T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1536.1 | Out of a fender brochure | SALEM::DWATKINS | Time to get the SKI-DOO ready... | Thu Oct 26 1989 10:48 | 28 |
| I have some catalogs if front of me, here is what they say...
Fender Std. P-bass comes in black or artic white but, they show a
sunburst one in the picture?!?!?!?
Power J-bass special comes in black, candy apple red, artic white, and
pewter.
The jazz bass special and j-bass special fretless come in the same
colors as the power j-bass.
The standard J-bass comes in black or artic white.
The standard left hand j-bass comes in 3 color sunburst or vintage
white.
It lists all necks as rosewood except the "power" j-bass special,
it lists that as "G.M.R. Tri-Lam"
For Squiers, both p-basses and j-basses come in artic white or black.
The bullet bass is available in artic white, black, or red.
All squier basses have rosewood necks.
Don
|
1536.2 | Check out EVERYTHING else first... then buy. :^) | SALEM::ABATELLI | Nouveau Blues Rocker | Fri Oct 27 1989 10:00 | 11 |
| Are you sure you *want* to buy a Fender bass?? For almost the same
money, you can buy a Kramer ($350.00 price range). I've been playing
bass for along time and have played alot of different basses. If I
wanted to buy a bass today, I would look at everything available.
Fender makes a good bass, but for the price, I'd look at Kramer,
Ibanez etc. There are plenty of choices within the $300. - $400. price
range. Check out all the possibilities and then make your decision.
JMHO
Fred
|
1536.3 | from across the sea..IBANEZ_4_ME!!! | HAMER::KRON | KA-BOOM | Mon Oct 30 1989 10:18 | 33 |
| -Didn't you have a series of hassles with your squier before???
Why in the world would you want to even consider another????!!!!!
If I were you, I'd check out at least 3 names:
Ibanez
Ibanez
and last but not least, Ibanez!!!
And maybe Kramer,Musicman,G+L......
-Bill(Ibanez_nutz)
|
1536.4 | A Vote for Fender | STAR::DONOVAN | | Mon Oct 30 1989 14:16 | 33 |
| Older musicians may remember the time that if you played
"electric bass" you would say you played "Fender bass."
"Fender bass" was a generic term, similar to Coke, Xerox,
Kleenex, etc.
Anyhow, they were doing it first, and I personally feel they still
do it best.
The Squier series is a budget line, isn't it? I wouldn't look for
any serious quality there.
Fender Precision and Jazz are frequently looked down on because of
their warm, bassy tone. Some say it they sound too "seventies."
I had the opportunity to play a Fender Precision Elite with onboard
active electronics and it had a wide variety of sounds, not the least
of which was a fine, punchy, eighties sound.
And the feel of the instrument cannot be described! Perfectly balanced
with a weight that felt "right there." It was a beautiful instrument
and I shouldn't have let it go.
Anyways, to make a short story long, I'd stay with Fender. I mean, if
you're going to spend the money, stay with a *real* bass by the people
that have been doing it longest.
Prices range from 450-525 for a standard Precision or Jazz to 750-850
for the Elite series.
Tom, you live in Lowell, right? It's probably worth a drive up Rt. 3
to Ted Herbert's Music Mart on Elm St., downtown Manchester. He is
an authorized Fender distributor and usually has a decent supply
on hand.
|
1536.5 | | VIDEO::TASSINARI | Bob | Mon Oct 30 1989 17:47 | 12 |
|
I played a lot of basses when I was shopping for one. I liked this
Fender Jazz bass but it was a bit more than I had wanted to spend. I kept
looking and found myself comparing everything I tried to this Fender.
Well in the end I went with the Fender and have been very happy with it.
It felt right.
My advice? Try them all and go with the one *you* like the best.
You'll be happier going that route.
Bob
|
1536.6 | | USCTR1::EDEGAGNE | Mr. Ed the Talking Bassist | Tue Oct 31 1989 09:26 | 8 |
|
Gotta agree with .5 I did the same thing when I was shopping for
a bass. Played everything from a Jackson Concert Bass to a Kubuki
Factor Bass, ended up settling with a real nice Ibanez, probably
one of the best basses I've ever played! Try 'em all.
Mr. Ed
|
1536.7 | Fender isn't just for Motown anymore ya know | SALEM::ABATELLI | Nouveau Blues Rocker | Mon Nov 06 1989 09:21 | 8 |
| I suppose that people might believe that Fender basses have a '60ish
'70ish sound, BUT with all the aftermarket toys like EQ and chorus
effects, that old sound doesn't have to sound like that old sound.
I agree that a '69 p-bass doesn't sound like a Guild Pilot bass,
but that old Fender doesn't have to sound like Motown either.
Fred_who_looks_at_a_world_with_endless_possibilities
|
1536.8 | Fender vs Kramer | MCIS5::NOVELLO | | Wed Nov 08 1989 11:41 | 15 |
|
I bought a new Precision bass in 1977, which I loved, but I sold
the next year cuz I needed money.
In 1979 I bought a new Kramer Pioneer (Precision clone) with brass
plated hardware including the nut, which had a much brighter sound,
for much less $$$ than I would have paid for a new Fender. I've been
using the Kramer ever since. I upgraded to Seymore Duncan PUs.
I recently played Brian Kelley's Aria Pro II, with active electronics
which had a nice sound.
Guy
|
1536.9 | Resale? | FSTTOO::GALLO | Racing in the street. | Wed Nov 08 1989 12:32 | 19 |
|
What about the resale value of Kramers vs Fenders? If I buy
a gen-u-ine P-Bass, I know I can get a pretty good price for it
if I sell it. I know that resale probably should have little to
do with a bass purchase, but since tastes change, and we all don't
have bottomless pockets, the resale value *is* an important factor.
BTW, I'm not saying that Kramers don't have resale value, just
that I don't know if they do. Fender basses definitely do. As as
matter of fact, the Fender resale value is at once both attractive
and a pain, since I'm kinda interested in picking up a *cheap*
used P-Bass :-).
As an aside, how about some comments on other P-Bass clones.
