T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2311.1 | Fender open back combo user | SALEM::TAYLOR_J | Marshall Rules,Fender Controls | Fri Aug 30 1991 10:40 | 4 |
| I like open back cabs, the closed back cabs always seem muffled
to me.
JT
|
2311.2 | | WRASSE::SAKELARIS | | Fri Aug 30 1991 12:08 | 14 |
| Well, to me it seems like I prefer an open back, but my mind could be changed
depending upon the equipment and type of gig itself. My opinion is that all
else being equal (quality of the equipment), an open back will disperse the
sound making it sound more ubiquitous. I think in a club setting that's
important. Obviously, not that you can't hear a closed back, but maybe
something is lost to the other band members. There's many ways around this
such as miking thru the PA, monitors and whatall so it's no big deal.
For me, and considering the music I'd play (R&B) were I to return to playing
in a band, I'm not sure I'd mike anything but vocals. I think I'd go for the
WYSIWYG effect. And for me, that'd be my axe, a chord, and my Fender "the Twin".
"sakman"
|
2311.3 | Tuned! | GIAMEM::DERRICO | Set Weekend=RELAX_ON | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:01 | 11 |
| If my ears are correct, a closed cabinet seems to have a little more
of a compressed sound than an open back. It's probably because you get
less cone movement - because of the air resistance of the cab.
Also, you get different resonances from the cabinet it self. You
probably need the more power to get the same cone movement on them.
On the open-backs, the cab is mostly untuned. You get most of your tone
from the speaker itself - with little help from the cab.
Please correct me if I'm wrong!
/John
|
2311.4 | ...and yet another option.... | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | UNIX is cool... | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:30 | 6 |
| Well is your closed cab ported or not???
I use two rivera 2 X 12 cabs that are closed back but are ported on the front.
I like 'em...
dbii
|
2311.5 | | FDCV08::GOODWIN | | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:54 | 24 |
| From my experience, here are some observations I've made:
- Open back cabs attenuate some of the lower frequencies,
which results in a brighter sound. Thats why closed back
cabs seem to have more mid-to-low punch.
- Closed back cabs require more wattage to achieve the
same sound pressure level as open backs, but they also
project the sound better.
- There is more speaker cone movement in open back cabs.
- Open back cabs are fine for small-to-medium sized rooms,
Closed back cabs do a better job in large rooms.
- You can blend your sound by using both open and closed
cabs. I've discovered that I prefer the sound qualities
produced by this technique. It's kind of a best-of-both-
worlds approach.
- There's a third category of cabs not yet discussed here:
ported cabs, and if we really wanted to get esoteric, we
could discuss the sound differences between front-loaded
and rear-loaded cabs!
|
2311.6 | | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | MESA Boogie modified by PEAVEY! | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:54 | 25 |
| re: .4
Dave,
I picked up a Fender 2x12" cab that after taking the back off to
see what it was loaded with (turned out to be Pyle drivers) I noticed
that someone had put one port for each driver! So I stuffed fiberglass
into the ports and taped the internal side of the port with tape so
nothing comes through the ports. OK, not bad sounding and a little less
bottom end (my amp is bottom heavy anyway so this was a good fix). I
have noticed that certain notes can sustain almost forever with my open
back combo, while the closed back 4x12", or this 2x12" cabinet need more
"ummmph" to get that controlled feedback I can achieve easily with
an open back. This is using a Strat with some compression through a
Mesa head. My Peavey MX gets this controlled feedback alot easier
through a single EVM-12", **BUT** if I open the back on the 2x12" maybe
it'll be easier to get this controlled feedback than closing it up.
I'll try it when I get home today.
Who knows... maybe I'll get lucky? ;^)
Rock on,
Fred (who's been playing around with cabinets
alot this week).
|
2311.7 | open or closed, open or closed, hmmmmmm... | LEDS::BURATI | Fender Bender | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:01 | 17 |
| Closed back all the way for me. I have an old small Fender Bassman 2x12
cab (loaded with JBL D120) on my 50w Marshall and to my ears, this is
IT.
But really, it all depends on what you're doing with the amp. I'm
playing at home and I like the big round sound I get with this combe.
Playing with other instruments is a whole nuther thing. Too much bottom
on your guitar's sound disappears into the other instruments. I think
open backs in general are probably more effective in band situations.
More energy goes into the range of frequencies where your guitar cuts
though.
As a side bar: Back in '69 and '70 I caught the Allman Bros at some
local clubs. Duane and Dicky used Marshall stacks loaded with JBLs with
the backs removed. They (the band, that is) had a GREAT sound. Perfectly
balanced.
|
2311.8 | exit | MEMORY::RATTEY | | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:14 | 5 |
|
re -1......Duane and Dickey at some local bar.......geeze
if I could only have been there....
|
2311.9 | "Open back" in a *small* club worked very well for me! | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | MESA Boogie modified by PEAVEY! | Mon Sep 02 1991 13:06 | 22 |
| Well, I took the rig on it's first gig. While having some second
thoughts on whether to take my old faithful PV-MX along "just in case"
I went Boogie alone with my Altec loaded Fender 2x12" cabinet with its
back completely removed without the speaker divider, no ports (not that
it would have mattered anyway in an open back) and I removed the fiberglass
insulation too. It actually looked kinda funny from the back, BUT the bottom
line here is "how did it sound".
