T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2849.1 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Mon Nov 08 1993 09:57 | 8 |
| re: .0
> Here is a note for ratholing about the GUITARnotes VI tape.
OK, I'll start...
*Hey*, I still haven't received my GN-V!!!! :-) :-) :-)
|
2849.2 | | TECRUS::ROST | Marcel Marceau's voice coach | Mon Nov 08 1993 10:04 | 6 |
| Re: .1
Anyone still looking for a copy of GN-V can contact me if a second
generation dub is OK.
Brian
|
2849.3 | "I Got The I-IV-V Blues" | BRAT::PAGE | | Mon Nov 08 1993 10:16 | 4 |
|
Hey, can I submit a 15-minute blues jam? :-)
|
2849.4 | 8( | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Too many blues, not enough chops... | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:31 | 3 |
| I knew we shoulda taped that night at Stormy Monday.....dam!
dawg
|
2849.5 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | Don't Look Past Me | Mon Nov 08 1993 13:01 | 9 |
| I can see it now...
Side A -- Da Blooz Side B -- Progressive $#!+
Dawg Buck
Fred Abatelli db
Brian Rost Edd Cote
;')
|
2849.6 | 8) | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Too many blues, not enough chops... | Mon Nov 08 1993 13:04 | 7 |
| re: -1
Well,
sounds cool! Fred, Brian, when can we start taping?
dawg
|
2849.7 | Beat Generation | TECRUS::ROST | Marcel Marceau's voice coach | Mon Nov 08 1993 13:28 | 10 |
| Re: .5
No way I would be on the blooz side, I would definitely make the prog
$#^% side because I can play that stuff OK, I need more chops if I
wanna play blooz 8^) 8^)
Actually I was thinking about that tape I made of poetry recitations
backed by multi-tracked guitar feedback...
Squeal Jung
|
2849.8 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:22 | 5 |
| > Actually I was thinking about that tape I made of poetry recitations
> backed by multi-tracked guitar feedback...
No WAY!?! That's what *I* was gonna submit!
|
2849.9 | I can name that blues tune in... ONE note! | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | DOS Boot | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:48 | 4 |
| I have a one note guitar solo for the blues side that'll blow you guys
away!
;-)
|
2849.11 | We get the spine label... | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:20 | 3 |
| Yo Buckster, what about those of use that don't like either?
gh
|
2849.12 | This time fer sure, I got to get another hat | GIDDAY::KNIGHTP | get me a gin and pentatonic | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:36 | 7 |
| okay
this time I'm in, I have some stuff laying around from our last
demo, I'll send it to you Brian, with spare tapes so I can get copies
of GN IV and V ( I only have the first 3).
What sort of reference tone do you want, I will master my stuff
to 3db as per usaull, is that ok?
P.K.
|
2849.13 | How do you make a test tone? | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Wed Nov 10 1993 07:11 | 3 |
| How does one go about putting a test tone on a tape? Do you
have to buy an "official" test tone generator? How about a tone
from a guitar tuner?
|
2849.14 | yeah, waddaya want? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | no comment | Wed Nov 10 1993 07:30 | 6 |
| re: -1
I dunno the answer, but i assume that i would just play a note at the
level i'm gonna record; maybe strike it 2 or 3 times?
Brian?
|
2849.15 | How to record a test tone | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | DOS Boot | Wed Nov 10 1993 07:46 | 10 |
| You probably don't need to buy any devices to generate a test tone.
To put a test tone on the tape just find something that can produce
an audio signal with a constant (unchanging) volume.
Record the test tone such that your recording level needles stay at
zero. Like a keyboard playing one note with an organ sound.
The idea behind the test tone is so that Brian can precisely match
the recording level of the copy he's making.
|
2849.16 | | TECRUS::ROST | Marcel Marceau's voice coach | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:38 | 16 |
| Re: last few
What db said. Possible sources:
1. tuner output
2. synthesizer or organ playing a sustained note
3. test tone generator (you guys all have a full reapir shop in your
basements, right?)
