T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1689.1 | | PNO::HEISER | Kitty Hawk fever | Tue Feb 20 1990 12:46 | 1 |
| Do those Eventide Harmonizers gloss over pick sounds?
|
1689.2 | | ZYDECO::MCABEE | Definitely no A | Tue Feb 20 1990 13:09 | 7 |
| Are you attacking the strings with the absolute flat edge of the pick?
You should get a smoother sound by holding the pick at an angle to the string.
Have you tried a lot of different picks? Jim Dunlop black nylon picks are
slightly softer than most. You could get pick noise from a pick that's too
thin or too hard, depending on your technique.
Bob
|
1689.3 | | MPGS::MIKRUT | Don't you boys know any NICE songs? | Tue Feb 20 1990 13:17 | 11 |
| Your strings may be too close to the pickups. When I play I generally
am resting the palm of my hand on the strings not being played,
whereas, when my pickups were adjusted close to the strings, I would
get a clicking sound out of the pole peices. I just set the pickups
a little low, and now the clicking is gone.
I don't know if this is your problem, though.
FWIW,
Mike
|
1689.4 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Tue Feb 20 1990 13:19 | 4 |
| If your effect unit is doing a fair amount of compression you may have to live
with it...
dbii
|
1689.5 | get slow | KIDVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Tue Feb 20 1990 15:58 | 1 |
| slide the pick off the string
|
1689.6 | Thuck, Thuck, Thuck, Thuck | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Tue Feb 20 1990 16:34 | 9 |
|
I gotta agree with dbii. I find this problem with my (stomp box)
compressor an distortion units. In all cases, it's just the normal
pick click being amplified to the point of obnoxiousness. So why don't
all your albums exhibit such a sound? Probably better compressors. I
find that when running my guitar through the peak limiter of a tape
deck that I have no clicking problem.
Brian
|
1689.7 | Yawwwwwwn, technoid picking 8^) | CIMBAD::TOTH | | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:57 | 29 |
| I think there are two ways to get click. One kind you get when you
the pick first engages the string and the other happens when the
pick releases from the string (sometimes maybe it even hits the
next adjacent string).
The first type of noise has a lot to do with the way the pick
first contacts the string I think. If the flat portion of the pick
contacts the string first the THWAP, you get noise. If the side
of the pick contacts first, then its a matter of what angle the
pick make with the string relative to the direction the pick is
moving. In genereal, I'd say the you want to place your pick as
shallow as possible so that the edge of the pick at rounded portion of
the tip is what strikes the string first. Then, as you move the pick to
be closer to making a right angle with the string, the softer the
attack becomes. I usually sand my picks down at the edges where
they first contact the strings so they feather out from the pick
face to the edge. This way you don't get as much noise from the
string windings as the pick slides along the string during the pick
stroke.
If you use real thin picks, the flex of the pick may be such that
when you release the string, the pick snaps over causing a click and
possibly hitting the adjcent string. You can get around this by using
medium or heavier picks.
Soo, Medium picks, rounded on opposite faces and edges, only minimally
engaged with the string and held at about a 45 degree angle to the
string. If that doesn't help, shoot me. 8^) jt
|
1689.8 | THUCK,CLICK | TALLIS::ZURAWSKI | | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:57 | 8 |
| Thanks for the suggestions -- I'll try them tonight.
re.2: yes I do pick flat, and probably too hard.
re.6>: yes I found that the clicking is less noticeable after taping
I'll try less compression tonight.
John Z
|
1689.9 | Guitar <=> hell ? | TALLIS::ZURAWSKI | | Fri Feb 23 1990 09:30 | 23 |
| Well I tried many different things last night. Picking at different
angles helped but did not cure the problem. The biggest culprit was the
Scholz SUSTAINOR -- with compression (and especially distortion) it
seemed to accentuate the clicks. When I substituted the pre-amp output
of the Mesa Boogie in its place the clicks were less objectionable.
I have yet to try lowering the pickups.
If I switch off the echo unit then the clicks don't bother me so much
(I should never have bought an echo unit!).
