T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2879.1 | | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:12 | 33 |
| First thing, Get a Shure SM-57 (used for about $60-$70, $95 new)
You'd be amazed at how many studios that can afford nearly
any mic end up using SM-57's for this particular application.
The bottom line is that you need to make experiments: put the mic
in a particular place, make a test recording, then try it in another
place.
A lot of people report that the most successful/satisfying method
involves mixing both a "close mic" (shoved up to the speaker) and
"ambient mic" (further back in the room).
Another recommendation that may garner some controversy here, but I
am none-the-less rather convinced of:
If you're recording a distorted part, when you're in the "adjusting
the dials" phase, try and get a sound you like and THEN, although it
may be painful to do, try and back down the gain a significant notch.
The real problem here is that something that sounds great when you're
soloing in a room by yourself, typically doesn't sound the same when
you put it back into a mix. Generally speaking the LESS distortion
you have, the better it will both cut thru the mix AND... the less it
will muddy up the rest of the mix.
However, this is a very hard thing to convince yourself to do (record
using a sound that isn't what you think it should be).
Others, feel free to flame this suggestion: I'm really curious if
others have the experience, or have counter-experience.
db
|
2879.2 | | TECRUS::ROST | Fuzzbox Voodoo | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:30 | 26 |
| Keep in mind that what microphones pick up is not what your ear hears
in the room, or even what your ear hears if you stick it where the mike
is. Depending on what you are trying to do (recording or miking amps
for live performance, you didn't say which) there are lots of factors
to consider.
In recording, the idea is to create a sound on tape that will give an
*illusion* of an amp in the room. How that sound is created is almost
immaterial, there are numerous ways to get good sounds, and engineers
will argue endlessly over how to do it.
In live perfomance, the intent is to project the sound of the
instrument into the room and the concerns are faithfully reproducing
the sound that the player wants, minimizing the pickup of *other*
instruments and vocals, and avoiding feedback.
Modern pop music recordings use lots of techniques like multiple
microphones, using signal processing to create artifical room
acoustics, even miking multiple amps or dubbing multiple guitar tracks
to create a "bigger" sound. The intent is not even to make it sound
*real* but make it sound *good*. If I can plug a guitar into a tiny
Pignose, stuff a mike in front of it and get a sound that makes the
listener think he's hearing a wall of Marshalls, then that technique is
justified.
Brian
|
2879.3 | | LEDS::BURATI | I'mthecultofpersonality | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:42 | 3 |
| If you want to preview what a single mic will pick up in various
location, listen with one ear blocked. granted, it's a little tough for
a lone guitarist.
|
2879.4 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Like a cat caught in a vacuum | Thu Jan 20 1994 07:15 | 15 |
| > If you want to preview what a single mic will pick up in various
> location, listen with one ear blocked. granted, it's a little tough for
> a lone guitarist.
Guess you could plug one ear with an earplug for the test. However,
guitar amps are generally close miked. I don't recommend putting your
unprotected ear anywhere near where the mike is usually placed!
One point on recording guitar amps with SM57s. I've read at least one
source that says you want the mike very close to the speaker to take
advantage of the mike's (considerable) proximity effect to get a
reasonable bottom end to the signal. If you're distance miking, you
may want to choose a different mike.
Greg
|
2879.5 | | BLASTA::Pelkey | Life aint for the squeamish | Thu Jan 20 1994 07:25 | 22 |
| I'd have to agree with the trend in the last 4 notes.
Best luck I've had is to use a decent uni-directrional mike,
(Like an SM57) and get it about 2 feet out from the amp,
(I have a 2/12" combo) and I generally place the mike dead
center, be-twix the two speakers..
Then I take a BIG comforter, or sleeping bag, and I cover the Amp,
and mic stand, forming a makeshift tent, over the whole rig.
This helps to cut down the room noise a bit, and allows me
to make the appropriate adjustments on the input level of
the channel..
As far as effects, and such go, the less the better, add it later.
The goal is to get as good a track down as you can, worrying about
the grease and delay, or what ever, later.