Twanging a few notes on a guitar is pretty useless. The tone isn't
mandatory, guys! If you can put one on, fine, if not, that's fine,
too.
Brian
|
2849.17 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:42 | 4 |
| So...we record a 0vu test tone on the tape then slam our music at +6,
right?
gh
|
2849.18 | look out, I'm running with scissors! | EZ2GET::STEWART | Life is a contact sport! | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:44 | 10 |
|
just like a K-Tel commercial, right?
|
2849.19 | | TECRUS::ROST | Marcel Marceau's voice coach | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:53 | 7 |
| Re: .17
I really don't care where you put the levels! If the levels are
particularly hot and distort on everybody's copy, then the whole world
will know you can't read a VU meter 8^)
Brian
|
2849.20 | rathole indeed! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | no comment | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:07 | 9 |
| RE: "twanging a few notes on the guitar is pretty useless"
Heard me play ,eh?
RE: then the whole world will know you can't read a VU meter
a what?
8)
|
2849.21 | eh? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | no comment | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:52 | 7 |
| It may not be much of a quality representation, but it could be fun for
posterity's sake; why don't we record and submit our next session at
Stormy Monday's? Why not? Anybody have suggestions for possible
recording equipment? A cheesy boom box would do it, but something
"nicer" might be better!
dawg
|
2849.22 | Yes!! | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:59 | 4 |
| I think you guys should definitely record it, and submit at least a
couple of songs for the compilation!
Greg
|
2849.23 | | TECRUS::ROST | Marcel Marceau's voice coach | Wed Nov 10 1993 14:11 | 4 |
| Hang on, lemmee ring up Chris Jagger and arrange for the Rolling
Stones Mobile to head over to Merrimack...
Sodhead
|
2849.24 | rolling truck stones thing just outside | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Wed Nov 10 1993 14:36 | 3 |
| That means we GOTTA do "Smoke On the Water"
/dunt-da-da dunt-da-dada
|
2849.25 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Wed Nov 10 1993 14:54 | 3 |
| > /dunt-da-da dunt-da-dada
Hey Butthead, that was cool! Heh heh...heh.
|
2849.26 | | BRAT::PAGE | | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:13 | 13 |
|
Well, I'm willing to provide my ADAT (don't really have enuff
mikes, though), but it seems kinda like a logistical nightmare to
try and set up recording there. I mean, it's not like it's "our gig"
or anything. Even just tossing up a few mikes would be a little tough
cause the place is so small, there's other people playing, and the
audience is sitting right there waiting...
If we could find a way to meet some place else, before or after
the jam, I'd be willing to go for that...
Brad
|
2849.27 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:30 | 3 |
| Bring a RatShack PZM mic or two and tape 'em to the wall.
|
2849.28 | no need for elaborate recording procedures | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:16 | 5 |
| Yeah, I think the best thing to do for this would be to hang a pair
of condenser mikes in the room somewhere and go direct to stereo (2
tracks on the ADAT would be fine, even a cassette deck would be fine).
Greg
|
2849.29 | | KDX200::COOPER | There's a moon in the sky! | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:39 | 7 |
| Yeah, or fox simplicities sake, anyone have a portable DAT?
Of course, a Studer 32track digital workstation, an SSL console, anna
bunch of racks of tube compressors, gates, lexicon, eventide, TC...
You get the picture right?
;-)
|
2849.30 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Nov 11 1993 06:52 | 11 |
| re: .28
> Yeah, I think the best thing to do for this would be to hang a pair
> of condenser mikes in the room somewhere and go direct to stereo (2
> tracks on the ADAT would be fine, even a cassette deck would be fine).
Just don't forget that you'll need mic preamps. If you know someone
with one of those cute little Mackie 1202 mixers, it would work very
nicely.
-Hal
|
2849.31 | How 'bout... | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Thu Nov 11 1993 07:11 | 5 |
| It might be more entertaining to put a recorder on the tables where
everyone's sitting and record the banter, with the jamming in the
background. Especially if Steve brings his family album. %^)
Dave
|
2849.32 | you were there last time..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | no comment | Thu Nov 11 1993 07:13 | 6 |
| >>I mean, it's not like it's "our gig" or anything.
yes it is.....