I'm a born-again-guitarist (I stopped playing for a number of years
and recently got back into it with a vengeance). I always thought that
a good guitar was all I needed -- how wrong I was: I seem to spend all
my time re-arranging my hardware just to get that right sound. To get a
good blues sound I have to configure the system oneway; to get good
distortion a totally different way. Is this why there are so many
effects out there; and is this why so many guitarists have more than
one axe?
Sigh,
JZ
|
1689.10 | I've been there.... | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Fri Feb 23 1990 11:26 | 36 |
|
" Is this why there are so many effects out there; and is this why so many
guitarists have more than one axe?"
Yes But....
It's all related to what your trying to play and how picky you
are with your sound. And the crowd also....
I find I carry a minimum of 3 guitars to play alot of today's
sounds. Plus you need the capabilities to have enough flexibility in
your amp to cover any of the idioms with the flick of a switch. Now
people may believe that this is a little overboard,but unless you can
establish a particular style or idiom your music fit's, your hardware
has to be flexible. To what degree of flexibility? Well in any given
set I may go from an acoustic number to blues(strat)to jazz(archtop)to
rock(strat/lp)....This may seem to be extreme....
To a less picky crowd,I could probably pickup one guitar and
play all night if I liked the one sound.
I believe that for each idiom there is a guitar which
best provides it's representative tone/sound. But you could also
say the same with effects.
I have used several SRD Product's in the years past,the preamp
in particular for at least a year,I found that it had limitations that
I tried to live with but eventually I traded it in. In my setup I used
an ab switch to bypass it when not in use. Keep in mind some of these
limitations were self inflicted :^)
Effects,I find I use minimally,I use the spring reverb in the
amp and Chorus and flange and delay where I need to. In some cases to
change sound and texture of the music.
One last thing keep in mind I'm the only guitarist in the group
and for the most part the main instrumentalist,with bass and drums. So
I cover rythmn and leads and then some.... Alot of sound to fill in and
out......
Good Luck....
Rick
|
1689.11 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Fri Feb 23 1990 11:48 | 5 |
| re: is this why we have more than one axe..
or even better more than one amp/preamp
dbii purr purr purr purr
|
1689.12 | ways to go | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Fri Feb 23 1990 13:14 | 36 |
| I agree with a lot of what Rick said in .10. Another thing to keep in
mind when purchasing equipment is its "flexibility quotient". There are
some guitars that have one very distinct characteristic sound that they
do extremely well, and can do very few variations on this. For example,
Telecasters, Strats, Les Pauls, and so on all tend to be quite
distinctive. The same applies to amps and effects: Marshalls, Boogies,
Rolands, Rockmans, etc all tend to have pretty distinctive sounds.
That's one end of the spectrum. So if I was really into jazz I'd get an
archtop and a Roland chorus or Fender twin. If I was really into
country I might get a Telecaster and a Fender. If I was into blues/rock
I'd get a Les Paul and a Marshall. A setup tailored to a specific
idiom - that's one way to go.
At the other end of the spectrum is gear which tends not to have a
particularly distinctive sound, but is capable of producing a wider
range of sounds. For example, guitars with active electronics that
provide greater control over the tone, programmable effects units, amps
with a lot of configuration options, etc.
Personally I own only two guitars: an acoustic (which I rarely perform
with) and a Gibson ES-345 semi-hollow electric. And I use only one amp,
a Seymour-Duncan combo with very few effects. But I play blues, rock,
country, folk, jazz, pop, and so on, and get pretty good sounds. My
guitar is capable of producing a wide variety of tones, and so is my
amp. I can't sound exactly like Jimi Hendrix, I can't sound exactly
like Mark Knopfler, I can't sound exactly like Eric Clapton, or Larry
Carlton, or Wes Montgomery, or ... But with a relatively small amount
of gear I can produce a nice sound appropriate to just about any style
of music I might be called on to play. I'm not saying that's the best
choice for everyone, but it's the one that keeps me happy.
ps - Of course I'd be much happier if I had about $1M worth of stuff
and a road crew to haul it around and set it up, and could use a
different guitar and amp on every song :-)
- Ram
|
1689.17 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | Funk-o-metal Carpet Ride | Mon Feb 26 1990 10:22 | 28 |
|
I have a question on picks/picking...
