T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2751.1 | yes....they are owned by Gibson | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Wed Jun 16 1993 07:58 | 7 |
| There's a note in here somewhere about Epiphone guitars. I think they
are great values. They are basically a "low end" Gibson with their
copies of the more popular Gibson electrics. There's a noter here who
has an Epiphone Les Paul and I remember him having quite positive
comments about his purchase. Anyone else?
Steve
|
2751.2 | | DDIF::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Wed Jun 16 1993 08:09 | 6 |
|
Try notes 1629 and 1808. I think today's Epi's are made in Korea and
though the company is owned by Gibson. Epi's used to be made in
Kalamazoo...
JP
|
2751.3 | | TECRUS::ROST | Deja vu all over again | Wed Jun 16 1993 08:15 | 26 |
| Note 1808 discusses the current Epi guitars.
Here's a thumbnail history (probably not 100% accurate on dates):
Epiphone was independent of Gibson in its early days, and built fine
archtop guitars.
In the mid-late fifties, Gibson bought them out and for a while Epis
were made on the same lines as Gibsons, often using the same parts.
Some Epis were almost exactly like Gibson models, such as the Rivoli
bass and Riviera guitar often seen used by UK rock bands during the
first British Invasion.
By the 70s, Gibson had moved the Epi name over to imported guitars
which in general were not copies of particular Gibsons. The emphsis
was on flattop acoustics, though they did make some elctrics (only
model I recall from this period was the Genesis).
Finally, just a few years ago Gibson decided to emulate Fender's
successes with the Squier line by introducing imported Epiphone
versions of hot Gibson models (SGs, Les Pauls, Firebirds, etc.). They
also reissued some classic Epi models like the Sheraton semi-hollow.
In addition the line includes some Fender clones and some modern
looking solidbodies that are unique to the Epi line.
Brian
|
2751.4 | Tonight show last noght | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Wed Jun 16 1993 08:36 | 8 |
| FWIW: The Jay Lenno Show featured a band called X (Exine was there, but
I don't know what John Doe looks like, so he probably wasn't. They
sounded like the same old X) whose lead guitarist used an Epiphone
solid body & a Marshall half stack. It sounded really clean & bright
with a lot of upper middle maybe like a Strat with a Gibson LP Deluxe
pickup.
Paul
|
2751.5 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Wed Jun 16 1993 08:42 | 4 |
|
Great deals on Epiphones at Acton Music on rt 27. Tons of 'em.
|
2751.6 | Nice axes | POWDML::COHEN_R | | Wed Jun 16 1993 09:48 | 24 |
| I've been asked to do some restoration pearl
work (cloud inlays) for some Epi's.
Arch tops and mandolins are super.
Good axes for people who play real music --
i.e. -- not rock electric. In other words, can you
spell "Country Gentleman" vs. "tele" and "strat"?
A "really" good Epiphone is up there with a good
D'Angelico or a Maceferri.
Does anyone out there play or appreciate acoustic anymore?
An old folky -- banjos a specialty,
Ralph
(Custom pearl, banjo, and folk restorations)
|
2751.7 | huh? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Wed Jun 16 1993 09:51 | 7 |
| >>Good axes for people who play real music -- i.e. -- not rock electric
interesting comment.......is electric blues not real music? How about
electric southern rock? How about Steve Morse's contributions to
electric guitar 'music'? Interesting comment......
Steve
|
2751.8 | Whoa! | TECRUS::ROST | Deja vu all over again | Wed Jun 16 1993 09:56 | 6 |
| Re: .7
Hey, can we avoid a rathole here? Let's stick to the Epiphone topic,
OK?
Brian
|
2751.9 | | TAMDNO::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ MEL | Wed Jun 16 1993 10:13 | 11 |
| re: .3
> They
> also reissued some classic Epi models like the Sheraton semi-hollow.
I had been under the (apparently mistaken) impression that the Sheraton
was an ES-335 clone. It certainly *looks* alot like one. Which existed
first, the Sheraton or the 335?