-Tom
|
1536.10 | Re-sale... | HOFNER::MELENDEZ | Not negotiable | Wed Nov 08 1989 14:44 | 4 |
| My .02 cents; I think when it comes to music stuff resale is
everything. I like to think when I buy an instrument, I'll get
my money out of it.
|
1536.11 | Re-sale not important 2 me. | MCIS5::NOVELLO | | Wed Nov 08 1989 15:07 | 15 |
|
Re-sale is not important to me. I guess it depends on how soon
your going to sell it. I've had the bass 9 years and have made much
money using it, so I've gotten my money's worth. I haven't seen too
many Kramers for sale, so I don't know what the resale value is.
Also remember this. Selling something used depends on how many
others are out there for sale too. I had a tough time selling
my Fender P bass at the time, because there were always 10 or 15
others for sale. I ended up getting $200 for it and I had wanted
$250.
Guy
|
1536.12 | Fender Performer series | USMRM4::BGROCHOWSKI | | Thu Nov 09 1989 09:35 | 8 |
| I was chacking out basses at my local store and I found a Fender
Performer. This bass looked nothing like a Fender, had 24 frets
and Thinner neck than the P and J basses. I liked the way it played.
Anybody else know anything about these Performers. The merchant
stated that Fender made them for 1 year and that was it. They got
it new in late 87/early 88.
Bg
|
1536.13 | Scarce | AQUA::ROST | Subliminal trip to nowhere | Thu Nov 09 1989 13:05 | 6 |
|
Performers are pretty rare. There was also a guitar version.
I believe they were Japanese made.
Brian
|
1536.14 | Squire II P-Bass? | FSTTOO::GALLO | Racing in the street. | Thu Nov 09 1989 14:45 | 8 |
|
Anybody heard of a new bass by Fender? I believe it called a
Squier II P-Bass. I haven't seen one, I've only heard of it. It's
supposed to be a low end bass.
-Tom
|
1536.15 | As Of 11/89 Anyway | AQUA::ROST | Subliminal trip to nowhere | Thu Nov 09 1989 16:52 | 19 |
|
Current Fender bass line as far as I can figure it:
Squier (Korean?):
Squier P-Bass
Squier J-Bass
Japanese Fender:
P-Bass Standard
J-Bass Standard (fretless available)
J-Bass Special (really a P-Bass with extra pickup and no pickguard,
fretless available)
Power Jazz Bass (same as Special plus active EQ)
U.S. Fender:
57 Vintage P-Bass
62 Vintage P-Bass
62 Vintage J-Bass
P-Bass Plus (fine tuning bridge, Lace Sensor P-J pickups, 22 frets)
|
1536.16 | Squier Series Discontinued? | FSTVAX::GALLO | Racing in the street. | Tue Nov 14 1989 20:05 | 17 |
|
I just got off the phone with a guy from Manny's in
NYC and he said that Fender has discontinued the Squier series
basses. He didn't specifically say *only* basses, so I'm not sure
whether he meant guitars too. He also said that the Jazz Bass was
going to be made in the USA.
Anyone know if this is true?
The guy I talked to also said that the Squier P-Basses
were 3/4 scale. I've played squier P-basses and they didn't *seem*
to be any shorted than normal. Was the guy right? If so, what does
2" shorted scale do sound-wise?
-Tom
|
1536.17 | Fender Dealers | FSTVAX::GALLO | Racing in the street. | Tue Nov 14 1989 20:09 | 12 |
|
Anyone know where the "authorized" Fender dealers in the E.
Mass/So. NH area are? I'm looking to pick up a used squier p-bass
cheap (~$200). I'd settle for a new one if I could get it in my
price range :-).
If anyone sees any Squier P-basses, I'd appreciate it if
you'd pass the info along..
=Tom
|
1536.18 | It didn't feel any different. | MCIS5::NOVELLO | | Wed Nov 15 1989 14:11 | 13 |
|
I borrowed a Squire bass one night from the Dumpster Bunnies
at a gig when my Kramer had a bad input jack. The scale didn't
feel any different......
File this next part under WHO CARES.
I found an old tape of me playing my Fender P bass. I've decided to get
another one, just for "that sound".
Guy
|
1536.19 | for .17 | SMURF::BENNETT | Hey, Mr. Tambourine Man | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:29 | 3 |
|
Music Workshop, Salem, NH does Fender. So does Ted Herbert in
Manchester NH.
|
1536.20 | New - $279! | FSTVAX::GALLO | That's 400 watts... *per* channel! | Fri Nov 17 1989 12:00 | 12 |
|
I just picked up a Japanese Fender P-bass for $279 (no case)
from Sam Ash (mail order, of course :-)). This was by far the
lowest quoted price, out of the 7 or so place I called. The prices
varied from a high of $399 to $279. Also the guy I talked to said
that Fender prices just went up.
I always wanted a P-bass, so I'm a happy camper. :-).
-Tom
|
1536.21 | Mail Order? | DECWET::FURBUSH | Ghost in the machine | Fri Nov 17 1989 12:27 | 4 |
| re .20
Where is Same Ash? Do you have a phone number?
|
1536.22 | | FSTVAX::GALLO | That's 400 watts... *per* channel! | Fri Nov 17 1989 12:47 | 8 |
|
Sam Ash is in NYC. The number is:
(800) 4-Sam Ash (cute huh? :-))
-Tom (I'm Psyched!)
|
1536.23 | | USCTR1::EDEGAGNE | They're only good for one thing | Fri Nov 17 1989 13:47 | 6 |
|
Do they have a mail order catalog? Can I just call the number
and they'll send me one or what?
Mr. Ed...looking for some more Hartke Cabs!
|
1536.24 | ? | FSTTOO::GALLO | That's 400 watts... *per* channel! | Fri Nov 17 1989 15:03 | 8 |
|
I don't know about a catalog. It's a toll free number,
I'd just call and see if they've got catalogs.