8)
|
2849.33 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Thu Nov 11 1993 08:38 | 26 |
| re: Coop
> Of course, a Studer 32track digital workstation, an SSL console, anna
> bunch of racks of tube compressors, gates, lexicon, eventide, TC...
This is a GUITARnotes tape, dude. Adding *ANYTHING* to the sound is
*strictly* prohibited!
re: Hal
>> Yeah, I think the best thing to do for this would be to hang a pair
>> of condenser mikes in the room somewhere and go direct to stereo (2
>> tracks on the ADAT would be fine, even a cassette deck would be fine).
>
>Just don't forget that you'll need mic preamps.
...of course.
> If you know someone
>with one of those cute little Mackie 1202 mixers, it would work very
>nicely.
I don't know anyone with one, but *you* probably do, since you just
sold one not long ago, right? Did a fellow noter buy your 1202?
Greg
|
2849.34 | Might not be close enough | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Nov 11 1993 10:08 | 15 |
| re: .33
>> If you know someone
>>with one of those cute little Mackie 1202 mixers, it would work very
>>nicely.
>
> I don't know anyone with one, but *you* probably do, since you just
> sold one not long ago, right? Did a fellow noter buy your 1202?
Greg:
Yes, Rodney Mashia bought it, but he lives in New Hampshire, so I'm
not sure he's within striking distance of the infamous "dawg jam".
-Hal
|
2849.35 | Merrimack, that is | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Thu Nov 11 1993 11:17 | 3 |
| Good news, Hal - the next "infamous dawg jam" will be in New Hampshire!
Dave
|
2849.36 | 8) | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Make it so.... | Thu Nov 11 1993 11:39 | 5 |
| C'mon up Hal; I mean you and I only work about, what, 25 minutes apart,
and it might as well be 500! There's some neat irony in us both travelling
to NH to meet each other....
"dawg jam"...I like it!
|
2849.37 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Nov 11 1993 12:00 | 17 |
| re: .36
> C'mon up Hal; I mean you and I only work about, what, 25 minutes apart,
> and it might as well be 500! There's some neat irony in us both travelling
> to NH to meet each other....
Actually, when I'm in the office we're only about 5 minutes apart (my
office is in COP). I work at home in Baltimore as much as I can get
away with.
Hey, is there any other silent Baltimore/Washington guitar noters
lurking out there? Maybe we could arrange a get-together?
Steve, if any of your many jams are ever on the Baltimore side of DC let
me know. I'd love to hear you play.
-Hal
|
2849.38 | always lookin! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Make it so.... | Thu Nov 11 1993 12:13 | 22 |
| >Actually, when I'm in the office we're only about 5 minutes apart (my
>office is in COP). I work at home in Baltimore as much as I can get
>away with.
Jeez!, let's do lunch one day!
>Hey, is there any other silent Baltimore/Washington guitar noters
>lurking out there? Maybe we could arrange a get-together?
anyone?
>Steve, if any of your many jams are ever on the Baltimore side of DC let
>me know. I'd love to hear you play.
don't you mean, you'd love to get together and play? I know of NO
blues jams in the Baltimore/DC area, but it's because I don't look for
them, as I live 60 miles south of Landover in King George, VA. If you
ever hear of one, lemme know. Might check the local papers; in two
cities the size of Balt/DC, you'd think there'd be a jam!
dawg
|
2849.39 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:15 | 8 |
| re: .38
> don't you mean, you'd love to get together and play?
That depends...I haven't heard you play, yet! I'm afraid I'll be
terribly embarrassed! (1/2 :-)
-Hal
|
2849.40 | not to worry......8) | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Ask Mikey, he'll eat anything... | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:23 | 2 |
| >That depends...I haven't heard you play, yet! I'm afraid I'll be
>terribly embarrassed! (1/2 :-)
|
2849.41 | It's spreading to *this* note! | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:52 | 6 |
| > I'd love to hear you play.
