T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2413.1 | | RGB::ROST | Felix Pappalardi in a previous life | Thu Dec 26 1991 13:51 | 37 |
| I think that the Boogie doesn't really fit other than look simply
because it was an attempt to "hot rod" the older amps. The earliest
ones were actually heavily modified Fender Princetons!
The Peavey is actually their second attempt, since they had an earlier
"vintage" amp line back in the 70s.
I've heard some people grouse about the reissues from Fender and
Marshall because they were expecting some sort of fire-breathers and
heard, well, "old" amp sounds. The reissues are cool simply because
even if they are not 100% like the originals sonically, they are a LOT
more affordable.
But there are still a lot of other older amps out there at *dirt cheap*
prices that are overlooked. Any of you passed on a Fender Bassman head
at $100? Big mistake! These make *great* guitar amps, particularly if
the application is as a backup head or to build a stack for the
practice space, etc. Old Traynors and Ampegs are also undervalued (I
bought a working 40 watt Ampeg combo last year for a whopping $20!!!)
and make great utility amps.
As far as lists, reviews, etc. there are already notes on all of these:
Marshall JTM45 head (reissue)
Marshall JTM45 "Bluesbreaker" combo (reissue) both 45 watts, all tube
Fender Vibroverb (reissue) 40 watts, all tube
Fender Bassman (reissue) 50 watts, all tube
Peavey Vintage (Bassman clone) 50 watts, all tube
Kendrick (Bassman clone) 50 watts, all tube
THD (Bassman clone) 50 watts, all tube
Mesa Boogie Mk I (reissue) 100 watts, all tube
Brian
|
2413.2 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Thu Dec 26 1991 14:54 | 14 |
| My reply would fit under updated for this topic. I have a Fender "the
Twin". I would like to try other amps just to find out why anyone would
buy them, I like my Fender that much. It has the classic Fender clean
sound, and it is a channel switcher with the other channel being the
overdrive channel. If I had to compare it with any other amp's sound, it'd
be the Boogie.
I like a rich creamy Allman Bros tone, and my Fender does this for me.
As I said, I would like to try other amps just to satify my own
curiosity. I think I get the tone I like with my setup, but
maybe if I A/B'd it with a Marshall and a genuine LP, I'd hear a
difference.
"sakman"
|
2413.5 | | FREEBE::REAUME | KH/REXX SnoB | Fri Dec 27 1991 11:04 | 7 |
|
You CAN'T leave out the mega-bucks VOX AC-30TB reissue. The original
british invasion sound and a classic in its own right!
I'm still waiting to find an original at a garage sale for $100!!
-B()()M-
|
2413.4 | anything goes | GLDOA::REITER | | Fri Dec 27 1991 11:39 | 5 |
| My reason for posting the base note was just to get an idea of what was
on the market today in anything that either SOUNDS or even LOOKS like a
vintage amp, but is new production. I don't want to get hung up on
definitions. Anything you list is OK.
\Gary
|
2413.6 | Old Tube amps. | SMURF::BENNETT | MC Escher & DJ Pablo P. | Mon Dec 30 1991 15:23 | 22 |
|
Right now I own 3 tube amps:
o Fender Super 60. This has all the crystal-clear sound of
the old Fender with all the modern amenities like channel
switching, FX loop, DI output.
o Fender Bassman 50 Head. This is a great sounding amp. I've
got it sitting at Harvey's on consignment sale. I agree that
these make great amps. And for the price it's almost
unbeatable.
o Traynor YGM-3 - this is a 20 - 25wt combo with footswitchable
reverb and tremelo and a 12" speaker. It uses 2 EL84s in the
output stage and sounds AMAZING when run flat out. It "breathes"
but doesn't p!ss off the neighbors.
