T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1727.1 | $300 | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Mon Mar 19 1990 15:09 | 2 |
|
I'd say $300, max.
|
1727.2 | yep $300 would be ok.... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Frog lickers unite! | Mon Mar 19 1990 15:43 | 7 |
| RE: .1
Brian's price is fair.....I think you can still buy an "american
standard" Tele for under $450 with case if ya find a dealer that'll
dicker. I KNOW you can get one for under $500.
Steve D.
|
1727.3 | blood thicker than..........? | CSOADM::SHUMWAY | I used to be disgusted, but now? | Mon Mar 19 1990 18:43 | 11 |
| Would there be any features/qualities/oddities that would make it
more valuable? I'll have it in my hands in a week to check out. It
was displayed at a vintage sale for $450. I can get it for $400
from an inside source. I'm told by my cousin (the inside source)
that it is an ok deal. My cousin is much more knowledgeable than
I about older stuff as he is a collector of vintage gear. He actually
contacted me 3 months ago when he first saw the guitar and thought
it might be a good axe for me as I lean toward the blues. I do trust
that my cousin would not steer me wrong but it looks like I need
to do more research.
Joe
|
1727.4 | Vintage re-issue? | CIMAMT::KELLY | Feelin' a little edgy | Tue Mar 20 1990 08:10 | 13 |
| Is it a vintage re-issue? I'm not sure about the yeats, but I understand
Fender re-issued '57 and '62 Strats and 'xx? Teles. I believe one of
the distinguishing marks of the Tele re-issue is the Bakelite
pickguard: the stuff looks like black plastic, but is more brittle.
I'm pretty certain the cream body and maple neck are two attributes of
the re-issue.
If it is a re-issue, then there should be a certificate from Fender
stating that fact.
Regards,
John Kelly
|
1727.5 | | CSOADM::SHUMWAY | can't get no antidote for... | Tue Mar 20 1990 08:23 | 6 |
| Seems like it did have a black pickguard (havn't seen it for a couple
of months). I'll have more info in a couple of days. Any other things
that I should look for? Maybe I should get a book on Fenders. Any
suggestions in that area?
thanks,
Joe
|
1727.6 | Yeh, yeh, yeh.... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Tue Mar 20 1990 10:01 | 29 |
|
I just looked in my Fender instrument book and I didn't see
anything that would distinguish an 83 tele.... at least from a
collectable point of view. I'm (obviously) not an expert on guitars,
but if you're looking for a collection guitar, I don't think you could
go wrong with an 80s tele.. I feel like Fender instruments are going to
keep going up in value (although I wish the heck they'd stay affordable
for hack musicians like me) AND... I believe that teles in particular
will become more popular in the 90s... as they become recognized as the
"axe of choice" with more and more famous artists.. (I usually charge
for these predictions... will you be paying by check or credit card ;^)
If you are looking for a musical instrument to play (trust me, I
knoooooooow what I'm talking about on this one)... sit down and play it
for a while, borrow it, play with friends, etc..... see if it has a
sound that's pleasant to you and one that fits the style of music that
you play.... then decide whether to buy it or not.
I just finished shopping for a new strat and everyone that I played
sounded different... of course, that me, and I'm a very sick person..
Good luck, hope you enjoy the tele
Steve
|
1727.7 | 2c worth of Telebabble !! | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Tue Mar 20 1990 11:56 | 58 |
|
I have a 1971 Telecaster and I can share some of my experiences
with you.
First of all, I love my Telecaster, especially now that I have
modified it a little. I replaced the original neck pickup with
a Seymour Duncan 1/4 pounder. This transformed it into a very
strong contender. The original neck pickup on a Telecaster has
much lower output than the bridge pickup. This results in a very
thin sound (in neck position) and a very bright sound (in the
mix position). The Seymour Duncan 1/4 pounder is a single coil
pickup, the same physical size as the original, and it drops in
in a matter of minutes with no routing or irreversable mods.
When I first bought my Tele, the guys in the band I was playing
hated the sound of it. They begged me to leave it home and use my
Strat for gigs. I prefer the neck on a Tele to that of a Strat.
Telecasters are good for some things and not-so-good at other
things. For example, Telecasters are great for getting a pedal-steel
sound by grabbing a pair of strings and bending one. Telecasters are
not very good for playing slide (in my humble opinion) due to the
neck radius. The Strat seems to be the guitar of choice for slide
due to the flatter neck. If you are looking for a clean country sound,
the Telecaster is a good choice, but if you wish to overdrive an amp
to get a Marshall crunch, you're better off with a guitar that has
dual coil humbucking pickups. I do not advocate hacking up ANY guitar
to switch from single coil pickups to humbuckers. Many people do it,
but to me it's not a very good practice, especially considering the
huge selection of guitar models available at very affordable prices
in every configuration imaginable.
