T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1744.1 | You gotta have 'grease' to play the blues! | CIMAMT::KELLY | Feelin' a little edgy | Fri Mar 23 1990 13:04 | 22 |
| Three recommendations:
1. Get a Fender reverb unit. I haven't seen one in a long time, but I
used one with a Fender Bandmaster, since it came w/o reverb. If you
can find one, I would guesstimate a price of $75 - $100 (US). Certainly
a traditional sounding reverb.
2. Buy some outboard processing unit...a Yamaha SPX-90 is one example. This
digital effects unit has many 'built-in' effects or you can build your
own. There a couple of nice canned reverb sounds in the SPX-90: plate,
spring, large hall, small hall,...
If you decide to choose this more modern route, others in this note
will be able to guide in choosing the right unit; the SPX-90 is one
of a number of effects processors. I haven't seen an inexpensive
processor of this type; the Yamaha is around $500 (US).
3. There may be a reverb footpedal available, in which case I would
expect it to cost maybe $125 (US).
Regards,
John Kelly
|
1744.2 | | LARVAE::BRIGGS | They use computers don't they? | Mon Mar 26 1990 04:40 | 14 |
| I too have been going through a similar thought process.
I have a Fender Champ 12 which has a lousy reverb. So do I get....
a) Analogue Delay pedal
b) Digital Delay pedal
c) Effects box (as in previous reply)
d) Some other option?
I can't help thinking the most long term cost efficient is the effects
box.
Richard
Basingstoke, UK
|
1744.3 | What I'd do | SMURF::BENNETT | no personal name | Mon Mar 26 1990 15:40 | 8 |
|
Get a better tank and have mount it in the champ enclosure.
I have one of those amps an they botched the reverb big-time.
Accutronics makes nice ones: 708-639-4723. They're in Cary, IL, USA
|
1744.4 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Mon Mar 26 1990 15:43 | 4 |
| how about a Digital Reverb Pedal ? I've never used one, not being into
reverb for guitar...
jc
|
1744.5 | | IOENG::JWILLIAMS | Welcome to the Bush League | Mon Mar 26 1990 15:56 | 6 |
| I hated reverb. None of those spring jobs ever sounded good to me.
Solid state is definitely the way to go. Regarding pedals vs.
rackmount: Rackmount effect units cost more up front, but will save you
a bundle in the long run.
John.
|
1744.6 | Reverb | SMURF::BENNETT | no personal name | Mon Mar 26 1990 16:54 | 12 |
|
No accounting for taste ;-).
I love that murky amplifier reverb sound. Especially playing
blues music. No distortion, just amp reverb. I hope springs
never go away.
rathole topic:
anybody know how they did the reverb on Ricky Nelson's
"Hello Mary Lou" ? That's gotta be one of the scarriest tracks
in all of 20th century music.
|
1744.7 | 2c worth of advice | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Mon Mar 26 1990 16:56 | 20 |
| Since the author of .0 is asking specifically for reverb, and wants
to keep the cost down, I would suggest something like a Boss RV2
which sells for about $150. Others in the same pricerange are available
from Digitech, Ibanez, DOD, Peavey, etc.
The rack mount units with more than one effect are known as
multi-effect units. These range in price from around $200 to
several thousand. Personally, if I were going to spend $150
for a reverb pedal, I would consider getting an Alesis MidiverbII,
because these (rack-mount) units have 99 digital effects (including
regular reverbs, reverse reverb, gated reverb, delay, chorus,
flange, and 10 special effects) all for ~$200. There are many
other units on the market that offer more effects, or allow you
to layer two or more effects, but the prices are considerably
more money. I'll add more info later. Gotta run.
Mark Jacques
|
1744.8 | RV2, $75 | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Mon Mar 26 1990 17:16 | 8 |
| Re: .7, Boss RV2
I know the original noter was in the UK somewheres, but for US types,
Sam Ash is blowing out RV2 s at $75 each, while they last.
1-800-472-6274
|
1744.9 | | PNO::HEISER | I survived the Phoenix buyout | Mon Mar 26 1990 17:19 | 6 |
| Re: -1
How do you guys find out about these blowouts (i.e., Sam Ash)? Are you
on some sort of mailing list?
Mike
|
1744.10 | | ASAHI::SCARY | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Tue Mar 27 1990 01:57 | 9 |
| Im played a Fender Super 60 (I think ...) last week. Little combo job,
tubes, 1x12" .... that's the amp ya need ...
Couple that with a Strat *and* a Les Paul.
Effects ? Grab a Cry Baby, and 2 20' cables and go play.
Scary
|
1744.11 | A UK opinion | IOSG::CREASY | This is glue. Strong stuff! | Tue Apr 03 1990 14:14 | 24 |
| RE: .7
While I'd agree with Mark J that the Midiverb II is a good piece of
equipment, I wouldn't recommend it for the base noter (sorry, I've
forgotten your name). Reasons?
First, prices on this side of the pond are exorbitent compared to the
US. I picked up a Midiverb II, heavily discounted, for �210 - that's
over $300. Standard retail is around �300. The base noter is in
Ireland, where I believe prices are even higher.
Second, the Midiverb really works best at line levels, rather than
instrument levels - I doubt that a small practice amp has an effects
loop.
Third, the Midiverb II is a stereo unit, and designed for high-tec use.
Like another noter, I don't think you can beat spring reverb for an
authentic blues tone.
So, just to offer my 2c worth, I'd go for a spring reverb unit if you
can pick one up (unlikely), or buy a reverb pedal, which shouldn't set
you back more than �50.
