning and heat, so it faced
no extremes.
With medium or heavy strings, tuned up some.
I am learning the guitar, found out my mother still had this one, and
got it out. The top is buckled, the bridge is warped, and the bracing
is loose.
I have gotten two estimates for repairs so far, and will get another this
week. The first two were $200 and $400 for repairs.
This guitar still has some of the tags and tissue paper it was sold with.
I am curious what year it was actually manufactured (probably 1966 or 1967),
and how much it would be worth after being repaired.
It will not be for sale, due to the family attachment.
thanks,
JPB
|
3066.11 | | E::EVANS | | Wed Nov 29 1995 08:04 | 6 |
|
Since you have tags and it wasn't used much, maybe you could get Gibson to
do some of the work under warranty. I was able to do this with my Martin.
Jim
|
3066.12 | Feed a cold, starve a fevor! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Thu Dec 14 1995 08:00 | 11 |
| Well the J45 deal is done. I ended up keeping the L00 Blues King.
It really is a good playing/sounding guitar and I decided it is
one guitar a need to keep.
I traded the LG1, my old Harmony Bass and cash for the J45. Now that
it officially belongs to me, it's time to get it polished up, change
strings, and tweak the action. This is one guitar that I'll keep
forever. My kids can fight over it after I go to that big blues-jam
in the sky.
Mark
|