T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2823.1 | You can't just turn it off | LEDS::ORSI | GotInAt2WithA10+WokeUpAt10WithA2 | Wed Oct 06 1993 14:27 | 9 |
|
> New reissue amps: blackface Deluxe Reverb!!! YES!!!!!
Oh boy, I'm in trouble now. Just when I thought I had this thing
under control....and the next GTS Anonymous meeting isn't 'til
next monday night.
I. M. Screwed
|
2823.2 | | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Wed Oct 06 1993 14:31 | 5 |
| re: Harley Strat
Oh boy!!! An axe that leaks and vibrates...
Edd (closet Harley-owner-wannabee)
|
2823.3 | | BLASTA::Pelkey | Professional Hombre | Wed Oct 06 1993 14:44 | 7 |
| Great,,,
Lace Sensor Pickups for an acoustic.....
Now if Floyd Rose would only come out with that acoustic-whammy......
C. U. Lata
|
2823.4 | | LEDS::BURATI | I'd rather be playing my B-3 | Wed Oct 06 1993 15:02 | 11 |
| RE: Harley Strat
Heh heh. I have a '62 strat that's all apart because when I bought it,
someone had given it a motorcycle gas tank paint job, i.e. a heavy
automotive black finish with midnight blue curly pinstripe designs on it
and a sortof batwing pickguard made of brushed black anodized aluminum.
(Fortunately, the original greenish pickguard was in the case.) I
stripped the old finish off and just about filled a 12 oz coffee can
with it. This WAS a Harley Strat.
--Ron
|
2823.5 | | TECRUS::ROST | Keef Riffhard | Thu Oct 07 1993 09:45 | 8 |
| Oops, checked the blurb again, actually the Pro Jr. *does* have tubes,
but no channel switch, etc. It's like an old Champ, just volume and
tone.
The Harley guitar apparently has a aluminum body, good choice for those
who think a Twin is light. 8^)
Brian
|
2823.6 | %^) | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Reunite Gondwanaland! | Thu Oct 07 1993 11:15 | 5 |
| re: Harley Strat
Does this mean you can't tune it?
Dave
|
2823.7 | | KDX200::COOPER | Testing my new personal name | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:33 | 2 |
| Probably can't go fast on it either...
:-0
|
2823.8 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | anti-EMM! anti-EMM! I hate expanded memory!- Dorothy | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:55 | 9 |
| re: can you tune it
sure but parts fall off everytime you use it! :-)
Coop, I know of a harley you might want to run against...it beats 427 vets in
1/4 mile runs regularly, of course you gotta schedule a day when it's running..
dbii
|
2823.9 | hhhhhmmmmmmm.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | KeepItSimple | Thu Oct 07 1993 12:56 | 5 |
| re: last few....
The excess vibration might come in handy...........
>8*}
|
2823.10 | Strathead? Shovelcaster? | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Thu Oct 07 1993 13:44 | 3 |
| Would it be OK to play a Flatocaster thru a Yamaha amp?
Edd
|
2823.11 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Did it. Done it. *WHAP* owwww! | Thu Oct 07 1993 17:40 | 2 |
| Harley Strat = Makes a cool sound, but you can't keep it running too
long.
|
2823.13 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Reunite Gondwanaland! | Fri Oct 08 1993 11:05 | 6 |
| Does the blurb say whether the Pro Jr. has reverb?
Dave
Does it mention the Bronco's "Dangerous Distortion" (mentioned in 685.59)?
That one sounds like it's too much for me. %^)
|
2823.14 | | KDX200::COOPER | Testing my new personal name | Fri Oct 08 1993 11:34 | 2 |
| Yeah, but can that Harley beat my FZ ??
:-)
|
2823.15 | I'm fickle! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | KeepItSimple | Fri Oct 08 1993 11:52 | 7 |
| re: -1
only if you're pushing the FZ....uphill.
8^)
Steve who likes domestic guitar/toys and Foreign motorized stuff.
|
2823.16 | | TECRUS::ROST | Keef Riffhard | Fri Oct 08 1993 13:18 | 9 |
| Re: .13, Pro Jr.
See .5, this thing has two knobs, volume and tone. No verb, no
nothing... Hey it's all tube, ya need more tone, that's what the tone
knob is fer 8^)
The Bronco's distortion is "dangerous" because it's solid state 8^)
Brian
|
2823.17 | I've already got a two-knobber at home | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Reunite Gondwanaland! | Fri Oct 08 1993 13:58 | 20 |
| re: .16
Yeah, I read that; I just figured (hoped) maybe you gave an incomplete
description.
