T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1424.1 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | Where the down boys go | Tue Aug 15 1989 16:19 | 4 |
| Even if you convert the signal to low impedance, it will still sound
castrated. It will sound like Boston sounds in concert, as they go
direct from their Rockman modules to the board....if that is what you
like, then do it.
|
1424.2 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Tue Aug 15 1989 16:44 | 17 |
| RE < Note 1424.1 by MARKER::BUCKLEY "Where the down boys go" >
I'm not really sure what I want, and having never heard Boston in
concert, I can't comment.
From time to time I read in these notes about how people are using their
GP8's or ME5's or whatnot to run directly to the board. Have any of you
actually mapped some road time doing this? Have you been satisfied with your
sound?
What would be the best way to get a decent guitar sound into the mains?
Do you mike the speaker cab or do you take a pre-amp out from the amp? If you
mike the cab, do you cover it with a blanket to isolate the sound to the mains?
Any other tricks?
Dan
|
1424.3 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | Where the down boys go | Tue Aug 15 1989 18:03 | 15 |
| The only time I ever dig a direct-to-board connection is a strat thru a
compressor to the board (or a strat thru rockman to the board). Ultra
clean sounding and low noise. For gain things, I don't think direct
applications work well. There are certain characteristics associated
with using a speaker. The "marshall chunk" is said by many to be a
product of the speaker cab moreso than the electronics driving it!! You
can get a variety of tones from close-micing a cabinet...and its nice
to have the choice of speaker to color your overall tone too. Your
guitar sound will definitly take on a more `muscular' feel too it with
speakers. For live applications, you can mic in in several ways to get
what you want. Some people turn the speakers away from the audience to
get more punch from the amp. Some people put plexiglass in front of
the amp, and mic the indirect reflections off the glass (SRV used to do
this!) for a sound. Experimentation is the best key to finding what
you like/don't like.
|
1424.4 | Just say "no" to line-out's ... | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Wed Aug 16 1989 06:04 | 11 |
| I made the mistake once (and just once ...) of using the line-out
on my Marshall and going into the board instead of using a mic.
The sound man loved it - "look ma ! No feedback !". But we taped
the gig and my Marshall sounded like a overdriven Kent ! Sounded
terrible. My advice is to use a good mic and a good speaker cab.
Put a piece of tape over your line-out just in case your soundman
has any ideas ...
Scary
|
1424.5 | Tapes don't always tell the true story | NRPUR::DEATON | | Wed Aug 16 1989 09:31 | 10 |
| RE < Note 1424.4 by ASAHI::SCARY "Pretty neat username, huh ?" >
Just a question on your recording... Did you run the input to the tape
deck from a line out on the board? If so, it may not be an accurate
representation of how your guitar sounded in the hall.
Just a thought...
Dan
|
1424.6 | | LEDS::ORSI | Cuz I felt like it, OK? | Wed Aug 16 1989 09:43 | 26 |
|
I use a direct box at the spkr output of the head with
very good results most of the time. I generally mike the
spkr cab, but if it picks up too much drums or bass, I'll
direct it. I never use the line outs, because some are part
of a loop and the loop has to be completed for the amp to
work properly. What you get is interaction. Thats what causes
your guitar to "sound like a Kent". Interaction can be defeated
by transformer isolation, i.e., a direct box.
From what I read here in notes, I've come to the conclusion
that direct boxes and line outs are misunderstood and misused.
Most line outs are not transformer isolated and this is where
the problem starts. That 1/4" line out on the back of your amp
is not isolated from the internal circuitry in most cases, so
when the sound guy cranks it up at the board, it sucks your
signal dry. Some amps come with a cannon connector output at
mic or line level. In most cases, and for all intents and pur-
poses, the amp has a built-in direct box. The purpose of most
1/4" line outs is to drive another power amp or "slave" as they
used to say. Then they got more sophisticated by adding a line
in also, so as to create a loop. But in most cases ya gotta
complete the loop or ya gonna screw something up.