Old ampegs are a gas - I've been half-heartedly keeping my
eye out for an old ReverbRocket2. I've noticed that several of
the bands I really liked in the late 70s (Damned, Clash, Sex Pistols)
spent some time using V4 heads for the guitars.
|
2413.7 | Gimme those even harmonics... | SOLVIT::FRASER | Rollover: 1000 Points When Lit! | Tue Dec 31 1991 09:29 | 19 |
| For the time being, my primary amp is the all-tube reissue 1963
Fender Vibroverb - rated at minimum 40 watts RMS into 2 x 10".
It's true to the original in looks and sound with comparatively
minor modifications, such as a three pin line cord, solid state
rectifier and a pcb instead of point to point hard wiring.
I've been offered a good deal which would let me upgrade to a
reissue Twin Reverb but I dunno...(what do you think Sakman?)
We picked up an Ampeg B15-N all-tube bass amp for Sandy - this
is the famous Portaflex version which allows you to undo four
clips, flip the head over into the cabinet and lock it down for
protection during transportation. Sounds great! It's a
nominal 30 watts RMS and dates from the mid-late '70s. Kicks
the crap out of the Peavey 80 watt solid state she had before,
in a clear demonstration of the efficiency of tubes over
transistors, watt for watt.
Andy
|
2413.8 | Bass Amp of the Gods | RGB::ROST | In search of Richard Sinclair | Tue Dec 31 1991 10:09 | 8 |
|
Actually the superiority of the Ampeg has a lot to do with a much more
efficient and better tuned speaker cab. The tubes add the icing to the
cake with their warmer tone. Hope you didn't pay too much, prices on
these vary widely and condition seldom has anything to do with price!
I've seen ones in great shape for $150 and beat ones for $450!!!
Brian
|
2413.9 | | SANDY::FRASER | Err on a G String | Tue Dec 31 1991 10:54 | 11 |
|
This Ampeg is in gorgeous condition - looks like someone kept it in
their living room all this time - not a mark on it, and we paid what we
thought was a fair price.
Fwiw, the same store has another B15 in stock, and it appears to be in
very good condition too. We didn't see the head as it was clipped
shut, but it does have wheels attached.
Sandy
|
2413.10 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Tue Dec 31 1991 14:53 | 17 |
| re .7
>> I've been offered a good deal which would let me upgrade to a
reissue Twin Reverb but I dunno...(what do you think Sakman?)
Yo Andy!
Hmmm, I'm a little confused here by the word "reissue". Is there some
new Twin offering or do you speak of "The Twin". Insofar as "The Twin",
I can't think of a reason NOT to get one. It's still the same classic
Fender clean sound on one channel and a Mesa Boogie type overdrive for
the other channel. It does get some serious bucks, but only by
comparison to PV's. In comparison to Mesa's they're less expensive and
I think a better buy for the buckage.
In the new year, we'll get together and you can try mine.
"sakman"
|
2413.11 | | SOLVIT::FRASER | Rollover: 1000 Points When Lit! | Tue Dec 31 1991 15:07 | 19 |
| Dave,
My understanding is that this is a reissue of the '65 Twin
Reverb - if so, it should have the tilt-back legs but I didn't
think to check that when I played through it last week. From
memory, it's blackface/two channel (4 x inputs)/2 x 10", so I'm
not sure it would give me anything more than my Vibroverb
besides more watts...
Good idea about the New Year - we've been talking about making
some noise together!
All the best to you and Elaine - and to all Guitar_noters for
'92!
Cheers
Andy
|
2413.12 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Tommy The Cat | Tue Dec 31 1991 16:23 | 6 |
| > Insofar as "The Twin", I can't think of a reason NOT to get one...
> ...and a Mesa Boogie type overdrive for the other channel
That's one reason.
8^)
|
2413.13 | Vintage info | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 09:00 | 16 |
| Folks,
I don't have a lot to add to this but I do have a copy of Guitar Player ( I
think) that includes an in-depth comparison between the Fender re-issue Bassman
verses Peavey, THD, and others.
