T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1546.1 | chomp chomp chomp | LUDWIG::BOUCHARD | | Thu Nov 02 1989 07:08 | 8 |
| I used to have a Kramer fretless and used rotosounds on it, the
only thing with roto's is that (for a fretted bass) they tend to
eat frets, and on a fretless they tend to gouge into the fingerboard.
which over time tends to wear in nicely, but it does take a away
a bit from the appearance, if thats important to ya.
Dan . . .
|
1546.2 | Get a good EQ and you're ready to dance! | SALEM::ABATELLI | Nouveau Blues Rocker | Thu Nov 02 1989 12:52 | 26 |
| RE: .1
That's the main reason why they put "flats" on it. I've seen
many fretless basses with "halfwound" strings. GHS makes a
pro formula "BriteFlat" string in medium and light gauge.
Personally, I wouldn't put roundwound strings on a fretless.
A fretted bass is fine, cause then you just replace the frets
(after a while), but with a fretless... replace the neck? Not
for me. So what choices do you have?
1.) Tapewound: Very flat sounding, but will never hurt your neck
and some say it has more of a stringbass tone.
2.) Flatwound: Brighter than #1, but still has a mellow tone, *if*
you're used to roundwound strings. These strings will
save your neck as well.
3.) Halfwound/Groundwound/BriteFlats: Much brighter than #1, or
#2, but won't chew up your neck like regular
roundwound strings. After alot of use you may however
start to see neck wear with these strings. (see 1546.1)
My vote? Flatwound, or Briteflats, but not roundwounds.
For that "double bass" tone, go with tapewound strings.
JMHO - Fred
|
1546.3 | Another half-way measure | NEWVAX::PHARMON | | Thu Nov 02 1989 14:59 | 13 |
| Another option you might want to check out is a string made (or
sold, anyway) by Ken Smith - "Oval(w? r?)ounds". I've been meaning
to try these on my fretless, but haven't gotten around to it.
They seem to be similar in concept to the half-round idea, except
a little more toward the round-wound sound; I'd expect they
probably would groove the fingerboard out somewhat sooner, too.
For what it's worth, I use D'Addario Half-Rounds. If the action
is low enough, you can get a considerable amount of growl out of
them. The main complaint I have about them is that I wish the low E
had better definition.
Paul
|
1546.4 | KEEPS BARNACLES OFF TOO! | HAMER::KRON | KA-BOOM | Fri Nov 03 1989 10:10 | 5 |
| I read that Jaco (Mr.fretless)used to get marine epoxy from a boating
supply and coat the fingerboard with it....it's very hard and will
allow you to use any strings.I haven't got around to doing mine
yet but I'll let you know when I do how it turns out.
-Bill
|
1546.5 | another idea | RICKS::CALCAGNI | punk jazz | Fri Nov 03 1989 10:59 | 13 |
| I've tried a fretless done up with marine epoxy; I didn't like it.
If you don't care for the slippery feel of a maple neck, you
probably won't care for this either.
Former noter and fretless bassist extraordinaire Steve K used to
use Rotosounds on a fretless rosewood P-bass. His solution to the
groove problem was to have the fretboard planed every couple of
years (Macduff's did it for him). I remember being pretty suprised
by this, but Steve said it wasn't too expensive or a big hassle.
That P-bass had a nice, thick slab of rosewood on it too. Evidently
he thought the feel of the wood was worth the trouble.
/rick
|
1546.6 | All good things must come to an end... | WEFXEM::COTE | No, Kelly. I said *wits*... | Fri Nov 03 1989 12:10 | 6 |
| I spoke with Steve not too long ago and believe he mentioned he was
shopping for a new neck.
Seems the rosewood is getting a bit thin...
Edd
|
1546.7 | Replace 'em | CSC32::G_HOUSE | No. 24, the naughty bits | Fri Nov 03 1989 19:24 | 5 |
| Depending on how much you wanna spend, fretboards *can* be replaced. I
doubt that it would be a cheap repair. Overall it's probably cheaper
to buy a new neck.
Greg
|
1546.8 | | IAMOK::CROWLEY | We want.....a shrubbery! | Mon Nov 06 1989 14:17 | 9 |
|
re .6
I believe he's already replaced the neck. Guess there was nothing
left to plane!
Ralph
|
1546.9 | I'd rather replace strings, than a fretboard, or a neck! | SALEM::ABATELLI | Nouveau Blues Rocker | Wed Nov 08 1989 08:44 | 9 |
| RE .5, .6, .7, .8
I rest my case! ;^)
Now, it's your choice... replace strings, or fretboard?
Gee let me think about this for a minute.... ;^)
Fred
|
1546.10 | All Roundwounds Are Not The Same | AQUA::ROST | Subliminal trip to nowhere | Wed Nov 08 1989 16:41 | 18 |
|
Some roundwounds are worse than others. Rotosounds are probably *the*
most abrasive strings known to man 8^) 8^) Buying a new neck is OK
for a Fender maybe, but for neck-through basses it can get a bit pricey
8^) 8^)
I use Fender rounds on my fretless and I have no problem with neck
wear. I briefly tried Dean Markley rounds, these left marks on the
fingerboard and caused gouging of the bridge saddles!!!
