T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1981.1 | Bassy by nature | ICS::BUCKLEY | There is a mirror on the beach... | Tue Sep 25 1990 15:26 | 10 |
| I have a particluar opinion...
For one, I *hate* ported cabinets! The bass response is just nowhere!
I mean, it's not tight and well defined...it's more of a 'fluffy'
sound. Seeing that you'd be driving it with an M3, which itself is
inherently bassy, I think it could possibly be one bogus combination!
Also, the music man stock speakers are crappy...not a lot of high end.
If, indeed, it had JBLs, that may work out ok.
If you plan to check it out, bring your head along and PLAY thru it!
|
1981.2 | | PELKEY::PELKEY | Kodachrome Junky | Tue Sep 25 1990 17:18 | 16 |
| I don't think a ported cab is applicable for a guitar amp myself.
Can't say infact, that I've really ever seen one.. Either that's
a rare feature, or maybe it was used, and the previous owner did that.
For some P/A purposes, a ported cab works well. Perhaps, even for bass
given a bi-amp rig.
But for regular guitar, you'd do best with either a closed back, no port,
or if you have to settle for it, an open back.
I've got an open back 2-12 100 watt 2 chanell Yamaha, and I closed the
back up on it once. didn't do much, the cab just wasn't designed
for closed applications. I used to have a 4x12 closed back ampeg cab
with a V4 head.. I liked that. Had some bottom end with A-uthority, but
alas, twas a trifle too big for what I was looking for..
|
1981.3 | Huh??? | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Tue Sep 25 1990 21:23 | 2 |
|
Kitty Hawk is low end amp????
|
1981.4 | Yeah, bassy Kitty | GOES11::G_HOUSE | | Tue Sep 25 1990 23:59 | 25 |
| Kitty Hawk is not a "low end" amp as far as it was marketed and it's
relative quality, however they do have an incredible amount of bass
response. When I use the M3's preamp, I set the bass control on it on
about "1" (runs from 0-10). If it's set above "3" it's overwhelming.
My favorite distortion tone from that amp is with the following
settings:
Treble Mid Bass Lead gain Rhythm gain Lead master Master Presence
7 8 1 10 6 8 >3 6.5
Great tone! (BTW, I put master over 3 because that's where my amp
seems to start "breathing". It doesn't sound right below that) Then
boost the mids with a stomp EQ for a more of a bite.
Most of that high frequency range stuff you hear from my rig is from
the MP-1 which is mega-bright.
Back to the topic at hand. I've seen a Mitchell 2x12 guitar cabinet
that was ported. I never heard how it sounded so couldn't comment.
I've been very happy with the sealed unported guitar cabinets I've
used (Marshalls & Ampegs).
Greg
|
1981.5 | | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Wed Sep 26 1990 01:55 | 4 |
|
Bass at 1, treble at 7 and mids at 8? No wonder I was wonderin'!
J. Who_always_thought_Kitties_had_more_high_end
|
1981.6 | Try it 1st! Either you'll like it, or you won't. | SALEM::ABATELLI | I don't need no stinkin' Boogie | Wed Sep 26 1990 10:33 | 16 |
| From what you've stated, it sounds like you have a 2-12" bass cabinet
that Music Man sold in the late 70's. I may be wrong, but that's my guess
cause I don't have the old brochure with me right now. I knew a bassist in
NY that used that cabinet for bass only and it sounded nice. Never heard
it with a guitar however.
It's all a matter of tone/taste ya know? Do as Buck suggested, cause
I'd recommend the same... try your head through the bottom and judge
it for yourself. If it's been hacked up to have that port, then it may
be able to go back to its original form. If you do (in fact) have the
"bass cabinet" version, then try it out. Either you'll like it, or you
won't.
My 2�!
Rock on,
Fred
|
1981.7 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | There is a mirror on the beach... | Wed Sep 26 1990 10:54 | 8 |
| I remember the Music Man catalog from circa 1980 bucause I was looking
for a new amp at the time.
