T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1927.1 | | PELKEY::PELKEY | Professional Aumbre | Fri Aug 03 1990 13:54 | 5 |
| well, letsee,, basically, the light touch is what seems to work
best.
I think some try too hard, and the effect is too blurry... I just
take a slow gentle, approach...
|
1927.2 | It's subtle | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Fri Aug 03 1990 14:12 | 18 |
|
Well, for starters, vibrato is a subtle effect. Think of your
Mom baking buscuits in the kitchen with a red plaid apron and singing.
It's a very small wiggle, just enough to be detectable. It adds
"warmth" to the tone and the modulation *frequency* (if you were
doing it on a synth) is in the 3-8 Hz area.
If your hands are tense, start by modulating the pressure with
which you're holding the string down to the fret board. If you have
kinda high frets, you should be able to hear a very small pitch
change as you do this. If you have a scalloped fretboard,...
Work up to moving the string along the line of the fret itself,
trying again to keep it small and subtle. When you catch the frequency
and the modulation both at the same time, it'll sound warm, and
musically pleasing.
Joe
|
1927.3 | the "butterfly" vibrato | RAVEN1::BLAIR | I'm crushing your head! | Fri Aug 03 1990 15:37 | 6 |
|
The Arlen Roth Chicago Blues Guitar vid has an excellent segment
on vibrato and goes into detail on BB's technique which concentrates
more on the placement and pivoting of the side of the index finger
on the side of the neck. He uses a rapid rocking of the string.
Subtle yes, but quick.
|
1927.4 | When. | SMURF::BENNETT | Be Bay Be | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:05 | 12 |
|
Vibrato should have a life. It usually `grows' on sustained
notes. The best exercise I know of for getting the feel of this
is to set a aside a practice session for one note.
Relax fully before beginning the session. Sit with the instrument
and feel the silence. Find a note on the fretboard. For the next
hour, play with one that one note. If you find yourself drifting,
go back to it. This exercise will help you learn about the
attack and aftertouch techniques and will also get you interested
in rhythm. It's OK to good with amp settings and FX while doing
this stuff.
|
1927.5 | Keep dem cards and letters rollin' in... | MAIL::EATOND | In tents | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:08 | 6 |
| Thanks, all, for the suggestons. I'll hafta try them out this weekend.
Any other words of advice gladly received. Anyone else have a hurdle
getting a good vibrato? How did you overcome it?
Dan
|
1927.6 | Vibrato techniques | BSS::COLLUM | Oscar's only ostrich oiled an orange owl today | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:14 | 36 |
| The idea is to modulate the tension on the string somehow. There are
several ways:
1. If your guitar has high frets, modulate pressure on the string as
you fret the note.
2. If your frets are low, fret the note firmly, then release your thumb
and hand from the back of the neck while keeping the finger firmly on
the string being fretted and vibrate your hand in the same direction as
the string runs, i.e. you pull the string looser and tighter by doing
that.
3. Fret the note, release the hand and thumb as described above. Then,
while keeping the finger very stiff, slide the string back and forth
across the frets. This motion originates from the elbow, your wrist
and finger will be stiff. (This one feels awkward to me for the index
finger, but I use it for the others often)
4. Fret the note lightly and let up on your thumb gripping the neck,
but not totally released as above. Then twist your forearm back and
forth. This will slide the string back and forth across the frets.
All of these motions are subtle. #'s 1 and 2 will get you very slight
vibrato which is really nice at times. #3 can be almost as heavy as an
old technology whammy bar, but can be just as subtle as your touch
develops. #4 is some where in between.
Depending on the fingering you're in the middle of, position, etc, the
different ways are appropriate and work well at different times.
See if those are decent descriptions. It's hard to tell when I'm
writing them.
Have fun, hope this helps,
Will
|
1927.7 | different strokes | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:26 | 36 |
| Vibrato is one of the things for which I think it helps enormously to
have a *visual* aid. For one thing, there are at least three vibrato
techniques:
1. "pushing" vibrato - This is the way most rock and blues players do
it, by pushing the string toward the top of the neck.
2. "pulling" vibrato - I've rarely seen anyone use this technique
besides myself, but I use it a lot as an alternative to pushing. You
have to sort of catch the string under your fingertip and pull it in
toward your palm. It's good for doing wide vibrato on the low strings
(you run out of fretboard if you push them, plus it's hard to get the
right pivot in your wrist with your fingers stretched out all the way),
as well as for doing a lighter, quicker vibrato.
