T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1465.1 | Let's here more... | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 240-6501 AET1-1/A6 | Tue Sep 12 1989 15:10 | 7 |
| Hey, a price would be nice to see.
Also, a review of how it works from anybody who has had
a chance to try one out would also be nice.
When are they going to be available?
Rick
|
1465.2 | knowing Roland, I doubt it | PNO::HEISER | all fired up!!! | Wed Sep 13 1989 01:17 | 3 |
| Wouldn't be grand if it were in the same $$ neighborhood as the SGE?!?!
Mike
|
1465.3 | Roland = $$$$$$$$$$ | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Wed Sep 13 1989 01:51 | 8 |
| Hey, it'd be nice if they were a grand ! (1K$). I'd be willing
to bet they'd list for about $1700 or so ... without the FC-100
or EV-5.
Scary (who's willing to trade his GP-8 on one ...)
|
1465.4 | Yeouch ! | ASAHI::COOPER | Insert Heavy Metal phrase here.... | Wed Sep 13 1989 12:29 | 5 |
| They had one at Parker Music about a month ago...
Suggested retail was $1799. I *ran* away !
jc (Who didn't try it, cuz he was scared he'd like it !)
|
1465.5 | entering the MIDI mortgage zone - abort now | USRCV1::REAUME | 2#4U | Wed Sep 13 1989 14:30 | 5 |
| For that price I'd rather MIDI another rack unit to the SGE and
have as many if not more effects AND money left over. I didn't think
it would list for that much. I expected around 1K w/o the FC100.
I was gonna bet that the GP-16 would sell but I think I'll reserve
judgement. I'll get the specs soon anyway.
|
1465.6 | Bogus | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Ghastly ghoulish apparitions | Wed Sep 13 1989 16:49 | 6 |
| Roland is notorious for being overpriced, but having good gear.
I'd never pay that for an effects unit. Sheesh, for that you could buy
*THREE* SGEs *and* a MIDI foot controller!
Greg
|
1465.7 | | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Wed Sep 13 1989 23:38 | 10 |
| Would you rather have 3 Yugo's or 1 Porsche ?
Just raggin' ya there Greg !
Scary
|
1465.8 | FYI, guys | COMET::MESSAGE | Harder'n Chinese Algebra | Thu Sep 14 1989 11:01 | 9 |
| This month's Electronic Musician has a very good article comparing
ME-5, SGE, Yamaha, etc. GUITAR signal processors. Comparisons
include "retail" prices, features, etc.
For what it's worth, I fiddled with an ME-5, and wasn't overly
impressed. The distortion didn't seem all that good, but maybe it
was a bad day at the shop. I'll try again........
Bill
|
1465.9 | 8^) | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Ghastly ghoulish apparitions | Thu Sep 14 1989 17:52 | 6 |
| re: Jerry
I'd take *one* SGE over a GP-8 any day! It's like comparing an RX-7
with a Mercedes. The RX-7 is faster, handles better, and costs less.
Greg
|
1465.10 | GP-8 for sale !! and its not for a GP16 | MPGV5::HASTINGS | | Fri Sep 15 1989 10:57 | 15 |
|
I'm selling my GP-8 if anyones interested. It's not because I want
a GP-16 either. Selling price $1000 including FC100 the Morly version
of the EV5, works just as nice, a brand new midi cable for the FC100,
I'm still using the old one that will come with the package to.
I am willing to negotiate.
I work 1st shift DTN 237-3539 or home after 5:00 485-7409
I do alot of running around at work so keep trying if you
can't get me once. I'll be listening.
Tim Hastings
|
1465.11 | Nmail Address MPGS::HASTINGS for 1465.10 above | MPGS::HASTINGS | | Fri Sep 15 1989 11:43 | 6 |
|
To add to note 1465.10
Mailing address MPGS::HASTINGS
|
1465.12 | Get real Roland | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 240-6501 AET1-1/A6 | Fri Sep 15 1989 13:00 | 6 |
|
Gp-16 @$1700! No thanks. I don't wanna know how good it is either.
I hope Roland IS reading this notes file!
Rick
|
1465.13 | MIDI money management 101 | USRCV1::REAUME | 2#4U | Fri Sep 15 1989 13:26 | 28 |
| OK, here's some good news-
The dealer that sold me my GP-8 told me he has a list price of $1199
for the GP-16. That's a little more like it! Still not cheap but
hey, this is Roland. Here's an effects break down:
Block A (mono) Block B (stereo)
1-compressor 1-short delay
2-dist/overdrive 2-ch/fl/ps/sp *
3-picking filter 3-auto panner
4-phaser 4-tapped delay
5-parametric EQ (4 band!) 5-reverb
6-noise suppressor 6-lineout filter
*- chorus/flanger/pitch shifter/spatial expander
Obviously you can't combine certain effects like in Block B #2
you get to use one of these effects only. I'm sure the quality of
the digital effects is better than the GP-8. I don't know what the
range is of the pitch shifter. There is a input level control and
headroom indicator (sorely missed in the GP-8). Balance XLR ins
and outs as well as 1/4" standard jacks (nice for using direct).
