T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2990.1 | HUH? | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 07:35 | 8 |
| RE: The white finish on my Ibanez RG550 is SHOT.
So you finally get the finish so it looks cool and now you want to ruin
it by making it look new?
I don't get it?
Fred (who's Strat is just starting to look cool) ;^)'s
|
2990.2 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | why do we have to fall from grace? | Mon Oct 17 1994 07:39 | 6 |
| -1
C'mon guys, I'm serious. I'm not into the "nicks and dings" look.
Thanks once again...
B
|
2990.3 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Mon Oct 17 1994 18:21 | 15 |
| Buck,
Do look into the folks who do custom airbrush work (read on, read on...
:-)
I had one guy tell me that he'd undercoat refinish the guitar (ya
know, normal cellulouse/guitar paint stuff) for nothing if I'd pay
some some art work... I was thinking of doin' my pink RG550 with some
sort of cool black air-bruch type work like scrimshaw or something,
and it wasn't going to cost ANYTHING (comparatively) to do it ($100?).
This guy did a HELL of a nice job on cars, bikes, jackets, etc...
It's something to think about anyway - I mean it doesn't *have* to
be anything gaudy to have that 'custom shop' look.
Give it some thought...
|
2990.4 | | MADMXX::KNOX | | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:18 | 7 |
| Geez Coop... You're not really gonna paint over that screamin' pink??
Pesonally, I prefer the basic black... finger smudges give it a
different look every time I play it!!
/Billy_K
|
2990.5 | | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:44 | 4 |
| > Pesonally, I prefer the basic black... finger smudges give it a
> different look every time I play it!!
Eat plenty of potato chips while yer playin, enhance that look.
|
2990.6 | | MADMXX::KNOX | | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:52 | 7 |
| Greg,
Why didn't I think of that... The oil from the chips would
refract the light really cool!!
/Billy_K
|
2990.7 | ;^) | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Wed Oct 19 1994 18:11 | 4 |
| You could draw little things on the finish with your finger grease.
It could be like a total look!
Greg
|
2990.8 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Fri Oct 21 1994 10:34 | 3 |
| Fear not - Pinky will stay the color it is...
That guitar roolz just the way it is..
|
2990.9 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | I know all about the honor of God... | Fri Oct 21 1994 10:43 | 4 |
| If there was ever a sale made in error, it was that Pink Ibanez!!!
I played some of my quickest licks on that neck!
Coop, if you ever get the notion to sell, call me!!!
|
2990.10 | | MADMXX::KNOX | | Fri Oct 21 1994 11:48 | 5 |
|
So that's why that guit sounded so cool... it's still got the
ghost of Buck-licks in it...
/Billy_K
|
2990.11 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Sat Oct 22 1994 13:56 | 3 |
| And still has smudges from Bucks favorite key on the fret board...
:-)
|
2990.12 | Favorite Finishes in Worcester area | PCBUOA::ANDERSON_R | | Thu Nov 17 1994 09:07 | 8 |
| Worcester area
Contact Kevin @ 852-6055
FAVORITE FINISHES
Rich
|
2990.13 | Airbrushing Lacquer for Chip Repair?? | POWDML::SELIG | | Mon Mar 17 1997 13:11 | 16 |
| My son recently purchased an '84 white Gibson LP Studio that has some paint
chips. Since I do car restoration as a hobby, I was thinking that I
could repair the chips with an airbrush using an automotive acryllic laqcuer
followed by 1000 grit wet sand to blend and polish.
The chips are on the front edges where the Studio model lacks
protective edge binding and on the back where I would guess a belt
buckle inflicted damage.
Is this worthwhile if done well or will it detract from the value.
Since we are dealing with a white finish...I'm assuming it will be easy
to tint the white to get the correct "aged" white hue.
Is it common for the white finish on guitar necks to yellow more than
the body....I'm assuming that this has something to do with the hand
oils getting absorbed into the finish??
|
2990.14 | yes, but probably not a big deal | ASABET::pelkey.ogo.dec.com::pelkey | Professional Hombre | Mon Mar 17 1997 14:19 | 17 |
| I'm no expert, so this is not 'the definitive answer' but
I would guess, yes, touching up the finish would probably
devalue the guitar a bit,, but it's not like your talking
about a 59 gold top, or some other vintage item .. That
would be taboo, without a doubt.
Mark Jaques. is probably one of the guys that could give
you a better idea on what you're up to, Mark, jump
in any time..
Studio's typically resell for anywere from $425 -> $600
depending on condition, I wouldn't imagine making it cleaner
would hurt your resale value *a lot*... question is,
are you planning on selling it ??
/pelksta...
|
2990.15 | Are acrylic and nitro compatible? | NEWVAX::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Tue Mar 18 1997 07:08 | 13 |
| re: .13
> My son recently purchased an '84 white Gibson LP Studio that has some paint
> chips. Since I do car restoration as a hobby, I was thinking that I
> could repair the chips with an airbrush using an automotive acryllic laqcuer
> followed by 1000 grit wet sand to blend and polish.
I agree with .14 that Mark Jacques probably knows more about this than I do,
but the Gibson is probably finished with nitrocellulose lacquer, and I'm
fairly sure that I've heard that acryllic lacquer isn't compatible with
nitro.