Don't get your hopes up, Hal. He plays blues, and they suck, dontcha
know? %^)
Dave
|
2849.42 | I've always liked the DC area | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | DOS Boot | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:20 | 6 |
| > I know of NO blues jams in the Baltimore/DC area,
Y'know, I've always appreciated the advanced cultural aspects of
the DC area.
;-)
|
2849.43 | nothing original, it wouldn't be boring.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Ask Mikey, he'll eat anything... | Mon Nov 15 1993 09:33 | 13 |
| Well, Brian DID say it was a rathole!
BTW, my plans for volume VI submission are instrumental covers of a
couple of my fav tunes. My blooz (boring and repetitive) song is gonna
be none other than "key to the hiway" (what a shock, eh?) and I'm planning
to cover Jeff Healey's "That's What They Say"; it's kind of a
country/rock/ballad from "See the Light" album....one of my fav JH tunes.
My brother in law has agreed to make me a backing tape of bass, kybds and
drums for each tune that I will add my guitar to. We'll see what
happens....maybe I won't get pissed off and act like a brat, withdrawing
my submittal this time.
Dawg
|
2849.44 | the blooz tune is in.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Fri Dec 10 1993 07:44 | 5 |
| I just recieved my first backing tape. I'm gonna try and do the
recording over the holidays. Grad school is a crunch right now;
2 classes:== 2 term papers, 2 presentations, 2 FINALS!
joe college
|
2849.45 | 8( | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Mon Dec 13 1993 08:03 | 18 |
| Recording blues........
I tried to put something on tape this weekend that i would be willing
to let others listen to and I just can't get it. I have discovered
that while I love to play blues stuff live at jams, when I try to
record something that comes close to having any dynamics at all, I
fail. Blues *is* boring and repetitive when I try to use a backing
tape and just jam lead lix over it.....sheesh! I'm going back to the
drawing board.......
I need a 4 track! I'm gonna try and use my Technics tape deck. It's
got left and right recording channels with respective level
controls.....
I'm bummed, everything sounds like sh*t!
dawg
|
2849.46 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Mon Dec 13 1993 08:31 | 10 |
| re: .45
> I need a 4 track! I'm gonna try and use my Technics tape deck. It's
> got left and right recording channels with respective level
> controls.....
What happened to the four-track you had a few weeks ago. Did you have
to give it back?
-Hal
|
2849.47 | I'll fix this situation.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Mon Dec 13 1993 08:42 | 13 |
| >What happened to the four-track you had a few weeks ago. Did you have
>to give it back?
Once I figured out how to use it (basically), I was smart enough to
figure out it was broken! I returned it......
I just talked to my bro-in-law (bass/kybd player). I think I'm gonna take
all my stuff to his basement, and record my songs live with him on
bass/kybds and my sister on drums. He said he would be willing to
split the cost of a 4 track with me in the near future....
dawg
|
2849.48 | Happy for the chance to spend someone else's money | DOCTP::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives. | Tue Dec 14 1993 07:48 | 8 |
| See note 2.2728 (I think that's the one - Tom Benson). If that 234 is
still for sale and you have a decent mixer, you'll have a real nice
4-track set up. I have the 8-track version (238), and I love it.
In fact, I thought about getting this myself, but I'm afraid I'd have
to do that trick you guys are always talking about (sneaking it into
the house :-)
Justine
|
2849.49 | And get a Mackie 1202 to go with it | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Tue Dec 14 1993 08:01 | 7 |
| re: .48
Justine's right, the 234's a really nice machine. I'll probably be
selling mine soon since I've gone 8-track. A friend of mine gets
first crack at it, though.
-Hal
|
2849.50 | always happy to spend someone elses money as well! ;') | POWDML::BUCKLEY | Scandalized my name! | Tue Dec 14 1993 12:28 | 6 |
| Hey Justine...
Dump that 328 piece of garbage and get an Alesis ADAT!! ;')
smooches...