The article (rightly) gets VERY picky about the pros and cons such as solid
state verses tube rectifer/transformer VA /speaker magnets/cone material.
Very informative including manufacturers comments.
regards,
Dave
|
2413.14 | good modern vintage stuff | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Don't fret! | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:59 | 38 |
| One modern amp with a "vintage" character seems to be the Duncan
84-40. These were powered by a quartet of EL-84s (just like the
beloved VOX AC-30s) and had modern conveniences like channel
switching and effects loops. They came in two speaker flavors;
1x12" and 2x10" (my preference). I never actually heard one, but
it seemed like a great idea; they were definitely touted as the
sort of "modern-vintage" thing the original note asked about.
These may be out of production now; keep your eyes open for good
deals on used ones in WantAds, Daddy's, etc.
In a similar vein, the Bedrock 1200 series. These were available
in various configurations; 50 watt head, 2x12" and 4x10" combos,
all tube. There was also a wide variety of custom coverings in
addition to standard tolex; wild stuff like hot pink or lime green
snakeskin. I have tried the Bedrocks and like them a lot. They were
supposedly designed specifically to emulate "classic" amps sounds
and came with a sheet of recommended settings to do just that:
e.g., SRV blackface Super Reverb, Beatles AC-30, Bad Company Marshall
crunch, Townsend Hiwatt, etc. Some of these sounds were better than
others, but the amp is generally good sounding, playable, and vintage.
Dave Hicks loved this amp in a GP review (for what that's worth).
Bedrock has since changed ownership and has a new line out; I think
the 1200s are discontinued. I have seen a lot of these used in shops
around Boston.
re Twin vs Vibroverb re-issues
I think the brown Vibroverb is one of the best old amp re-issues I've
ever heard; it really has the character of a vintage Fender. One
disadvantage in moving up to the Twin re-issue is that the tremelo
circuits are different; white and brown Fenders were renowned for
their distinctive thick tremelos, and the re-issue captures this.
Later blackface amps had a slightly different circuit, not quite
as cool. This may or may not be important, depending perhaps on
how many surf covers you do. The Twin will let you play cleaner
louder, which may be worth the switch.
/rick
|
2413.15 | | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Mon Jan 06 1992 15:53 | 11 |
| I considered buying an 84-40. Nice tone. I didn't get one for the
following reasons:
o Both units that I tried out had too much hum.
o I heard a couple of bad rumours about repairs.
o I found a mint condition '68 Fender Deluxe Reverb that I
liked better.
FWIW, I liked the 1x12 version of the Duncan better than the 2x10.
|
2413.16 | one gone by... | CAVLRY::BUCK | Re-build the Cyclone Racer | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:09 | 3 |
| Man, I should have bought that Metaltronix Blues '59 amp I was
scoping out at EU's in Boston that time...talk about a RARE BIRD!
|
2413.17 | Peavey Classic 20 | RGB::ROST | I'm not into music, I'm into chaos | Thu Feb 13 1992 13:11 | 5 |
| Peavey has shown another new tweed amp at NAMM, the Classic 20, two
12ax7, 2 EL-84, 1-10", 20 watts. List will be $250. Sort of like an
updated tweed Deluxe.
Brian
|
2413.18 | Peavey Classic Head | RICKS::ROST | Subconcious desire to be deaf | Wed Jun 17 1992 08:15 | 4 |
| Peavey has also announced a head version of the Classic 50, looks sort
of like a Marshall done up in tweed with arrow knobs.
Brian
|
2413.19 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | Love is a friend when you need one | Wed Jun 17 1992 08:16 | 4 |
| -1
Cool!
|
2413.20 | | PAKORA::IGOLDIE | So be it....! | Thu Jun 18 1992 18:23 | 5 |
| this amp received an overall good review from the guys in Guitar
magazine.
