T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1941.1 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Mon Aug 20 1990 11:44 | 6 |
| A dip switch for gain ??
Whats the manual say ??
I wouldn't mess with it. If it's not in the manual call Daddys perhaps ?
jc
|
1941.2 | rebel w/out a clue | MUSTNG::TAYLOR_J | | Mon Aug 20 1990 11:55 | 2 |
| I bought it used from daddys W/no manual { or footswitch }
in sight
|
1941.3 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Mon Aug 20 1990 15:04 | 3 |
| Rutroh. Goto plan B. Call 'em up.
jc
|
1941.4 | ????????????? | LOONMT::TAYLOR_J | | Mon Aug 20 1990 15:34 | 1 |
| CALL WHO?
|
1941.5 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Mon Aug 20 1990 15:38 | 3 |
| Daddys...Errrr, if thats where you got it...
jc
|
1941.6 | Try the manufacturer | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Mon Aug 20 1990 16:08 | 4 |
| You might try calling Dean Markley. I don't know their number, but
most companies will try and help you out.
gh
|
1941.7 | Go to the Horses' Mouth | MILKWY::JACQUES | I Need a Miracle | Mon Aug 20 1990 16:54 | 7 |
| Note 1421.10 lists Dean Markley's address and phone number. I
would try calling them, and while you have them on the phone
request a copy of the manual for your amp.
Good luck.
Mark Jacques
|
1941.8 | READ ABOUT IT!!! | OTOO01::ELLACOTT | non_teenage_mutant_ninja_bassist | Mon Aug 20 1990 19:55 | 7 |
| Do you guys ever read the reviews in the back of Guitar Player????
That amp is reviewed in the whats new section of the August issue.
The dip switches are for voicing, allowing for up to 256 different
settings so you can fine tune your tone/gain. And I'm a bass player!!
FJE
|
1941.9 | Guessing game | MILKWY::JACQUES | I Need a Miracle | Tue Aug 21 1990 09:26 | 11 |
| With all those combinations, it would be nice to have a manual for
a few more clues as to how to fine tune the amps tone. It would beat
the heck out of having to try all 256 combinations.
I would set it and forget it. Constant messin' with this little
DIP switch will most likely cause the thing to break.
By the way is this a tube or solid state amp ?
Mark
|
1941.10 | | NISYSG::TAYLOR_J | | Tue Aug 21 1990 10:28 | 1 |
| solid state
|
1941.11 | My new Dean Markley head | MAIL::EATOND | | Wed Dec 19 1990 09:39 | 20 |
| I tried out a Dean Markley amp head (rack-mount, two spaces) last night
and ended up buying it. It sounded REAL nice through two 4X10's. It's
a bit of a departure for me to buy something without researching it
first... So, some questions:
1) The model number is RM-40-SR. Does anyone know anything about
it? (I'm going to be calling Dean Markley tofday to get a manual)
2) It's REAL lightweight, surprisingly so for the sound it puts
out. The store told me that it had an upgrade to make it 100 watts.
I've never heard of upgrading an amp to raise the wattage - is that a
likely possibility (not that it matters, I never cranked the amp above
half-way)?
Just a general question on amps... If it takes a few seconds for
the sound to kick in after switching it on, can I assume that it is at
least partially driven by tubes?
Dan
|
1941.12 | probably solid-state | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed Dec 19 1990 10:53 | 22 |
| If this amp has tubes, chances are they are visible through the back
of the head. Most tube amps are heavy, so if this amp is as light
as you say, it's probably solid state. Dean Marley makes both.
Many amps include a time delay relay which prevents pops from getting
to the speakers when powering up. Does this amp remain silent for a
few seconds, then produce a click followed by the normal output being
present ? If so, it sounds like it has a relay.
Anything can be modified. The problem with trying to up the power
of an amp is the power supply can only source so much current, and
the circuitry can only handle so much current as well. I would be
concerned about the amp overheating or self-destructing if it's
been modified to produce more power than it was originally designed
for. In a tube amp, to increase power you would have to either add
tubes or change to differant tubes. In a solid state amp, the
power transistors can be replaced with differant components with
higher gain. Perhaps Jay Tashjian or some of the other circuit
Guru's can elaborate.
Mark
|
1941.13 | | MAIL::EATOND | | Wed Dec 19 1990 14:08 | 26 |
| Thanks for the reply, Mark. I finally got through to Dean Markley -
they're sending me a manual for the amp head.
The guy I spoke with said that it has a tube in it for the preamp
section - that explains the fact that it "warmed up" like a tube amp.
It also explains the very tubish sound it got, as well as why it weighs
so little.
He said there was no "kit" to upgrade to higher wattage, so I think the
salesman was just giving me a line (or was passing on a line from the
guy that sold it to them).
Funny thing - this has to be the first time I have really liked the
sound of a tube preamp such that it won over other favorite amps. I've
tried various tube pedals and always (eventually) ended up getting rid
of them. I don't understand what it is about this tube preamp that
made it so appealing... Maybe it was the fact that it was running into
such a big stack (2 4X10 cabs)?