-Tom
|
1536.25 | Jeeeeeeeezzzzzz | DECWET::FURBUSH | Ghost in the machine | Fri Nov 17 1989 16:00 | 7 |
| > (800) 4-Sam Ash
A lot of DECies must read this notes file. This number has been busy for the
last two hours.
|
1536.26 | I know I asked this before, but... | FSTVAX::GALLO | Rickenbacker Man | Mon Jul 30 1990 08:30 | 12 |
|
Does anyone have any information about Telecaster Basses?
I'm thinking that I might want to pick one up, but really don't
know all that much about them. So:
1. Which model (single coil vs. humbucker) is considered better?
2. How much would one go for?
3. Does anyone actually have one that I could take a look at?
-T
|
1536.27 | I've got a '68 | GLASS::ALLBERY | Jim | Mon Jul 30 1990 11:08 | 19 |
| Re 1536.26:
>> 1. Which model (single coil vs. humbucker) is considered better?
I have a single coil that I like. The single coil is the
earlier model-- it may have more snop appeal-- I don't know.
>> 2. How much would one go for?
Beats me. I haven't seen one for sale in quite a while. Mine
is actually a '68 tele bass body and electronics with an early
70's P-bass neck. I got the body for free (it was left in the
attic of a house my parents bought), and picked up a used p-bass
neck for $80.00. I refinished the body and put it together.
>> 3. Does anyone actually have one that I could take a look at?
Sure, if you're ever in the Detroit area...
|
1536.28 | Not too popular. | MCIS2::NOVELLO | I've fallen, and I can't get up | Fri Aug 10 1990 22:14 | 8 |
|
For some reason, the Telecaster basses were never popular.
A friend had one in 1969. It played and sounded nice.
He sold it last year for pratically nothing about a week
before I happened to call him :-(.
Guy
|
1536.29 | | FSTVAX::GALLO | Rickenbacker Man | Mon Aug 13 1990 09:00 | 9 |
|
I'm not even sure I really want one. What got me started on it
was that I saw the "Sun Rhythm Section" at the Lowell Folk Festival
a few weekends ago and the bass player (Stan Kesler) was playing
an *original* 1955 P-Bass, which of course the single coil style
tele basses look like.
-Tom
|
1536.30 | I had one for many years | MAIL::EATOND | In tents | Mon Aug 13 1990 14:06 | 10 |
| When I was actively playing bass, I had one that had "Telecaster"
on the headstock, but the body looked like a strat-type body. It had a
single pickup and I replaced the bridge with a Badass II. I was not a
connoisseur of fine instruments at the time, but it was just fine for
me.
I sold it for $225 a few years back to buy more synthesizers.
Dan
|
1536.31 | Tele-Basses etc. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Yes, you do need a Boogie | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:18 | 20 |
| The last time I was in Daddy's in Shrewsbury, they had a Tele Bass in
stock with a humbucking pickup. This one had a Badass bridge, and the
holes from the original bridge were visible. The condition was okay but
not great. I recall they wanted about $600 for it. It was hard to judge
how it would play with a string-change and some adjustment to the action.
Off the shelf it played terrible. The case was also quite beat. IMHO
Daddy's is not a great place to find vintage instruments. They rarely get
anything worthwhile, and when they do they place a very high pricetag on
it. If I were looking for a vintage Fender Bass (or any vintage instrument
for that matter) I would go straight to Mr. Music in Allston Ma. That
is where I bought my '83 Jazz Bass.
I've always been interested in Tele Basses. The single-coil model appeals
to me more than the humbuck. It is the closest thing to an original Slab
Precision. Not the most versatile bass in the word, but capable of
producing the great Fender Bass sound, and applicable to just about any
type of playing.
Mark
|
1536.32 | Tele Basses As The Holy Grail? | AQUA::ROST | She moves me, man | Tue Sep 25 1990 16:20 | 21 |
| Re: .31
Daddy's used prices are seldom grounded in reality. I saw a Japanese
J-bass with Alembic pickups going for $550, used. Considering that the
bass brand new is a $400 item, that was way out of line. Their prices
are based on trade-in discounts, so that nearly identical pieces in
their stock may have vastly different prices, and some new gear will
actually be priced just a few $$ over a used piece in the same store!
Single coil Tele basses have gotten pretty rare, I very seldom see them
around, although since the last ones were made around 1970, that's not
too surprising. Other basses of similar vintage, like Gibson EB1
reissues, for instance, are equally hard to come by and usually in only
fair shape, since basses that sell for low $$ tend to get bought by
people with little $$, like kids who will beat on the thing
unmercifully.
Actually, what you need, Mark, is a 1963 Gibson Thunderbird IV....
white, of course.... 8^) 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
1536.33 | T-Bird Bass | MILKWY::JACQUES | Yes, you do need a Boogie | Wed Sep 26 1990 14:20 | 14 |
| Now that you mention the Gibson Thunderbird Bass, there was an ad in
one of the Guitar rags a while back for a Rock memorabilia auction
which took place in England. Pictured in the Ad was the Gibson
T-Bird bass which was used by the Yes bass player on "The Yes Album".
The bidding for this bass started around $2500.00. This is the same
auction where one of Jimmy Hendrix' Strats sold for >$200K.
I always thought the Yes Bass player used Rickenbacker basses exclusively
(Especially on "the Yes Album"). The bass playing in "Seen all good
people" and "Starship Trooper", etc. all sound like they're done on a
Rick bass.
Mark
|
1536.34 | | SMURF::GALLO | From small things... | Mon Sep 30 1991 09:52 | 5 |
|
Anyone know wood is used in a "typical" Fender Bass?
|
1536.35 | It's Monday Morning,after all. | KIRKTN::JHYNDMAN | Big Jim | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:07 | 9 |
|
Re -1.
>Anyone know wood is used in a "typical" Fender Bass?
Yes.
8-) Sorry,couldn't resist it !!
|
1536.36 | Basswood, Alder, Poplar | RGB::ROST | Spike Lee stunt double | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:59 | 11 |
|
Most of the current imported Fender basses use basswood, except for the
Squire II series which must be made out of balsa wood or something, as
Fender conspicuously leaves that data out of the catalog.