I will admit I used to use Daddario Half-Rounds but found for rock
music they weren't bright enough.
Pedulla is the only bass manufacturer that I know of who has gone to
the trouble of epoxying fretless necks at the factory. The epoxy adds
to the tone as well, enhancing the "growl". The feel, of course, is an
acquired taste.
|
1546.11 | | NEWVAX::PHARMON | | Thu Nov 09 1989 10:37 | 7 |
| re: .10
Interesting...how long have you been using the Fender rounds?
And approximately how long do they stay bright-sounding enough
to suit you?
Paul
|
1546.12 | Believe It Or Not | AQUA::ROST | Subliminal trip to nowhere | Thu Nov 09 1989 13:08 | 9 |
|
Re: .11
I've been using them for about three years now. I only change strings
about every six months, even though they change tone considerably over
that time.
Brian
|
1546.13 | Fretless w/ Flatwounds for me | VAXWRK::SAKELARIS | | Mon Dec 18 1989 17:20 | 23 |
| I bought my fretless with roundwound strings on it. When it was time to
replace them, I was about to get some roundwounds when the guy who sold
me the guitar told me to stay away from the rw becuse of the neck
gauging. The neck on mine had started to show the effect of their use.
Liking the tone of the rw string, I reluctantly agreed to put on
flat-wounds. I have absolutely no problem with the sound of the flats,
and don't you want to why?
Check this out. The fretless has a much diffent sound, and use than a
fretted bass that most of us use. What's important with a fretless is
the ability to slide from one note to the other adding fluidity to the
composition. Roundwound strings are admittedly brighter. But I think
the brightness pales in importance when you consider what you're really
trying to do with a fretless. Add to that the use of a stereo chorus
and the subtlety that's -changed- by using the flatwound string (notice I
didn't say lost) still greatly enhances the flavor of the piece, so
long as the peice is something that the fretless is suited for.
In other words, if you wanna do slap 'n pop, stick to the fretted.
If you wanna do something tasteful (and please I don't mean to imply
that s&p can't be tasteful) that has a real signature type of sound to
it, use the fretless. If you play a fretless for that reason, you
have nothing to fear by using flatwound strings.
|
1546.14 | Questions on fretless bass | ULYSSE::WILSON | John, 828-5631 | Thu Dec 01 1994 06:41 | 42 |
| Some questions on fretless bass:
I just bought a second-hand 4-string fretless (my first fretless). It
is a home-defretted (I presume) Yamaha BB200 P-bass copy and not
expensive so I don't mind experimenting on it. It is actually a delight
to play: seems well set up, with a low action and good balance. I had
a look at old notes and learned a few things but I would be grateful for
any tips about fretless basses. Such as:
1. My top priority question: The strings are roundwound. Should I
change to flatwound quickly i.e. before playing any more? Do roundound
give a better sound? The roundwound ones wear down the fingerboard
I know, but are we talking about a matter of hours, days, or weeks
before this wear is noticeable?
2. Fingerboard maintenance. I have read discussions about
epoxy resin and so on. How often do you need to varnish or otherwise
look after the fretboard? Anything to do to reduce fingerboard wear?
3. Learning to play the thing. It is difficult to hit the notes right
without looking. I tried to play along with a few jazz numbers today
(numbers I can play easily on my fretted bass) and the result was not
good. Any practice routines? Or fretless books? Playing with your eyes
shut seems a good idea.
4. What sort of material is it particularly well suited to and perhaps
more important, not suited to (I realise this is to some extent a
matter of personal taste). I guess that it would be good for jazz and
latin stuff and not for blues and rock or slapping in most cases but I
would appreciate some opinions.
5. Any particular effects to aim for? It makes a very nice distinctive
buzz against the fretboard when I pluck the strings hard. Vibrato? Any
others?
6. Any other tips. Thanks.
Regards
John
|
1546.15 | round wounds | GAVEL::DAGG | | Thu Dec 01 1994 07:14 | 8 |
| I haven't played much fretless electric, but I vote to
keep the round wounds, don't treat the fingerboard, and
start by trying to get it in tune in first position,
either using 1-2-4 or 1-2-3-4 for the half steps, depending
on how big your hand is.
Dave
|
1546.16 | Now I just use my GR-1... | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Thu Dec 01 1994 08:34 | 16 |
|
I was the prior owner of the infamous fretless bass that Miguel
tried to sell a gazillion times. The only thing that I can
comment on concerns your intonation question. What helped me
the most was making sure my fingers were at a 90 degree angle
to the fretboard. If your fingers are at an angle, the notes
are progressively flatter / sharper.
Play fifths and octaves and pay attention to the angles.
Also, mine had frets that were filed down so the frets remained
as markers.
Tom
|
1546.17 | | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | | Thu Dec 01 1994 08:43 | 9 |
| I use roundwounds on my fretless. I tried flats and halfwounds, but
they just didn't sound as good. I use no extra special care other
than making sure the guitar doesn't fall down on it's neck so the
strings dent the fretboard. After playing it for (for and on) 2 - 3
years there is no major wear. At least nothing to get crazy about.