When it comes to high speed picking, We all know that the pick is
at its most effective when the very edge of the pick is being
used, ie about 1.25 mm. This means there is far less string
resistance and the pick can glide over the string, as opposed to
riding over them like a steam roller over speed bumps!!
Anyway, my question to you people is... how do you hold you pick,
in relation to the tip, when picking fast?? Do you hold it close
to the tip, so that there is only a very small amount of pick
being used, or do you hold it quite far back, and basically use
your judgement to pick just with the very tip ?? I currently hold
the pick pretty close to the tip, but the trouble with this I
find is you sometimes get subtle harmonic overtones, which when
amplified, interfere with the smooth sound needed to keep fast
picking clean and fluent. This could be caused by the fact that
my right hand thumb nail is quite long, for acoustic playing, and
maybe my nail is slightly touching the string after I pick the
note.
How do you guys hold picks ?
Cheers,
-Tony (going through hell trying to learn to play his new guitar
without leaning his hand on the Floyd and thus making the
notes bend!).
|
1689.18 | Another picker heard from | CIMAMT::KELLY | Feelin' a little edgy | Mon Feb 26 1990 12:28 | 10 |
| I play with heavy mandolin picks...the tiny tear-drop shaped guys.
I hold the pick with just the tip showing, trapped between the side
of my first finger and my thumb. The heel of my hand rests on the
bridge to provide support. Also, as mentioned in previous replies,
the pick is canted relative to the string, to avoid 'clicking' and the
tendency to 'catch' on a string.
Regards,
John Kelly
|
1689.19 | picky, picky, picky... | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Mon Feb 26 1990 13:49 | 26 |
| I hold my pick between my thumb and forefinger, with the forefinger
bent at both joints. The result, if you looked at my hand from the
side, is that my thumb is exactly parallel to the plane of the strings,
and the thumb and fingers present a completely flat surface with just
the tip of the pick extending down to touch the strings. I hold the
pick a little bit up from the tip generally, but as my speed increases
I "tuck" it in slightly by hooking in my forefinger, so that
effectively I am holding it closer to the tip. I find that this gives
me more control for fast passages.
I sometimes rest the heel of my hand on the bridge, but more for
damping purposes than as a stylistic thing. I defintely don't do this
when I'm playing fast parts. I have one habit that is a little strange,
probably would be considered bad practice, but has never caused me
problems - I extend my pinky and touch the tip to the pick guard much
of the time. I've tried playing without doing this and don't see much
difference, like I said, it's just a habit I developed. The only time
it causes me any grief is when I play some guitar on which the
elevation of the strings above the pickguard is quite different from
mine, in which case it just feels a little awkward.
I've never noticed the problems you described, regardless of how close
to the tip I was holding the pick. Maybe you do need a nail trim, or
try changing the angle of your thumb with respect to the strings.
- Ram
|
1689.20 | One way to do it... | BSS::COLLUM | Just do the move! | Mon Feb 26 1990 13:54 | 24 |
| I had the same problem when I switched from an SG as my standard guitar
to a Strat.
My right position is like this: I hold the pick (standard size guitar
pick, a Gibson heavy) back away from the point, say, 3/8 of an
inch (almost a cm). I hold it back there to keep my fingers out of the
way. I hold it between thumb and index finger only, with the third
fingertip resting on the screw that adjust the height of the middle
pickup (on a strat). I usually hold it relaxed, almost loosely, to let
it cross the string natually rather than forcing the motion. Somtimes
it's a little canted, but if I want to try to make it sound very
precise, I hold it perfectly parallel to the string. I need to be a
little louder or puchier, I just tighten up the grip a little without
changing position.
Like the previous note said, pick with just the least amount of the
pick that will give consistancy. I find I start missing if I back off
too much.