As far as a 1983 Telecaster is concerned, I wouldn't consider a late
model Tele to be collectable at all, unless it was built by Fender's
custom shop with some unique features/finish. To me, a late model Tele
is a good utility instrument, and is a pretty good value considering
all the instruments with $1000+ pricetags. To me, a collectable instrument
is one which is relatively hard to replace. A late model Tele is a cinch
to replace. Drop in any music store, and you can buy one off the rack.
"Collectable" Tele's would include '48 Broadcasters, Nocasters, early 50's
models, Thinlines, most of which would carry very high pricetags. A few
years ago, you could get American made Fender Teles and Strats for
$300 and up. Today, it seems these instruments are selling much higher.
Most people feel that American made Fenders are much better than their
Japanese couterparts, but this is not true in most cases. American made
Fenders do hold their resale value better than Japanese made (at least
on the US market), but the overall quality is about the same for both.
It is hard to fully understand the differances because Fender has so
many differant product lines (Squire, Contemporary, re-issues,
Standard, American Standard, etc). If you compare the Standard Japanese
product with the Standard US product, they are almost identical. I have
heard that virtually *ALL* vintage reissued guitars are now made in
Japan. Can anyone verify/dispute this ??
Hope this helps.
Mark Jacques
|
1727.8 | Where Will This Craziness End | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Tue Mar 20 1990 13:24 | 10 |
|
"Vintage Series" Strats, Teles and basses are all US made. The
reissued Jazzmasters, Tele Customs (binding, rosewood neck) are Japanese.
To confuse the issue, I've just seen mention of a "reissue" series,
Strats and Teles called in "50s" and "60s" versions (note that the
*Vintage* models are labeled 52, 57, 62, i.e. specific years). No idea
where these are made, but I'd certainly guess Japan.
Brian
|
1727.9 | I've seen one | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Tue Mar 20 1990 17:31 | 15 |
| Yes, I just spotted a vintage re-issue Strat in a music store
(rosewood neck, cool Sonic Blue finish). When I asked the price,
I was told $499. This is dramatically less than I thought Fender
vintage models were selling for. Turns out it's a made-in-Japan
vintage re-issue.
Btw, except for the name and the shape of the headstock, this guitar
seemed exactly like the Fernandes vintage Strat copies I've seen.
My guess is that these guitars are being manufactured by the same
factory/people. This is a plus for someone looking for an authentic
vintage copy; Fernandes and Tokai vintage copies have always seemed
to me to be truer to real vintage Strats than the American made Fender
re-issues.
/rick
|
1727.10 | broad-based product lines | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Wed Mar 21 1990 13:29 | 50 |
| I'm not sure what Japanese outfit is manufacturing for Fender, but
I am under the impression that they have either bought out an
established Japanese firm, or have entered into a captive contract
with one (in other words, they only make products for Fender).
I could be totally wrong.
I have a soft cover book at home about the Stratocaster (red cover).
This book is dated in the early 80's so it is not quite current.
Anyways they claimed that the first reissued guitars were made in US,
but were not very authentic. The next series of vintage reissues were
Japanese made, and were extremely close to the originals. Then they
started making reissues in both the US and Japan, but they marketed
the US made versions in the US and the Jap versions worldwide (except
US). Fender seems to be intentionally muddying the waters with all
kinds of differant product lines.
Another company that is following in Fenders footsteps is Gibson.
Gibson owns Epiphone, and is now putting the Epi name on a line of
Korean made instruments which includes the Emperor, Sheridan (both
of which are old Epi models), Les Paul copies, SG copies, and the
Accu-Bass which has a Precision body with a mutant Fender neck.
All of the Epiphones I have seen offer great value. I am surprised
that Gibson (or St Louis Music, Gibson's parent company) are not
marketing the Epi line very aggressively. It could become a very
popular line with the right ad campaign. The Accu-Bass sells for a
mere $219 with gig bag. The SG std copy is a mere $319. The rest
are priced to sell at around $500.
The guitar market can easily be compared with the motorcycle market.
There are tons of really hot bikes that are made in Japan, and sell
for reasonable prices, but most of the old hard-line bikies still
prefer Harley Davidson. Even when Harley was owned by AMF (and was
building the worst bikes on the road) faithful HD riders continued
buying them for ridiculous prices. The Harley Davidson of today is
owned by it's corporate employees, and they are making an excellant
bike (but pricey). They have introduced the new "Evolution" engine
which many people are raving about. Fender and Gibson both went
through phases where they were owned by an uncaring conglomarate.
In Fender's case it was CBS, and in Gibson's case it was Norlin.