Neal
|
1424.7 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Wed Aug 16 1989 10:26 | 18 |
| RE < Note 1424.6 by LEDS::ORSI "Cuz I felt like it, OK?" >
> From what I read here in notes, I've come to the conclusion
> that direct boxes and line outs are misunderstood and misused.
So, do you think you could explain what exactly direct boxes are? My
understanding is that they are meant to both 'step up' the signal and to
create a balanced line (3 conductor). It confuses me to think that you could
send an amplified signal (from the speaker outs on an amp head) into a direct
box. I guess I need more education. I would have thought the amplified signal
would fry a direct box.
I have a Pro-Co 4-in/out passive direct box. It has a switch on each
channel to choose between instrument and line. How would this unit be used in
this scenario?
Dan
|
1424.8 | 2c | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Aug 16 1989 12:06 | 34 |
| I doubt the passive di box you have can handle a speaker output,
but there are di boxes that can.
There are basically two types, but some can do it all. One type
direct box can handle an instument input (like an acoustic guitar
pickup), and, in fact, steps the signal up from <100mv up to 1v.
The output is a cannon connector that can be run virtually any
distance (through a snake) to the mixing board. Speaker emulators
are basically direct boxes that can handle a speaker output
and they color the sound the same way a speaker would. Again,
the output of these di boxes is a cannon balanced jack. I believe
Countryman makes a direct box that can handle either.
Something like the Harry Colbe silent speaker, or the new GT
speaker emulator are only intended for handling speaker outputs.
My cousin has gone from using a miced up Boogie, to using a
GK250ml (lined out) to using a GP8. He claims the GP8 blows
everything else he has used away, totally, and I have to admit,
he sounds great through the GP8. It's totally a matter of
opinion, and what tones your music requires. In some cases,
micing a tube amp is totally unpractical (this is the case
in his act where he playes guitar and sings while programmed
synth and drums provide the rest). Use of a preamp only makes
it much easier to balance his guitar volume with the rest of
the voices in his act, and allows him to monitor everything
from one speaker. To him, this outweighs the slight differance
in tone he could possibly get from a tube amp.
Of course this is always a matter of personal opinion, and as much
as I think he sounds great, I personally prefer a tube amp.
Mark
|
1424.9 | Effects send experiment | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 240-6501 AET1-1/A6 | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:21 | 31 |
| Dan,
You might experiment with this if you amp has an effects loop.
I take the send signal from my Guitar amps effects loop, run
it thru a 1/4" to XLR transformer, and send it to the board thru
a dedicated compressor/limiter. The amps effects return is unused.
I set the compresser on a pretty heavy compression setting, to
maintain a consistent level, and avoid blasting the PA. I get
most, but not exactly the same tone as the amp produces.
I believe that your amp design will be a major influence in what
tone you get. For me, it is acceptable.
With this set-up, I can use the G-amps master volume to adjust the
amps level, without effecting the PA send level at all! That is
very useful. I have complete control over my stage monitor kevel
(g-amp), and the sound man has complete control over the PA mix.
I also have a direct out on my amp, which has a level knob. But,
I've found that to be quite a bit noiser than the effect send,
and I loose independent control of guitar and PA levels.
If I wanted to use the effects loop for effects, I suppose that
it could be split and routed back to the amps effects return.
A stereo effect could be used for this, and you could get stereo
seperation between your amp, and the PA. I don't know whether that
would necessarily be desirable, but it could be avoided if not.
This seems to be the cleanest, most full proof method I've
found. Mic'ing a guitar amp can work well in the studio, but
for a live stage set-up, I avoid it.
Rick
|
1424.10 | | TCC::COOPER | Captain KRUNCH ! | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:21 | 4 |
| I've always felt that you loose that "ambience" when you line out...