Geez, I've got a fifties-vintage Rex practice amp, replete with peeling
tweed contact paper "Tolex", that has all those features, except it's
about 4 watts. Gets a nice smooth distortion with both knobs all the
way up and humbuckers, but you can talk over it. I was hoping Fender
was going to put out something a little more - shall we say - modern, a
15-watter with reverb, some gain, effects loop, stuff like that. A
small amp, but a real one. You know, sort of a "Pro Jr."
Maybe I have to look at vintage Princeton Reverbs or something. Did
Super Champs have reverb?
Dave
(Bitch, bitch, bitch! Ever since the baby came, "When are we gonna get
married?")
|
2823.18 | real amps | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:14 | 2 |
| Super Champs had reverb, no effects loop though. $200-$300 used, when
you see em (not often)
|
2823.19 | | TECRUS::ROST | Keef Riffhard | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:14 | 9 |
| Re: .17
Yes, the Super Champ has reverb but guess what..when you kick in the
overdrive, the reverb is disabled!
The Champ 12 was close to what you are asking for, but that's been
discontinued.
Brian
|
2823.20 | not a big deal | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:21 | 7 |
| Not so fast barfbagbreath... you can turn up the preamp volume on
a Super Champ, kick in the mid-boost, and get mucho blackface-like
distortion WITH the reverb intact. Reverb gets disabled in high gain
mode with the extra tube stage, supposedly because things could get
a little "unstable". I haven't found this feature to be a big problem.
/rick
|
2823.21 | Setting Me Up As The Fall Guy, Eh? | TECRUS::ROST | Keef Riffhard | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:30 | 4 |
| Hey pencilneck, you were the one who told me about the reverb getting
disabled in the first place!
Brian
|
2823.22 | | LEDS::BURATI | lay back and dream on a rainy day | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:33 | 6 |
| I've seen Fender schematics where the boosted signal is actually taken
from the triod driving the reverb pan. These were 70s and early 80s
models. Could it be that sort of design that requires disabling the
reverb?
--Ron
|
2823.23 | | TECRUS::ROST | Keef Riffhard | Fri Oct 08 1993 15:47 | 13 |
| Re: .22
That was the secret of the old Ice Cube overdrive device, it used the
extra gain stages for the reverb.
Since you mentioned schematics, I thought I'd throw in the fact that on
many Fender amps of the 70s that had line outs, it's not a preamp out
but really a tap off the output transformer via a dropping
resistor...so while you don't get the effect of the speaker, you *do*
get all the power amp coloration using the line out. This is also
found in some Music Man designs.
Brian
|
2823.24 | ghost writer | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Fri Oct 08 1993 16:08 | 10 |
| re .22
yeah, cool idea but I've seen the Super Champ schematics and as I
recall this isn't what they did. They just intentionally take the
reverb out when the extra tube stage is kicked in
re Brian
well, the secrets out; Brian really asks me for all the answers he
posts in notes :-)
|
2823.25 | A Deluxe cure for the Blues | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Tue Mar 07 1995 10:56 | 79 |
| I play semi-occasionally in sort of a small big band group. Most of
the members played together in my college jazz band, and our typical
gig is a wedding reception for a couple that wants something diffent
than your typical wedding band fair (no, we don't play "Proud Mary").
We played fairly frequently shortly after college, but as the years
have passed (and we all got married, had kids, etc.), the time between
gigs has increased significantly.
In fact, its been three years. I had more-or-less given up on us
playing again (I live about 100 miles a way from the majority of the
band members, so it makes little sense for me to find us gigs).
I used to use a Fender Deluxe 85 (a small solid state combo with a
single 12" speaker), but I've sold it, since I was never THAT crazy
about it, and wasn't using it for anything else). So when I found out
we had a gig this summer, I decided I needed a new guitar amp.
When I got rid of the the Deluxe 85, I thought my '68 Fender Deluxe
Reverb would be adequate, if we ever played another gig. When faced
with the though of actually using it, however, I began to grow
concerned: I'm not sure it can be loud enough and still clean enough
for jazz; and it has not been the most reliable amp over the past
couple of years (it has an occasional fit, and despite three trips
to the amp doctor, the problem still shows up now and then).
So I was in the market for an amp with the following:
o Reasonably portable
o Nice clean sound, tubes preferred
o At least one 12" speaker
o Reasonable price
A local music store had a sale last weekend, so I decied to check it
out. I came home with a new Fender Blues Deluxe (I guess if Fender
makes an amp with Deluxe in its name, I have to buy it).
The Blues Deluxe is a 1x12 combo with tube pre-amps and power amp.
It has two channels: a vintage clean style channel, and a "drive"
channel with a master volume. It uses 2 6L6 power tubes and
puts out 40 watts (or possibly 60, the manual is not consistent).
Styling is retro-vintage, like a tweed bassman. The store had them
in both tweed and and blond tolex.
