T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1327.1 | the school of hard knocks | ANT::JACQUES | | Fri Jun 02 1989 10:28 | 45 |
| I wouldn't "knowingly" buy anything stolen. When shopping
in a pawn shop, how are you suppossed to know if something
is stolen or not ?? I would assume that anything sold
through a pawn shop was legitamate, and as long as you
walk out with a reciept, I wouldn't worry about the police
knocking on your door.
This brings a interesting story to mind. I met a guy a while
back that learned about buying stolen property the HARD way.
Him and his friend (the friend plays guitar) were in a Worcester
bar one night (half drunk, of course), and a guy approached them
and offered to sell them several guitars dirt cheap. They left
the bar and followed the guy down Park ave into a parking lot
behind a funeral parlor (just happened to be located directly
next door to EU Wurlitzers). They met a couple of guys that
live in the projects directly behind Wurly's, and bought
~5 instruments for $200. The guys took the money and left.
These two guys started opening the cases to see what they
had bought, and before they could open the second case, they
found themselves surrounded by police officers. It seems
the instruments had just been stolen that night. The back door
to EU Wurly had been completely torn off its hinges. They
were arrested and confessed to accepting stolen property. This
wasn't good enough for the police. The police testified in court
that they found their fingerprints "inside" EU Wurlitzers, and
both of them were found guilty of breaking and entering, and
grand theft. Between lawyers fees, court costs and fines, they
each ended up paying $2500 and were on probation for 1 year.
They also got to spend 2 days and nights in the Worcester County
jail. For this much money they could have easily purchased the
guitars for full list price.
Obviously, these guys were very stupid to fall into this trap. They
had to know they were buying stolen property, especially since
they were right next to a music store. I don't condone the police
lying in court by saying they found their prints inside the store
(you can believe what you like, I don't believe these guys commit
a b&e). I think the punishment they recieved was a little harsh,
but one thing is for sure, they won't ever buy anything "hot" again.
After hearing this story, niether would I.
Mark
|
1327.2 | | WEFXEM::COTE | No marigolds in the promised land... | Fri Jun 02 1989 11:24 | 8 |
| Nope, not a prayer I'd knowingly buy something hot.
I've managed to modify some of my synths so that my name (not the
manufacturer's) is displayed when you turn them on.
Thiefs suck...
Edd the insured
|
1327.3 | Whaddaya mean it's in the trunk of your car??? | CSC32::G_HOUSE | No, you're not there... | Fri Jun 02 1989 11:45 | 25 |
| I wouldn't knowingly buy something that was hot. I don't like thinking
that the next time someone gets a good deal like that, it might be my
stuff he's buying.
But the big question is, how can you know? I mean in a scnerio like .1
describes, it's pretty obvious, but if you're just buying something
from an individual, maybe from an ad in the paper or a flea market, how
can you tell? I guess you could ask them if they have a receipt for
when they bought it (I have receipts for most of my major equipment),
but not everyone will save them like that.
Pawn shops are SUPPOSED to run the equipment they receive through a
police screen for the serial numbers anyway (at least around here), and
they ARE a business which will give you a receipt for the merchandise,
so the chances of getting burned there is less.
I'm told that my homeowners insurance would cover my equipment, at
least while it's in the house. Since I don't gig right now, that's
good enough for me. But my policy did change companies recently (since
I checked on that anyway), so I probably need to be sure it's all
covered now. There was a big discussion in MUSIC not too long on the
subject of musical equipment insurance. Those interested may want to
find it.
Greg
|
1327.4 | | ASAHI::COOPER | It's just me and my Z | Fri Jun 02 1989 11:47 | 21 |
| Thiefs suck...
Ah-men.
Insure your equipment ! Your a fool if you don't. If you own a house,
your gear is covered. If you rent, your renters insurance coveres your
gear. If you keep your equipment elsewhere, tell the insurer, and they
will sell you something to cover you. Do not tell them your a
professional musicain. It'll cost you more. When I rented up in Mass,
the insurance to cover all my rental junk, plus all my off-site
instruments and stuff was maybe $100/yr. A small price.
I've been ripped off before. It sucks.