Nick
|
1744.12 | Roll on 1992... | SIOG::PKIRK | I wonder if I'm on the right planet......? | Mon Apr 09 1990 11:56 | 10 |
|
Hi all
Thanks very much I've kept all the replies for when I'm on my next
couse in the UK. As the last noter said prices of that kind of stuff
here are crazy here at the moment, a real rip-off as they should
not really be that much more expensive...Roll on 1992....\
Paul
|
1744.13 | reverb pedals and others | RAVEN1::BLAIR | the forecast calls for pain | Wed Nov 14 1990 13:21 | 16 |
|
Does anybody have any experience with any of the reverb stomp boxes?
Like the Boss RV2, etc? I woke up this morning and decided I was gonna
trash my whole multi-effects approach and go back to stomp boxes where
there was less equipment romancing. Also, I was intrigued by the idea
in .1(?) about replacing the spring unit in my KH. The 3 springer I
have is noisy and enemic compared to the "water tank" sound of my
DSP 128+. One other dumb question. Is it advantageous to have some
effects in the effect loop and some before the preamp? Ie; does the
following make sense assuming on-board distortion and out-board reverb?
effects loop: delay/reverb
before preamp: wah/chorus
-pat
|
1744.14 | JMHO | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Not a problem | Wed Nov 14 1990 13:55 | 11 |
| Unless you want a real subtle chorus effect, Pat, you probably want it
in the efx loop too. Why not just stick the DSP in there and add a wah
in front and you've already got your setup without buying a bunch of
stomp boxes.
The reverb stomps I've seen went for at least $150-$200 and didn't
sound as good as the DSP you already have, then you'd have to buy a
delay and a chorus (each about $80-$120) and you will have spent a
bundle.
Greg
|
1744.15 | gonna take a step back | RAVEN1::BLAIR | the forecast calls for pain | Wed Nov 14 1990 14:08 | 5 |
|
Thanks Greg. So you're saying have delay, chorus, and reverb in the
loop and keep the wah in front? I have a decent delay (pds1002) and
chorus (peavey digital type) pedal already so I only need a decent
sounding reverb. That's where I was at when I bought the 128+...
|
1744.17 | | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Wed Nov 14 1990 22:29 | 8 |
|
Pat. Stick with what you got, man. That'll save you money AND
your marriage. 8*)
Seriously, I don't see why you're looking into delay pedal. I find
dps128+ to be plenty flexible to grow/ungrow with me...
J.
|
1744.18 | I got sumpin' up my sleeve ... 8^) | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Nov 14 1990 23:08 | 4 |
| No Pat - definitely ditch the DSP .... do you wanna play or be a
programmer ? Wagagagaga .... 8^)
Scary
|
1744.19 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Thu Nov 15 1990 10:27 | 7 |
| Yeah, Scary wants the DSP. What a friend eh ?
Yo Pat, the one thing I like about the DSP is the "set it, forget it"
thing. I like those "Ultimate Reverbs" for recording AND live. I
haven't even plugged a MIDI cable into it yet.
jc
|
1744.20 | punchin out | RAVEN1::BLAIR | the forecast calls for pain | Thu Nov 15 1990 11:28 | 11 |
|
Moot discussion guys. Jerry officially owns it now. Whew! I feel
bluesier already 8^). I want the real time, understanding and control
of my old stompers, even if they don't have the capabilities of the rack
stuff. I realize that perhaps some midi controls and the like would help,
but I wasn't comfortable with the direction my gear and sound was headin'.
More power to the rack masters, but it just don't feel right for me now.
Hey J., good thing I didn't sell the PDS1002, eh? Any other 'verb pedal
recommendations besides the Boss RV2?
-pat (ex rack puke)
|
1744.21 | Analog ? Did you say ANALOG ? | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Thu Nov 15 1990 11:53 | 13 |
| Pat,
Want that vintage sound ?
I suggest you head down to DixieLand Music (aka- vintage stuff
junkyard) and pick up that Echoplex that he's had forever. He'd
probably let it go for a song, and you just can't beat them for
the wild sounding verbs and delays... Jon Butcher still uses them
and Hendrix was REAL big on echoplex too...
They work on a tape loop !
jc (Who played the one at Dixieland, and loved it)
|
1744.22 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Thu Nov 15 1990 23:00 | 5 |
| I used to have a similar unit made by Univox (yep, I'm *that* old !)
and it was pretty neat for those days ... but that was before
electricity and .....
Scary (more toys than sense these days ...)
|
1744.23 | echoes from the past | MILKWY::JACQUES | I've been down, but not like this before | Fri Nov 16 1990 08:48 | 22 |
| I also had a Univox. Mine used a small tape cassette that plugged
into the back. The tape drive alignment was poor, and the unit
seemed to work when it fealt like working. If you pushed on the
tape, the unit would kick in. I got to the point where I was shoving
matchbooks and other foreign objects in the slot to force the tape
to align. It was about as reliable as a cheap 8-track tape player.
I gave it to my cousin.
The Echoplex units worked much better. They sold more than one
length tape. I think they offered tapes of 30 seconds, 1 minute,
and 2 minutes loops. I think some (if not all) of the Echoplex
units ran on vacuum tubes.
Roland also made a tape echo called the "Space Echo", which was
also a good quality tape echo unit.
For a long time a wanted an Echoplex, and it was high on my priority
list, but by the time I was ready to buy one, rack-mount digital
delays were available cheap, and could be rack-mounted.
Mark
|
1744.24 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Fri Nov 16 1990 11:16 | 5 |
| Yeah, it was the Roland that he has down there Pat. Go scope it
out. Real vintage sounding.
jc (Who is in mourning. I thought you were gonna follow in my
footsteps and be a MIDI rack puke. ;)
|
1744.25 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Fri Nov 16 1990 11:16 | 4 |
| Yep, a stack of picks usually kept my tape unit working too ... it was
way cool at the time though ! Almost groovy .... 8^)
Scary
|