T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1895.1 | Boss BE-5B | AQUA::ROST | Get up and get hip to the trip | Tue Jul 10 1990 10:14 | 36 |
| <<< CVG::WORK3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]GUITAR.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Guitar Notes >-
================================================================================
Note 1481.0 Boss BE-5B Pedalboard for Bass 4 replies
AQUA::ROST "Chickens don't take the day off" 10 lines 16-SEP-1989 20:06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boss has added an new multi-effects pedal, the BE-5B for bassists.
According to the new GP, it is a floor unit, like the BE-5 for guitar,
and has compressor/limiter, exciter/distortion, graphic EQ and
delay/flange/chorus on board. No idea on price, but I would guess in
the $350-400 ballpark lioke the BE-5.
I could have used one of these five years ago when I was doing top 40.
Brian
================================================================================
Note 1481.3 Boss BE-5B Pedalboard for Bass 3 of 4
AQUA::ROST "Subliminal trip to nowhere" 15 lines 15-NOV-1989 15:23
-< It's Here, But... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BE-5B has arrived finally. Saw but did not hear one today. Quoted
a price of $345 at Daddy's in Shrewsbury, MA.
You get four effects: Limiter (threshold and level controls),
Overdrive/enhancer (drive, tone, level and enhance controls), ten band
graphic EQ (starting at 31.5Hz and going up in octaves, with a level
control) and a delay/chorus/flanger (six knobs total, including "effect
level", this is a wet/dry mix, maybe?). Conspicuously absent is the
noise supressor of the BE-5.
I still may audition one, but the mix of effects isn't quite what I can
use.
Brian
|
1895.2 | Bass Rockman | AQUA::ROST | Get up and get hip to the trip | Tue Jul 10 1990 10:42 | 2 |
|
Note #1006 covers the Scholz Bass Rockman headphone amp.
|
1895.3 | relocated | MILKWY::JACQUES | If you don't stop, you'll go deaf | Tue Jul 10 1990 11:41 | 43 |
| <<< CVG::WORK3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]GUITAR.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Guitar Notes >-
================================================================================
Note 1890.17 The Offical Bass "Playing" Note 17 of 19
MILKWY::JACQUES "If you don't stop, you'll go deaf" 29 lines 10-JUL-1990 08:44
-< re. Bass efx >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan,
I'm not sure how much chorusing would enhance the bass, but
Flange definately does if used sparingly. The last band I was in
did a slow melodic tune by a Girl named Judy Roberts entitled
"Madame Blues". Our bass player kicked in a flanger for this tune
and it definately added a nice twist to the bass tone. I have
played my bass through my MidiverbII and it sounds really nice
through the fanger. MidiverbII's have a full band of flange efx to
choose from (10 differant flange patches) and they can be picked
up very cheap. I've seen them around $150.00 used. The *mix* control
on the midiverbII allows you to vary the effect from very subtle
to very heavy.
I see all kinds of efx advertised for bass and I have to wonder
how many bass players actually use them and whether they enhance or
detract from the sound. The latest one I'm seeing is the Digitech
Bass harmonizor. Another thing I've seen that I question is the use
of Whammy's on basses. Steinberger makes a bass with their trans-trem
whammy-bridge system. Kahler also makes whammy bridges for bass.
The one thing I would try to avoid when adding efx to bass is anything
that could make it sound muddy. It's hard enough to produce a nice
clear well-defined bass tone without adding something to muddy it up.
Years ago, a lot of bass players were using wah-wah pedals on bass.
I suppose a few people used it effectively, but in most cases it
sounded pretty redundant. Perhaps an envelope follower that sweeps
the filter frequency up would be neat (used very sparingly).
A friend of mine used to use a set of "Taurus" (sp?) pedals.
I know nothing about these accept that they are bass synth pedals.
Anyone ever try these ?
Mark
|
1895.4 | Chorus: Wah-Wah of the 80s | AQUA::ROST | Get up and get hip to the trip | Tue Jul 10 1990 12:12 | 47 |
|
Re: .3
The Kahler bass tremelo (why do they call them that, they are
*vibrato* units) is officially discontinued.