Oh, I HAVE found some excellent deals at pawn shops. My BC Rich
will testify to that. One way to check the "temperature" of an
instrument is to look for a serial number. If there isn't one,
then the thing is probably hotter than a ... Well... You know what
I mean.
Good topic.
|
1327.5 | don't go home without it !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Fri Jun 02 1989 12:06 | 44 |
| My equipment is insured as long as it is in my home, under
my home owners policy for full replacement cost. The minute
I remove it from my house, I believe, it is no longer covered.
My cousin plays professionally (full time) and all of his
equipment is fully insured, regardless of where he leaves
it. This type of coverage is expensive, but is a necessity
for him, and can be written off as a business expense. Every
time he buys or sells a piece of equipment, he updates the
ins. co's list, and provides them with reciepts. He has never
had to put a claim in on his policy, but it only takes one
incident for the insurance to pay for itself.
I played in a band for 2 years, with no insurance on any of our
gear. For this reason, I had a firm policy of not leaving my
equipment anywhere. The guys in the band used to bust my chops
because I would haul my twin reverb, and all my other gear in
and out of clubs every night, regardless if we were playing a
3 night engagement. One weekend, we played at a place called
the Red Rooster, in Keene NH. We were assured that our gear
would be safe, because the owner's son would be spending the
night in the club with a friend, and would "gaurd" our gear
for us. Regardless, I took my gear home that night, anyways.
The next night, when we arrived, our drummer noticed that
his drums had been moved slightly. He figured they must have
moved them to vacuum the rug or something, but in the process
they dragged his bass drum over some nails he had driven into
the stage to anchor it. This resulted in several scratches on
the bottom of the bass drum. We started playing, and when he
went to strike his roto-tom, he realized the skin had a huge
hole in it. He later found a drum stick which was split in
half. Needless to say, the guys that were supposed to be
protecting our gear obviously had a little jam session of
their own, which resulted in this damage. We wanted to approach
the owner and complain, but were afraid that if we did, we might
have a problem getting paid. Granted, none of our gear was
stolen, but it was definately abused.
My advice is to scale down your gear (the ideal scenario is to walk
into a club with a guitar and a rack containing a preamp and all
your efx, and plug directly into the PA) and don't leave it anywhere.
|
1327.6 | Wrong! | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Fri Jun 02 1989 12:39 | 60 |
| re: .4 and .5
.4> If you own a house, your gear is covered.
.5> My equipment is insured as long as it is in my home, under my
.5> home owners policy for full replacement cost.
Guys, I think you ought check carefully with your agent. It's amazing
how much myth goes around in notesfiles about insurance. We've had
this same topic in MUSIC.
I am just short of CERTAIN that you will discover that your coverage
is NOT what you think *IF* you have used any of your equipment to
make money or any other form of compensation.
You will find that almost all policies exclude "business equipment".
Now, I know YOU may not think of your guitar as "business equipment",
but the accepted definition of that term is anything that's used to
make money. If you've received any compensation for playing out,
your stuff not likely to be covered by your homeowners policy.
Even if it's stolen from your home (and not at a gig), you probably
are NOT covered. The equipment simply is NOT covered by the policy.
And don't think "well, I'll just tell them I didn't make any money
with it". Pragmatically, *THEY* don't have to prove that you didn't.
What really happens is that they say it's business equipment and
simply don't pay you, and then YOU have to sue them.
So how do you get it insured?
The policy you need is called an "Inland Marine" policy (don't ask me
to explain that name - it's has a historical derivation). Some
insurance companies will offer it for music equipment. Some won't.
It can be EXTREMELY expensive as a seperate policy. But it can be
EXTREMELY cheap as an attachment to your homeowners policy, although
some company's don't give you any breaks for that.
I ended up switching my homeowners policy because they were willing
to do it very cheaply as an attachment to a homeowners policy. I
think it was something like $99.
One thing that I do agree with however, is that that it is ABSOLUTELY
FOOLISH to play out without having your stuff insured.
I also feel compelled to add a standard caveat: It's quite clear that
on these matters, you should not take anything said in a notesfile
as fact, but consult an expert.
Don't find out the facts and importance of insurance matters the
hard way. Consider that the worst case is that you lose all your
stuff and (unless you're so rich as to be able to afford to replace
it) then no more music for you.
I have known THREE people this is happen to. It scared me enough
to go out and find out the facts and make sure that I was covered.
