T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2714.1 | Wrong price | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Wed Apr 28 1993 09:42 | 2 |
| Price should be US $565 ....not $410!
|
2714.2 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Wed Apr 28 1993 11:54 | 5 |
| Doesn't sound like much of a bargin to me, can't get get a "The Twin"
for not all that much more? I'd much rather have the Twin (with
optional loading crane, of course).
Greg
|
2714.3 | Priced right! ..right? | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Wed Apr 28 1993 16:12 | 8 |
|
Ahem ...screwd up again...price IS US $410
It is solid-state hence the decision not to go for "The Twin"
Placy
|
2714.4 | SK Usually Means Sidekick | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Thu Apr 29 1993 08:13 | 13 |
| The other Fender amps which have had an "SK" prefix are the Sidekick
amp line, which are imported from Japan and Taiwan. For $410 with
2-12" and 100 watts I would bet it's not US built. To date the
largest of these for guitar is I believe a 65 watter. None of them
that I have heard were very impressive, not worthy of the Fender name.
I would audition this against some of the US built solid state Fenders
like the M-80, the Deluxe 85, Ulktra Chorus, etc. before making a buy
decision.
Good luck.
Brian
|
2714.5 | Watts a M80? | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Thu Apr 29 1993 12:41 | 5 |
| Thanks for the advice Brian - I will go and check the other ones out -
keep 'em coming!
Placy
|
2714.6 | | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Fri Apr 30 1993 10:14 | 20 |
| Re: .5
Fender has five lines of solid state amps:
1. Sidekicks: imported, all combos (except the SK-100B bass head),
standard Fender cosmetics, marketed as practice/beginner's amps
2. "regular" series: standard cosmetics, includes 85, Deluxe 85, Deluxe
185, etc.
3. "chorus" series: like #2 but with stereo chorus, includes Princeton
Chorus, Ultra Chorus, etc.
4. "carpeted" series: these don't look like normal Fender amps, they
have light grey carpet covers, red knobs; includes some practice amps
(J.A.M., R.A.D., H.O.T.) and the M-80 combos and heads; marketed
towards hard rock/metal players
5. BXR: high power bass amps, the BXR-300 (head or combo), Dual 400
(head)
|
2714.7 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Fri Apr 30 1993 11:25 | 3 |
| > includes some practice amps (J.A.M., R.A.D., H.O.T.)
(D.U.M., N.A.M,s)
|
2714.8 | A new champ also | CAMONE::ZIOMEK | Pump up the TEST | Fri Apr 30 1993 11:31 | 8 |
|
Fender also has a new 'Champ' series out, the '25se'. It's got a
solid state preamp, with a tube power section, 2 5881's I think. It
also has reverb, contour, effects loop, 1x12, and a headphone jack.
Rated @25w. List is 479.00, Daddy's in CT has it for 399.00, and
immediately went to 350.00 without looking me up in the 'system'.
John
|
2714.9 | | SOLVIT::SNORAT::OLOUGHLIN | The fun begins at 80! | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:07 | 8 |
|
You can get a Super 60 for $400.00 to $425.00 with
a little negotiating/whinning.
Rick.
|
2714.10 | Fender, Mesa, or Peavey & whine | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:56 | 10 |
| I liked the Princeton chorus until I heard the all tube Lead 112 or
Super 112 or whatever. Anyway it's tough for me to get excited about
either of them when the Mesa .50 Caliber is in the same price range.
The new all tube "Vintage" series Peavey's are a lot of bang for the
buck too. I personally would avoid a Japanese made one, except maybe at
a fire sale price.
Generally, the right kind of "whining" will get a slice off any of
them.
Paul
|
2714.11 | Maybe I needed to whine louder... | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Fri Apr 30 1993 16:44 | 12 |
| RE: -< Fender, Mesa, or Peavey & whine >-
I thought Mesa Boogie didn't let its dealers discount. Have I been
lied to (again)?
FWIW, I tried out a Mesa .50 Caliber and was seriously disappointed.
I thought both the Super 112 and the Peavey Classic 2x12 seriously
out-performed it. I couldn't get a really good clean sound out of
it, and it had tons of hiss. Maybe I tried a lemon...