Bucky
|
2849.51 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Tue Dec 14 1993 14:01 | 6 |
| What a guy!
But, if you're getting, I think I'd rather have the Tascam DA-88 then
the Alesis ADAT.
Greggy
|
2849.52 | so many choices.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Wed Dec 15 1993 11:25 | 6 |
| My partner in this deal is leaning towards Tascam, but we're gonna shop
used stuff, too. We'd like to get something simple, but effective and
turn-key. I don't want to have to buy a host of accessories (mixer) to
use it. We would like to have punch in/out and headphone features.
dawg
|
2849.53 | | KDX200::COOPER | There's a moon in the sky! | Thu Dec 16 1993 07:02 | 4 |
| Man, I'd check out the new offering from Fostex - they have a new
four-track porta-studio which looks like the CATS MEOW with Dolby S
and all that jive. Scope it!
jc
|
2849.54 | Tascam 424 or 234 w/ Mackie Mixer | DOCTP::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives. | Thu Dec 16 1993 07:04 | 13 |
|
A friend of mine has produced to excellent cassette albums using a
Tascam 424 (4-track cassette with decent built-in mixer. ) He has had
to do multiple bounces on tracks since he's pretty much a 1-mand band
and doesn't use a sequencer, and still the sound quality of the
finished product (final mix done in a studio) is quite good.
These decks seem to hold their value in the used market pretty well,
and new they go for aroudn 475-500. For that you could buy Tom's 234
and still get a Mackie 12-channel mixer! By the way, I don't know Tom
and I stand to gain nothing by hawking his wares :-)
Justine
|
2849.55 | Steve and the Family Noise..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Thu Dec 16 1993 07:19 | 9 |
| I made a Vol VI submission last night at my sister's house. Her
husband sequenced the keyboards and then we all played along with that,
him on bass, me on guitar, and sis on drums. We taped it on my Technics
cassette deck with a 'left' and 'right' mics hanging from the ceiling.
Crude, but it's all we had. We made 4 takes and agreed that we were
not satisfied with any of them....but one of 'em is going to Brian
tommorrow.....
We need a 4 track.......sigh
|
2849.56 | | BRAT::PAGE | | Fri Dec 17 1993 08:30 | 14 |
|
A few months back, Guitar Player magazine had "Songwriting" issue
(with an old photo of Hendrix on the cover). One of the articles in it
was a 4-track shootout where they reviewed and rated a bunch of them.
I can't remember which one came out on top, but if you're interested
I can check on it and post it later.
I think most people have been very happy with the Guitar Player
"shootouts". They review thoroughly, rate accurately, and they're
not afraid to call an item a piece of junk if it stinks-- even if
the manufacturer is one of their advertizers.
Brad
|
2849.57 | | STAR::BENSON | Musical Weapons Research | Fri Dec 17 1993 10:07 | 3 |
| RE: Several previous: Wow, my 234's becoming famous! And it's STILL
AVAILABLE...
Tom
|
2849.58 | in a southern mood....... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Tonya wacked Jimmy Hoffa | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:20 | 15 |
| Here's the scoop on my SECOND submission to VOL 6.....
Equipment: American Std Strat, Dean Markley 35w combo, Ibanez TS10,
Boss digital delay, Technics 2 channel cassette deck.
Song: Outlaw's "There Goes Another Love Song"
Method: Played along with Outlaws Live CD (Hittin' The Road) and taped
the whole mess on the Technics. I adjusted the EQ so the Outlaws
guitars were nearly inaudible, so 'most' of the rythmn and leads you
here are moi......
Bulldawg jams with the Outlaws......in the mail to Brian today!
sd
|
2849.59 | %^) | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Good rhythms to bad rubbish | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:57 | 3 |
| > "Tonya wacked Jimmy Hoffa"
BWAHAHAHA!
|
2849.60 | "Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?" | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:16 | 10 |
|
Do people really hear these tapes? There's always this drive
to get things to tape and send 'em out but then the "review"
note just sits there. Even submitters don't reply sometimes.