US made instruments tend to be made from alder or poplar.
One wood Fender seems to have avoided is mahogany, which was used in
many Gibson and Guild basses.
Brian
|
1536.37 | Characteristics of what? | HSOMAI::CESAK | Makin tracks..sales and rails | Mon Sep 30 1991 15:05 | 15 |
| Just for the record...
Mahogony is a good wood for guitars because it handles moisture so
well. The word warpage is not included in it's vocabulary.....but
because of the extremely loose grain, it requires a filler before it is
stained. This explains why most furniture etc. that is made from
mahogony is very dark in color...ie. whatever color is used to stain
it, must cover the filler.
Bass wood is good because it is soft like pine and does not destroy
saw blades, drills etc. ,in contrast to oak that will kill a brand new
carbide saw blade after a few cuts. The good thing about basswood is
that it does not splinter the way pine does and it stains very well.
pc
|
1536.38 | good wood | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Musician's Friend - wife's enemy | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:10 | 28 |
| Basswood is very popular in Japanese made Fender vintage clones;
it's very light and resonant, and seems to closely duplicate the
properties of the 30 year old alder in vintage Fenders. However,
I've spent some time with basswood instruments (Strats and basses)
and in my experience the favorable first impressions fade rather
quickly. What seems like an "old Fender feel" in the store gets to
feeling "cheap and thin-sounding" after you've had it home for awhile.
It's actually a little too light and resonant, and doesn't have the
substance of the alder.
NY builder Roger Sadowsky makes some very fine custom basses that try to
capture the spirit of the old Fenders, while adding modern conveniences
in hardware and electronics. He builds his basses out of alder, swamp-
ash (generally a light ash) or basswood topped with maple. This basswood
topped with maple is the same idea used in the new EVH guitar; the maple
probably beefs up the basswood tone somewhat.
Most new American made Fenders are alder; however, new Fenders don't
feel the same as the old ones. If you ever actually put a good 60's
Fender bass against any of the new standards or vintage re-issues, the
difference would be very obvious. Maybe something happens to the wood
over time, perhaps a drying out? Or maybe the wood was just a different
grade in those days.
Note that Fender did actually build some mahogany Strats in the early
60's; it makes sense that they may have also built some basses, although
I've never seen it documented. It would be interesting to check one of
these out if they did.
|
1536.39 | P vs. J | NWACES::HICKERNELL | | Wed Mar 31 1993 16:23 | 14 |
| Here's a question whose answer may seem obvious to anyone who's Fender-
literate, but since I'm not:
What's the difference between a Precision bass and a Jazz bass?
I know some of the physical differences: number and type of pickups,
body shape, neck taper, that sort of thing, but what are the differences
in sound and playability? I have this idea that a J-bass is richer
sounding, while a P-bass might be a little punchier; I imagine this
difference to be due to their respective pickups. Any truth to this?
What else? Is one or the other better for some types of music than for
others, IYO?
Dave
|
1536.40 | A guitar players impression... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | ThatsWhenIreachedForMyRevolver | Wed Mar 31 1993 17:40 | 42 |
| > I know some of the physical differences: number and type of pickups,
> body shape, neck taper, that sort of thing, but what are the differences
> in sound and playability?
Umm... Not to state the obvious, but those *are* all those things which
would affect it's sound and playability...
> I have this idea that a J-bass is richer
> sounding, while a P-bass might be a little punchier;
I think you got it backwards, the P-Bass has a richer, fuller sound to
me. The J-Bass is the one with the punchy sound. Single coil pickups
and both of the pickups are closer to the bridge (brighter).
> I imagine this
> difference to be due to their respective pickups. Any truth to this?
...and the pickup positioning.
> What else? Is one or the other better for some types of music than for
> others, IYO?
Personal preference I guess. The J-Bass has a narrower fretboard and
it makes it less comfortable for me to play 'cause the strings are so
close together at the nut (fumblefingered as I am). The P-Bass has a
wider fretboard and a less pronounced taper to it, and generally feels
better to my hand.
The most versatile instrument is one that has a p pickup and a j
pickup. I have a Fender J-Bass Special which has this configuration
and the electronics are very versatile, but the J pickup is very noisy
(if I used it much, I'd consider replacing it). A friend and I swapped
necks too, I got a P neck and he got the J neck, we were both happier.
The J type pickups seem more in favor for people that do a lot of
slapping and popping, where the P style seem more for those that like
that big fat bottem endy type sound.
Someone who actually plays bass as their primary instrument can
probably give ya a little better description.
Greg
|
1536.41 | | LEDS::BURATI | never gonna do it without the fez on | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:58 | 9 |
| >A friend and I swapped
>necks too, I got a P neck and he got the J neck, we were both happier.
Wow. I thought the Precision had a shorter scale than the Jazz, Greg.
But if you did this then they must have been the same. Otherwise the
intonation would have been way off as you traveled up the fretboard.
I must have been wrong.
--Ron
|
1536.42 | you really should have one of each | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:34 | 17 |
| I think I'd tend to go with "punchy" when describing the Precision;
the sound is primarily lower mids and really stands out in a band
mix. The Jazz bass can get more highs and deeper lows, but lacks
presence in the middle compared to the Precision. This is partly
due to placement of the pickups, but also to the design of the
pickups themselves. When the Jazz was introduced, the pickups
were intended to be less punchy and smoother sounding because
a lot of P-bass owners were complaining about blowing their
speakers too often.
As stated, both basses are 34" scale. The Jazz has an offset contour
body that balances a little better than the Precision, which is
slightly neck heavy. The necks are typically narrower on the stock
Jazz, but you do see Precisions with factory order narrow necks
occasionally.
/rick
|
1536.43 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:45 | 21 |
| re: .40
Lemme see if I've got this right...
A P's pickup is closer to the neck than a J's neck pickup? If so, it
certainly should have more bottom end. And isn't a P's pickup also
single-coil (just split)?
The J's neck is narrower over most of its length (I assume they're both
about the same where they join the body, if you can swap them); is the
J's fretboard more curved or anything? I can see that this issue
wouldn't affect the sound, just that some people would prefer one over
the other.
