T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2698.1 | yeah! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Send lawyers, guns, and money! | Tue Mar 30 1993 11:33 | 6 |
| I agree on the Yamaha mystery....I'm bettin' they could make a quality
rig.....
One wonders!
|
2698.2 | Comments? | KDX200::COOPER | Let The Light Surround You!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 11:50 | 13 |
| I think the Japanese have a yen (sorry...) for the high-tech.
You'll notice no shortage of synths, MIDI gear, D2D recording,
DSP technologies, DAT (blah, blah, blah). I think that 'they'
are looking toward the future, and that perhaps the future is
not in amps, but in high tech gear.
Perhaps they also think that making a toob amp is not a very
profitable business because of the leanings of some of us (We know
who we are :-) towards the markets mentioned above...
jc
|
2698.3 | maybe it's in the water | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Tue Mar 30 1993 12:15 | 22 |
| Okay, here's a try. The Japanese have no "ear" for it. Look at another
area where they've made little headway, pickups; the rule of thumb is
you upgrade pickups on a Japanese instrument right? The big replacement
pickup houses and custom winders are all in the West. The Japanese have
a well founded reputation for solid engineering, and this shows up in
their dominance of most consumer electronics. But when you're talking
amps and pickups, you're talking "tone" which is less tangible and
requires a more aesthetic discipline. It's a lot harder to engineer
in good tone.
Btw, I don't think this is an inherent trait of the Japanese, and I
don't think they're lacking in aesthetics either. It's just that in
this area, we have the experience and the support network. Electric
guitar was invented here, developed here, and continues to be practiced
here more than anywhere else. Innovations in amplifier and pickup design
are typically created by player types, with lots of real-life R&D
happening in bars and clubs and concert halls continuously.
For a weird analogy, it's kind of like the US college system churning out
basketball stars for the NBA.
/rick
|
2698.4 | Umm... | JUPITR::DERRICOJ | Defy The Laws Of Tradition | Tue Mar 30 1993 12:57 | 10 |
|
Maybe it's not an engineering challange?
Or, Maybe Europe and the US have already designed it and taken the fun
out of redesigning?
/Buffy
|
2698.5 | Focus on the Consumer | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Tue Mar 30 1993 13:12 | 5 |
|
NOPE....There's just no money in it !
|
2698.6 | | TECRUS::ROST | Louis Prima in a previous life | Tue Mar 30 1993 13:25 | 8 |
| Re: .5
No money? Imported amps have a decent market share in the small/cheap
amp market, so why do they have no presence in the higher end?
Could you expand on this argument?
Brian
|
2698.7 | Margin $ vs Margin % | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:00 | 11 |
| It's not that high-end amps aren't profitable -- they just don't sell
in volume. So at this point in time, the Japanese haven't been
interested...
A similar situation exists in telescopes. The Japanese make great
optics. They virtually dominate 35mm SLRs. With telescopes, however,
they seem quite content to stick to the consumer (department store)
models. Meade and Celestron (two US companies) dominate the market --
although they rely on Japan for their eyepieces and low-end stuff.
Jim
|
2698.8 | Could be wrong, though.. | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:02 | 29 |
|
O.K I'll try....
The way I see it, the Japanese (or any smart business) probably
sees little benefit in entering a market with so much competition and
relatively small profit potential.
To put it another way; except for "leading edge technological
ventures", I believe they won't manufacture something if they can't
sell, say....a million of 'em....guaranteed! Even if they built
the best sounding guitar amp in the world, how many could they sell?
How many guitar players are out there?
Every family has a TV or two. Most have a VCR, stereo, radios...
a car etc. etc. Something like 100,000,000+ households just in the
US alone. Compare that to (optimistically) 40% of the guitar player
market, a few hundred thousand..and I don't think the costs to design
...tool up..manufactuer..and distribute warrant persuing a venture of
that type.
Besides, I hear they like Marshalls...
|
2698.9 | | TECRUS::ROST | Louis Prima in a previous life | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:11 | 7 |
| Re: .7 and .8
That makes sense except for one thing...why do they sell guitars? Or
even keyboards for that matter (although they now dominate there, it
used to be U.S. dominated). ????