The cabs offered by Music Man were indeed 4x12 (closed back) for guitar
or bass, and a ported 2x12 (was the size of a 4x12, fwiw) for guitar or
bass.
B.
|
1981.8 | Speakers R Us | MILKWY::JACQUES | Yes, you do need a Boogie | Wed Sep 26 1990 11:27 | 35 |
| see note 1799 which is a generic "guitar speaker cab" note. This will
give you some ideas as to what brands and models to check out.
Some of my own suggestions for guitar cabs:
Mesa Boogie makes 1x12, 2x12, and 4x12 guitar cabinets. They offer
Celestion, EV, and their own speakers as options. Prices are pretty
reasonable, and they are built like a truck. Mesa offers open back,
half-open back, and closed-back "Thiele ported" cabs. You can demo Mesa
Cabs in most Daddy's Junky Music stores. They are also available direct
from Mesa Boogie.
Peavey makes all kinds of guitar cabinets. Someone mentioned in a
previous note that they make a cab with 4 30w Celestians which sells for
about the same as you'd pay for the speakers alone. They just came out
with a couple of speaker cabs that can be rack-mounted (FWIW). These are
available in 1x12, 1x15, (and possibly 2x10) configurations.
Carvin offers lot's of differant cabinets for guitar. Call them and
ask them to send you their catalog. From there, you can order direct.
Laney is another one to check out.
Another thing to consider is buying 2 1x12 cabs in stead of 1
2x12 cab. The advantage is that the cabs are smaller, easier to carry
and fit into your car. Having two cabs allows you to run one or both
in mono, or run the pair in stereo. It allows you more flexibility.
For really small clubs you can leave one home and just carry one.
Mesa Boogie makes the best selection of 1x12 cabs (IMHO). The prices
are quite reasonable. I saw one at Daddys on sale for $175 with a
half-open back and 1 12" Mesa Boogie Black Shadow speaker. The system
I am thinking of putting together would include 4 of these cabinets
with one of their tube power amps.
Mark
|
1981.9 | Light up the table saw, Merle! | ISLNDS::KELLY | | Wed Sep 26 1990 18:19 | 15 |
| Tacking onto the Mark Jacques reply, I'd vote for two single 12in.
enclosures. The flexibility/modularity is attractive. You can
tote just one for 'small' situations, like rehearal or maybe wedding
gigs, bring both for more yelling power, use 'em in a stereo mode
and split the cabinets across stage, turn one into a temporary monitor
when the real monitor gets a quart of beer in it. Finally, you
can build them one at a time, which helps cash flow.
I've built dozens of Thiele-aligned enclosures, which are ported and,
IMO, sound fine. My choice in tone favors 'clean', so perhaps folks
who are 'crunchier' might have a valid point about ported cabinets
sounding less-than-great.
Regards,
Johnny Jupiter
|
1981.10 | But how does it sound? | COOKIE::S_JENSEN | | Wed Sep 26 1990 21:04 | 8 |
| Ok, I'm curious. I love the sound of my 4x12 boogie cabinet, but I'll be
the first to admit that I don't love carrying it around. The idea of a
modular cabinet sounds neat; grow it to fit the application. But, before I run
off and buy 4 boogie (or other) 1x12 cabinets, I'm wondering what the difference
in sound would be. Has anyone compared a "normal" 4x12 cabinet and 4 1x12
cabinets??
steve
|
1981.11 | | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Wed Sep 26 1990 21:14 | 5 |
|
OK, I'm curious, too. Any ADA 2X12 owners out there? How about
spillin' yer guts as to love or hate stories?
J.
|
1981.12 | Try it, you'll like it. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Yes, you do need a Boogie | Wed Sep 26 1990 22:52 | 25 |
|
I'm not sure how the Thiele ported 1x12 sounds for electric guitar. The
open back cabs are really half-open back. These are basically the same
type of enclosure that are included in all their combos. If you like the
sound of a Boogie 1x12 combo, you'll like the sound of the 1x12 half-back.