I can see how the P-J pickup configuration would be versatile, though
it sounds as if you mostly use the neck pickup on yours.
Thanks for the info, Greg. Any other opinions or descriptions? Anyone
hate Fender basses, for example?
Dave
|
1536.44 | All This Talk Of P and J Is Making Me Hungry | TECRUS::ROST | Better living through chemicals | Thu Apr 01 1993 13:24 | 31 |
| >A P's pickup is closer to the neck than a J's neck pickup? If so, it
>certainly should have more bottom end. And isn't a P's pickup also
>single-coil (just split)?
No, the "neck" pickup is in about the same location on both basses.
It's really midway between neck and bridge. The P pickup is two single
coils (one for each pair of strings) wired for humbucking. A Jazz is
also humbucking when both pickups are on equally loud. This is why P-J
setups tend to have a buzzy J pickup, there's no way to wire it up with
a P pickup to get hum rejection. Some replacement pickups like EMG and
DiMarzio are fully humbucking individually.
>The J's neck is narrower over most of its length (I assume they're both
>about the same where they join the body, if you can swap them); is the
>J's fretboard more curved or anything? I can see that this issue
>wouldn't affect the sound, just that some people would prefer one over
>the other.
Curvature of fingerboards and neck radii on Fenders has varied widely
over the years, so there's no easy answer here. Also some "Jazz"
basses are really Precisions, notably the Jazz Special and Power Jazz.
They are just P-basses with a J pickup added.
>Thanks for the info, Greg. Any other opinions or descriptions? Anyone
>hate Fender basses, for example?
I do, well some of them: Coronado, Musicmaster are real dogs. Also
almost anything made from about 1970 to 1984, poor quality control, fat
necks good only to use as baseball bats.
Freddie Tavares
|
1536.45 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | But really, what could go wrong? | Thu Apr 01 1993 16:01 | 18 |
| re: .42 -< you really should have one of each >-
Yeah, that's how I feel about lots of things. Unfortunately...
re: .44
> almost anything made from about 1970 to 1984, poor quality control, fat
> necks good only to use as baseball bats.
Hmmm... That probably explains how I ended up with a Gibson bass. Way
back when (about 1970) I played a P-bass that had a neck like a tree
trunk and strings like bridge cables; I decided I couldn't live with that.
The EB-0 may have sounded like mush, but it sure is easier to play. %^)
Thanks, all. I'm toying with the idea of another bass, and it's never
too early to start dreaming.
Dave
|
1536.46 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | ThatsWhenIreachedForMyRevolver | Thu Apr 01 1993 17:48 | 10 |
| > Also some "Jazz"
> basses are really Precisions, notably the Jazz Special and Power Jazz.
> They are just P-basses with a J pickup added.
Not to contest your knowledge, Brian, 'cause it's usually much better
then mine (especially when it comes to basses), but my J Special was
more like a J bass with a P pickup added (until Tom took the J neck,
now it's more like a mongrel).
Greg (who likes Fender basses!)
|
1536.47 | | SPEZKO::TOMG | Dragon Dictate User | Fri Apr 02 1993 07:10 | 19 |
| re: .-1
I think Brian meant that the body is pretty close to p-bass shaped,
rather than j-bass shaped. The Jazz bass special seems like a p-bass
with an added pickup and slimmer neck. Seems that way to me, at
least.
By the way, the neck is great. Much more comfortable than the p-bass
neck was. Jazz bass specials seem to pretty inexpensive also. I'd
definitely consider one if I was in the market for another Fender
instrument.
Tom
---
Dictated with Dragon Dictate.
|
1536.48 | in Midnight Wine :^} | SANDY::FRASER | Uppity blues woman... | Fri Apr 02 1993 07:29 | 8 |
|
Well, you can always pick up a P-Bass plus, which has the shape and
feel of a Precision along with both types of pickups. I usually run
both pickups at the same time, and the Jazz doesn't seem noisy at all -
nice bass, made in the US, reasonable price.
Sandy
|
1536.49 | new J-basses are nice | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Fri Apr 02 1993 09:37 | 11 |
| To anyone in the market for a Fender bass, I highly recommend the
recent Jazz+ (or is Jazz Special? I get confused by the variations).
Anyway, it's the one with Fender Lace Sensors and active electronics.
Body and neck are standard Jazz design, weight is just about right and
the neck feels great. The active electronics seem similar to the Kubicki,
in fact someone on USENET claims it's the same electronics. There's
a passive mode for you paranoid types and the Lace Sensors sound super
in all modes. Outstanding, and miles ahead of anything short of an
original "stackpot".
If I didn't already own a great J-bass...
|
1536.50 | | TECRUS::ROST | Better living through chemicals | Fri Apr 02 1993 12:30 | 7 |
| Re: .49
It's a Jazz Plus, available in four or five string versions.
The only thing wrong with it is it isn't a Precision 8^) 8^)
|
1536.51 | Nice... | JUPITR::DERRICOJ | Defy The Laws Of Tradition | Sat Apr 03 1993 01:12 | 6 |
| The Jazz Bass Plus I found to be a great rock bass. It's nice and clean
sounding. Nice tone in all modes. It is difficult to get the standard J-Bass
farty tone that the passive/non-Lace basses have, but is not a real problem.
/John
|
1536.52 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | But really, what could go wrong? | Mon Apr 05 1993 09:27 | 4 |
| So, Brian, what is it about P-basses that you like better than J's?
Just the neck shape, or is there something else?
Dave
|
1536.53 | P vs. J Is Mostly Religious | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Mon Apr 05 1993 10:58 | 45 |
| Re: .52
I have never owned a Jazz Bass. For years I was anti-Fender since I
started playing right when they were making what was probably their
worst stuff ever (1970s). By comparison, newer brands like Kramer,
Curlee (remember them?), Hamer, even Peavey, were making basses cheaper
than Fender but with better features, using a lot of the parts that
Fender owners were buying to "hot rod" their basses (Badass bridges,
DiMarzios, Schaller tuners, *shielding*, etc.).