Even so, I still worry.
db
|
1327.7 | | PNO::HEISER | New Oxymoron: Rap Music | Fri Jun 02 1989 13:22 | 11 |
| I've had to take out special "riders" for my audio gear so I imagine
musical instruments would too.
Some good ideas were posted in AUDIO notes too, for dealing with
insurance companies if you do get ripped off. Make sure you take
pictures of everything you own (so that brands, model names are
legible) and keep all your paperwork too. Even a video tape would
be great. Just go down to your local guitar shop and film everything
on the wall :-)
Mike
|
1327.8 | LEARN FROM MY MISTAKES | CASV02::PELLERIN | | Fri Jun 02 1989 13:37 | 50 |
|
The point is - CHECK WITH YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY. I have claimed
stolen guitars (stolen from a GIG). I told the insurance company
that I was asked to fill in as a favor for a friend. They payed
and the only proof I had to provide was receipts and/or pictures
of the instruments. They gave me REPLACEMENT COST.
This may not be true in all cases. CHECK IT OUT TO BE SURE.
>The policy you need is called an "Inland Marine" policy (don't ask me
>to explain that name - it's has a historical derivation). Some
>insurance companies will offer it for music equipment. Some won't.
>It can be EXTREMELY expensive as a seperate policy. But it can be
>EXTREMELY cheap as an attachment to your homeowners policy, although
>some company's don't give you any breaks for that.
I now have an Inland Marine policy - NOT ATTACHED TO MY RENTORS
or any other policy. I'm covered for Fire, Theft, Water Damage (from
a flood), and Damage caused to the equipment from an accident (if
the truck gets hit and it gets smushed).
I'm covered for $13,000 (THIRTEEN THOUSAND) AND IT COSTS ME $80.00
per YEAR!!!!
I LEARNED MY LESSON AFTER WATCHING MY EQUIPMENT BURN IN A CLUB I
WAS PLAYING AT. I lost about $7,000 worth of gear - I literally
watched it burn, and the court battles are still going on after
almost two years. I doubt if I'll ever see any settlement money,
but I can dream can't I ?..... (I did write the loss off from my
taxes though).
I ended up switching my homeowners policy because they were willing
to do it very cheaply as an attachment to a homeowners policy. I
think it was something like $99.
>One thing that I do agree with however, is that that it is ABSOLUTELY
>FOOLISH to play out without having your stuff insured.
I'll never be fooled again.
-BAP
|
1327.9 | correction | CASV02::PELLERIN | | Fri Jun 02 1989 13:42 | 10 |
| IN .8, I mistakenly left in a paragraph from an earlier reply:
"I ended up switching my Homeowners"
Forget that.
My point was that Inland Marine is indeed inexpensive, and even
as a stand-alone policy.
-BAP
|
1327.10 | addendum | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Fri Jun 02 1989 16:29 | 54 |
| To Mark and ASAHI::COOPER.
I could easily believe your agent told you that you were covered if
the question you asked was "Are my musical instruments covered?".
They ARE covered subject to the exclusions in the policy. That
question however would not tell the agent enough for him to know
that they are subject to the exclusions.
The question to ask your agent is "Am I covered even though I use
these instruments to play out and earn money for doing it."
And I want to emphasize that if you play out, you should get one
of these policies. The excuses I normally hear are:
o Well, I receive money but I don't turn a profit
Doesn't matter.
o I get paid but it's just a hobby
Doesn't matter.
o How can they ever find out that I make money
Answer: they don't have to (see my previously reply)
o I'm very careful
So were the folks I know who lost all their stuff. Besides
being "careful" means giving your stuff to the guy holding
a knife rather that risking your life.
o Insurance policies are rip-offs.
Not if you get the right policy. This requires some effort, but
in the course of a normal lifetime, it's quite likely to be
worth it.
One other thing. When dealing with insurance companies, do NOT
do not attempt ANY fraud (to get a lower rate, a higher claim amount,
etc.). That's why you usually have to sign something that says
"this is true to the best of my knowledge" or something like that.
If you are caught (and they have lots of incentive to try)
you can find yourself with a loss that isn't covered (because the
policy was invalidated on the count of fraud) AND facing a lawsuit
or criminal charges.