My 2 cents.
Fred
|
1546.18 | | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Thu Dec 01 1994 09:29 | 6 |
| I think you can play anything you want to on it. I used to play rock
and blues with a guy that played a fretless Fender Jazz and it worked
fine in that context. He didn't really do much with it's
"fretlessness" though.
Greg
|
1546.19 | Most of all, have fun! | COOKIE::LAMBERT | Sam, Storage Mgmt. S/W @CXO | Thu Dec 01 1994 11:26 | 39 |
| I've got a cheapie fretless, too (a Hohner, who make very good guitars for
the money, as far as I'm concerned) with the phenolic fingerboard, and I
use roundwounds. Even though that material is supposed to be heavy duty in
its own right (some sort of epoxy/resin stuff) I've had to sand down the
board a couple of times over the years to get the grooves out of it.
It's worth it to me though, as I agree that half rounds, and especially
flatwounds, sound dead. I also don't use the fretless as much as I used
to, so it's no longer a concern at all...
Putting an epoxy coating on the board will certainly make it last longer,
but you'll lose some of the "woodyness" of the tone. Jaco was the one that
popularized this method. With constant use you'll still have to renew the
epoxy every few years or so.
I'd say just play it as is, especially for the short term. You won't hurt
the board in the forseeable future. And you can always sand the wood if it
becomes a problem. Then think about replacing the board or neck in the
future, as necks are relatively cheap. Or replace the whole instrument
when it's time to trade up. (Oh, how I wish I had the money to buy Brian's
B.C. Rich fretless... <groan> <groan>)
For regular maintenance, if it's really dry where you are, consider *very
lightly* oiling the board with woodwind bore oil maybe once every 3 years
or so. Be sure to let it soak in well - at least overnight - then
thoroughly wipe it off with a cloth. Finger oils should take care of the
rest.
As for techinque, as was mentioned previously make sure you're fingers are
perpendicular to the board at all times. Intonation just takes practice to
get right. You can't be sloppy on a fretless. :-) Actually, you can:
that's part of the charm of the sound. I read a good tip recently for
basses with fret lines: Tune the bass so the true note sounds when you
finger slightly behind the line, as it would if it had frets. That way the
lines don't throw you off.
After all this talk it sounds like it's time to go dust my fretless off...
-- Sam
|
1546.20 | | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Thu Dec 01 1994 11:39 | 6 |
| > I read a good tip recently for
> basses with fret lines: Tune the bass so the true note sounds when you
> finger slightly behind the line, as it would if it had frets. That way the
> lines don't throw you off.
...and never play an open string!
|
1546.21 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | The animal trainer and the toad | Thu Dec 01 1994 12:22 | 19 |
| actually, Greg's reply does suggest something I've observed on
fretless. Open string notes in your lines are very helpful
in spot checking your intonation; you'll probably find yourself
using them a lot more than you would on fretted. I know for
me the tendency is to drift sharp; I've heard this from a lot
of other bass players too. My theory is that slightly sharping
the note gives that pleasing vocal sound and you tend to want
to do it, but the "errors" are cumulative. It's scary how far
off you can end up when you finally hit an open string again.
An exercise I've found useful in getting my intontation together
on fretless is to try to make it sound like a fretted bass.
Concentrate on hitting notes exactly and consistently; make a game
of it by trying to fool yourself into thinking your playing a fretted.
I find after a few days of doing this, my control and intonation
are much improved AND I can now gliss and buzz and play with the
notes without losing my sense of where I am in relation to true pitch.
/rick
|
1546.22 | jaco's fingerboard | GAVEL::DAGG | | Thu Dec 01 1994 12:52 | 6 |
| Did Jaco really epoxy his fingerboard?
Just curious,
Dave
|
1546.23 | I like playing bass, but it doesn't like me | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Thu Dec 01 1994 13:00 | 7 |
| Yeah, Jaco really did epoxy his fingerboards.
For me, I'm just lucky if I hit ANY of the notes with the correct
intonation. I'll keep my frets any day! I have enough trouble
with those big giant strings when I try to play bass...
Greg
|
1546.24 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | The animal trainer and the toad | Thu Dec 01 1994 13:50 | 6 |
| Jaco was a big advocate of Petit's Poly-Poxy; this is supposedly
heavy duty marine grade stuff. Make sure the can you get is pre-CBS :-)
I forget if this was mentioned before but to get the most "growl"
out of your fretless, set up for minimum neck relief and low action.
|
1546.25 | | TRUCKS::GORE | Bar Sinister with Pedant Rampant | Fri Dec 02 1994 05:11 | 5 |
| The one time I played a fretless base I was told to only use a classical
vibrato technique. Any lateral movement of the strings wears the fingerboard
too much.
Ian G.
|
1546.26 | Thanks | ULYSSE::WILSON | John, 828-5631 | Wed Dec 07 1994 01:14 | 5 |
| Thanks to all for the very helpful replies.
Regards
John
|