Staynz
|
2413.21 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | Sleeping Beauty Land Theme Park | Thu Jun 10 1993 10:33 | 18 |
| I'm looking into buying a combo amp in the near future. Below are my
requirements --
o 50wt or 100wt's
o Channel switching capability (need clean and obscene sound
felexibility)
o FX Loop
o All values, or Hybrid prefered
I know a while ago, some people in here picked up some Carvin combos.
You guys happy with them?? I know Marhsall has some stuff out, but
I suspect it's in the mega-bucks range. I know Fender has a LARGE
selection of combo amps available, but from what I've seen they're big
bucks as well. I don't think I really wanna be spending like $800 for
a damn combo amp!
Any suggestions?
|
2413.22 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:26 | 3 |
| What's your budget, dude?
gh
|
2413.23 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | Sleeping Beauty Land Theme Park | Thu Jun 10 1993 12:43 | 1 |
| I guess I would say like $600, tops.
|
2413.24 | | LEDS::ORSI | BeenFlushedFromTheBathroomOfYourHeart | Thu Jun 10 1993 13:24 | 3 |
|
Buck, check out 2.2451
|
2413.25 | "The Twin" may be on the block | VOYAGR::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Thu Jun 10 1993 15:04 | 4 |
| I'm thinking of selling my Fender "The Twin". If so, I'll be asking
around $600 for it. If you're interested send mail.
Mark
|
2413.26 | | KURMA::IGOLDIE | Second heat..! | Sun Jun 13 1993 04:27 | 6 |
| when I was in Colorado Greg and I were checking out some guitars and we
were using a Crate combo.Don't know what Greg thought about it but I
liked it.Cool amp!
ian
|
2413.27 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Mon Jun 14 1993 11:25 | 4 |
| I didn't think we ever heard it by itself (ie, without any of the Boss
stomp boxes hooked up)...
Greg
|
2413.28 | Check out my Super 60 ;-).... | SMURF::BENNETT | Scajaquada | Mon Jun 14 1993 11:47 | 5 |
|
Crate? Check out the Crate Stealth. 50wt 1x12 combo runs 4 6V6
power tubes. Nice sounding amp.
|
2413.29 | | KURMA::IGOLDIE | Second heat..! | Mon Jun 14 1993 12:15 | 5 |
| re- Greg....didn't we hear it on its own in Rice's?You fannied about
with the knobs and I created a racket! 8)
ian
|
2413.30 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Son of Spam | Mon Jun 14 1993 13:27 | 7 |
| re: Ian
Oh yeah... I forgot about that one. I was thinkin of the one at the
other place. Yeah, yer right, I remember now. FWIW, that was a Crate
Stealth half-stack.
Greg
|
2413.31 | | MASALA::IGOLDIE | Second heat..! | Tue Jun 15 1993 06:31 | 4 |
| it was really nice!
ian
|
2413.32 | The "other" valve amps! | PAVONE::TURNER | | Fri Dec 03 1993 09:06 | 27 |
| I thought this was as good a place as any for this note. I also put it
in the MUSICIANS_UK notesfile, but I'm probably just as likely to get
some takers here.
Flicking through the private ads in the "Guitarist" (published in the
UK) magazine, I was struck by the large number of people selling old
valve amps/combos. Selmer seems to be the most prominent name, but
there's also Viper, Sound City, Session, etc.
Of course, there are a lot of vintage Vox amps for sale, and I'd love
to have one (wouldn't we all?), but �600 for a Vox AC30 just happens to
be outside my price bracket. I'm no longer resident in the UK either,
which doesn't make matters any simpler.
So what's the lowdown on these other vintage valve amps? Is anyone
familiar with the Selmer 100W Treble n' Bass for example? Is the
difference in prices with Vox amps just a question of pure snobbery?
Can the Vox AC30 really have been so far ahead of the competition?
Dunno how many of them found their way Stateside (probably a fair
number), but I'm sure I recall a famous 60s band (Kinks? Small Faces?)
using Selmer amplification...