Brian
|
2698.10 | I don't have the answer either | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Back to your oar, 41. | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:21 | 9 |
| One thing the Japanese have been good at for a long time is copying
other people's designs, possibly with some improvements, then selling
lots of them with cutthroat pricing. It seems to me some Japanese
company like Yamaha could copy some of Fender's, Marshall's or
Mesa/Boogie's designs and sell a lot of units, possibly (hopefully,
from their point of view) driving the original designer out of the
business. Or are they afraid of Peavey? %^)
Dave
|
2698.11 | let's become amp design consultants to Mitsubishi | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:39 | 10 |
| Well, I for one wouldn't worry about any Japanese company putting
Fender, Marshall, or Mesa out of business. The reason? Well, I know
this is going to shock a lot of you, but a heck of a lot of amp
business has little to do with sound. It has to do with the name
on the control plate. There's a market for those amps and most of
that market is going to buy the name, period.
Now there is a market for innovation, a good example being the success
of the GK 250ML. I would expect Japanese companies to be able to make
inroads (along with some decent $$) with products like that.
|
2698.12 | | LEDS::BURATI | never gonna do it without the fez on | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:42 | 24 |
| The way I see it is that what the Japanese are best at is "time to
market". They're very good at getting new technology into a shippable
product in volume in a short time. And one thing that I observed about
the japanese long ago is that, unlike American businesses, they are not
afraid to retool. A company like Sony comes out with redesigned consumer
electronics gear like it's their "flavor of the week". (Frankly I think
they over do it. It induces buyer hesitation) We're (American
businesses) getting better in this regard but only because we learned
some tough lessons.
Anyway, this talent is best used in markets characterized by quickly
evolving technologies. They can stay ahead of the curve, get there
before competition (in volume) and eat up market share as they go. They
don't care about obsoleting products because that's how they make their
money.
Because the amp market is not moving along a technology curve like, say,
keyboards, it offers relatively little to the Jap music companies. It's
a market already locked up by a handful of companies. Penetrating it
requires a whole different strategy.
Then again, I could be wrong.
--Ron
|
2698.13 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Flat Tyres on a Muddy Road | Wed Mar 31 1993 02:36 | 29 |
|
I remember in 1972 a neighbour of ours here in the UK getting A
Datsun!! Yes, really, he bought himself a heap of Japanese junk! We
couldn't believe it. It was analagous to someone today buying a Skoda
or, God forbid, a Trabant!
I remember the first Japanese Hi Fi amps appearing and us 'purists'
scoffing at them.
I remember the Honda 50 (OK, but they'll never produce a real bike!). I
mean who'd forsake a Triumph or Norton or a BSA for a JAPANESE bike! Be
serious!
I have learnt the folly of this attitude which clearly comes across in
many of the replies to this note.
IMHO the whole electronic music amplification is a rip off especially
when it comes to amplifiers. There are an awful lot of parallels
between the amplifier business and the (at least UK) car business,
motorcycle business and HiFi business when they were all, one by one,
decimated by more reliable, higher functionality and cheaper products
from Japan.
The ONLY *possible* thing saving Fender, Marshall etc al is, as
pointed out earlier, is the lack of volume shipment potential. Its
certainly not price, functionality and most definitely not brand
loyalty.
Richard
|
2698.14 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:34 | 4 |
| I could be wrong on this, but I believe I recently heard that Harley is
currently the biggest selling motorcycle mfg in America AND Japan.
"Brand loyalty" is the wrong term, a better one is "mystique".
|
2698.15 | Dual Rectifier = Panhead? | TECRUS::ROST | Louis Prima in a previous life | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:42 | 6 |
| Re: .14
Lousy analogy, because Harley is a real specialized subset of
motorcycles. If they made amps they would be Mesa/Boogie, not Fender.
Brian
|
2698.16 | | KDX200::COOPER | Let The Light Surround You!! | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:01 | 5 |
| RE: .14
Don't be silly. Harley Davidson doesn't sell 5% of what the big four
sells in motorcycles. All four of the biggies from Japan are
multi-BILLION dollar companies...
|
2698.17 | | DECWIN::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:25 | 16 |
|
I don't see that many companies making a lot of money in tube amp
gear, and that might influence Japan. Companies seem to come and go.
(Can you say KittyHawk?)
Sure, Mesa, Fender, and Marshall make money, but does that represent a
large enough market to get involved?
However, if you look at high-tech rack mount gear it would seem to be a
more natural business for Japan to be involved in.
Also, it's certainly not beyond Fender to ship some of it's amp
manufacturing work to Japan......
