T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2220.1 | shedding a little light | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Fri May 31 1991 12:49 | 14 |
| > The serial number is L91020.
I think the serial number puts it at around '66 or '67. I'll have to
check some of the serial number lists that I have though. Serial numbers
are tough to go by because they were usually grossly out of sequence. I
have a '62 Stratocaster with a serial number that is typical of '60 and
'61 models.
If you're adventurous, there's a date marked at the butt end of the
neck, i.e. where the truss rod adjustment is. That's the NECK date.
There might be a date pencilled into the control or pickup cavities if
the unit hasn't been refinished. Pickups also sometimes have dates
written or stamped on their undersides. All of these things together
give you an idea of the time the piece was manufactured.
|
2220.2 | De-neck it... | WMOIS::MELENDEZ_M | | Fri May 31 1991 14:41 | 4 |
| I think the guitar is older than 66. The date is stamp on the neck.
At least the older fenders that I had. I had a 63 Jaguar which had
a L serial number.
|
2220.3 | beware serial numbers | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Fri May 31 1991 14:52 | 11 |
| > I think the guitar is older than 66. The date is stamp on the neck.
> At least the older fenders that I had. I had a 63 Jaguar which had
> a L serial number.
I have a '65 Stratocaster with a neck date of Jan-65 (ahhh that infamous
month). The serial number is L71--- and according to the serial number
lists its typical for '65 and '66 models. That's why I estimated
the Jazzmaster to be around '66 to '67 or '68.
--rjb
|
2220.4 | peghead | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Fri May 31 1991 14:55 | 4 |
|
BTW, if the peghead is smallish (as opposed to the latter ones with
exagerated features), its probably '65 or earlier. If it's the larger
peghead, it's probably '66 or later. They made them both ways in '65.
|
2220.5 | I stand corrected | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Sat Jun 01 1991 19:50 | 2 |
|
I looked it up and it probably was made in '65.
|
2220.6 | thanks | TUNER::BROWN | One Gun, One Bullet, One Foot | Tue Jun 04 1991 08:50 | 10 |
| Thanks for the information. THe peghead is the larger style, with the
exaggerated features.
I just restrung it last week, before writing this note. I'll check the
neck and internal dates at the next restringing.
Now I wonder what this Jazzmaster is worth. It cost me $140 back in
'68.
ed
|
2220.7 | EXAMPLES | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Tue Jun 04 1991 11:26 | 16 |
| > Now I wonder what this Jazzmaster is worth. It cost me $140 back in
> '68.
My guess is somewhere between $300 and $600 depending on
whether or not it has any unusual features (factory custom color) and
its condition.
A recent flier from a vintage instrument dealer listed 3 Jazzmasters as
follows:
1965 lefty, sunburst, very good cond+, w/ orig hard case $1295
1962, olympic white, w/ white peg head, exc cond, brown case $1150
1963, blonde, very good cond-, brown case $ 700
1964 Jazzmaster neck, no decal $ 175
note that these guitars are all unusual in one way or another.
|
2220.8 | not a rare one. | TUNER::BROWN | One Gun, One Bullet, One Foot | Fri Jun 07 1991 13:58 | 9 |
| The Jazzmaster is just factory stock, no special color schemes or
customized anything... THe only non-original thing is that the
original white plastic tone and volume knobs located near the
cord jack were replaced with some brown knobs with brass inserts, back
in 1971, because one of the original ones cracked and split.
That, and there is a blemish on the back, near the lower "horn".
So I guess it's not a real hot collector's item...
I'll probably hang on to it for at least another 23 years.
|
2220.9 | | WELCLU::GREENB | Only losers take the bus | Sat Jun 08 1991 05:37 | 5 |
| Hey, I've got one of these too, although it's not as old (circa 79/80).
Does yours have a fat neck like mine? It's a lot deeper than yer
average Fender neck, but is still comfortable to play.
Bob
|
2220.10 | not too fat, not too skinny | STEREO::BROWN | One Gun, One Bullet, One Foot | Tue Jun 11 1991 08:58 | 6 |
| I think the neck is "fender standard" - not having anything else to
compare it against. Definitely not a skinny neck like some of the old
mosrites and rickenbackers.
Just bought a small second-hand Peavey amp, and the fender and the old
hofner still sound pretty good. Now to get back into shape...
|