Then one day somebody let me play their 62 Precision. Wow. Not at all
like the 70s models, lighter, slimmer neck...then I tried out the
Precision Elite in 85 when it came out, vintage-style dimensions with
modern hardware (active electronics, fine-tuner bridge, Schaller pegs)
real nice but I wasn't about to drop $1000. One year later, CBS sold
Fender and I picked up a new Elite at a $300 blowout price. Since
then, I've become quite attached to it. I'm used to the P sound and
find it fits what I need to do. Besides, Keith Ferguson plays a
P-bass 8^) 8^)
I do have two other basses which have twin pickups (neither is a J or
PJ setup, though) and they get that thinner J-bass type sound (without
the noise, the pickups are humbuckers), but I usually run them with the
bridge pickup off, as they sound more like a P-bass that way 8^) 8^)
As far as necks go, my Rich is close in feel to my P, the Steinberger
is way different. I like a lot of things about the Steinberger but
have begun to start playing the P again a lot because I like the way
the neck feels better. The narrower spacing on the Steinberger (more
like a 60s "narrow neck" P than a J) felt really uncomfortable at
first, but now I can go between all of my basses (including a short
scale Danelectro) easily, although each one makes me play differently
because of the sound and feel.
#50 was a running joke I have with Rick C., who is a J-bass man. It's
sort of the bassist's verion of the Les Paul/Strat debate.
Interestingly, all of Leo Fender's followups like the Music Man
StingRay and the G&L basses are based on the Precision body and neck,
not the Jazz. And while many clones opt for a seond pickup at the
bridge, most still use a P-type pickup at the neck. At least one
manufacturer (Pedulla) has gone from a J-setup to a PJ setup.
Brian
|
1536.54 | I rest my case | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Mon Apr 05 1993 11:54 | 1 |
| Jaco played a J-bass
|
1536.55 | :^) | LEDS::BURATI | never gonna do it without the fez on | Mon Apr 05 1993 11:58 | 5 |
| > Jaco played a J-bass
Game Calcagni.
|
1536.56 | Vincebus Eruptum | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Mon Apr 05 1993 12:17 | 8 |
| Re: .54
You might've convinced me if you had reminded me that Dickie Peterson
played a Jazz 8^) 8^)
I'd rather be Keith Ferguson than Jaco, anyway.
Brian
|
1536.57 | BTS strikes | NWACES::HICKERNELL | But really, what could go wrong? | Mon Apr 05 1993 13:01 | 12 |
| Thanks for the info, folks, especially Brian. Interestingly, I had a
chance to play a Jazz bass this past weekend and really enjoyed it. A
friend has a '65 J-bass and he let me play it on a couple of tunes at
a jam. Boy, does it play differently from my Gibson! I was surprised
to find I didn't have too much trouble getting around on the
longer-scale, thick, tapered neck, though if I played it for any length
of time I'd certainly build up my left hand muscles.
And boy, did I like the sound of it. Hmmm... "Honey, could I use the
checkbook for a few hours?"
Dave
|
1536.58 | ain't no cure for the summertime blues | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Mon Apr 05 1993 13:05 | 15 |
| all seriousness aside...
I've owned both. Like Brian, I was anti-Fender when I first started
playing, but my reason was more because EVERYONE played a Fender in
those days and I had to be different. Teenage rebellion, and all that.
Then one day, I had to borrow a bass for a gig and ended up using
someone's early 60's Precision. "Oh umm... gee... I guess that's
all the fuss is about". I learned the folly of my ways, and
bought my first P-bass (a factory fretless) shortly thereafter.
For a straight rock or R&B gig, you still can't touch a Precision for
that big pumping low-mid sound. For the jazz and weird stuff I play these
days, the better hi-mid presence of the J-bass is more useful. And
although modern Fenders are nice, there's still nothing like a good early
60's; they're orgasmic.
|
1536.59 | drive-by bass hack with question | BSS::D_PELTONEN | A little DAP'll do ya! | Wed Apr 07 1993 10:43 | 26 |
|
I saw a P-bass the other day that I can't seem to find any
information about; perhaps somebody here might know what
it is. It's a Fender Precision, with the following:
Neck is marked Precision Special. It has the bullet truss rod
adjustment. However, it has a 4-bolt neck plate instead of the
usual 3-bolt/tilt thing that I've seen on other bases with
bullet truss rods. Additionally, the serial number is on this
plate; 106172.
It has the thumb rest, on top. Rather than plastic, the rest
appears to be made of aluminum (or its painted) and has "Fender"
in script embossed on it.
The bridge is not like what I've generally seen on P-basses.
Instead, it looks like a Badass, although somewhat less
massive. It, too, has the Fender logo in script on it.
The tuners appear to be the tulip design, and well used. The
whole bass looks old, but the bullet truss rod makes me think
70's. Perhaps an old body with a newer neck? Or, are all the
above associated with its being a Precision Special? Any
information would be appreciated!
DAP
|
1536.60 | Precision Special It Is | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Wed Apr 07 1993 13:31 | 13 |
| Re: .59
The Precision Special came out around 1979 or so and was made for two
or three years. It uses pickups and brass hardware that Fender was
selling as "hot rod" parts to compete with DiMarzio, etc. I've seen
them in red, white and natural walnut. It should have three knobs,
volume, bass and treble, instead of the usual two (it has a preamp).
"Tulip" tuners sound odd to me, like they were put on later. They
should be gold-plated like the other hardware if original. Not sure
what these are worth today, they sold for about $1100 list.
Brian
|
1536.61 | | BSS::D_PELTONEN | A little DAP'll do ya! | Wed Apr 07 1993 14:19 | 24 |
|
Re .60
Thanks for the reply, Brian.....I've read plenty of you in here
and I was hoping you'd volunteer :-). I own a copy of "The Fender
Bass" (to indulge my lust of Jazz Basses mostly) but it makes no
mention of any Precision Special. Now that you mention it, something
looked different on the pickguard as well; might have been that
there are three pots.