I've never put one together but what's the scoop on how many
go out to folks? Do non-submitters hear them?
Tom
|
2849.61 | Grrr... | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Good rhythms to bad rubbish | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:24 | 4 |
| Some non-submitters do enter reviews, but only if they get the friggin'
thing in the first place. %^(
Dave
|
2849.62 | We Aint Gonna Put Sony Music Out Of Business | TECRUS::ROST | Clueless and slightly slack | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:28 | 20 |
| Yes, non-submittors do hear them. Based on the COMMUSIC Tapes, I'd say
about 1/4 to 1/3 of the tapes go to non-submittors. New tapes also
generate orders for back volumes. Most non-submittor copies go to
read-only types. I haven't kept track of the three COMMUSIC tapes I
did, but I think the "best seller" might have been about 20 copies
total.
Ya gotta remember that people who don't read the notesfile have no idea
the tapes exist. Not that there's likely to be heightened demand if
folks *did* know they existed, Whitney Houston it aint.
I know *I* like the tapes because I get to hear your smokin' leads, Tom
8^)
I think the review thing petered out because of some near-flame-wars on
past tapes. COMMUSIC still gets reviews posted for the tapes done
there. Hey, if someone is gonna mail me $3.75 for a new volume, I
guess they liked the last one enough to take a chance 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
2849.63 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:34 | 12 |
|
Just to be clear, I have all of them and have enjoyed hearing
everyone - and we've come a long way, baby! ;^)
I was just curious about the what/who/where which led to why.
Also, where's players like Fred A. (who I've heard many times)
and Danny Weber (who I'd love to hear).
Or even Stormin'...
|
2849.64 | | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Wed Mar 02 1994 15:11 | 11 |
| > Also, where's players like Fred A.
I've often suggested that Fred and I put something together for
one of these tapes, but it hasn't happened yet.
I'm tempted to submit the 1.5 minute version of "I Feel Lucky" we
recorded for our db wilfred demo last night.
Fred put some very cool licks and tone on that.
db
|
2849.65 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Wed Mar 02 1994 16:18 | 13 |
| re: Tom
What difference does it make whether someone writes up a review or not?
I don't think I reviewed the last couple of tapes, but I enjoyed
listening to them. Formal reviews or not, it's been interesting
(verbal, face to face) conversation material between several other
noters and myself.
I don't know how well the more recent ones have done, but I seem to
remember sending out between 20-25 copies of Guitarnotes I when I put
that one together.
Greg
|
2849.66 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Thu Mar 03 1994 06:03 | 7 |
|
Greg - I guess I was kinda matching received tapes with reviewed
tapes, that's all. There's this excitement of "the tape's out"
that just peters out...
Aren't you glad I asked? ;^)
|
2849.67 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | anti-EMM! anti-EMM! I hate expanded memory!- Dorothy | Thu Mar 03 1994 06:13 | 8 |
| I dunno I never got a copy of the one Coop put together.
Back whenn the first Commusic tapes were put together there were folks who
felt abused by the reviews, and to be fair some of them were perhaps a bit
too cold. Since then I've always tried to find something nice to say or I
didn't review.
dbii
|
2849.68 | mine suk! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Tonya wacked Jimmy Hoffa | Thu Mar 03 1994 09:32 | 4 |
| If you guys have enjoyed past copies of the tapes, that's about to
change.......this one will have ME on it!
>:*}
|
2849.69 | its a lot to ask | GIDDAY::KNIGHTP | There's room for you inside | Sun Aug 14 1994 18:03 | 16 |
| Hi
I would like to get a copy of a couple of tapes as well as
guitar notes 6 tape. I lost my guit note 3 tape 8^(. (long story,)
Would anyone be able to dupe 3,4,5,6 for me????PLeeeeeeeeeese!!!
I now have an 8 track and I promise to send in a submission for guit
notes 7..........
Dont worry about cost ...I will send you a money order in good
old US dollars.
P.K.
Pretty please
|