Anyway, I got what I wanted - an affordable amp that is flexible enough to
use it with whatever size cab(s) I want to carry - single small cab for
practices or the 2X10 cab(s?) I plan on building over the holiday
vacation.
Dan
|
1941.14 | Go with the 4x10s! | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Join the Brotherhood of Tone | Wed Dec 19 1990 14:26 | 3 |
| 4x10s kick major booty, Dan. Consider them instead of 2x10s...
Greg (who has both)
|
1941.15 | Like with Dean MArkley | STOHUB::TRIGG::EATON | | Tue Feb 12 1991 11:36 | 17 |
| I've been playing with this amp for a number of weeks now. I like it a
lot. I've used a variety of cheap amp over the years, usually Peavey, but never
got as much satisfaction out of an amp as I have with this one. I have a 4x10
cab that I picked up locally and I built the 2x10 cab too. The 4x10 cab
definately wins - it sounds so much warmer and fuller.
I've got a general question, though. The clean channel is incredibly
loud - so much so that I have never been able to turn it way down (like 1 or 2).
The dist channel, though, can be pegged out (both pre- and master volume) and no
appreciable hearing loss is noticed 8^). Why is there such a difference? Is
this normal?
I also got my Ibanez tube screamer in the mail last week. If volume is
necessary, I find patching the pedal into the clean channel gives me all the
volume I could ever want (and still have a family to come home too 8^).
Dan
|
1941.16 | | GSRC::COOPER | Major MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Tue Feb 12 1991 12:04 | 5 |
| In a word ? Natural Compression. klay, thats two words, but...
it's a by product of distortion (especially with tubes).
jc (Who's Quattros clean side is on 1 while the OD side is on 11)
|
1941.17 | errata and reply | STOHUB::TRIGG::EATON | | Tue Feb 12 1991 12:38 | 15 |
| RE: my reply .15
>The clean channel is incredibly
>loud - so much so that I have never been able to turn it way down (like 1 or 2).
Er, that should be...
>The clean channel is incredibly
>loud - so much so that I have to turn it way down (like 1 or 2).
RE: Coop
So, I take it then, that I shouldn't be concerned?
Dan
|
1941.18 | | GSRC::COOPER | Major MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Tue Feb 12 1991 12:44 | 5 |
| I wouldn't be. Most amps that I've owned do the same thing...
Except for my GK's which had built in compression out the whahoo
on the clean channel.
jc
|
1941.19 | 84-40 | GOOROO::CLARK | not(cranking) => yanking | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:46 | 5 |
| I remember seeing ads for the Dean Markley 84-40 tube amps a few
years ago. GP gave them a real good review. Has anyone played one?
How did you like it?
- Dave
|
1941.20 | DM or SD | LEDS::BURATI | Fender Bender | Thu Oct 10 1991 17:52 | 5 |
| re -1
I thought the 84-40 was a Seymor Duncan amp.
-ron
|
1941.21 | S-D | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I wanna be sedated! | Thu Oct 10 1991 18:01 | 5 |
| Yeah, that sounds like the Seymor Duncan amp to me. If so, I put a
review of it in here awhile back. Very "Fenderish" to my ear, probably
make a good amp for playing the blues.
Greg
|
1941.22 | oh, yeah, never mind | GOOROO::CLARK | not(cranking) => yanking | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:23 | 5 |
| re last few
uh, gee, you're right. Sorry.
- Dave
|
1941.23 | Speaking of AC-30 s | LEDS::BURATI | Fender Bender | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:29 | 7 |
| While we're on the subject though, I've been wondering about Seymor's
amps. What's happened to them? I don't see anything on them anymore. Was
this 84-40 any good? Reading about them I thought there were some good
ideas there, but I got the impression that the amps were sort of
overkill in terms of options and flexability. Is there a note here on
Duncan amps?
|
1941.24 | Check Out #2072 | RGB::ROST | I Had A Torrid Affair With Geraldo | Fri Oct 11 1991 16:30 | 7 |
| Note #2072 is on the 84-40. There's also some notes on the Duncan
Convertibles that Ram Sudama entered when he was shopping for one, but
a search of dir/ti=duncan didn't show it.
Probably the deal with the Duncans is lack of promotion.
Brian
|
1941.25 | Dean Markley or Spectra? | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Tue Aug 16 1994 14:01 | 11 |
| My friend had an old amp in his shed that was all taken apart. When I
inquired he said a resistor had burned up and he guessed at the value.
After about a week it burned again. He tried to find a schematic for
it but had no luck so there it sat all stripped down. On the front of
the amp it said Spectra 225. The name looked familiar. I have a Dean
Markley amp that is a Spectra model 112. I called Dean Markley and they
informed me that they bought out Spectra in 1981 and that they would
send the schematics right out. It turns out that the resistor was a
47 ohm 5 Watt. No wonder the 50K he put in there burned.
Mark
|