I may seem adament, I'm sorry. But I've seen three heartbreaking
stories and I *do* want to make an impression on people about how
important this is.
db
|
1327.11 | CYA is the bottom line... | ASAHI::COOPER | It's just me and my Z | Fri Jun 02 1989 18:08 | 17 |
| I called my rep. I found out that in my policy (A Allstate Deluxe
Homeowners), I am covered for my musical stuff as long as I'm not
a professional. Being a pro means you make one thin dime (even
if you lose money on the gig !) your a pro; You lose.
Well, I asked him why my claim got settled when I lost some stuff,
and he said because you gave use an itemized list of all your goodies
(including pics) and we charge you for "an adder". In other words,
My policy wouldn't have covered 'cept I payed for extra coverage.
It costs me $99/year. A *Very* worth-while $99 it is...
But like someone said earlier...Sorry I forgot who, and I'm too
lazy to look... DON'T LISTEN TO ME, I'M JUST A DUMB GUITARIST,
NOT AN INSURANCE PRO !!
Don't find out the hard way.
|
1327.12 | Coverage? | CSC32::G_HOUSE | No, you're not there... | Fri Jun 02 1989 21:23 | 37 |
| re: .6
>And don't think "well, I'll just tell them I didn't make any money
>with it". Pragmatically, *THEY* don't have to prove that you didn't.
>What really happens is that they say it's business equipment and
>simply don't pay you, and then YOU have to sue them.
What if that is the honest truth? Are you saying they will still try
this? I mean, the truth is that, until recently, I've never played
with a real band, but I have a lot of musical equipment. It never left
my house. The band I play in now only plays for fun, and only a our
friends partys, we don't get paid.
If someone breaks into my house and steals all my stuff, is my
insurance company, who assured me that my musical instruments were
covered a couple of years ago when I bought my homeowners policy, going
to try and deny my claim on the grounds that I am a professional
musician? Simply because of the quality and quantity of musical
equipment which I choose to own?
I am not a professional musician (you could easily tell this by hearing
me play). I have never made a red cent playing music. Do I have to
*prove* this to someone to get an insurance claim paid?
Now THAT sounds unfair to me! Why should I have to buy additional
insurance just so my insurance company won't have to pay my valid claim
(should I ever have one)? Fortunately, I live in a low crime area and
hopefully the issue won't ever come up. I am fully willing to go get
the additional coverage that I'd need should my band ever start playing
for money, but in the mean time, I don't think I should have to shell
out extra when I asked them specifically if my instruments would be
covered and they assured me they would. (Incidentally, I *did* tell
them that I had a lot of expensive instruments and asked repeatedly if
they were covered...)
Greg
|
1327.13 | Deal of a lifetime! | FTMUDG::HENDERSON | Fun with Flesh! | Sat Jun 03 1989 14:31 | 30 |
| I inquired with my agent as to my equipment coverage as part of
my home owners policy and it is covered but only while it is IN the
house. If I take my equipment out, I need additional coverage which
I have. When I acquire new equipment, I contact my agent and give him
the serial number and replacement cost of the equipment. I also keep
a list of serial numbers at a location other than my house in case of
fire. One more precaution I have taken is to photograph all of my
equipment, especially older or custom pieces as this can be difficult
to replace or receive replacement value. Sometimes this requires an
appraisal from an approved dealer or collector.
This topic reminds me of one of those deal of a lifetime situations
where I was introduced to a guy in Manitou Springs, Colorado who
happened to have a Gibson Byrdland and a custom ES-175, both under
$450.00. I almost blew a snot ball on my shoe when I saw the condition
of these instruments, they were mint! The serial numbers were intact
and even though I am no expert, I could tell these babies were being
sold far below their value. Grudingly, I refused to purchase these
beauties though I must admit, I had a 10 minute argument with myself!
The Fishead was caught two days later trying to sell them in Denver.
They were stolen from Colorado Springs. There is a God! I could picture
myself playing my newly acquired jewel out around town and having a
6'8" monster ripping my arms off and shoving them neatly up my nostrils
because I was playing his stolen guitar. I am very careful when buying
from a private party and/or swap meets.
I am in favour of a SLOW death penalty for thieves of musical
instruments....they're so personal!