Minimize any eq-ing you normally do, and try to miniminze
in-line boxes. In otherwords keep the accessories
to a bare minimum to get the sound yer lookin for.
|
2879.6 | | LEDS::BURATI | I'mthecultofpersonality | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:03 | 12 |
| Close miking is generally to prevent leakage from other sound sources
and to eliminate room ambience. When you're recording solo, there are no
other sound sources and a small amount of room ambience can sometimes be
useful. To analysize a particular setting without endless trial and
error taping/move the mike cycles, one can check the sound using the
method I described. There would be absolutely no point in putting your
ear up against your speaker.
Sorry if that wasn't excruciatingly clear in my previous reply.
--Ron
|
2879.7 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Like a cat caught in a vacuum | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:06 | 23 |
| > Close miking is generally to prevent leakage from other sound sources
> and to eliminate room ambience. When you're recording solo, there are no
> other sound sources and a small amount of room ambience can sometimes be
> useful.
Just because your don't have to worry about mike bleed doesn't mean
you'd select a distant mike position. If you're using a common dynamic
mike like an SM57, you're not going to get enough signal out of it to
be useful unless it's within around 2-3 feet of the amp (unless you
have the amp turned up to an absolutely excruciating volume). If you
have something that doesn't allow you to set the mike preamp gain, like
most portastudios, then you're tracking a low level signal onto tape,
decreasing the signal to noise ratio. If you're using anything short
of a professional recording mixer, you'll most likely start getting a
lot of noise from the mike preamps when you crank the gain enough to
get a decent signal level into the mixer.
>Sorry if that wasn't excruciatingly clear in my previous reply.
Close miking is used far more often then distant miking for guitar
amps. No need to jump my case.
Greg
|
2879.8 | | MILKWY::BLOMBERG | | Thu Jan 20 1994 12:48 | 26 |
| I generallly agree with close miking being the most useful technique
for a recording studio application. Assuming that 2879.0 was talking
about recording, you might want to use a recording studio quality
microphone. SM57s are generally for stage applications. Critical
listening in headphones will identify the grittiness and the coloration
provided by this class of microphones. It is a great workhorse, but
not in the studio. Test record a Grand piano and you will see what I
mean.
If you want toughness plus clarity, a properly placed EV RE-16 can
provide satisfaction. It does have the disadvantage of picking up at
+/- 120� off axis (it is super-cardioid, so avoid having another
instrument close by. RE-16s cost more, but last forever and can be
re-sold to broadcast and recording studios. Sennheiser 421s are
another decent choice.
By the way, for stage, only mike the amp if you have to. It is
sometimes a shame to take a signal from a good guitar and nice tube amp
and risk it by picking it up with a stage-microphone, sending it through
a stage-quality transistorized board (with EQ, no less), and force it out
through less-than-sweet PA speakers. Sometimes ya have to, but don't do it
just for the sake of doing it.
|
2879.9 | | ROCKER::KNOX | | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:03 | 18 |
| RE: .8
>>> By the way, for stage, only mike the amp if you have to.
If you are playing anywhere other than lounge-lizard-land, you're
going to have to mic the guitars. The amp should be dialed-in for
the "sound" you want, but the volume should be set as an onstage
monitor. No one (other than the guitartist!!) wants to hear the
guitar at "room-volume" while onstage.
Some guys like to send a mic'ed signal and a Direct Box signal to
the PA board. If the soundman is worth his weight in beer, he'll be
able to mix these two signals to get a real sweet mix in the mains.
My 2cents,
Billy_K
|
2879.10 | Mic'ing and direct box works for bass too... | ROCKER::KNOX | Rock'n'Roll Refugee | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:20 | 10 |
|
RE: -1
By the way, Mic'ing and Direct Box'ing works equally well for BASS.
I have two 15" Theill cabs and a 4x10 cab (bi-amp'd). I put a '57 on
one of the 10" speakers as well as running a direct signal to the board.
In this way, I mix the two signals at the board (one clean from the DB
and one real punchy from the 10" speaker.
/Billy_K
|