As far as chorus/flange go, ever since Jaco fired up a Lexicon delay,
bassists have been chorusing themselves to *death*. A recent
development has been chorus pedals for bass that split the signal and
only chorus the high end, so the fundamental doesn't wash out or sound
out of tune. Peavey has started to offer high-pass effects loops on
bass amps for this purpose (they even sell a chorus pedal with a
crossover built-in, for budget biamping).
Using effects like flange/chorus on bass is tricky, a little bit goes a
*long* way. Every time I hear fretless bass through a chorus I want to
gag...Jaco made it his, everyone else, please find something else to do,
OK?
What about fuzz bass? After everyone messed with it in the 60s, it
kind of died out (although Jaco used to kick in some fuzz on his live
solos). One guy who took it to extremes was Hugh Hopper (with bands
like Soft Machine and Isotope) where he got a remarkable horn-like
timbre, very hip stuff.
The undeniable pioneer of bass FX was Electro-Harmonix, who offered
boxes for bass before anybody else thought of it. Two in particular
that were interesting:
Mole/Hog's Foot
The name depends on whether it's in the "plug-into-the-amp" box (Mole)
or a stomp box (Hog). Same circuit, this is the classic LPB-1 power
booster modified with a filter so that it works as a bass booster. It
cuts out a lot of your high end and muddies up the bottom. So what,
you say? Want to go from a crisp Rick twang to some rub-a-dub reggae
thump? Here you go...
Bassballs
Whatta name. It was basically an envelope-follwoing filter, but
instead of sounding like a wah, this one sounded more like a
flanger or phaser sweep. It also had a switch to kick in a dsitortion
circuit which accentuated the upper harmonics, providing a more
dramatic filter sweep effect.
Brian
|
1895.5 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | Slam Dancin' with the Buffalo | Tue Jul 10 1990 13:01 | 27 |
|
Regarding the discussion earlier about `Compressors'.
I have a built in Compressor in my Yamaha amp, and I don't
use it. Main reason being, that when I'm playing the strings
(two finger method) I get a very noticable `POP' out of the
speaker instead of a smooth tone. This is with the
compressor at four to five on the dial, tops ! Anything less
seemed to affect the volume too much. I reached the point
where I just left it off and keep the volume down to four.
However, this past Saturday afternoon, I went to a jam
session and decided to see how my little 15 Watt practice
amp would do as a pre-amp. (Since it has an overdrive switch
on it. :^)) With both of these amps connected as such, I
didn't have to turn either amp over 2 on the dial. If I'd
done so, I would've been blowing out windows. The compressor
was also set to 2 and I didn't experience the POP as
mentioned earlier. Only problem now is that I'm getting a
feedback hum which I'm going to try eliminating with a
heavily shielded patch cable.
Something to ponder, but the overdrive added a VERY smooth
fuzz to the tone of the bass. It's amazing what a little $70
amp can do for ya' ! :^)
Matt
|
1895.6 | 4+1 Bass conversion kit | MILKWY::JACQUES | If you don't stop, you'll go deaf | Thu Jul 12 1990 11:04 | 29 |
|
Has anybody seen the latest invention from the Wilkinson dude
that invented the Wilkonson roller nut. His latest offering is
a kit which allows you to convert a 4 string Fender-style bass
to a 5 string without any radical mods. It is called the 4+1
bass conversion kit. The kit consist of the following.
1. First of all the kit provides a replacement string guide
which holds the ball end of the extra string.
2. Second of all the kit includes a 5 string nut.
3. Third the kit has a replacement bridge, which has an
integral tuner for the extra string.
The resulting Bass still has only four tuners on the neck. The
ball end of the extra string is attached to the string guide, and
tunes up on the bridge. You can either add a low b or high b
string. It is necessary to drill a couple of new holes to mount
the bridge, but if you later decide to convert back to four strings,
these holes get covered up by the original bridge, and no one will
ever know it's been modified. I read a product profile in one of the
latest guitar rags (I think Guitar Player) and they gave it favorable
reviews. The system lists for ~$175.00 but if you consider it saves
you from dumping your present bass or buying an additional
instrument, it may be worth the investment for some players.