IMHO, it was very successful. I got the clean and tight low end I
like with my Strat and got a very nice overdriven tone too in the lead
channel without sounding like a chainsaw. Very smooth and dirty at the
same time. I was very happy with it to say the least. Oh yeah, I was
able to get the controlled feedback NO PROBLEM too. The band does this
tune from Gary Moore called "Still Got The Blues (for you)" and at the
end I play the B string down to an open "B", then use my whammy to bring it
down to an "A" where I get the string to oscillate and just hang there
until I'm ready to quit it. I told the guys in the band not to expect
that to happen with this rig, but it worked! I'm very pleased with this
rig. Thanks Rick! :)
Rock on,
Fred (one happy camper)
|
2311.10 | My Preference In Cabs Is Loud Ones | RGB::ROST | Fart Fig Newton | Tue Sep 03 1991 10:19 | 21 |
| The physics of the matter is that closed, ported cabs are designed to
provide better bass response and *reduce* the amount of cone movement.
This is why they are used on bass cabs, of course, and they can be
useful for guitar (check out Danny Weber's commnets in the Boogie MkIV
note).
I have used both open and closed back cabs and there's no doubt that
the closed cabs for *guitar* give a thicker, "heavier" tone. I like
it, but open backs are OK, too. They just sound different.
As far as controlled feedback goes, I would expect the open back to be
preferable since the sound is more dispersed close to the amp (get 20
feet away and dispersion is proabbly about the same), which means you
may not need to stand right in the line of fire to get the feedback.
Mesa has been selling "half-open" cabs for a few years, where there are
*two* panels on the back of their 2-12 and 4-12 cabs, so you can have
the upper (tilted) half running open back and the bottom closed, sort
of like the stack setup Danny mentions in his note.
Brian
|
2311.11 | Closed=Bass, Open=6 string for GVK! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:42 | 20 |
|
Yep, I don't know dick about the physics, Rosty, but I do know that
all that stuff about theile ports works. I just finished my ultimate
bass cab!! It's a 2x15 loaded with Gauss speakers, 3/4 ply, 40" tall,
24 wide, 15 deep, 3" foam baffle and 2 3x6" theile ports at the bottom
(they started out at 8" but I got a little freq distortion going so I
trimmed them). I run my SVT into this cab and I can get lots of clean
low end with no distortion. It's going to be a ball buster to lug,
but: a. I guess if I want that sound, the price I pay is the lug and b.
I can't afford one of those 7 or 8 hundred dollar hartke jobs.
For guitar, I still like the open back, Fender style cabs, seems to
be a little more twangy, but I struggle to get a Marshall type sound
with those amps.
Gree Vee King
|
2311.12 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Why NOT ask why? | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:21 | 5 |
| re: Grevies new cab
It probably weighs less then the SVT! (or a Twin...)
;^)
|
2311.13 | yeah sure it's heresy! | HAMER::KRON | MARSHALLWILLBUTFENDERCONTROL | Tue Sep 03 1991 16:00 | 4 |
| re: last
-probably weighs less than a puke-filled rack too! 8^)
-Bill
|
2311.14 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Fri Sep 06 1991 12:19 | 3 |
|
Hmmm.. so *THAT'S* what a hernia feels like.... [;^)
|
2311.15 | Ported humour | TROOA::CONNOLLY | | Mon Sep 09 1991 19:07 | 3 |
| Actually, open cabinets are best when they're filled with liquor.
Closed cabinets work well when you're hiding from her husband.
|
2311.16 | | RANGER::WEBER | | Wed Sep 11 1991 12:19 | 26 |
| Both types of cabinets have their strengths and weaknesses. The
closed-back cabinets get more bottom end for a given size and being
directional, give somewhat more control. I like their sound when
playing with a small jazz group. With a louder band, I prefer the
cutting power of an open back: extra bass response often muddies
things up. Other band members tell me that they can hear me better: I
think that this is mostly due to the sound bouncing out the back.
I feel that a single 12" speaker in an open back cabinet lacks bass. I
much prefer a 15" or 2-12" for this type of cabinet, but the latter is
too heavy for me and the former is hard to find. Boogie used to make
15's available in both extension cabinets and combo's, but stopped some
years ago due to lack of demand. The 15" combo weighed over a hundred
pounds (almost as much as a Twin :-)). Rather than fight it, I usually
use a closed back amp when I need small size and light weight.
The Boogie "Half Back" cabinets seem like a good idea if you want both
extended low end and cutting power. My open/closed Boogie stack has one
advantage, though--I can always take just one of the bottoms when I
need to travel light.
Danny W.
|
2311.17 | | PELKEY::PELKEY | Snert ! Fetch me my dagger. | Sat Sep 21 1991 11:06 | 18 |
| While we're at it,,,
I'd say it all depends on the style you play most. There's
clearly a night and day difference.
For general type stuff, an open back cab is usually fine.
In otherwords, I feel they provide good reinforcement for a variety of
styles. I use a couple of Yamaha open back combos (one with 2-12s,
the other with 1)
but for the real heavy stuff, I've always preferred a closed back cab.
Wasn't nothing quite like the autority of my V4 head, with the two
4-12 cabs stacked up.. Moving it was an issue though..
I've always thought the perfect set up would be the head of
yer choice, with switchable cabs. Closed and Opened. Never
got to that point.
|
2311.18 | 2x12 combo & 4x12 angle cab = !*!*!*!*!*!*! | SOFBAS::FARREN | | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:28 | 11 |
| On of the best sounds I have gotten was when I used two Marshall 50W
open back 2x12 combos and two angled 4x12 closed back cabinets with a
stereo chorus on real slow all the time. the open backed 2x12s rip with
alot of mids and highs and the closed back 4x12 make the whole sound
warmer and help the rig to project better in big halls.
I would definitely recommend a 50W combo with a angled 4X12 over a
stack.
cf
|