Mesa suggests (for an extremely versatile system) that you use one 1x12
open back and one 1x12 Thiele cab for each side of a stereo system. The
open back provides a big open sound, and the Thiele cab provides a tight
bass response. They also suggest you order the open back cab with a
Celestian and the Thiele cab with an EV. I'd like to hear a system like
this, but most dealers simply don't have all the components in stock at
one time to demo them together.
Since I bought my Mesa Studio preamp, I have been lusting after more
Boogie gear. I would love to buy a couple of their SUS-4 racks, a tube
power amp (either the 50/50 or 295) and 4 1x12 enclosures. Of course,
I'm looking at >$2500 in additional expense. The nice thing is that I can
buy one thing at a time and spread the expense out over time. I figure a
system with the 295 amp and 4 1x12's is equivalent to using two 100 watt
Twin reverbs, plus you get the Boogie tone, and the convenience of rack-
mounting. The first thing on my list is the Sus4 racks. I'm planning on
buying 2 12-space Sus4 racks in the near future.
Mark
|
1981.13 | Lots of pieces to carry though... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | | Thu Sep 27 1990 00:53 | 20 |
| One thing that comes to my mind about the modular setup being discussed
here (4 1x12s as opposed to 1 4x12) is that while each 1x12 will be
lighter and easier to carry, you'll have to make more trips in and out.
Yeah, carrying one heavy 4x12 is not especially pleasant, but I think
it's more tiring to make 4 trips with the 1x12s. (not to mention the
worry of having part of your equipment stolen while you're carting
things back and forth!)
If you're going to use all four speakers very often, it's probably
going to be more convenient to have a single 4x12 cabinet.
Maybe a better compromise would be to have a pair of 2x12's if weight
is an issue. Coop seems happy with the sound of his homebrew 2x12s
(made by hacking a 4x12 in half and putting in the additional sides).
I had the same problem and, out of courtesy to my back, I bought a pair
of 4x10s which are relatively lightweight. I love the way they sound
and they only weigh 55lbs each! (FWIW, they are Marshall cabs)
Greg
|
1981.14 | "But my dream is still alive..." | CSS::RCOLLINS | Angry Bob | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:06 | 16 |
|
RE: J.
I own two ADA slant 2-12's and I LOVE EM!!! I love the sound I get,
crunchy yet meaty. They weigh 48 lbs which makes it easy to carry one
in each hand. You can get these cabs with Celestions or with ADA
speakers. I have Cells. I've never heard how the ADA speakers sound.
Also, I used to roadie for a friends band and one guitarist had two
ADA's the other one a Carvin 4-12. So all us roadies would try and
"accidently" end up carrying the ADA's and then laugh at who had to
carry the Carvin. Or worse: "THE BASS CAB..." (add extreme reverb)
R.C.
|
1981.15 | maybe I shoulda put this in 1103? | FREEBE::REAUME | I know trouble cuz I am | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:25 | 23 |
| I own quite a variety of cabinets including 4X12's and 1X12's.
I rarely use the 4X12's. They are a major pain to cart around and
set up and I don't really see any benefit to my sound out front.
Looks wicked cool though, but is it worth it? Maybe for moving a
lot of air, but that's what the front end is for.
So I have a Kitty Hawk stack that consists of two 4X12's, one
slant, one straight just like a Marshall stack. Usually this is
powered by the M1 100 watt head. I can't even get this in the back
of my Taurus wagon! Luckily my wife has a Chevy Blazer!
I primarily use my Kitty Hawk 1X12 with a celestion 100 watter.
My rack was a Kitty Hawk 1X12 speaker cab that I converted to a
rack by removing the speaker and mounting board and installing rails.
So this way the whole package looks coordinated. On top of that
I have a custom made case that will fit either my rack system and
a foot controller or one of my KH combo amps. I'm considering putting
my M3 chassis into the spare KH head enclosure that I have and turning
the KH combo enclosure into another 1X12. That would still leave
me with my M1 exotic wood combo and my M5 practice combo.