It works for me, but I've seen other people use other techniques that
work just as well.
Will
|
1689.21 | | HAMSTR::PELKEY | Dangerous Distortion, Serious Sustain | Mon Feb 26 1990 15:58 | 69 |
| re: Multiple guitars...
We Started out (the other guitarist and I) just using one each..
But then break a string, band takes a break, or better
yet, wips into a three piece rendition of "Name your favorite 1,4,5
tune" Hey, adapt and overcome right...
Then, we got into acoustics... Nice change! And, break a string, change
the set and do some acoustic material. Novel concept. Crowd thinks
we're clever, However, *WE* just got our butts out of a jam...
Then we started micing up the set list to the point where it was obivous..
"This axe just don't cut it for some covers"
(This axe = Balls Delux Ibanez, just too much for the lighter/blues
stuff) So, started lugging my strat around. Bonus here was the Strat
could handle the rough stuff as well as the lighter/nonacoustic stuff,
so another saftey valve for the busted string blues..
Then, we went Midi via Midi Guitar...
Now this may seem extreem, but now on stage, behind me sits four
guitars. (cuz I usually bring all of them, mostly out of necessity)
It's a real drag when you're trying to get into the house quietly with
four guitar cases banging away, and/or tuning up..
re: picking. I too use the Mandolin Picks. I have used those
exclusivly since I was about 17. I don't show much pick to
the strings. I pick in a circular motion with the required up-down
stroke method. (Gee, it's so automatic, I actually have to stop and
think,, just what I do in this regard..." but I know that at times,
I'll nail the strings, at other times, not hard at all... I don't
use compresion, sparesly use Chorus at all, use a touch delay probably
40% to 60% of the time during solos... I don't recal the naggin
thwap...
Perhaps the base note author is either
a: picking too hard...
b: using a roughed up pick....
c: Killing w/ compression , which is a dynamite tool, but it's a pretty
dumb animal.
It will cause one some trouble if the compresion/attack and release
times are too agressive.
I'd suggest that you keep your current setup, don't change anything,
and just try and discover exactly whats causing you the grief.
Start eliminating variables till it's obvious, then work on that.
You'll probably find it's not you, rather to much gain, or distortion,
or compresion. Orr, quite possibly, your pick, or the gage of your
strings. Then go after the pickup distance in relation to the string,
but don't screw with this too much. Too drastic of a change, and it
will do some changing to the 'voice' of your guitar, or at least the
'voice' your used to. not that this is bad, however in the case
of a strat for instance, there's something to be said for the distance
and the magnetic field created between the sting nad the six poles
in each of the three pickups.
By the way, I've got that LArry Carlton "On Solid Ground" that you
mentioned..
Real nice peice of work by Larry
|
1689.22 | My 2 penn'orth. | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Tue Feb 27 1990 09:06 | 13 |
|
I know that it's fatal to use new strings in the studio. I only
did it once & I had string squeak & pick noise all over the place. I went
back & did the session again a couple of days later when the strings
had bedded in & all was quiet again.
It was only when recorded the pick noise came in, couldn't hear it
just through the amp (Marshall, no effects) so I put it down to tape
compression. It seems according to the other guy's here that
compressors are prone to this so maybe my guess was right.
Cheers
Pete.
|
1689.23 | Clean up these new strings! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Greg House | Tue Feb 27 1990 13:47 | 9 |
| re: new strings
I find there there is some sort of oily residue on new strings,
probably left from the manufacturing process. I absolutely hate the
feel of this stuff, so whenever I can, I wipe new strings down with
rubbing alcohol to get rid of it before I play them. Improves the feel
substantially.
Greg
|
1689.24 | Oily illusion? | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Wed Feb 28 1990 04:16 | 11 |
|
I thought that too but I think that it's because the finish on new
strings is so smooth that it just gives the impression the there is
something oily on them. A rub down with anything like alcohol will
cause the string to start oxidising & rough the surface up a bit, even
though it's only microscopic in effect, its enough to improve the grip.
Well...thats my theory...:-)
Cheers
Pete.
|