Jim
|
2714.12 | How about Gallien/Krueger Backline 1000 | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Mon May 03 1993 12:52 | 6 |
| ....ARE THE LEAD 112 or Super 112 solid state. I also checked out the
Gallien/Krueger Backline 1000(?) did not play it but seems like it will
do the job.
Placy
|
2714.13 | Geez, Anybody Got a New Catalog? | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Mon May 03 1993 13:07 | 4 |
| There is a thing called a Super 112 which is sort of an upgrade of the
Super 60 tube amp. What's a Lead 112?
Fred Tavares
|
2714.14 | The Tavares?? | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Mon May 03 1993 15:01 | 2 |
| ...not the Fred Tavares from Fender?????????
|
2714.15 | This is the Super 112 | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Tue May 04 1993 10:49 | 10 |
|
Introduced in Sept. 1990 were the dual-preamp Super 112, with one 12,
the dual-preamp Super 210, with two 10s. In the solid-state dept. are
the 25watt J.A.M with one 12 and 4-preprogrammed sounds, the 25watt
H.O.T with 4 preprogrammed sounds and one 10, the R.A.D with one 8 and
20 watts, the M-80 Chorus with two 65watt channels,reverb, stereo
chorus and stereo/mono effects loop and also the Squier SKX series in
the 15-25 watt range
|
2714.16 | It's LOUD - I said it's L O U D | SEDOAS::MILLER_N | | Tue May 04 1993 11:52 | 26 |
| Hi
This is Dusty Miller here in the UK. I play in a rock blues outfit and
have not heard anything (other than other Fenders) come close to my
Stage 185 (that's a solid state 110 Watt RMS into 1x12" at 8 Ohms, or
160 Watt RMS (185 music) if I run an extension speaker cab driving total
4 ohms.)
The amp sounds gorgeous - a real crunch, the clean is very clean and
it's L O U D. It's also incredibly portable - heavy but compact.
The Rhythm player in the band (After the Watershed) uses a Power Chorus
- again loud and beautiful sound. Another pal has the Pro 185 which is
dual 12" speakers running 160 watts as above. The power is amazing but
so is the weight....too much for me after 2 hours on stage with a heavy
axe around my neck!!
I've also tried the Delux 85, but it didn't come close to the amps
listed above - much thinner and more toppy, more of a practise amp.
Good luck in the search and I hope Fender keep turning amps out like
this....there's nothing close at the price in my opinion.
Cheers
Dusty
|
2714.17 | Maybe only vintage whine | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Tue May 04 1993 12:39 | 18 |
| RE: .11 etc.
The correct name is "Super 112" as mentioned. Not "Lead 112" I was
hallucinating.
YES there are Mesa "lemons". There are also some that require more TLC
than others to get the right sounds. If you don't like the one you
tried, don't get it.
I thought they *never* discounted them either, but I've seen evidence
to the contrary. It depends who you're dealing with & how you're
dealing. Certainly used ones are all over the map both in price &
performance.
I'm not surprised you like the new Peavey's. Sound/performance per $$$,
they are tough to beat.
Despite the rave (in .15 or .16) I still prefer tubes. Some of the MOS
FET stuff looks promising, but they all seem to be lame in one way or
another.
If you're planning to use a multieffects unit, maybe a very plain power
amp would suffice. Like a reconditioned black face Fender Pro Reverb !
Paul
|
2714.18 | CODA | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Thu May 06 1993 09:42 | 8 |
|
Well, I took a Fender SKX100 to the rehearsal and you guys were right
on as to its tonal qualities. It is rated at 100w RMS but one of the
guys amps - a Fender Concert - rated at 60w RMS was waaay LOUDER. The
clean was not as clean as the Concert and broke up when the clean
channel was turned up (not cranked). I will not be buying this amp and
the search goes on.
|
2714.19 | Paint It Black | TECRUS::ROST | I need air freshener under the drums | Mon May 10 1993 14:46 | 5 |
| Saw some new M-80, J.A.M., etc. amps the other day and the latest ones
shipping are now in a black carpet instead of grey. Actually looks
better in black, IMHO.