-Hal
|
2990.16 | | POWDML::SELIG | | Tue Mar 18 1997 07:22 | 13 |
| Actually lots of '70's European cars (BMW, Mercedes, etc) used
Glassurit nitro-cellulose lacquer....I've never had a problem with
incompatability between nitrocellulose and acryllic; and I've been able
to spot-blend without difficulty.
Is it true that the Gibson whites seem to be more prone to
paint-cracking (spider cracks) than other colors. The fellow at Action
Music in Acton said he saw alot cracking on older whites and he
attributed it to thermal expansion-contraction cycles.
Thx,
Jonathan
|
2990.17 | time warp | RICKS::CALCAGNI | thick slabs of dirt in a halo of airy twang | Tue Mar 18 1997 07:39 | 3 |
| This is a bit off the subject, but was Gibson even making the LP Studio
back in '84???? Better check that date, or that model.
|
2990.18 | Serial# to Model Cross-Reference?? | POWDML::SELIG | | Tue Mar 18 1997 07:45 | 6 |
| I checked the serial number on the Gibson web site and came up with the
'84 date. No corresponding model info available on the web site to
match with serial number....so I'm just going with the headstock
decals.
|
2990.19 | | ASABET::pelkey.ogo.dec.com::pelkey | Professional Hombre | Tue Mar 18 1997 08:12 | 7 |
| Cracking,,, spider cracks... finish cracks...
Known as, Finish Checking....
--- as you were....
/pelksta
|
2990.20 | In my best blues-dawg voice | KDX200::COOPER | There is no TRY - DO or DO NOT! | Tue Mar 18 1997 08:36 | 1 |
| ...and those aren't chips - that be character!
|
2990.21 | | NETCAD::BUSENBARK | | Tue Mar 18 1997 09:32 | 4 |
| From what I've read Gibson has always used nitrocellulose lacquer....
Rick
|
2990.22 | lacquer 101 | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Tue Mar 18 1997 09:51 | 59 |
|
I'm really no expert on guitar finishes, but I have done a couple with
good results. I refinished a Telecaster body and did a complete refin
on a Gibson SG. On the SG, I left the back of the headstock in tact so
the serial number and "Made in USA" stamp would not be lost. Blending
the rest of the finish with the back of the headstock was easy. In both
cases, I used nitro-cellulous lacquer. My understanding is that acrylic
and nitro are not compatable. Lacquer *thinner* is universal, but acrylic
resin is synthetic material and nitro-cellulous resin is organic. When
you apply a coating of anything over another material, it tends to sit on
top of the finish with a limited bond. If you apply nitro-cellulous
over nitro cellulous, you can use a mixture of naptha and thinner to
"reflow" the two materials into one. This would not work if you sprayed
acrylic over N/C. This combination of chemicals is also known as "blush
remover". It is used whenever there is moisture trapped below a layer
of lacquer. This shows up as a white residue below the surface. Usually
one squirt of blush remover will reflow the lacquer and allow the moisture
to escape. It's amazing how well this stuff works! If you are trying to
blend colors and get a level finish, you don't need to take chances
mixing two differant materials with known compatability problems.
Guitar finishes tend to be quite thick after all coats of color and
clear have been applied. Generally we are talking 20 or more coats
of lacquer. You would have to build up a new finish in the chip and
wet sand all of the excess lacquer around it. Usually there is about
6 coats of clear lacquer applied first to seal the wood. Next comes
about 6 coats of colored lacquer to acheive the desired color. The
remaining 8+ coats are clear. You would have to experiment with
differant pigments to match the original finish. Once you get the chip
level with the rest of the finish you could shoot a coat of clear over
the entire guitar. There is no guarantee that you will be happy with
the results. I wouldn't attempt this on a white finish. It just seems
unlikely you will be able to match the color and get a level finish.
Personally I think this would be a tedious process and after all
is said and done, you may not be happy with the result. If the finish
is really beat and you are intent on improving it, I would refinish
the entire guitar except for the back of the headstock. This way you
are pretty much guaranteed a nice level finish across the entire
guitar, and you don't have to worry about matching the color 100%.
In general, lacquer cracks seem to show more on an opaque
finish than they do on a clear finish. All lacquer finishes are
susceptable to this.
If you like a challenge, you might consider routing the body
and apply a binding around the front and back edges. You could
always recruit the help of a luthier to do this. Bear in mind there
is a lot more work refinishing a guitar with binding. You have to
scrape the lacquer off the binding before you start into the clear
coats. This is one of the reasons why fancy guitars with lots of
binding around the neck, headstock, body, f-holes, etc. are so much
more expensive than their plain-Jane cousins.
When I read the basenote, I thought the same as Rick. Did Gibson
evan make a LP Studio in the early 80's? To my knowledge they didn't.
Mark
|
2990.23 | | BUSY::SLAB | Audiophiles do it 'til it hertz! | Tue Mar 18 1997 10:37 | 5 |
|
>nitrocellulose lacquer....
Cellulose heroes never really dye ... is that what they say?
|
2990.24 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | thick slabs of dirt in a halo of airy twang | Tue Mar 18 1997 13:46 | 5 |
| re LP Studios from 1984...
Well, I just saw another one listed on Gruhn's web page, so I guess
they were indeed making em back then.
|