So put me down for preferring the portability of a 1X12. Another
factor in this is that I use a Red Box for my line to the mixer
and that does a good job of emulating a 4X12 sound.
-BooM-
|
1981.16 | 1x12 left me wanting MORE | ICS::BUCKLEY | There is a mirror on the beach... | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:43 | 7 |
| BAH!
Call me old fashioned, but I still love the sound of a STACK! Yeah,
I've played thru 1x12's for a while, and 2x12's after that, but I need
at least a 4x12 for me. And two 4x12s is it as far as I'm concerned!
Buck, who'll gladly cart it around just for the sound!
|
1981.17 | | PNO::HEISER | midnight moon weaving her chain | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:07 | 8 |
| I've been looking into this myself lately. A pair of Mesa's 1x12s is
only $350.
If you ever get a chance to hear any Phil Keaggy (yeah him again) stuff,
he uses a pair of the Thiele 1x12s from Mesa with his rack. Sounds fine
to me.
Mike
|
1981.18 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:22 | 6 |
|
I've been really attracted to the sound that I get through a 4x10
cabs.. it seems to sound more roomy and well rounded than my other 1x12
or 2x12... is that just because there's mreo speakers??
|
1981.19 | 2x12 vrs. 4x10 | MFGMEM::RATTEY | | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:04 | 10 |
|
I've been bouncing back and forth between the idea of a 2x12
vrs. a 4x10 cabs. (closed back). Anyone have preferences/pros/cons
between the two ?? Here again I'm staying away from the 4x12 option
because of the hassels of moving it. Keep in mind I'll be powering
it with a KH M-3.
Ray
|
1981.20 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | There is a mirror on the beach... | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:13 | 2 |
| Well, fellow noter Greg House plays his Kitty M3 thru (2) Marshall
4x10 cabs, and I think it's a mint sounding combo!
|
1981.21 | | DECWIN::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:38 | 9 |
|
I've heard an M-3 head through a Marshall 4-10 cab and IMHO it
sounds great! The definitive mid-range punch machine!
Kevin
|
1981.22 | ;^) | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Thu Sep 27 1990 20:14 | 5 |
|
Yup. Greg's stack does sound good
When he's not feeding back...
|
1981.23 | REAL men do feedback! | GOES11::G_HOUSE | | Fri Sep 28 1990 20:47 | 25 |
| re: .-1
Outta my face, I was doing Ted Nugent tricks!
re: 4x10s .vs. 2x12s
I can't really comment on this well because I've only used 4x12s and
4x10s, but I can say that the combination of the Kitty Hawk M3 and the
Marshall 4x10s is one that I *really* like! Like Kevin says, it's
really a killer midrange sound.
I've also used the M3 with an Ampeg 4x12 which sounds very good as
well. It's a full sound with a little more bottom end, a lot less
midrange and a slight bit less treble then the 4x10s (to my perception
from doing a quick A/B comparision once long ago). Bear in mind that I
almost always use the two 4x10s together (seems fuller) and I only had
(have) one 4x12.
My *opinion* is that a 2x12 might give you an easier to carry package,
with maybe more bottom end then a 4x10, but you may find the sound
won't be quite as thick as you want it. Maybe get 2 2x12s so any one
piece is easier to carry, and then use them both together to get more
air moving. This is the approach I take with the 4x10s.
Greg
|
1981.24 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:01 | 9 |
| Justmy opinion, but the M3's would be AWEFULLY bassy with
4x12's....Go with the 4x10's.
Cheap alternative:
Those MArshall Microstack speakers... I've got four of them
and they wail !
jc
|
1981.25 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:04 | 5 |
| I liked my tone with 4x12's and the M3, but I was going for a thicker,
bluesy type tone. I too, think 4x10's would be the best of both
worlds.
Scary ... who's gonna build a can with 10 6x9" triaxials .... 8^)
|