Kevin
|
2698.18 | just stay away from those AMF Boogies | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:42 | 7 |
| re a couple back
yeah, I guess a Mesa/Harley analogy was sort of what I had in mind,
so what? Couldn't guitar amps in general be considered a specialized
segment of the electronics market? Btw, the figure is something like
60% market share for Harley in their class of bikes (heavyweights);
this from a Fortune magazine article.
|
2698.19 | | TECRUS::ROST | Louis Prima in a previous life | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:48 | 27 |
| Re: .17
>However, if you look at high-tech rack mount gear it would seem to be a
>more natural business for Japan to be involved in.
They are in *already*, big time, i.e. Roland, Yamaha, Korg, Ibanez,
but they don't dominate yet, since ART, DigiTech, Alesis, Lexicon, etc.
are all U.S. built.
>Also, it's certainly not beyond Fender to ship some of it's amp
>manufacturing work to Japan......
The early Sidekicks were Japanese, now they are from Taiwan. All the
"big" Fender amps are U.S. made. The only amp brand I can think of
that is "dual sourced" is Marshall. You can buy the 10 and 25 watt
combos under the Marshall name (UK made) or the Park name (Korean) at
20% less.
Any noters from Japan in here? Certainly in the UK there are brands of
amps sold that neever make it to the U.S. (Carlsbro, WEM). When I was
in Korea in the mid seventies, there were domestic amps, even stacks,
but they were all garbage. Still, since the cost of a Fender was about
3 times U.S. list due to duties, you did see these amps in use (of
course, really well-heeled bands had U.S. or UK gear). Are there
Japanese amp companies that sell only to the domestic market?
Brian
|
2698.20 | | LEVERS::R_PEPE | | Wed Mar 31 1993 11:41 | 4 |
| I'd be interested in knowing where most of the components that go
into any US made amp come from, including loudspeakers.
-Ralph
|
2698.21 | | KDX200::COOPER | Let The Light Surround You!! | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:32 | 7 |
| Slight nit:
My lexicon verb is designed in the US, but has Made In Japan all over
it.
FWIW,
jc
|
2698.22 | | TECRUS::ROST | Better living through chemicals | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:12 | 14 |
| Re: .20
Most speakers are built in the US (except Celestions). Although SWR
uses Fostex (Japan) as a source for their tweeters. Components come
from various places; lots of the hardware (jacks, pots) and ICs in
American gear may be Japanese. Tubes come mostly from China or Eastern
Europe these days.
Re: .21
Say it aint so. Oh well, now we know how Lexicon got the price down.
Brian
|
2698.23 | | KDX200::COOPER | Let The Light Surround You!! | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:20 | 8 |
| >Say it aint so. Oh well, now we know how Lexicon got the price down.
Okay: "Say it aint so."
But thats what it sez... Actually, I can't say for SURE about the
'verb, but I noticed it said made in Japan on my MRC...
jc
|
2698.24 | | CHEFS::BRIGGSR | Four Flat Tyres on a Muddy Road | Thu Apr 01 1993 02:23 | 4 |
|
My Fender Champ's made in Mexico and has Chinese valves as standard.
Richard
|
2698.25 | Chicken & Egg | TRUCKS::GORE | Bar Sinister with Pedant Rampant | Fri Apr 02 1993 07:57 | 13 |
|
I seem to remember reading that the Japanese don't like to export their
products until they've been on the domestic market for a while. Off the top of
my head I can only think of one Japanese rock band (and I can't even remember
the name) but they're Marshall users.
Re .7
The Japanese *do* make, and export quality telescopes; Vixen and
Takahashi to name but two. With their domestic market increasing, they're
becoming more agressive with their exports too!
Ian G.
|
2698.26 | The 51st State | GJO001::REITER | | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:26 | 7 |
| That reminds me... I was in the camera store yesterday, and I noticed
they had a Meade telescope there, and remembered a note in this string
about how Celestion and Meade were top-end gear Made In USA, so I paid
attention.
This Meade telescope was made in Taiwan.
\Gary
|
2698.27 | | NEEPS::IRVINE | It would appear I *AM* a number! | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:31 | 12 |
| RE .25
�Off the top of my head I can only think of one Japanese rock band
(and I can't even remember the name) but they're Marshall users.
The Band would have to be Vow Wow... a most excellent band..
Can't say if they were using Marshall gear the last time I saw them
(4-5 years ago)
Bob
|
2698.28 | I Wanna Roadie For Shonen Knife | TECRUS::ROST | Better living through chemicals | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:37 | 8 |
| Re: .25
Japanese rock bands may not super common here in the US, but a few have
made it onto domestic labels, how about: Loudness, Sadistic Mika Band,
Shonen Knife, even a Japanese blues singer (!!??), Toru Oki (this guy
has to be heard to be believed!).