3. "shaking" vibrato - This is the way classical guitarists do it
(there's probably a better name for it). You move your whole hand
parallel to the neck instead of across it, while keeping your finger in
the same place, sort of like you were using a slide. Larry Carlton uses
this very effectively, as do many jazz players. It gives a lighter,
much more subtle vibrato.
It's also possible to combine 1 & 2 above into a really wide, wild
vibrato, and of course there are vibrato *bars* and various techniques
for using them. Then you can pull the strings at the above the nut,
below the bridge, flex the neck... Who said guitar was simple?
In any case, some of these techniques are difficult to master and
require a lot of practice. I've learned a lot over the years by
watching the hand placement and left hand wrist technique of other
guitarists whose playing I admire. I personally happen to prefer
listening to guitarists who have mastered these techniques, because
they add a lot of character to your playing, as opposed to just
cranking out notes.
- Ram
|
1927.8 | | UPWARD::HEISER | gimme that phone! | Fri Aug 03 1990 17:19 | 6 |
| > 2. "pulling" vibrato - I've rarely seen anyone use this technique
FWIW, Keaggy uses this method quite a bit, but not as much as "pushing".
I agree with it not being very common though.
Mike
|
1927.9 | | HPSRAD::JWILLIAMS | | Fri Aug 03 1990 17:58 | 17 |
| Yes, generally:
E - push
B - push
G - push
D - push
A - pull
E - pull
It's fortuitous that the lower strings are also easier to grab with one
finger.
Most vibrato should be subtle, however, there are some brilliant
counterexamples. Vibrato creates musical tension.
John.
|
1927.10 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | be Excellent to each other! | Fri Aug 03 1990 19:30 | 7 |
| The pushing / pulling of the strings is how you control tonality on the
classical guitar. Vibrato , you have to have a soft touch on the string
and move th finger tip in a wiggling pattern.
Or you can hold a whammy bar in the palm of your hand, let it rest
there, no real weight on the stick , just enough.
This might be alot harder if you only use a plectrum , where you have
to move the hand.
|
1927.11 | | CSC32::H_SO | I'm reliable: Made in Korea | Fri Aug 03 1990 19:30 | 17 |
|
It all depends on application.
For lower notes, I like using slower/subtle vibrato.
For higher "screamer" notes including pick harmonics, I LOVE using
fast/wild vibrato.
These changes, according to the mood of the song.
As far as acquiring them, there's a neat article by Rick Emmett
in Guitar Player Nov 89 issue. I really can't post it since it has
illustrations, but I'd be happy to send it to ya if you wanna send
me your mailing address.
I think relaxing your hand helps a lot, also. Watch B.B. King
or any other blues giants sometime.
So-Hong
|
1927.12 | I love finger vibrato! | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Sat Aug 04 1990 22:33 | 60 |
| I was kind skeptical about the replies you'd get when I first saw this
note, but I am pleasantly surprised. Even though vibrato is very
difficult to explain how to perform, there have been some excellent
and informative responses here.
I think vibrato is a great way of making a note a little fatter, so it
sticks out just a bit.
I remember reading one of those instructional articles written by Steve
Morse several years ago and the part that he impressed on me was that
vibrato technique should center around a certain note and should be
varied on either side of it, or else it will sound out of tune. I
think he recommended using a combined push-pull technique, but I don't
really remember.
One exercise that Steve Vai recommended in one of his columns is like
someone here recommended in a previous note, that of playing only one
note for several hours (yep, he really did say for several *hours*)
trying different vibrato techniques and such. I remember talking to
Joe Minville not long after that came out and he said he'd tried it and
thought it really did help.
Personally, I also had trouble getting a good vibrato technique. I
play electric guitar almost exclusively and for the first four years I
played (or so), I used a technique similar to the classical technique
described before, where you push and pull the string without bending it
(you know stretching it nut to bridge rather then bending it side to
side on the fretboard). It sounds ok, but is VERY subtle on an
electric.
I was taking lessons from a guy that showed me a technique more rock
and blues oriented, which is the bending technique like BB King uses,
where you fret the note using your index finger and then pivot your
entire hand around it. This can give you a really wide sweeping
vibrato and it's pretty easy to vary the speed. This guy had me
work on nothing but this for at last three weeks. It didn't come
easy and quite honestly, it was probably over a year before I could
really do it well.
As my playing has progressed since then, I've gotten a little more
aggressive and I've found myself using a vibrato technique that sounds
similar to the "pull" technique that Ram presented. I usually use the
pivot thing if I'm fretting the note with the index or middle finger,
but use the "pull" technique if I'm fretting with my ring finger or
pinkie. The way I do it is to GRAB the neck and then turn my wrist
while pulling and releasing with my fingers. This gives a really wide
vibrato that I find is hard for me to get any other way.
