T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1750.1 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Sun Mar 25 1990 21:30 | 1 |
| What has happened to the color? My 69ish looks OK as far as I can tell ...
|
1750.2 | Martin's are easy | TOOTER::WEBER | | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:08 | 3 |
| 1968-'69 if the serial # is correct.
Danny W.
|
1750.3 | How Easy? | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Mon Mar 26 1990 12:25 | 4 |
| Mr. Weber could you explain Martin's serial number schema for the
benefit of the Present and Future Generations , please?
Andrew
|
1750.4 | Martin's are easy because... | TOOTER::WEBER | | Mon Mar 26 1990 16:57 | 18 |
| re: -.1
Sure. Martin has used consecutive serial numbers since the turn of the
century. All one needs to do is look at one of the many published lists
of years vs #'s and find the appropriate year. Martin is probably the
only company that you could call, tell them the number and get an
accurate date with no other info.
Since 1969 is one of those years of special interest to the vintage
market, I know that serial #'s from 256xxx to 271xxx are 1969ish, so
the # in question should be 68ish. If I had one of those lists in front
of me, I'd be sure of which year it actually is.
If you were looking for the date to be coded into the #, sorry. It
wasn't coded into that Fender # either--it's just a fluke that 76xxxx..
numbers were from 1976. Next year they were S6xxxxxx..
Danny W.
|
1750.5 | It must be smoke that causes it.... | KIRKTN::JHYNDMAN | Life in the bus lane | Mon Mar 26 1990 20:54 | 9 |
| Thanks for the info,Danny.The guitar belongs to the guitarist from the
Scottish rock band Nazareth,and had been dropped,causing 19 splits in
the side of it.My friend is a first-class repairman and has done a
brilliant job on the guitar.
As for your question re the color,Alex,I only meant that yellowing
of the top finish after the first few years that looks better than the
whiter shade of a brand new Martin !
Big Jim.
|
1750.6 | patina | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Tue Mar 27 1990 13:20 | 7 |
| The change in color, due to aging, is known as "patina". Patina is
usually due to yellowing of the lacquer. When an older instrument is
stripped and refinished, the patina is lost, and the instrument loses
much of it's vintage appeal.
Mark Jacques
|
1750.7 | | E::EVANS | | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:36 | 8 |
|
Older instruments can be reworked without stripping the top. My D-28 had the
bridge removed, reset and the top "oversprayed" by Martin. This process did
nothing to change the patina. However, if given my choice, I would take an
untouched instrument over a similar reworked one.
Jim
|
1750.8 | another date wanted | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Mon Apr 23 1990 18:42 | 7 |
| Can anyone (Danny?) give me a date on this Martin HD-28?
# 429534
Thanks.
- Ram
|
1750.9 | 1979 | TOOTER::WEBER | | Tue Apr 24 1990 10:06 | 1 |
|
|
1750.10 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Sun Jun 25 1995 16:54 | 17 |
| Stumbled on a Martin today:
Inside the numbers are: 00-18
and s/n 388111
This particular axe is in mint condition, with only a small finish-ding
around the D-string tuning peg. Any idea of the date and it's worth?
Thanks!!
PS - On the main-stay running from the bridge to the neck (back of
guitar) looks like someone took a felt pen and signed CF Martin IV on
it. IS this a common practice? How could I tell if it's authentic??
Thanks again!!
|
1750.11 | 1976 | HANNAH::BECK | Paul Beck, MicroPeripherals | Sun Jun 25 1995 20:35 | 20 |
| > Stumbled on a Martin today:
Hope you didn't break it...
>
> Inside the numbers are: 00-18
>
> and s/n 388111
1976.
If I had to guess a price I'd put it in the $800 neighborhood.
Others can probably come a lot closer.
RE the signature -- my OM has both CF Martin III and IV's signatures
in it, but it came from the custom shop, so it's not surprising.