Casey Cheeseum
|
2698.29 | | TRUCKS::GORE | Bar Sinister with Pedant Rampant | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:38 | 5 |
| Re -1
That's the one!
Ian G.
|
2698.30 | | TRUCKS::GORE | Bar Sinister with Pedant Rampant | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:40 | 3 |
| Damn, NOTES clash! Vow Wow was the band.
Ian G.
|
2698.31 | Mfg. in the shadow of St. Basil's | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Tue Apr 06 1993 12:27 | 11 |
| FYI: Mesa Dual Rectifier comes stocked with 5U4G's from Russia. They
still use vacuum tubes in military aircraft over there, so maybe they
can still make decent tubes cheap.
Anyone looking to start a company that produces high end tube gear
send me E-mail. The market *must* be good if there's no Japanese
competition.
All the arguments about specialty item & thin markets don't have to
apply if it's done right. I'm serious about starting a company,
partners or not.
Paul
|
2698.32 | | GJO001::REITER | | Thu Apr 08 1993 14:55 | 6 |
| re: .31 (sort of)
Isn't some of the real high end audio stuff all-tube?
If so --- How does it survive? Where is it made?
\Gary
|
2698.33 | It Aint Just Guitarists Who Are Crazy | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Fri Apr 09 1993 08:41 | 12 |
| Re: .32
Most high-end audio tube gear is U.S. made. It's also ridiculously
expensive, partly because of the cost of building tube amps and partly
because of low volumes built. How about the Meridian CD player with
*tube* analog section for a mere $1000!
Plus there is a big market in *vintage* tube hi-fi gear from the 50s
and 60s (hmm, sound familiar?) although the stuff often gets hot-rodded
to further improve performance.
Brian
|
2698.34 | | BSS::D_PELTONEN | A little DAP'll do ya! | Fri Apr 09 1993 10:08 | 15 |
|
Certainly not under the listing of "great" amps, but surely
Japanese.....my practice amp is an Ibanez. I saw it in a
hock shop some time back and bagged it for $75 or so. Its
20w solid state with what looks to be a 10" speaker; even features
compression. Nothing fancy, but it works and sounds great for
what I do with it. I originally was looking for a used PV
Minx, but the prices both new and used were more than I wanted
to spring for a practice amp. The Ibanez fits the bill nicely,
plus you get to see the look of people's faces when show 'em
the logo :-).
DAP
|
2698.35 | | KDX200::COOPER | Let The Light Surround You!! | Fri Apr 09 1993 12:51 | 3 |
| I didn't know Ibz even made amps!!
wow!
|
2698.36 | Ibanez Bass Amps and Rolands With Tubes | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Fri Apr 09 1993 13:32 | 13 |
| Re: .34,.35
I've seen a few Ibanez bass combos that looked like (surprise) Roland
amplifiers! 60 and 100 watters with 1-15". Wurlitzer's in Boston had
some of these back around 85. I suspect they were built for non-US
distribution.
That reminds me of one interesting Japanese tube amp, the Roland
Bolt-60. This was a Boogie wannabe with transistor preamp and tube
power, 1-12" These were around at the dawn of the 80s, anybody else
remember these? Andy Summers of the Police used them for awhile.
Brian
|
2698.37 | | LEDS::BURATI | never gonna do it without the fez on | Fri Apr 09 1993 13:50 | 7 |
| > That reminds me of one interesting Japanese tube amp, the Roland
> Bolt-60. This was a Boogie wannabe with transistor preamp and tube
I remember those along with the all SS Cube(?) 40 and 60 and Cu=be
keyboard amp.
--Ron
|
2698.38 | | BSS::D_PELTONEN | A little DAP'll do ya! | Fri Apr 09 1993 13:57 | 9 |
|
Brian raises an interesting point; Colorado Springs is a military
town. Lots of GIs rotating overseas and lots of folks pawning
stuff (as an aside, I love haunting pawnshops :-). Its very
possible that this amp was bought/pawned by someone in the
service and that is was not intended for US distribution.
DAP
|
2698.39 | Tube A/D only $1000 ? That's cheap ! | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Tue Apr 13 1993 17:06 | 7 |
| Guess who's *buying* those old vintage high (priced) end audio tube
amps like Mac, Marantz, etc........ The Japanese !!!
There's a British made (I think) 100 watt stereo power amp that'll set
you back something like $68,000. Couldn't you support Pete Townshend's
habit at a Marshall stack a week for over a year at that rate ?