Reading these ads, it certainly seems that their owners are sad to have
to part with them!
Cheers,
Dom
|
2413.33 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Fri Dec 03 1993 09:24 | 13 |
| Sound City was a Marshall clone as I recall; we see many of these amps
in the States, usually at very very low prices. They are supposed to
be a could value for someone looking for an old Marshall type sound on
a budget.
Selmers are very rare here, but their early equivalent of the AC-30 (two
12's) is a great amp. I don't recall the name, but these have cool fake
alligator covering and a glowing "electronic eye".
What I'm really looking for is an old Wem stack (a la "This Was" era
Tull). Seen any of those in the ads?
/jeffrey
|
2413.34 | Valve Fever! | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Dec 14 1993 05:46 | 37 |
|
Sorry - after starting off this new thread, I haven't had a lot of
noting time of late.
To answer your question, Rick, I do recall seeing ads for WEM amps on
those pages, although not many in the most recent editions. There was a
guy trying to sell a WEM Copycat (is that an amp?) and there was also a
WEM Dominator up for sale at �125 (about $190?). As you'll have
guessed, I don't know too much about these, though.
But there does seem to be an enormous abundance of valve stuff at very
appetizing prices (with the obvious exception of the Voxes). So why is
it that people don't seem to be terribly interested in this stuff? Is
it simply that in 1993 they feel that amps with one tone control and no
effects loop input are a no-no? Frankly, I'd prefer to have an amp with
a great basic sound, even if it loses points for versatility. Channel
mixing and individual treble, bass, middle, hi-mid and lo-mid controls
are lovely, but I'm not going to pay 200% extra for them. Or am I
missing something? Any more info on the pros and cons of the vintage
valve amp market would be greatly appreciated.
Of course, I don't live in the UK any more so I'm torturing myself when
I browse through these ads. The lire is so weak at the moment that for
the first time ever, musical gear is as cheap in Italy as it is in
Britain. Shame that there are no old Selmers, Ampegs, Oranges or Sound
City amps kicking around here...this passion for collecting and storing
old things permeates right through British society, from books to
motorcycles!
Dom
P.S. After singing the praises of the Guitarist magazine in a previous
note, I must say that December's edition looks a little disappointing
(for my non-metallic tastes, anyway). Contains interviews with Def
Leppard, Geddy Lee, Status Quo, John Hiatt, Gordon Giltrap and INXS,
amongst others. However, the technical columns are always first class
and there's a wealth of information/ads, etc. in the 275 pages.
|
2413.35 | | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Tue Dec 14 1993 06:21 | 35 |
| >There was a guy trying to sell a WEM Copycat (is that an amp?)
I think it's a tape echo unit (like an Echoplex)
>there was also a WEM Dominator up for sale at �125 (about $190?).
Hmm, if it's that alien looking thing shown in the Tube Amp Book, i
want it...looks more like a TV than a guitar amp.
>So why is it that people don't seem to be terribly interested in this
>stuff? Is it simply that in 1993 they feel that amps with one tone
>control and no effects loop input are a no-no?
Basically, yes. I've come across a lot of old amps for next to nothing
(I even started that note on "where are all the old amps?"). Real
small ones (5-20 watters) are not that useful for live work and
since they don't have the dizz-buster sound that most young players are
looking for in their first amp, they languish gathering dust when $25,
some TLC and a fuzz box could have them cranking again. Some people
wouldn't believe that I have done hundreds of gigs with an old Traynor
bass combo I paid $75 for.
I think what's also started to happen is that these amps are too old
for younger players to know what they are. When I was a snot-nosed kid
I had never seen a tweed or blond Fender amp, since noone was using
them at the time....everything was Kustoms, Acoustics and Marshalls.
The converse is also true: my brother-in-law Thom has a blackface
Princeton Reverb in his basement gathering dust. He won't sell it to
me, even though he doesn't use it, because he once promised a bandmate
that if he ever got rid of it, he would give him first crack. To Thom,
it's a junk amp. I have no idea if he knows it's probably worth about
$500 now.