CBS screwed up Fender's reputation by cost-reducing the line,
introducing a Solid-state line of amps, adding the micro-tilt
neck and bullet truss rods, etc. Norlin screwed up the Gibson
reputation by forcing them to add a volute to the headstock on
most models, and in general by cost-reducing and lowering the
overall quality control standards. I believe that both companies
had short term profits in mind, and were not concerned with
longevity.
Mark
|
1727.11 | if ya snooze ya looze | CSOADM::SHUMWAY | can't get no antidote for... | Tue Mar 27 1990 17:00 | 15 |
| So I goes to pick up the tele to try out for a few days, But
guess what? It was sold the day before for $425. If I had got there
first it would have been mine for $400. Well now I've changed my
sights a little bit. I have my eye on a Schecter w/Bartallini pickup
and a maple neck. It looks like a Tele for the most part. I do like
the pickup as it has a switch to change from humbucker to single
and gives me boths sounds. Its a little rougher looking but thats
ok cause if a wall stumbles into me while I'm playing and bangs it a
little it wont bother me to bad. Price $250 but still working to
get it lower. Any ideas on this piece? Thanks for all the previous
info folks.
joe
|
1727.12 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:07 | 6 |
| I tried a Schecter once and it ROCKED !
It had old DiMarzzio Super Distortions in it and a Floyd. Looked like
a strat, but it didn't feel like one.
jc
|
1727.13 | fyi | BUSY::JMINVILLE | rockin' through the wilderness | Thu Mar 29 1990 17:25 | 3 |
| Pete Townsend plays Schecter Tele's.
joe.
|
1727.14 | ASAT = Telecaster? | LNGBCH::STEWART | Instant gratification takes 2 long! | Mon Oct 15 1990 10:46 | 14 |
|
Is anybody playing the G & L ASAT? It looks like a Tele to me
but it's built by Leo's new company. I'm looking for comments
(especially from Telecaster players) and prices.
|
1727.15 | Don't know much really | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Shread melodic | Mon Oct 15 1990 14:08 | 14 |
| I don't have an ASAT, but I played one a few years ago and really liked
it. It was one of the best feeling Tele style guitars I'd played.
I remember seeing some TV show on Leo Fender awhile back where he
talked about the design of the stock pickups in the ASAT. He listed
these as one of his inventions and said the design was patented. It's
supposed to have less magnetic pull on the strings, higher output, and
less succeptability to hum. I don't honestly remember much about the
pickups except that I thought they were ugly and kind of cheap looking.
I have no idea how much the guitars cost, I have seen one in a few
years.
Greg
|
1727.16 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Mon Oct 15 1990 17:52 | 5 |
| RE - ASAT pickups ...
Kinda sounds like Lace Sensors, huh ?
Scary
|
1727.17 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Shread melodic | Mon Oct 15 1990 17:55 | 3 |
| The intent is the same, but the implementation is different.
Greg
|
1727.18 | Bigsbys on Teles? | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Arms raised in a V | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:40 | 5 |
| Anyone heard of a Tele that came stock with a Bigsby tremelo? A friend
of mine's looking at one and never heard of a stock Bigsby.
Thanks,
Greg
|
1727.19 | Tele & Bigsby | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | Rock with Gene & Eddy | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:46 | 5 |
| I believe I have seen these in some old fender advertising reprinted
in Tom Wheelers book. Never seen one "up close & personal though".
How about one with a Bigsby AND a Clarence white string bender?
Wouldn't that be too hot to handle? :+)
|
1727.20 | Factory Bigsbys | TECRUS::LONELY::ROST | Baba Ram Bolinski | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:20 | 8 |
| Re: .18
Teles with Bigsbys were available from sometime in the sixties up into
the early seventies straight from the factory. It required use of a
different bridge plate than a standard Tele. In any case, they are not
very common.
Merle Travesty
|
1727.21 | And another one sighted... | LUNER::KELLYJ | Don't that sunrise look so pretty | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:20 | 5 |
| I saw a Tele with a Bigsby in the late 70's...the lead player for a
great Boston-based country band, Wheatstraw, was using it. The
player's name is Rocky Stone. I played his guitar and asked him about
the Bigsby: he said he bought the guitar with it already installed, so
it's not clear if it was a factory option.
|
1727.22 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Arms raised in a V | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:37 | 3 |
| Great! Thanks guys! As usual, you are a wealth of good information!
Greg
|
1727.23 | | LEDS::ORSI | Stimpy's Magic Nose Goblins | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:31 | 8 |
|
Years ago I played one o' them Telecasters with a Bigsby on it
at Marlboro Music. It came that way from Fender. The thing I
remember clearly about it was, the bridge was the same as the
one on my Fender Jaguar I owned at the time.
Neal
|