Mark Jacques
|
1895.7 | Yeah pretty interesting | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | No, I'm very, very shy. | Thu Jul 12 1990 17:00 | 4 |
| I saw a Fender bass that was fitted with one of these recently and it
looked really slick. Seems like it's a well done kit.
Greg
|
1895.8 | Be prepared!!! | HAMER::KRON | I'm the Amoral Minority! | Mon Jul 16 1990 11:05 | 22 |
| re -2 yep that sounds really great....I'll have to check it out....
anyway back to the business at hand............I use a variety of
effects for the bass:
1.peavey midi pedal board
(programmable patching+stereo out)
2.blue tube preamp (stomp box)
3.boss chorus
4. " bass flanger
5. " envelope filter
6. " pitch shift/delay
(usually set for a octave down-
to thicken out fretless lines)
It's important to use stuff sparingly otherwise you lose the function
of the bass in the band (imho anyway!) but it's nice when you're
playing a new song with your band and someone says "it's good- but it
needs a little something right here" so you step on the pedalboard and
addn a little dash of distortion or something to your recipe at a break
and it spices up the part really nicely. I also find that if you play
funk a few of these have become almost required.......
-catch y'all on a bounce!!!
-Bill
|
1895.9 | Going For A "Contemporary" Sound | RGB::ROST | My Baby Bass is my baby | Thu Jul 18 1991 14:30 | 42 |
| The band I'm curently in is going to be regrouping and we've talked
about going for a more modern sound. Well, for us "more modern" is a
pretty vague term since we've spent most of our five years together
getting more and more retro in our approach. Maybe I should say
"contemporary".
One thing we think we need to do is go for more of a processed sound,
something I'm not averse too, but I'm somewhat confused. I've spent a
little bit of time with the Boss BE-5B multi-FX and might want to check
out the A5-Bass from Korg, but have some reservations.
Maybe I'm out of touch, but do people really *use* these effects (other
than the Earth Movers....ha ha)? The typical recipe seems to be a
compressor/limiter-->exciter-->EQ-->chorus/flange/delay/reverb. On the
Boss they add a distortion and leave out the reverb, the Korg splits the
chorus/flange out from the delay/reverb.
My current amp has a limiter and a flexible EQ already. I suppose if I
look at the EQ as an *effect*, maybe having another might be useful,
but it doesn't seem to be such a big deal; if the bass and amp give me
a good clean tone why would I want to EQ it to death?
The exciter thing escapes me. The one in the BE5B seemes to do almost
nothing. There was a detectable midrange drop at full intensity, at
lower settings it seemed to do nothing useful.
That leaves delay-type effects. With only 5 presets on the Korg, I
could probably get by OK. The Boss would be ridiculous, bending over
to tweak the thing between songs. Yecchh.
I notice noone seems to make rack-mount bass FX boxes. But when I
check out the plastic construction of the Korg and Boss (they really
want you to *step* on these?) the flimsy power cord setups, etc. I'm
thinking that I'd be better off with a good rack-mount delay
box...which I already own one of.
If some bassist out there wants to give me some examples of where
they use these other effects I'd be interested in hearing about it.
Brian
The Old Fart
|
1895.10 | a little rambling....did it make sense? | QRYCHE::STARR | Spontaneity has its time and place. | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:03 | 13 |
| I'm not a bass player (nor do I play one on TV!), but just a general comment;
It seems like a lot of the "contemporary" bass players aren't using a lot of
effects, but they do seem to be going for a more trebly tone.
I know that's not real informative, but its just that it seems like today's
bassist's job is not just to hold down the low end - a lot of time it provides
the melody line. Listen to the new REM album for examples, on songs like
"Texarkana" or "Losing My Religion" - while the guitarist is playing chords,
the bass player is playing some kind of melodic line underneath it, with a
sorta Rickenbacker tone.
alan
|
1895.11 | a start... | HAMER::KRON | RU4REAL | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:23 | 11 |
| Dear Old Fart,
the thing to remember is what are you trying to achieve?