The amp is pretty basic. The 3 band EQ is for both channels. It
comes with a footswith to switch between the normal and drive channels.
Tubes are used in all critical areas, but some transistors are used
too (e.g., for the effects loop).
I tried it out with a Gibson ES-165 Herb Ellis (nice guitar) and
was quite pleased. My Deluxe Reverb does sound a little better,
but the Blues Deluxe does a pretty good imitation. Some things
I really liked:
o Although the drive channel can be set for a nice crunch,
it can also be set quite clean, allowing me to use the
normal channel for rhythm and the drive channel for lead
without sounding inappropriate.
o Nice sounding reverb, with a full-sized reverb tank (enclosed
in black tolex, just like they used to).
o Lots of useful sounds
o Good presence control
So I bought it. After a couple of sessions at home, I'm even more
pleased.
If size and weight were not issues, I'd prefer a '65 Twin re-issue,
but for me the Blues Deluxe is more practical. At a little over $400,
it's a great value. My only complaint, is that while I love the
vintage styling (even if my wife thinks its ugly), it is a bit more
conveniant to have the control knobs on the *front* of the amp.
FWIW, I bought a blond one. Of the two that were out in the store, it
sounded the best (not that the blond tolex has anything to do with it).
It looks great with my blond (all natural maple) ES-175 clone.
Jim (happy in tone land)
|
2823.26 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Suddenly Very Trendy | Tue Mar 07 1995 12:32 | 5 |
| I think the power rating on the Blues Deluxe is 40 watts. The Blues
Deville, the next amp up in the line, also uses 2 6L6s but they squeeze
60 watts out of em. Perhaps the two amps share the same manual, hence
the 40/60 inconsistency?
|
2823.27 | My impressions | GOES11::LAMBERT | Sam, Storage Mgmt. S/W @CXO | Tue Mar 07 1995 13:54 | 12 |
| I demo'd one of these the day I bought my Fender Performer 1000. I thought
the "drive" channel lacked, well, "drive". I demo'd it side by side with a
Peavey Classic 50 (same basic design), and found the Classic to have a
better crunch/drive sound than the Fender. It probably would do real well
for jazz though, given you don't need a good deal of distortion.
I'm still real happy with the Performer, I must say. Tube preamp, MOSFET
power amp. Sounds great, is compact and lightweight; can't ask for more.
And I saved about $100 by not having to have "all tubes".
-- Sam
|
2823.28 | Crunched Fenders and other thoughts | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Tue Mar 07 1995 14:37 | 40 |
| RE: "drive" channel lacking "drive"
That's exactly why I like it. Alot of amps' high-gain channels have
too much gain for me: you either can't get clean, or (for me) the
useful "clean to slight crunch" range is between 1 and 1.3.
If I wanted crunch, I'd just use the '68 Deluxe Reverb and
crank it up. Of course, my definition of crunch may be different
than yours. FWIW, I can't imagine turning up the gain on the
drive channel of the Blues Deluxe beyond six or seven.
I'll probably still use the Deluxe Reverb most of the time when I'm
playing at home. Actually most of my playing at home is on acoustic,
anyway.
I've demoed the Peavey Classic 50 a number of times, and while it
sounds nice, it (to me) seems to lack some of the classic Fender
tube "sparkle" I love so much. On the other hand, it probably spurred
Fender to make the new tweed line, so I give thanks to Hartley and
his boys.
Maybe I've should of tried out a couple of the amps in the Performer
series. I guess I've been disappointed so many times by amps claiming
to give you the "tube" sound without the hassle of tubes, that I've
given up trying. I know, the performers have tube pre-amps, but I've
always felt the power tubes are key to what make tube amps special.
Come to think of it, tube pre-amp, solid-state power amp is the only
combination I've never owned.
Glad to hear your happy with your Performer. It's good to see
Fender putting out such a nice variety of quality products (and
at reasonable prices to boot).
BTW, the Pro Jr. is cute, but I'd just as soon see it as more of
a tweed champ re-issue. Actually, I'd like a Princeton Reverb
pre-amp coupled with Champ power amp into a single 10" speaker.
At 6 watts, who needs a master volume... It would make the perfect
practice/recording amp.
Jim
|
2823.29 | Should also check out MosValve | GOES11::LAMBERT | Sam, Storage Mgmt. S/W @CXO | Tue Mar 07 1995 15:23 | 10 |
| Re: the Fender "sparkle". That's why I ended up with the Performer instead
of a Classic 50 or Blues Deluxe. It does the Fender sound in spades, and
also has all these neat Boogie type sounds built in. No need for an over-
drive pedal here. I (also) recently picked up an acoustic/electric guitar
and I'll tell you, that "Fender clean" sound can't be beat in that
application. I've been trying for years to get the "tube" sound without the
tubes. :-)
-- Sam
|