... Go figure.
|
2698.40 | | FREEBE::REAUME | light 2 dark,dark 2 light | Tue Apr 13 1993 18:25 | 5 |
|
Pete Townshend used HIWATT almost exclusively! As a matter of fact he
probably accounted for a HUGE amount of their sales!
-b{}{}mINFO-z
|
2698.41 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I came, I saw, I left... | Tue Apr 13 1993 21:26 | 1 |
| ...and it probably accounted for a HUGE amount of Pete's hearing loss.
|
2698.42 | Marshalls, HiWatts & headphones | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Fri Apr 23 1993 12:40 | 22 |
| RE: Pete Townshend used Hi Watt almost exclusively....
The 3 times I saw The (Moone) Who, Pete used all Marshalls. I've seen
numerous pictures of him with Hi Watt's, but I guess I just got
(un)lucky.
Entwhistle used Sunns at two of the three & Marshalls at the other.
Even the PA system was eight 4x12 Marshall cabinets the first time
I saw them.
The last time was their "Never Say Never ... Again" Farewell
tour where they had rack stuff (mostly Mesa) & that Electric/Acoustic
guitar.
Pete blames his tinnitis on extensive "rehearsing" through
headphones while drunk. I suspect this is at least parlty to blame.
One of the *LOUDEST* events I ever personally attended was Face To
Face just after they got signed & had all new HiWatt 400's. I was in
the front row at I think The Channel, & it was definitely a bit much.
For a while The Who were the *LOUDEST* band in the world, so I guess
it may take a real scientist to get to the bottom of the headphone
theory.
Paul
Anyway, my point in .39 was $68,000 is a *lot* to pay for an amp.
|
2698.43 | Acetone Amps | TECRUS::ROST | Author of Shemp Howard bass method | Wed May 05 1993 08:28 | 45 |
|
This came over the Internet today! I've heard the Acetone name
before, they sold combo organs back in the sixties and seventies.
From: [email protected] (Peter Corps)
Subject: Japanese Acetone guitar amplifiers
Date: Tue, 4 May 1993 22:21:22 GMT
I'm interested in corresponding with anyone who has
interest/information re: Acetone guitar amplifiers from Japan. I am
mainly interested in the tube models from the 1960's (or earlier?).
Most of the models I've seen were slightly smaller in size than the
average guitar amp, and are quite light-weight. They were made in both
amp/cabinet and combo styles in a wide range of sizes. They were
usually covered in white tolex, had silver faces and black control
knobs. They sported names like: "Rocky", "Elite", "Base 3", "Base 10".
Larger models had two channels, with master reverb and tremolo
controls.
I have found them to be one of the best cheap amplifiers ever made,
with a truly distinctive tone (much like the VOX AC-30). While
certainly not the loudest amps available they had an excellent clean
sound (warm and bright) with an excellent natural tube distortion
achieved by turning up the volume or by using an ElectroHarmonix LP-1
to boogie the pre-amp.
These amps were quite rugged and reliable, although not without their
problems - one of which was the use of series filament output tubes on
the larger models: (for which I have never seen a replacement listed)
about 50V, and a toggle switch (usually inside the back of the chassis
marked "100v - 110v" which I presume was to accomodate the different
line volatages in Japan and North America, unfortunately people would
switch it to 100V in hopes of gettin a hotter sound and thereby "aging"
the output tubes.
I have managed to find one recently - an Elite, it's about 12" tall,
10" wide and perhaps 6" deep, it's an open-back combo with a 6" or 8"
speaker, single-channel, tremelo, and (one-spring!) reverb but has no
tubes and no schematic diagram. If you have one or know of one please
let me know what tubes it needs to work!!
I don't know if these amps were ever distributed widely in the US or
not, I know they were sold in Vancouver many years ago but I ask anyone
with any information to please email me or post to the net. I may be
interested in purchasing one if I can find an original.
|
2698.44 | Acetone | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Wed May 05 1993 10:36 | 4 |
| They also made small PA rigs. I've seen a couple of 'em that appeared
to be in the same market as the old Shure Vocalmasters.
Greg
|
2698.45 | What ever fits the sockets...NOT | SUBSYS::GODIN | | Thu May 06 1993 10:39 | 5 |
| RE: .43 with a Tube manual & some patience, you can probably "reverse
engineer" the thing to determine at least the tube pinouts & probably
the tube types.
I don't think we've answered the primary question in this note yet.
Paul
|