I use a lot of pedals but I try to play exclusively in
a trio setting and like to be able to fill up spaces in
the group sound and mimic the sound of another instrument
such as a keyboard or guitar.Chorus ond or flanging are
invaluble for this.In conjunction witha distortion box/tube
driverthe sound can be quite impressive,especially with an eight string
bass.
more later,
-Bill
|
1895.12 | 8 string bass? | STAR::SALKEWICZ | It missed... therefore, I am | Thu Jul 18 1991 16:10 | 6 |
| An 8 string bass? I don't thinks I've evere seen/heard of such a thing.
Is that like a twleve string guitar with each string doubled/octaved?
Or is it 8 "different" notes when all strings are played open?
/Bill_the_very_curious_one
|
1895.13 | fx have their place | CAVLRY::BUCK | c'mon baby lets go for a ride | Thu Jul 18 1991 16:10 | 3 |
| A slight flange (very slight, more like a filter notch) is very
effective for hard rock/metal in bringing the bass out from under
the dinn of super-distorted guitars into the forefront of the mix.
|
1895.14 | Maybe I Already Have What I Need | RGB::ROST | My Baby Bass is my baby | Thu Jul 18 1991 16:40 | 26 |
| Re: .10, .11
Well, I'm figuring to get away from the thumpy 50s/60s tone I've been
using to a more contemporary sound I already can do the following:
1. Take out the foam I stuffed under the strings at the bridge 8^)
2. Play more often with a pick.
3. Use the treble boost on my bass for a brighter tone.
4. Use the limiter on my amp for a more compressed sound.
5. Change my strings more often (I leave 'em on for 6 months).
6. Mousse my hair 8^) 8^)
I already own a chorus stomper and a delay rack unit which I can use,
and the amp has a pair of FX loops so it's a question of what else
would I reasonably need. I'm figuring the companies stuff things into
bass multi-FX units because bass players say they need them and use
them. I just haven't been out to *see* any contemporary rock bands for
years...but I certainly don't hear gobs of fuzzed out and delayed bass
riffing going on when I turn on the radio, eh?
Brian
|
1895.15 | Double the pleasure, double the fun, double the strings | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I wanna be sedated! | Thu Jul 18 1991 16:44 | 6 |
| re: 8 string bass
Yes, the one's I've seen have had each string doubled, like on a 12
string guitar. Looks interesting...
Greg
|
1895.16 | Imagine me giving *you* advice... ;^) | WASTED::tomg | From small things... | Thu Jul 18 1991 16:51 | 23 |
|
I listen to a lot of "alternative" type music and I don't hear much
FX type stuff going on. A little chorus and EQ seems to go a long
way.
Recently, I've found that a good EQ goes a long way toward
getting different bass tones. For example, a really good
HM bass tone can be had by doing a sharp boost at 2k. Really
brings out that tone.
Alan had mentioned the R.E.M. stuff. All that stuff was done
on some kind of old P-basses. Dunno what kind of FX, but I
didn't hear anything obvious like serious delay, flanges or
other stuff.
IMHO, yer all set for FX. You might consider a 2x10 cab
to get more of that upper midrange stuff.
What do you consider contemporary sounding?
-T
(Who's not real big on bass FX)_
|
1895.17 | give me an hour or so to tune up | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Mel Schacher's Hairclub for Men | Fri Jul 19 1991 00:29 | 20 |
| re 8 string bass:
It's worse than that. 8 string basses have been around since at least
the 60's, when Noel Redding was often seen with a Hagstrom model. The
latest rage though is a 12 string bass, where each of the 4 normal bass
strings is doubled by *2* octave strings. Some famous players noted for
using these are Tom Peterson from Cheap Trick and the bass player from
King's X; I believe their's are both made by Hamer. Nick Lowe describes
the sound of his 12 as "like a trainwreck".
These type of basses are especially useful in power trio settings,
allowing the bass to function partially as a rhythm guitar; check out
"Live at Budokan" or "Live at Leeds" for reference.
I suppose the logical extension of this idea is an 18 string bass; a 6
string (the Anthony Jackson Heavy Metal model?) with 2 octave strings per.