And the direct out sound is adjustable thru Block B Efect #6.
The unit still uses the same footswitch and expression pedal as
the GP-8. Another additional feature is two switchable(programmable)
outputs for selecting different amps.
All in all it seems to be nice. I'd have to play one. I don't
think it's gonna be worth the extra money ever my SGE though.
|
1465.14 | If you're not into LIVE processed guitar or complex setups | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Mon Oct 09 1989 16:47 | 34 |
| Actually, I'm not terribly disturbed at the price. I'm not that
familiar with the SGE, but it's been described as an "multi-effects
processor" and I think the GP-16 is really a bit more than that.
The key thing about the GP-16 is INTEGRATION; It's a very
complete guitar control system. In addition to effects, it does
a variety of signal routing functions (to outboard effects, amp
switching, channel switching, tuning cutoff) MIDI *AND* non-MIDI
control of outboard effects and another difference between it and
the GP-8 is that it has an amp simulator (for recording) and
several kinds of outputs (XLR, phone plug, etc.).
In conjunction with the FC-100, it's hard to imagine needing
ANYTHING else (except perhaps something like an Ada MP-1).
If I was a pro, I'd certainly get one.
I would much rather have ONE integrated rack unit than THREE rack
units. Maybe you have to have "been there" to appreciate the
integration feature. I've had some pretty amazingly complex setups
and the GP-16 would have eliminated a lot of the cost, complexity,
errors, weight and setup/breakdown time. (The GP-8 already does
a lot for me).
If you're not someone who wants to do some pretty particular things
with heavily processed guitar, I can easily understand why the GP-16
doesn't seem like a good deal.
Actually I can think of one thing they left out: A digital tuner.
Other than that, I'd be hard pressed to ask for more in a unit
price under $2000.
db
|
1465.15 | FYI | SQUID::GOODWIN | | Sat Oct 14 1989 01:28 | 5 |
|
Music Emporium's current mail order catalog has the GP-16 priced
at $995.00. Too close to a grand for me to justify . . .
Steve
|
1465.16 | $$$$ justification ... | ASAHI::SCARY | MISTER Scary to YOU !!! | Mon Oct 16 1989 03:34 | 15 |
| I called my local music store and asked about that unit too. They
said that the GP-8's were being discontinued because they could
sell the GP-16 for about $45 more ! That sounds like a good deal
to me. And the salesman said that the reason the GP-16 was sooo
high was because, (his quotes ...) "it's a REAL guitar sound processor,
not a guitar gadget like the SGE ..". I read up on it in the Roland
Users Guide and it has some serious proffessional applications so
I guess unless you wanted to do some heavy MIDI stuff or recording
you wouldn't need *that* much versatility. Besides, if you buy
2 decent rack effects you've already dumped close to a grand in
it already, and this way you save money on that extra MIDI cable.
8^) Scary ...
|
1465.17 | Guitar gadget indeed | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Spam Monkey Shin Dance | Mon Oct 16 1989 12:04 | 11 |
| >And the salesman said that the reason the GP-16 was sooo high was
>because, (his quotes ...) "it's a REAL guitar sound processor, not a
>guitar gadget like the SGE ..".
Sounds like bullsh*t to me. At what point does something cease to be a
"guitar gadget" and become a "real guitar sound processor"? I hate
sales people that cop an attitude like that. Next week when he goes to
work at a different store that sells ART products, he'll be badmouthing
Roland...
Greg
|
1465.18 | | ASAHI::COOPER | No more flame burning in my heart... | Mon Oct 16 1989 17:52 | 4 |
| No kiddin'. Some people will say anything... Jerry, If your talking
about Rick, he told me he "loved" the SGE...
;^)
|
1465.19 | Salesmanship has no morals .. | ASAHI::SCARY | set world=no_cats | Tue Oct 17 1989 00:09 | 8 |
| Of course he did .... YOU have an SGE an are a potential customer.
I bought my GP-8 from him ... that's sales for ya !
%^}
Scary
|
1465.20 | Guys, it really is NOT just another guitar gadget | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Nov 14 1989 17:23 | 24 |
| re: last few
> Sounds like bullsh*t to me. At what point does something cease to be a
> "guitar gadget" and become a "real guitar sound processor"?