-Hal
|
2751.10 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Sweet summer sweat | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:35 | 4 |
| I have an Epiphone SG copy, and it's a nice-playing guitar. They go
for around $300 new at Daddy's (greater Boston area).
Dave
|
2751.11 | It's both... | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:39 | 10 |
| RE: Sheratons and 335s
Actually, I think it is both a re-issue and 335 clone. The original
Sheraton was (I believe) a post Gibson buyout / pre Orient guitar.
It was constructed similar to the 335 (probably even at the same
factory?), but sold as an Epiphone, and it had its own distinctive
headstock and other appointments. The current Sheraton is a copy of
the original Sheraton, which was sort of a 335 variant.
Jim
|
2751.12 | what it is | RANGER::WEBER | | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:46 | 6 |
| Actually, the Sheraton was the Epi version of the 355, not the 335.
Epi never built semi's pre-Gibson: all '50's & '60's Epi thinlines were
built in the Gibson factory in Kalamazoo.
Danny W.
|
2751.13 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | submit to Fred | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:33 | 10 |
| The guitar used by the player in X was a Crestwood I believe. These
are sort of an Epi variant of the Gibson SG, with a more squared off
body style. Rich Robinson of the Black Crowes has been seen using one
of these lately as well. Most interesting of these (from a collector's
point of view) have a "batwing" (self explanatory) headstock design.
Btw, that was John Doe on bass for X. Anybody have an idea what that
bass he was using is?
/orville humbucker
|
2751.14 | OK! OK! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:39 | 15 |
| >>Hey, can we avoid a rathole here? Let's stick to the Epiphone topic,
>>OK?
It would have been a debate, Brian, not a rathole...but, (sigh) you're
right, no rebuttles in this topic....
Actually, it didn't offend me, I just wanted to pursue the line of
logic. I love acoustic guitar music....as much as I love all kinds of
electric guitar music...and it's *all* real to me!
I apologize for my poor etiquette, but not for my comment in .7
Steve
|
2751.15 | SG kinda guy, arntchya? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:42 | 6 |
| >>I have an Epiphone SG copy
Why Dave, ididn't know you played the 6 string as well. I'm not
surprised it's shaped like an SG!
8^)
|
2751.16 | Just another red guitar | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Sweet summer sweat | Wed Jun 16 1993 14:33 | 16 |
| > Why Dave, ididn't know you played the 6 string as well. I'm not
> surprised it's shaped like an SG!
You been talking to my wife? That's exactly what she said when I
bought the SG, "I guess you really like that body shape, huh?"
Well, what can I say? After playing an EB-0 for 23 years I guess I'm
used to the neck, size, weight, all that. At least the SG's a slightly
different color from the bass - not as nice, but OK.
The main reason I bought it was because I got a good deal on it used,
and it's a pretty good guitar overall. However, I don't claim to be
able to play it - notice which one I brought to Blind Willy's that
night - just that I'm learning.
Dave
|
2751.17 | ! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Wed Jun 16 1993 14:45 | 5 |
| Bring that SG copy next time I'm up......*I'll* give it a workout!
It'll remind me of old times......8^(
Steve (who had one SG, but playing style was too 'heavy' for the
neck/body joint)
|
2751.18 | I have what U want. R U sure U want 1? | SOLVIT::SNORAT::OLOUGHLIN | The fun begins at 80! | Wed Jun 16 1993 14:55 | 15 |
|
If I had a chance to do it all over again - I wouldn't buy a new
Epi. A used acoustic maybe, for not more than 100 to 150. Get it home
and play the absolute hell outta it. Throw it in the back seat every-
where you go. Use for what it is, a beater.
I have an Epi acoustic/electric, single cut away. You can try it
if you want to. This guitar does not impress me, but then the measure
stick is the Guild. (I also do not care for the bright plywood top
sound anymore. But WTF. Try it for a week if you want.)