If you had one of these, changing strings and retubing your SVT in the
same month could require a second mortgage :-)
/rick_still_working_on_4
|
1895.18 | FX500B | PAULUS::BAUER | Richard - ISE L10N Center Frankfurt | Fri Jul 19 1991 06:33 | 21 |
| Hi Brian !
I know of at least one FX rack system (ok. half sized) for bass that's the
YAMAHA FX500B. It may be already reviewed in one of the magazines. I'll have a
look.
Since you already have some effects, I would suggest that you try to borrow the
FX500B user's guide from a shop. In the back (at least of the normal FX500) is
a complete list of sounds with all the parameters. You could then try to
replicate that with your effects and check the results. I've done that with
FX500 and my SPX900 with quite good results.
If you do so, I would be glad to receive a copy of those pages, as it may be
interesting also to try these with bass sounds from my synths.
This brings me back to the idea to have generic description of FX parameters so
that the settings of let's say a QuadraVerb can be brought over to ME-5 or so.
best regards
Richard
|
1895.19 | This & That | RGB::ROST | My Baby Bass is my baby | Fri Jul 19 1991 09:39 | 23 |
| Re: .17
Yo, Rick, Tom Petersson beat you to the idea...he had Modulus build
him an 18 string a few years ago, it's pictured in an old GP. The
graphite neck is needed due to the string tension.
Re: .18
Richard, thanks for the suggestion. The delay unit I already own is a
Yamaha SPX-50D, a precursor to the FX-500. Actually, the SPX is a good
box for live use, since it has the ability to build a "chain" of
effects so you can step through your presets without needing an
expensive MIDI footpedal, and there is a built-in loop so you can kick
in another effect under control of the SPX. I suspect that's what I'll
end up using, rather than buying any new stuff.
As far as "generic" effects parameters, remember that we're talking
software here and it's doubtful that any two manufacturers use the
parameters in exactly the same way. For instance, when you adjust
"diffusion" on a reverb, what the heck is that and if the parameter
goes from 0 to 63 is that linear, logarithmic, exponential, etc.?
Brian
|
1895.20 | Bass FX | SMURF::BENNETT | Pancretization | Tue Jul 23 1991 16:55 | 19 |
|
I've checked out my bass thru my DigiTech DSP256. There are
very few effects that are really worth while. Small amounts
of chorus or flange work well. Delay is very sloppy except
for 4-taps with very low delay times (>20 msec.) for a ringing
metalic sound. In this case there are certain frequencies that
get out of hand it I don't notch them in the parametric before
the delay. Reverb and bass also don't cut it except when room
size is about the size of the box on an acoustic bass guitar -
then it sounds real nice.
For effected bass sounds, check out The Cure, Sugar Cubes,
or New Order. Take another listen to "One of These Days" on
Pink Floyd's Meddle album for a good hard slap echo. EQ off the
low end, distort the rest and make like Lemmy.
Better yet -
take the gear ya got, dial up a grossly overprocessed sound, and
wring something musical out of it.
|
1895.21 | WHAT BASS EFFECTS DO YOU RECOMMEND? | BRUMMY::LAWTON | My freedom is your paralysis, Jim | Fri Mar 27 1992 11:52 | 14 |
| I may be in the market for some effects very soon. What do fellow,
noting bassists recommend? I already have a flanger (one of the old
Electro-Harmonix jobs) but I'm more than willing to part company with
it if anyone can tell me about an "all in one" effect that incorporates
flanging.
Wants: Compression, reverb/echo (gotta be clean echo).
Suggestions, anyone? I'm talking around the 300 pound/450 dollar mark
as a guideline for you all,
Thanks
Phil
|
1895.22 | Keep it simple IMHO | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | Who knew? | Mon Mar 30 1992 17:33 | 7 |
| All I use on bass is compression and either a flanger, or chorus.
Simple yet effective!
Rock on,
Fred
|
1895.23 | Simple works for me | IMTDEV::LARSON | LARRY LARSON | Tue Mar 31 1992 10:53 | 5 |
| I agree with the keep it simple philosophy. I have tried numerous toys
over the years and usually end up canning them. I now occasionally
use a BOSS Chorus and that's it.
Lars
|