I'd use a mike to make the most of that speakers "feeling".
jc
|
1424.11 | One more time | LEDS::ORSI | Cuz I felt like it, OK? | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:21 | 18 |
|
Re- .7, .8
Whether a direct box is passive or active, its output is mic
level. That is ~100mV, not line level. Direct boxes have
balanced mic level outputs. Cheap ones like the DOD or IMP 2
can only accept hi impedance passive inputs from a guitar, bass,
or hi imp mic. These a made frome a fairly inexpensive trans-
former. Others can accept amp level input as well as instrument
input because they have a switch and voltage divider or have a
multi-tap transformer inside. Active boxes do the same thing,
but are cleaner, and have better bandwidth. I own all 3 types.
All 3 have balanced low impedance mic level outputs to match
the mixer input. NONE have line level outputs.
There are devices which take a variety of audio signals and
give you a line level output, they are called mixing boards.
Neal
|
1424.12 | I go direct - stage and house | GLIND1::VALASEK | | Wed Aug 16 1989 16:20 | 17 |
| I have also been told that cannon connectors (ie. Radio Shack
type) are inferior to direct boxes as far as functionality (lifting
ground) and performance (bandwith, tonality) go. We were informed
to use direct boxes whenever possible and avoid cannon type
devices.
Also, I use Rockmodules. The output goes into a direct box and
to both the stage mixing board and house mixing board. My monitor
mix contains my vocal and guitar. Guess what else ? No complaints
from other band members or soundmen about my guitar-amp being
up too loud. I hear it great and it doesn't sound like BOSTON.
For what it's worth, my opinion only.
regards,
tony
|
1424.13 | | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Thu Aug 17 1989 00:25 | 10 |
| re: .5
We used a Pioneer tape deck with 2 EV mikes directly over the mixing
board. I couldn't believe the tape for a long time because my tine
was so good on stage. And I have tried going into the tape deck
from the line out and it was even more disgusting ...
Scary
|
1424.14 | Mic it, period. | ASAHI::SCARY | Pretty neat username, huh ? | Thu Aug 17 1989 04:18 | 11 |
| I have a GP-8 and it sounds pretty good through a PA. I guess it's
due to the fact that it's such a "processed" sound as opposed to
the "tube" sound you get from miking a speaker. Still, I don't
think you can beat a Celestion and a good mic to faithfully reproduce
a guitar tone.
Scary
(who runs a GP-8 though a Marshall - the best of both worlds !)
|
1424.15 | I've done some A/B-ing recently | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu Aug 17 1989 11:56 | 17 |
| I've used line outs from my GP-8 to record, but having listened to
it a bunch of times, and made comparisons, I think I'm going to
go back to using a mic.
Using the line-outs the guitar tone sounds great by itself and
there's no noise, but in the mix it doesn't seem to sound "real"
even though I add a little reverb.
It's one of those situations where a track sounds great when the
solo button is on, but not when put in context.
It makes recording the guitar much more painful (line out from the
GP-8 was EXTREMELY convenient compared to setting up and testing
the mic, and then running it through a compressor and then a gate)
but I'm certainly going to do that most of the time from now on.
db
|
1424.16 | RED BOX? | USRCV1::REAUME | undergoing behavior analysis | Wed Aug 23 1989 14:02 | 13 |
| I use my GP-8's line out at band practice. It works well in that
environment. I can deal with a slight compromise in my sound for
the convenience. We like to hear the vocals well at band practice
anyway.
But live I'm still miking my cabs. I would like to get away
from this if I found something that could do a good job. I'm hearing
good stuff on the H&K Red Box (Cabinetulator G). I asked a sound
man who does national acts if he's had anyone use them and he told
me Chuck Berry and Expose used them and they sounded great through
the fronts. These units accept line level in or speaker in! The
intent is to duplicate a 4X12 sound. I'd like to hear if a heavier
act uses them. The box lists for $99. Anyone got one or will I have
to be the first?
|
1424.17 | Use an amp. | UWRITE::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-0506 | Wed Sep 06 1989 09:51 | 10 |
| I agree with Buck in .4
I've tried going through my GP-8 directly into the board. The clean
sounds are phenomenal, but the distortion sounds like sh*t.
I now go from my GP-8 to my Boogie and mike the amp. It sounds much
better. (I lose the stereo option, though, because I only have one
amplifier.)
-Dan
|