The color of this bass is sorta a candy color, almost a pale
burgandy bordering on pink; the pickguard is single-ply white.
The tuners are definitely (peeling) chrome as is the bridge; no
brass anywhere. Again, I'd never seen one like it and was mostly
curious. However, it is available cheap (under $300) and even
though it needs some TLC its still the cheapest US P-bass I've
seen lately. What I was really wondering is if it was an older
body with a replaced neck and could be snarfed for short money :-)
Stick a J-bass neck on it and smile accordingly......
DAP
|
1536.62 | Buy It, Now! | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Wed Apr 07 1993 14:42 | 12 |
| Oh heck, for under $300 buy it!
The hardware may or may not have been refinished. If the thumb rest
and bridge say "Fender" then they were at some point in their life
*supposed* to be gold-plated! Also should have a white pickup cover
(instead of black).
The book you mention does indeed have a picture of a Precision Special,
I think they stuffed it onto the page showing the Elites. The one
pictured is all walnut (rarest version).
Brian
|
1536.63 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | ThatsWhenIreachedForMyRevolver | Wed Apr 07 1993 14:59 | 6 |
| Hey Dana! As Brian said, at $300, it's REAL hard to go wrong with
it...
(Nice seeing you writing some notes too!)
Greg
|
1536.64 | | BSS::D_PELTONEN | A little DAP'll do ya! | Thu Apr 08 1993 10:47 | 23 |
|
Re .62
Brian....have you considered a position in the exciting field
of assisting the visually impared? :-). I looked at the Fender
Bass book again last night and there was not only the picture
you mentioned but also this big ol' 2-page color spread that
included a Special (duh, me :-).....matter of fact, it has the
gold hardware you mentioned. I'm a mite conservative for that
kind of flash; perhaps my eyes avoided it for that reason :-).
So, this bass is what it's supposed to be....but ain't what I
thought it was. Hmmm. I need another bass like I need another
wife and kids....but the place that has it doesn't seem to
know or care what it is; they just want to outplace it...meaning
cheap. Hmmm....:-)
re: Greg....yeah, I figgered that rather than lurking around
the sidelines, I'd talk bass in here some....hell, didn't hurt
a bit :-)
DAP
|
1536.65 | And then there were 7 :-) | SSDEVO::LAMBERT | Idiots Rule | Thu Apr 08 1993 12:28 | 0 |
1536.66 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Think, it ain't illegal yet | Thu Apr 08 1993 15:52 | 15 |
| >Hmmm. I need another bass like I need another
> wife and kids...
One can never have too many instruments...
;^)
> re: Greg....yeah, I figgered that rather than lurking around
> the sidelines, I'd talk bass in here some....hell, didn't hurt
> a bit :-)
We don't bite...much. Well, ok, Buck does, but if you stay arms length
away and don't bother him while he's eating he's pretty personable.
;^)
Greg
|
1536.67 | some guys have all the luck ;^) | CSC32::W_ALEXANDER | | Thu Apr 08 1993 15:52 | 1 |
|
|
1536.68 | Local... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Think, it ain't illegal yet | Thu Apr 08 1993 15:54 | 4 |
| If you talk real nice to him, Will, maybe he'll pointcha at it instead
of buying it himself...
Greg
|
1536.69 | | CSC32::W_ALEXANDER | | Thu Apr 08 1993 16:21 | 8 |
| Well I have slobbered all over the rest of his basses,
maybe he will let me test drive this one.
Will
Who is refinancing and does not have the bread...
|
1536.70 | A little late to the discussion | ROYALT::TASSINARI | Bob | Wed Apr 28 1993 13:29 | 19 |
|
I have a Fender Jazz Special. The first time I picked it up it felt right,
played smooth. I tried bass after bass and nothing compared.
The thing that drives me crazy is:
> For a straight rock or R&B gig, you still can't touch a Precision for
> that big pumping low-mid sound.
I'd like it to sound like a Precision!
- Bob
|
1536.72 | :-) :-) :-) | RICKS::CALCAGNI | submit to Fred | Wed Apr 28 1993 14:20 | 1 |
| I rest my case (again!)
|
1536.73 | | TECRUS::ROST | Don't fry bacon in the nude | Wed Apr 28 1993 14:39 | 5 |
| Re: .72
Actually, real men play G&L
agagagagagagagagagagagaga.....
|
1536.74 | | LUNER::KELLYJ | submit to Barney | Thu Apr 29 1993 06:47 | 1 |
| I thought really real men play MusicMan (MusicMen? =|-0 )
|
1536.75 | I'll take a L2000 thank you! | FRSBEE::ABATELLI | You're not from around here are you? | Thu Apr 29 1993 07:37 | 5 |
| I'll stick with my '69 P-bass, but would also LOVE to get a G&L too
because G&L's have the "tone" I wish I could get from my Fender P-bass!
Rock on,
Fred
|
1536.76 | Reissue Series? | MVDS00::GALLO | | Fri Dec 17 1993 11:31 | 17 |
|
Anyone have any information on Fender "Re-issue" (NOT Vintage)
series basses?
I saw an advertisement in this month's Musician magazine, which
got me to wondering about the quality and price of these instruments.
So, anybody have any data on these?
Tom (who's back to some limited playing these days)
---
Dictated using Dragon Dictate (Voice Recognition)
Dragon Questions? Please Call.
DTN 264-1347
|
1536.77 | Try one | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Merry Merry, Joy Joy | Fri Dec 17 1993 14:13 | 14 |
| I played a Reissue P-bass at the Music Workshop (Salem, NH) a few
month's ago. I'm no expert on bass tone (just ask my band), but the
tone from this one didn't impress me too much. For that matter,
neither did the American Standard J-bass I also played.
Come to think of it, though, it could have been the Fender combo bass
amp I played them through. Both played well, however, and the price of
the P was attractive. I'd say the Reissues are worth a look, but don't
buy one 'til you've tried one.
Hey, glad to hear you're back playing again; we NEED more bass players
in this conference. %^)
Dave
|
1536.79 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Send John Thomas some doughnuts | Fri Mar 10 1995 09:36 | 32 |
| I owned a Precision Lite for a while... 89 to late 93 (I think).