Brian
|
2413.36 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Tue Dec 14 1993 07:08 | 13 |
|
> >There was a guy trying to sell a WEM Copycat (is that an amp?)
> I think it's a tape echo unit (like an Echoplex)
Exactly right - the Watkins Copycat used a simple loop of tape
rather than a cartridge. I used to buy a spool of 1/4" and
make my own loops, since they'd always break at the worst time
and the pre-made ones were expensive and fragile. Neat units
for their time, though.
Andy
|
2413.37 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Dec 14 1993 10:25 | 32 |
|
re: .35
>Real small ones (5-20 watters) are not that useful for live work and
>since they don't have the dizz-buster sound that most young players are
>looking for in their first amp...
Crazy world, innit? Still, I suppose we've got to be grateful to those
young, tastless shred types (and their huge bank accounts) for lapping
up the Mesa Boogies and the Trace Elliots and leaving us the classy
vintage gear ;-) ;-)
Seriously, I have to confess that I know a lot more about music and the
people who play it than I do about instruments, hi-fi, etc. (though I
know a lot more about guitars than I do about amps!). I'm quite clear
about the sort of sound I like, but I'm not nearly so sure how to get
it, largely because my playing experience so far has been restricted to
Fenders, Carlsboros, Peaveys, Laneys and the like - all solid state
stuff.
So what exactly do you experts look for when you buy old valve amps
secondhand? What are the pros and cons of these beasts? Someone
mentioned earlier about Sound City amps being akin to the poor man's
Marshall of a few years back. So what will I be sacrificing if I buy
the next Sound City combo that I see advertised, rather than an old
Marshall? If you tell me that it's just the name that explains the
difference in price, then I can only conclude that amps generate even
more snobbery than guitars!
Cheers,
Dom
|
2413.38 | Marshall, Move Over! | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Wed Dec 15 1993 06:04 | 9 |
| Look what came over the USENET...is WEMmania gonna be the next craze?
From: [email protected] ("David Morton")
Subject: WEM Copicat
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1993 16:05:56 GMT
I've just received the brochure on this, and discover that the re-issue
is a version of the valve mark II Copicat. Severe credit card stress is
imminent, has anyone tried one?
|
2413.39 | Tube Amp Shopper's Guide | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Wed Dec 15 1993 06:27 | 43 |
| Re: .37
When I see an old amp, I look it over to see what kind of tubes it
uses. Stuff that uses the typical Fender/Marshall types (12AX7, 6L6,
EL34, etc.) is going to be easier to maintain then something that uses
oddball tubes (like most Gibsons, early Ampegs). Looking at the power
tubes, the fuse and the AC power rating will give you an idea how much
wattage the thing will put out if you're not sure.
Next, I *listen* to it. Things like scratchy pots are a non-issue with
me (easily cleaned) but I'll often use that to drive down the price
if the seller has no idea how simple the fix is 8^)
The amp may make any of a variety of odd noises: hums, buzzes,
crackles, pops. You have to make a judgement call about that. Hum is
often either a bad ground connection or a sign that the filter caps in
the power supply need replacement (these are cheap to replace).
Sometimes it sounds like crap because the tubes are on their last legs,
so you have to wing it there, trying to guess how much better it'll
sound with new tubes.
You also want to look for signs of abuse or previous repairs. If the
things has burn marks all over the chassis, that should tip you off to
potential trouble 8^) 8^) Also check for non-original speakers (who
wants a Marshall stack loaded with Radio Shack speakers?) and other
"modifications" which may affect reliability, tone and value.