Brian
|
2714.20 | Fender M-80 chorus it is! | KAOFS::P_DESOUZA | | Mon May 10 1993 15:50 | 13 |
|
I have just bought a Fender M-80 Chorus. It has a real happening tone
and the chorus adds quite a bit to its functionality. It is quite loud
a lot louder on the overdrive channel than the clean one. It has the
grey carpet though and you're right I 've seen the black ones and they
look a lot better. I paid $380 for it as opposed to $580 for a new
black one. My used one came complete with cigarette burns so I don't
have to break it in. Now I have to figure out a way to paint it black.
Placy
|
2714.21 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Flat Tyres on a Muddy Road | Tue Jul 06 1993 05:14 | 38 |
|
Sat in a Music shop for two hours with my own guitar and effects and
compared a Marshall Valvestate 8080, Peavey Bandit, a brand new
Carlsbro (which was VERY interesting), a Fender Stage 112 and a Fender
Deluxe 112. I went in intending to get the Marshall. So what was my
verdict....
Well, to be quite honest the only amps that made my Strat sound like a
classic Strat were the Fenders. I suspect this should have been
expected as I felt the others were great for hard rock etc but for
middle of the road, country etc then the Fender just seemed to be the
ones for me. It really came down to a matter of personal taste.
The Fender Stage 112 (100watts +) was just TOO loud considering that
most of the time I play in small venues. The Deluxe 112 had the same
features just less power (65 Watts) and seemed a lot more manageable.
So I bought the Fender Deluxe 112. 65 watts into a single 12 inch
speaker. All solid state. Dual channel, reverb, great distortion and
and overall quality sound. Anyone know anything about these? I gather
they're new but are they some older amp upgraded?
The Carslbro amp referred to was obviously built to compete with the
Marshall and was physically enormous. Actually I found this a negative.
However it had two interesting features....
1) You could have both channels at once and there was a mix control
to vary how much you got from either.
2) There was a 'lead' footswitch. Ie you could set up a distorted
rhythm sound hit the lead footswitch button and get the same
channel albeit boosted to 'lead' level. This worked for the
clean or distorted channel.
All the above were 60-80 watts, same features more or less and all
costing roughly the same.
Richard
|
2714.22 | Not sure how "hot" a 10-inch speaker can be... | MLTVAX::RALTO | It's all part of the show! | Sun Aug 08 1993 00:39 | 15 |
| Reply .15 mentioned the 25-watt H.O.T amp with four preprogrammed
sounds and a ten-inch speaker... I'm pretty sure this was the amp
that I was looking at the other day, while checking out small
practice amps.
The price was around $225; would this be a decent enough little
amp to get back into learning to play? It seemed to have pretty
minimal features and controls... I didn't play around with it too
much because I was plugged into it mainly to check out how well
my old Harmony Rocket (!) had been fixed up.
Or might I be better off (sound quality, features, value for the
money, etc.) with something like a (gasp!) Peavey?
Chris
|
2714.23 | | DDIF::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Mon Aug 09 1993 07:07 | 13 |
|
Chris,
I looked at that amp but settled on the Fender Princeteon 112 (no
stereo, no chorus) because it has 35 watts and a 12-inch speaker for
a few $$ more (I think mine lists for $279 but I paid $250). However,
it took some time to get here because it isn't a model Daddy's (Nashua)
stocks.
I can bring in a copy of the Fender magazine/pricelist that shows the
whole range of Fender amps if you'd like...
JP
|
2714.24 | Sure, let's go a little bigger... just a little :-) | CORPRL::RALTO | It's all part of the show! | Mon Aug 09 1993 12:37 | 14 |
| Hi, John
Sounds like you made a good choice... I've been leaning towards
something slightly bigger than the 25W, 10-inch amp I'd looked
at last week, especially since my old amp was a slightly bigger
"Univox" (whatever that is, not a big name, I'd presume :-)).
That'd be great if you could bring that Fender magazine in, I'd
sure appreciate it! If you could send mail when you have it,
I'll stop by (if I can remember where you are after all of the
re-orgs/de-orgs/un-orgs they put us through!)...
Thanks,
Chris
|