White, maple neck, active pickups. A great sounding bass, IMO,
but nothing like the sound (or feel) of a standard P-bass.
It's a totally different animal.
It was nice having a very light bass on a long gig, but that's
not a great concern to me... hell, I spend 5 or 6 hours with
my walnut Alembic Europa 6 string hanging on me without fatigue,
and that thing weighs a ton.
If I were to say anything negative about the P-bass Lite,
it would be that the body and finish don't hold up as well
as they would on a harder (and heavier) solid wood body.
The P-bass Lite uses some composite for the body that's very
light, but not without its problems in terms of durability.
For example, the screw that held the hardware for attaching
the strap used to pull out all the time, and because the
body material was soft, I would have to use a lot of glue
to get it to hold, and kept putting in progressively longer
screws.
On the other hand, I ran over my P-bass light with a truck
once (honestly). It was in a Fender hard-shell case, which
got destroyed in the process, but the bass inside was fine.
This was not an intentional test, BTW, just plain old brain
damage after a long and arduous gig.
As for suggesting an Ibanez, well, you don't know how funny
that actually is... :-) :-)
-b
|
1536.81 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Send John Thomas some doughnuts | Fri Mar 10 1995 10:42 | 7 |
| Dave,
Actually, it could be basswood, now that you mention it. All I
know is that it was soft, but dense. That does sound like
basswood...
-b
|
1536.82 | 2c | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Fri Mar 10 1995 10:50 | 21 |
| If I remember correctly, Danny Daddieco had a Precision Lite that he
listed in here for sale a few years ago. It didn't seem to sell very
quickly. He bought it as a spare to carry around in case his main
squeeze (a Guild Pilot) ever had a problem at a gig.
In my humble opinion, The Precision lite is a completely differant
animal than a regular Precision. The body is much smaller than a
standard P-bass,and has no pickgaurd (yech). BTW, the Precision lite
is made in Japan. This will no doubt reduce the resale value. I think
your original choice (Precision +) is a far superior instrument. It
is like an original P-bass with some enhancements that are often
requested by players including the P/J pickup combo, 22 fret neck,
and improved weight balance. It is also made in USA! BTW, Fender also
has an American-Standard Jazz Bass that has been in production for the
last 4 years. I played a couple of these and found them to be very
cool basses. The price on an Amer-Std Jazz is considerably lower than
a Precision+. The Jazz also has the P/J pickups, as well as the
improved weight balance. I suggest you check one out before you make a
decision.
Mark
|
1536.83 | exit | MILKWY::UTTLEY | These go to eleven! | Fri Mar 10 1995 11:08 | 10 |
| I wasn't aware that the Lyte was Japanese made, that kind of turns me
off. However, the fact that it is smaller (and lighter) is what
attracted me to it. I've seen pictures of the American Standard Jazz
basses, and there is something about the shape of them that really bugs
me. I do plan to go out and look at them *all*, (I don't make rash
decisions on this sort of stuff), but right now I think I'm leaning
toward the standard Precision, since I've played one of these, and
everything fealt and sounded right to me.
Dave
|
1536.84 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Fri Mar 10 1995 12:46 | 13 |
| re: .82
Mark, I think you might be missing the point. What he's looking for is
a *lighter* bass. I love my Precision, but it's really hard on the back
over a four hour gig. If the Precision Lyte sounded 75% as good as a
normal Precision I would have to give it serious consideration.
Fortunately for me, this largely isn't a concern anymore, as I rarely
play electric bass nowadays. The upright is a real pain to carry around,
but at least at the gig it stands on the floor. :-)
-Hal
|
1536.86 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Mon Mar 13 1995 06:16 | 10 |
|
re: -.1, can you imagine how many more guitars and basses
dealers would sell if they bothered to set them up first?
The "some like high action and some like low action"
arguement doesn't wash when they just leave it the way it
came in.
Unreal...
|
1536.87 | | MPGS::MARKEY | Send John Thomas some doughnuts | Mon Mar 13 1995 08:27 | 26 |
| The P-bass Lyte that I had set up beautifully and held tune
really well. I don't remember the bridge being particularly
whimpy, although the machine heads were definitely smaller
than average.
As for the strings, I used to use medium Smiths on it, and it
was just fine. As I said, it held tune perfectly, and after
the initial setup (and since I stuck with the same strings)
it never needed a truss rod tweek.
I thought the thing had a great sound too... as I've mentioned
in the past, it was the bass I used in both the recording and
video of Digital's "Alpha Chip" rock video. Granted, the neck
gave the thing a guitar feel, but it was still a player IMHO.
As for setting up guitars and basses: I deal with 3 stores
exclusively. I call and tell them what I'm coming in to
try and when... and they have it set up for me. They know
that chances are pretty good when I bother to call them
that I'm intending to buy if I find the right axe, and
they make sure it's right for me. Not too long ago, I went
to a store in Boston expecting to buy one high-end bass
and walked out with three. So needless to say, they practically
set up the entire store now when they know I'm coming!!! :-)
-b
|
1536.89 | I had a feeling it would be the US p-bass | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Mon Mar 20 1995 13:07 | 11 |
| Congrtats Dave.It's always good to here the 'I found my Dream'
instrument story-especially if it's a Fender!
I bought my dream machine last November.A Strat-plus Ultra.Sunburst ash
body,3 lace sensors(red/silver/blue--bridge to neck),Fender
tremolo,rosewood neck and locking tuning heads. It was pricey (~1150
tx.incl),but i've *never* looked back! I love it more every time i play
it.The clincher was the final inspection stamp/build date...Sept 22..
my birthday.That's when i new i had to have it.
Anyways,best of luck with it.
-kev
|
1536.90 | God I love happy endings! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Mar 20 1995 20:27 | 12 |
| >> I played it for so long Saturday night I finally fell asleep and
>> woke up several hours later still holding it, then I played it some more.
Sounds like true love to me!! But, did you still respect it in the morning?
Congrats.
Mark
|