Best way to test the authenticity of this one is to phone Martin
with the serial number and see if it was a special order of some
sort. (If so that could adjust the price up a bit.)
|
1750.12 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Mon Jun 26 1995 10:50 | 4 |
| It looks like it was signed with a flair pen! And I can see it right
in the sound hole. Wierd man.
|
1750.13 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Mon Jun 26 1995 10:55 | 13 |
| Oh, and thanks Paul, I appreciate the note!
This guy was telling me it was a 1937 Martin, hand built by CF Martin
IV himself (hense the sig)...He said it was worth thousands...
Now, I'm no fool - this thing is in WAY too good a shape to be *that*
old... What'd he do pack it in cosmoline?? :-)
BTW - The action is high and stiff, and my $150 Alvarez sounds better.
:-) THink I'll stick with it.
Any other info I need to know?? I wanna confront the guy and have my
facts straight...
|
1750.14 | | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Mon Jun 26 1995 13:33 | 17 |
| CF (Chris) Martin IV wasn't even born in 1937... I'd guess he's
in his late 30's, early 40's...
Chris often signs Martin's "guitar of the month" special limited
editions. He also may sign custom shop guitars (as mentioned in
an earlier note).
I believe a 1976 00-18 would have been at least a special order
guitar (even if not custom)-- I think its been a *long* time
since it was a regular production model. Martin won't build
a special order instrument unless they get 50% down.
A good 00-18 would be a great guitar for fingerstyle blues or
19th century parlor music (or about any other fingerstyle music).
Jim
|
1750.15 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Mon Jun 26 1995 14:04 | 3 |
| Anyone have a phone number for Martin??
jc
|
1750.16 | | MSBCS::EVANS | | Mon Jun 26 1995 15:58 | 5 |
| To call Martin try 1-800-345-3103
(or 215-749-2837 if you want to pay for the call)
Jim
|
1750.17 | | MSBCS::EVANS | | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:07 | 8 |
| BTW, I don't think C.F.Martin IV signs guitars on the back. My guess is that
it is most likely a fogery (or much less likely - an impromptu signing). My
guitar is a limited edition with a CFM IV signature. It would be interesting
to see how closely the signature were.
Jim
|
1750.18 | | HANNAH::BECK | Paul Beck, MicroPeripherals | Tue Jun 27 1995 07:11 | 2 |
| The signatures on custom my OM are on a piece of paper glued to the
back directly behind the sound hole. Not felt pen, though.
|
1750.19 | looks brand new.... | NETCAD::BUSENBARK | | Tue Nov 28 1995 11:28 | 7 |
| Can anyone give a manufacture date on a D 28 with a cutaway with the
serial number of 505757?
Thanks
Rick
|
1750.20 | 1991 | GANTRY::ALLBERY | Jim | Tue Nov 28 1995 11:48 | 10 |
| 505757 would be 1991. Serial numbers ran from 503310 to 512487
that year, so it probably was relatively early in the year.
FWIW, I have two '91 Martins (HD-28 and a D-16H) and I think
both are great guitars (with the HD being exceptionally nice).
Probably not a large enough sample to make any claims on general
quality for the year, though. ;^)
Jim (who keeps his handy-dandy Martin serial number list in his
wallet.)
|
1750.21 | #437816 | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Byte me | Tue May 27 1997 21:27 | 9 |
|
Can anyone put a date on HD-28 # 437816, I bought this guitar
in 1984, and it is going to get some professional TLC after
sitting in storage for a decade (cracked bridge, worn frets
cigarette burn marks near the nut).
Thanks,
/Pat
|
1750.22 | | OGOPW1::16.123.56.185::Bruce_May | [email protected] | Wed May 28 1997 07:25 | 1 |
| Welcome back,,, Your D28 is a 1981,,, a delicate little vintage.
|
1750.23 | Martin serial numbers on the web | SMURF::PBECK | Paul Beck | Wed May 28 1997 07:53 | 3 |
| The serial numbers ranges are online at
http://www.mguitar.com/text/history/HIST0037.html
|
1750.24 | Fast or what! | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Byte me | Wed May 28 1997 08:42 | 4 |
|
Excellent, thanks to you both!
/Pat
|