At the point where it starts doing things like signal routing,
integrated switching, control/coordination of other MIDI *AND*
non-MIDI effects, etc. etc. all of which the GP-16 does and the
SGE (and various other multi-effect units) do NOT.
Guys, it's really not marketing bullshit. The GP-16 does a WHOLE LOT more
than something like the SGE. Read .14.
I can understand why most folks wouldn't appreciate the difference
between a GP-16 and the various multi-effect processors, but if
you're heavily into processed guitar and/or having a complex
rig, the GP-16 really is a very significant product.
Guys who plug their Les Paul right into the Marshall aren't going
to appreciate what it does, but guys with several amps, various
effects, complicated music that call for a wide variety of tones,
effects, etc. are going to buying up GP-16's like there's no tommorrow.
db
|
1465.21 | Why put down other products though? | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I just can't slow down | Tue Nov 14 1989 18:03 | 38 |
| > Guys, it's really not marketing bullshit. The GP-16 does a WHOLE LOT more
> than something like the SGE. Read .14.
I have read .14. I understand the units capabilities. I really
couldn't care less *how* much more it does then an SGE, that does not
give some sales person license to insult other useful (competing)
products. I consider the term "guitar gadget" as being a condecending,
derogatory phrase, clearly intended to diminish the listeners view of
the device being described. I am adamently opposed to the "put down
competing products" sales technique that seems so prevelant lately.
It's the kind of mentality that says "If you don't have <product X>,
then you're dirt". I really don't appreciate this approach.
I like to think that I'm capable of making my own decisions as far as
what equipment I need. I want to have a sales person tell me about the
product that I'm looking at, not other products. I can make any
subjective comparisons myself, I don't want or need help doing that.
It's getting to the point where going to a music store is like going to
a used car lot, you can't trust anyone.
Don't take this as a personal insult, Dave. I know and respect *your*
knowledge (and opinion) of these products. Clearly the GP-16 has
outstanding capabilities, but surely you'd agree that the term "real
guitar signal processor" is pretty ambiguous. That could be used to
describe anything from a cheap stomp box to the most sofisticated
modern electronic marvel. I maintain that "guitar gadget", as the
previous noter described it's use, is a derogotary term. That's why I
referred to it as bullsh*t. If another more descriptive phrase (such
as "guitar signal/sound control system") were used in place of "real
guitar sound processor", I would not be opposed to it's use.
However I feel that the term "real guitar sound processor" describes
the SGE just as well as it does the GP-16. My SGE is just as REAL as
any other product on the market! It does what I need and it met my
budget, how does that make it a bad choice? Why is it just a "gadget"
when it does more then 95% of the competing products on the market?
Greg
|
1465.22 | It is a step beyond multi-effectors | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Nov 14 1989 18:14 | 13 |
| OK, Greg.
I understand.
All I meant to say was that the GP-16 really is not "just another"
multi-effects/signal-processing device ala the SGE, Multi-Verb,
etc. etc.
A lot of people are putting it down because of it's price without, IMO,
appreciating what it does that is different and justifies (for many)
its moderately high price.
db
|
1465.23 | Ack, too late to return and spell check it... | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I just can't slow down | Tue Nov 14 1989 18:39 | 7 |
| Thanks Dave (also thanks for ignoring my glaring spelling errors, I
forgot to use DECspell... :-)
I didn't intend to put down the GP-16, it sounds very nice, just that
salesmans attitude.
Greg
|
1465.24 | | ASAHI::SCARY | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Nov 15 1989 01:31 | 11 |
| You would have to read up on the GP-16 to really understand how
powerful it is. If you have a complex rig that is made up of sveral
MIDI devices along with devices with on/off type footswitches then
you can really appreciate it. I think this salesman calling the
SGE a "gadget" was wrong, but I can see how he'd try and promote
Roland products since I bought my GP-8 from him and he said it was
like seeing your child move away from home ... he really liked.
Scary
|
1465.25 | I'll take the SGE | USCTR1::EDEGAGNE | They're only good for one thing | Wed Nov 15 1989 08:46 | 13 |
|
I don't believe that the SGE and MultiVerb are "just another" effects
processor, they are a little better than that. Granted, the MV
and the SGE are a lot alike but not completely (no analog effects
on the MV). Take a look at the price difference from the SGE/MV
and the GP-16. Enough said. The SGE is a very real guitar effects
processor and is capable of alot of different things, at a price
that the average musician can afford with little or no problem.
It brings that "big" sound to us little guys witjin a reasonable
price. By the way Scary, it can't be all that bad, it is the hottest
selling piece of equipment out right now.