Rick.
|
2751.19 | Should I loan this guy my axe? | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Sweet summer sweat | Wed Jun 16 1993 15:52 | 8 |
| > Steve (who had one SG, but playing style was too 'heavy' for the
> neck/body joint)
You must play like the guy I bought it from - he used to whammy notes
by bending the neck back and forth. Guess I'm lucky it's still in one
piece.
Dave
|
2751.20 | Old acoustic, in nice shape | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Wed Jun 16 1993 16:50 | 12 |
| I told my wife that they certainly *sounded* like John Doe & Xcine,
bingo.
I played a decent Epi acoustic at a flea market a while back. I was
hoping the guy selling it didn't recognize the name (not Gibson, Guild,
Martin, etc.), but no such luck. He was the original owner & it was
around 30 years old.
BTW: RE: .8 ... Nice catch, Brian.
Paul
|
2751.21 | Or is my catalogue out of date?! | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Thu Jun 17 1993 06:37 | 25 |
|
Does anyone know if the SG is actually marketed as the "Epiphone SG",
or does it go under another name?
I was looking at a catalogue from last year, and there's no mention of
an Epiphone SG. The Epiphone guitars listed are the following:
- S310
- G310
- Sheraton
- Emperor
- T310
- G400
- 435
- Les Paul Custom
- Les Paul Standard
I always imagined it was a legal hitch that prevented Fernandes, Tokai
and co. from marketing their Strat. copies as (for example) "Fernandes
Stratocaster", but I'm sure no such problem would exist between
Epiphone and Gibson.
Cheers,
Dom
|
2751.22 | SG? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Thu Jun 17 1993 07:51 | 13 |
| re:-1
I lost my Epi flyer, but I recall the SG shaped Epi having a model #
with no reference to the SG initials. BTW, what does SG stand for?
(Danny ?)
RE:-1 SG neck flex.....I couldn't keep my ES335 for the same
reason....I seem to subconciously 'press' with my right elbow when I'm
playing and this action kinda 'levers' against my left hand and the
neck flexes the axe right outa tune! I should learn to relax, I'd
probably live longer! No prob with strats or les pauls!
big dawg....
|
2751.23 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Thu Jun 17 1993 08:48 | 6 |
|
According to the AMS catalog, the SG Epi is the G-400.
349 includes case.
|
2751.24 | More Epi SG info | BUFFER::BIRCSAK | What's all this, then? | Thu Jun 17 1993 09:07 | 28 |
| FYI: This is what I found in last years Epi catalog:
G-100
With great fingerboard access and a fat, nasty, tone, the SG
is a basic musical weapon for rock, blues, and metal. The G-400
is Epiphone's authorized version of Gibson's famous SG '62, with
vintage style and tone and at a price to fit your modern wallet.
This is the guitar many of today's rock legends first played
professionally.
* Solid mahogany body and slim taper mahogany neck.
* Gibson deisnged exposed coil high output humbuckers.
* Chrome tune-o-matic bridge and stop bar tailpiece.
G-310
With the look of the great '67 Gibson SG, the G-310 has unbeatable
fingerboard access and a fat nasty rock sound. If you like your music
heavy and your guitars light, the G-310 is your best bet for affordable
performance.
* Two Gibson-designed high output exposed humbuckers.
* Traditional Gibson controls and hardware with chrome plated
tune-o-matic bridge and stop bar tailpiece.
* Lightweight mahogany body, bolt-in solid mahogany neck.
|
2751.25 | Steve's Guitar? | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Sweet summer sweat | Thu Jun 17 1993 09:50 | 18 |
| I knew my Epi wasn't designated as any kind of "SG", but I didn't know
what they did call it, and it's clearly an SG copy so that's what I
call it. I didn't know Epi made two models; wonder which one I've got?
The only difference between .24's two descriptions seems to be the
"bolt-in neck", which mine does not have. (I thought all SG necks were
glued in.)