The good news is that tube amps tend to have simple circuits so they
are easy to overhaul; the question is how much money do you want to
put into it before it's not cost-effective. Any oddities in the sound,
even if *you* know they are cheap and easy to fix can be used as
leverage against the price. Don't let the seller know that you rebuild
tube amps as a hobby 8^)
My rule of thumb is that *any* old tube amp that is not a "name" brand
like Fender, Ampeg or Marshall or a collectible like Orange should cost
no more than $200, period. in fact, $100 or less is more like it. I
think they are *worth* more as playing amps, but as far as what you
should pay for it, keep thinking of that lone C-note 8^) The fact is
that if the seller wants more, you can probably find another amp as
good or better for less, so be patient!
Brian
|
2413.40 | Much the wiser! | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Dec 15 1993 07:22 | 25 |
|
re: .39
Excellent, Brian - thanks a lot. That's exactly what I was looking for.
You also confirmed a lot of my suspicions.
>Any oddities in the sound, even if *you* know they are cheap and easy
>to fix can be used as leverage against the price. Don't let the seller
>know that you rebuild tube amps as a hobby 8^)
Shouldn't be a problem. He'd only need to look me squarely between the
eyes to realise I'm the sort of guy who can just about change a plug!
So despite the wealth of technical info in your note, there's no way
I'm going to be doing my own fixes/modifications. It's time I found out
about the prices of tubes here in Italy, as well...
My current (recently-formed) band plays a very sixties-influenced blend
of beat/R&B (Yardbirds, Muddy Waters, Kinks, Small Faces, Motown,
Stones, Chuck Berry et al). So we're looking for a fairly authentic
sound - without having to mortgage our homes to buy Rickenbackers and
Vox AC30s!
Dom
P.S. Could you give me the details of that Tube Amp book you mentioned
a few notes back? Cheers!
|
2413.41 | | LEDS::BURATI | boss burato | Wed Dec 15 1993 07:27 | 10 |
| re: previous repairs
Yay, thoust should heed brother Rost's warning. This could be the sign
of eternal damnation. For in this world there are many that would have
good men and women believe that they know of what they do. But they
don't. So asketh thyne question "Haseth thisuth amputh beeneth
repairedeth?" If they lie with a serpent's tongue, then you can always
drag their boney ass into court.
Rev. Jim
|
2413.42 | BLuuuuuuuzzz | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Sat Jun 17 1995 16:09 | 10 |
| I'm very seriously thinking of picking up a Fender Blues Deluxe
w/2x10's. Guitar Shop just gave them an amazing review and the price
just can not be beat - $599.99 Can. I haven't heard one yet but i have
heard great things about their tone, not to mention an amazing reverb.
I was wondering if anyone owns one or knows of someone who does. I'm
just looking for some honest feedback on how they do in the real world.
A friend of mine at the local dealer said thet they had a bunch come
back for repair and that makes my worry a little.
-kev
|
2413.43 | Blues Deville | MSDOA::GINN | Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler WD5IJL | Mon Jun 19 1995 08:00 | 7 |
| I bought a Fender Blues Deville (4x10's) last December. No problems yet
and it sounds great to me. The Deville was $799 less 30% at Alan's
Discount Music in Birmingham, Alabama.
regards,
Leo
|
2413.44 | | COOKIE::LAMBERT | Sam, Storage Mgmt. S/W @CXO | Mon Jun 19 1995 14:39 | 7 |
| You should also check out the Peavey "Classic" series, which pretty much
goes model for model on the Fender retro craze. Better reverb, slightly
higher gain (at least to my ears) and slightly less expensive. Can't hurt
to at least check 'em!
-- Sam
|
2413.45 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Was this ignorance or bliss... | Tue Jun 20 1995 06:29 | 12 |
|
Sam - the higher gain part is definitely something to consider.
The gain channel in the Blues DeVille (and Deluxe??) are really
meant to sound like the clean channel cranked. It's not meant
to be an overdrive/distortion channel.
I use a Tube Screamer and get an interesting sound when using
it with the gain channel, although I much prefer it with the
clean channel.
Tom
|