Mr. Ed...
|
1465.26 | Apples are also cheaper than oranges but try and make OJ with em | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Wed Nov 15 1989 10:33 | 24 |
| > Take a look at the price difference from the SGE/MV and the GP-10
> Enough said.
No, that's my point. Not nearly enough is said.
As to whether the SGE( or Multiverb) is "just another" multi-effector
I don't care to argue that. The point I was make is that it is,
inarguably, another multi-effectors (albeit good quality
multi-effectors).
The GP-16 is MORE than a multi-effector. It does many other things
besides multiple effects. In fact, it might still be viable even
if it didn't do multi-effects!
Many of you may not be inclined or in a position to take advantage
of the other things it does, and thus the extra cost may not be
justified for you, but you really can't compare the two strictly
on price.
Frankly, I think the GP-16 is a significantly better deal. The only
alternative to a GP-16 is something like a custom rack from
Bob Bradshaw which goes for a lot more than around a grand.
db
|
1465.27 | | USCTR1::EDEGAGNE | They're only good for one thing | Wed Nov 15 1989 11:01 | 5 |
|
Regardless, I'll take the SGE.
Mr. Ed...
|
1465.28 | Good sound still = Big $$$$$$ | OTOO01::ELLACOTT | Freddie's Revenge | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:03 | 1 |
| Just let me win the lottery then see my rack grow
|
1465.29 | | USCTR1::EDEGAGNE | They're only good for one thing | Thu Nov 16 1989 09:32 | 5 |
|
Wouldn't everybodies ?! Megabucks!! I can see that 16 stack,
quadruple-amped, 1000-space rack, quad stereo bass system now!!
Mr. Ed...
|
1465.30 | What is SGE ? | RUTILE::ZWART | The Sniffer | Tue Dec 05 1989 08:12 | 11 |
| I heard quite a lot of GP-8 & GP-16 over here in france and although
they seem to be really interesting I'm not interested in a most
of their features. I'm looking to a straight forward multieffect
rack having a good overdrive/distorsion a compressor/sutainer a
phaser a chorus a flanger a delay and a reverb a parametric or graphic
equalizer would be appreciated. It should be easy to use and alow to
use a maximum number of simultaneous effects. I heart all of you
talking about SGE (could somebody give more details, never heart
about it) any information on the ROLAND GS-6 or the KORG A-3 ?
Taco.
|
1465.31 | SGE! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I just can't slow down | Tue Dec 05 1989 13:53 | 16 |
| The SGE certainly meets the criteria you described. It's made by a
company called ART. It will do up to 9 effects at once. In addition
to the effects you mentioned, it will also do pitch shifting and has an
exciter. The EQ is a little limited (three band), but the selection of
overdrive/distortions and reverbs is excellent!
I think that it's performance for the price is very good.
This was my selection of multi-effects units. Remember that it's not a
preamp (Jeff Cooper will tell you all about that).
There's a whole note on SGEs somewhere in here, do DIR/TITLE=SGE for a
LOT more information. 8^)
Greg
|
1465.32 | good price! | FREEBE::REAUME | No Tubes - can you believe it? | Thu Dec 19 1991 10:56 | 9 |
|
If anyone's interested:
Roland GP-16 multi-effecter. $488.88!!!! (list is $1200).
Howard Goldman musician's Supply (716) 833-6111 (western NY)
-B-
|
1465.33 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Thu Dec 19 1991 11:04 | 1 |
| Damn!
|
1465.34 | Things that make you go hmmmmm.... ) | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | MESA BOOGIE modified by PEAVEY! | Mon Dec 23 1991 12:27 | 11 |
| re: .32
I wonder if that includes the foot controller?
I bet not, but for an extra $300.00 you can have one of those baby's
thrown in! Ofcourse if it does include the controller that'd be a
REALLY excellent price!
Rock on,
Fred (who likes the GP-16 alot!)
|
1465.35 | A lot of places seem to be dumping them | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Soaring on the wings of dawn | Mon Dec 23 1991 14:11 | 5 |
| The Foot controllers sell for a lot less than $300 (more like $150).
Anyway, I got both the GP-16 and the Foot Controller for $599 from
Daddy's which is probably an even better price than $488 for just
the GP-16.
|
1465.36 | | CUPMK::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-0506 | Fri Dec 27 1991 11:18 | 1 |
| Arrrgh...I can still remember paying something like $800 for my GP-8!
|
1465.37 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Hey you're pretty good - NOT ! | Fri Dec 27 1991 12:16 | 3 |
| I thought I got a deal on my GP8/pedals for $1150 ... ouch !
Scary (who's using it again ...)
|
1465.38 | Jerry's fav patch is BYPASS! | RAVEN1::BLAIR | You got me floatin' | Mon Dec 30 1991 13:30 | 0
|