One player who's vibrato technique is pretty unique is Eric Clapton.
He releases his thumb from the back of the neck and his whole fretting
hand moves straight up and down. He gets a really wide vibrato this
way and it seems like it's easy for him to control in the upper fret
register. Quite honestly, I've tried to do it this way and I just
can't do it! I'm so accustomed to some flavor of a pivoting type
vibrato that I can't get that up and down motion right. I suppose that
I could eventually get it, if I were to practice enough, but why
bother? I *like* my vibrato technique...
Hope this helps,
Greg
|
1927.13 | taken offline | MAIL::EATOND | In tents | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:52 | 4 |
| I'd love to see that article. I'll get in touch with you off-line.
Dan
|
1927.14 | confused | MAIL::EATOND | In tents | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:58 | 14 |
| > I remember reading one of those instructional articles written by Steve
> Morse several years ago and the part that he impressed on me was that
> vibrato technique should center around a certain note and should be
> varied on either side of it, or else it will sound out of tune. I
> think he recommended using a combined push-pull technique, but I don't
> really remember.
Unless you're doing vibrato on a bended (bent?) note, wouldn't it be
impossible to "center" the vibrato on the note? I mean, whether you're
pulling or pushing to create vibrato (using that technique), it is
still varying the note sharp, right?
Dan
|
1927.15 | Don't forget real slow | WACHU2::HERTZBERG | I'm the NEA | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:59 | 12 |
| � Unless you're doing vibrato on a bended (bent?) note, wouldn't
� it be impossible to "center" the vibrato on the note?
Yeah. That's true of all the techniques discussed so far _except_
the classical vibrato ("loosening" and "tightening" the string by
pulling parallel to the neck). That's one of the reasons I like
the classical alot. I use it so much that I've gotten enough power
behind it to make the pitch changes quite obvious. One thing I
really adore is modulating the pitch very slowly using this technique.
Try the 1-2 Hz range.
Marc
|
1927.16 | Uh...yeah | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Mon Aug 06 1990 14:27 | 12 |
| RE: .14
>Unless you're doing vibrato on a bended (bent?) note, wouldn't it be
>impossible to "center" the vibrato on the note? I mean, whether you're
>pulling or pushing to create vibrato (using that technique), it is
>still varying the note sharp, right?
I guess you're right, maybe I never did understand what he was talking
about...
Greg
|
1927.17 | double the fun | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Mon Aug 06 1990 14:33 | 24 |
| >� Unless you're doing vibrato on a bended (bent?) note, wouldn't
>� it be impossible to "center" the vibrato on the note?
>
>Yeah. That's true of all the techniques discussed so far _except_
>the classical vibrato ("loosening" and "tightening" the string by
>pulling parallel to the neck).
Not quite true. The classical technique also works from a fretted note
as a base and only varies the tone higher.
Another trick that I thought of is using two or more fingers when
pushing. To do this, fret the note with a finger other that the index
finger, then place one or two of your other fingers adjacent to it on
the string. For example, finger with your ring finger and place the
middle finger on the string right next to it. It doesn't really matter
whether the other fingers are in the same fret area or straddle frets,
because they won't affect the tone. They just provide some extra
muscles to bend the string. I don't normally use this technique unless
I am trying to get vibrato on a string that is already bent up pretty
far ("Jimi Hendrix" vibrato) where I need the extra strength (it takes
a lot of strength to control this). But it could be helpful to a
beginner with weaker fingers.
- Ram
|
1927.18 | Don't quit so easy Greg | RAVEN1::BLAIR | I'm crushing your head! | Mon Aug 06 1990 14:36 | 6 |
|
I agree with Greg that the vibrato should center intself on the note.
Maybe we're confusing bending with vibrato. You can do vibrato on a
bent or natural note, right? I think of the idea of centering as
moving the string toward you and then away from you with the center
being the natural note. Of course what the f*ck do I know. ;^)
|
1927.19 | The simple two-step method | ICS::BUCKLEY | I Wanna Be Your Man! | Mon Aug 06 1990 14:43 | 13 |
| >I mean, whether you're
>pulling or pushing to create vibrato (using that technique), it is
>still varying the note sharp, right?