BTW, the descriptions of the pickups are accurate as far as they go
(high output, exposed coil humbuckers), but they fail to mention that
something is missing in their output: tone, or treble, or something. I
liked them fine when I first got the guitar, but lately have come to
realize that they sound pretty flat. If I had the bucks, I'd put some
PAF clones on there.
And Steve, "SG" stands for "Stupid Guitar". %^) No, really, it stands
for "Solid Guitar". Pretty clever name, eh?
Dave
|
2751.26 | Something fishy here... | KEEGAN::TURNER | | Fri Jun 18 1993 11:20 | 17 |
| Well, I had another look at the catalogue after all this talk about
prices and it makes strange reading. Can anyone hazard a guess as to why
the Emperor costs nearly six times as much as the Sheraton (I won't bother
listing the prices as they're in Italian lire)?
Both guitars appear to have:
- Maple bodies
- Rosewood necks
- 2 humbuckers (type unspecified)
Mysteries of the Epiphone pricing policy...or a simple misprint?!
Dom
|
2751.27 | who knows? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Jammin' DRTRDR | Fri Jun 18 1993 11:29 | 3 |
| RE: -1
The Emporer comes stock with platinum strings?
|
2751.28 | | SOLVIT::SNORAT::OLOUGHLIN | The fun begins at 80! | Fri Jun 18 1993 13:32 | 11 |
|
Just taking a stab at it I would think the difference between
them would be along the lines of a 330 vs a 335. (Which would
kinda make sense, but not really six times worth of sense.)
Rick.
|
2751.29 | Epiphone now US-made | DDIF::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Thu Jun 24 1993 11:28 | 32 |
|
I stopped by Acton Music yesterday and was told that the Rivieria
(ES335 clone) and Sheraton (ES355 clone) are now being made in the US
at a Gibson plant. It felt and played ok but there was nothing really
exciting about it. The sticker price was something like $550. The
US-made Rivieria had a strange-looking trapeze tailpiece that sort of
put me off:
| | | | | |
| | | | | | <--- strings
| | | | | |
| | | | -----
| | | | X X
| | | | X X
| | | | X X
| | | | X X
------------- X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
\-------------------/
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
JP
|
2751.30 | Epiphone address & phone number | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Fri Jul 02 1993 07:05 | 19 |
| I got an Epiphone booklet from the music store in Chelmsford, MA (where
Hamel Music [RIP] used to be) & it has Epiphone's address as:
GIBSON GUITAR CORPORATION
641 Massman Drive
Nashville, Tennessee 37210-3781
USA
PHONE: (615) 871-4500
FAX: (615) 889-5509
Office Hours 8:00 - 5:00 CST
The booklet is dated 1991 & contains historical info & specs & pictures
of about 20 different models including electric, acoustic & bass
guitars.
My favorite page is the one showing (former) President George Bush
"shredding" with one of their "Strats" at the 1989 Inauguration
Banquet. Now *there's* a product endorsement deal !
Paul
|
2751.31 | | TECRUS::ROST | Deja vu all over again | Fri Jul 02 1993 08:02 | 6 |
| Re: .30
When Bush later toured the Peavey plant in Mississippi, they gave him a
Peavey guitar to play, pointing out that the Epi was made in Korea...
Obi Wan Nabee
|
2751.32 | %^) | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Sweet summer sweat | Fri Jul 02 1993 08:45 | 4 |
| Wow, George Bush playing an Epiphone Strat - there must be some
symbolism there...
Dave
|
2751.33 | and Clinton and chicken pick'in are in... | ROCK::CALCAGNI | | Fri Jul 02 1993 08:49 | 4 |
| Hey, did GP cover this angle? Shred is out, and so is ole George.
Coincidence??? I don't think so!
James Charvelle
|
2751.34 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Night of the Living Document | Fri Jul 02 1993 09:34 | 3 |
| Uh oh. Where does that leave me and my Epiphone?
Dave
|