Not nec. I mean, when I bend up to a note (either pushing or pulling),
I vibrato that (bent) note flat. Example:
1 b7 1 b7 1 b7 1
Bent release bent release bent release bent
Now, when I vibrato an un-bent note, or I'm using the whammy bar (with
either bent or non-bent notes), I pull the notes sharp. Those are
the two basic vibrato techniques I use.
|
1927.20 | had that base covered | MAIL::EATOND | In tents | Mon Aug 06 1990 17:34 | 5 |
| Well, if you all would read my note, I *did* say "unless you're
using vibrato on a bent note".
Dan
|
1927.21 | | WACHU2::HERTZBERG | I'm the NEA | Tue Aug 07 1990 10:14 | 12 |
| � >Yeah. That's true of all the techniques discussed so far _except_
� >the classical vibrato ("loosening" and "tightening" the string by
� >pulling parallel to the neck).
� Not quite true. The classical technique also works from a fretted note
� as a base and only varies the tone higher.
Respectfully disagree. I push towards the bridge and the tone gets
lower than the unmodified fretted note.
Another variation is to change the speed of the vibrato as a single
note is held.
|
1927.22 | I Agree with .21 | KIRKTN::JHYNDMAN | Life in the bus lane | Tue Aug 07 1990 12:56 | 8 |
| Yup,I also use the "classical" method for electric or acoustic(learned
painfully for slow fiddle playing!!" and you DEFINITELY stretch and
slacken the string if done properly;-so the notes sounded are around
the fretted note,above and below.
'Course it's not the only or best way for everyone............
Big Jim.
|
1927.23 | picking nits | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Tue Aug 07 1990 14:25 | 12 |
| >Yup,I also use the "classical" method for electric or acoustic(learned
>painfully for slow fiddle playing!!" and you DEFINITELY stretch and
>slacken the string if done properly;-so the notes sounded are around
>the fretted note,above and below.
I could believe this was possible on gut or nylon strings, but it's
really hard for me to imagine how you could be applying enough pressure
on a steel string to stretch it *toward* the bridge. That's what you'd
have to be doing to have the effect you're describing. But I'll take
your word for it (and check it out on my own).
- Ram
|
1927.24 | Did I mention how STRONG I was??? :^) | WACHU2::HERTZBERG | I'm the NEA | Tue Aug 07 1990 18:43 | 1 |
| Come over here, I'll show you.
|
1927.25 | S L O W down ... | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Aug 08 1990 10:08 | 8 |
| Pat Blair let me borrow a video called "Chicago Blues Guitar" by Arlen
Roth, and he demostrates some pretty good vibrato technique. While
following along with the tape, I noticed that my "style" is way too
fast ... but it's hard to slow it down after all these years. I've
noticed my hyperactivity on performance tapes too. My best advice
would be to slow down, no matter how slow you shake 'em now ...
Scary (hyper bends ...)
|
1927.26 | Don't change a thing... | TCC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Aug 08 1990 10:41 | 3 |
| But Scary, thats your style. If you changed it it wouldn't be you.
jc (who knows Scary-Vibrato when he hears it)
|
1927.27 | Shake it...gently | ISLNDS::KELLY | | Wed Aug 08 1990 12:46 | 15 |
| I typically create a vibrato by pushing and pulling the string when
the base note is unbent, so that the vibrato is 'centered' over
the base note, with the vibrato going sharp on both sides.
With a bent note as the base note, the same technique results in
one side of the vibrato being sharp to the base note and the other
side being flat.
I'm trying to get a vibrato that swells as the note sustains, like
a singer, because I love the way someone like Joan Baez can add
vibrato to a sustained note.
Regards,
John K.
|
1927.28 | Who are you calling bent ??? | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Mon Jul 15 1991 09:25 | 30 |
|
Folks,
Thought I'd dig this NOTE out and air what I found yesterday.
This is no new news from all the previous replies, but if any readers have
access to a two speed tape..........
I borrowed a reel to reel two speed tape over the weekend to make some slow
motion copies of the latest Gary Moore (Still got the Blues) album for the
purpose of copying some of his great blues licks.......
Well, after about an hour of listening to complete tracks at half speed, your
ear adjusts to the "octave down" and you start "listening" and recognising the
licks just as when they were at full speed.
The thing that stuck out for me, and I found myself listening to, was Gary's
vibrato. Sure enough, he would hit the note, then apply the vibrato taking the
note sharp as he pushed, and sharp as he pulled. At half speed the damn thing
sounded very un-musical and down-right out of tune.
I did the same for other guitarists.....including the un-tabed Clapton and
Hendrix section of the Eric Johnson video.......same effect.
So, in summary, our ears are fooled into thinking the vibrato "centres" (pitch
-wise) on the base note when applying BB King type vibrato on un-bent notes
and applied at 5 hz type frequencies.
Dave
|