DonH
|
1327.14 | Think pragmatically | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Sat Jun 03 1989 17:25 | 115 |
| re: Note 1327.12 by CSC32::G_HOUSE
> >And don't think "well, I'll just tell them I didn't make any money
> >with it". Pragmatically, *THEY* don't have to prove that you didn't.
> >What really happens is that they say it's business equipment and
> >simply don't pay you, and then YOU have to sue them.
> What if that is the honest truth? Are you saying they will still try
> this?
I can't tell you what YOUR insurance agency is going to try.
I'm suggesting to you that a common scenario is that if they have
any reason to doubt that the equipment is used for professional
purposes (which, you should understand, is not limited to monetary
compensation), they might choose to not pay your claim and let
you sue them for it. Intuitively, I would think this is a kind
of fraud that insurance companies have to fight all the time.
> ...is my
> insurance company, who assured me that my musical instruments were
> covered a couple of years ago when I bought my homeowners policy, going
> to try and deny my claim on the grounds that I am a professional
> musician? Simply because of the quality and quantity of musical
> equipment which I choose to own?
As I said, I can imagine them "assuring you" on the basis of some
presumption that wasn't true. I will tell you that verbal assurances
are worth only the paper they are written on (i.e. zilch). I'll
state it directly: verbal assurances don't mean a thing. The
"agreement" you have with your insurance company is whatever is
written into your policy. Nothing more. Nothing less.
> Simply because of the quality and quantity of musical
> equipment which I choose to own?
Insurance claims adjusters are regular people, more often non-musicians
than not. They may not appreciate the depths of spending that this
hobby/passion of ours brings us to.
Let's imagine a scenario: you're an insurance adjuster. I file a claim
for a loss on $20,000 worth of printing equpiment stolen from my
basement. I tell you that I am not a professional printer. You
gonna believe that?
I think it's quite reasonable, or at least within the realm of
reasonable expectation, for an adjuster to presume that some guy
with thousands and thousands of dollars of musical equipment is
a pro.
We are speaking PRAGMATICALLY here. I don't know what any particular
insurance company will do. I don't even know what MY insurance company
will do. So I observe what insurance companies have done to OTHER
folks and I try to cover all those bases.
That's the most important thing I can recommend: cover as many bases
as possible:
o Make the policy as iron-clad as possible
o Itemize all your equipment:
+ List it
+ Maintain the serial numbers
+ Retain the sales receipts
+ photograph it, preferably against a background that
establishes that it yours (like make it clear that
the photo was taken in YOUR house, or even get in the
picture yourself)
I have even resorted to having my cats in the pictures
I take.
+ Retain a copy of whatever you give the insurance company
It might not be a bad idea to get their agent to sign your
copy.
> I am not a professional musician (you could easily tell this by hearing
> me play). I have never made a red cent playing music.
As I said, money isn't the only form of compensation.
> Do I have to
> *prove* this to someone to get an insurance claim paid?
No, but this is an example of where you have to be pragmatic.
I think (but am not sure) that they have to prove that you aren't.
However, they can say that you are a pro, not pay the claim, and then
YOU would have to sue them. I think even the most reputable companies
might do this if there were enough indications (short of actual proof
of compensation) that you were a pro. Having a ridiculous amount
of equipment seems a very good indication.
> Now THAT sounds unfair to me! Why should I have to buy additional
> insurance just so my insurance company won't have to pay my valid claim
> (should I ever have one)?
This one of those "that's life" type answers.
Even if they are reputable, they know that there are tons of people
out there attempting to make false claims. If they have good reason
to believe a claim is false, they won't pay it. If they did, they
couldn't be competitive because they'd pay a higher price for fraud
then their competitors, and eventually fraudulent types would be
ATTRACTED to their company because they know they can get away with
it.
Like I said. Cover as many bases as possible, and get REAL
information. You should interpret what I tell you as nothing
more than MY impressions of how this work, not as fact.
db
|
1327.15 | Are my basses covered? ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Sat Jun 03 1989 17:32 | 26 |
| > Incidentally, I *did* tell them that I had a lot of expensive
> instruments and asked repeatedly if they were covered...)
Umm, I don't know if this applies here, but it reminds me of something
I should mention.
Most homeowner policies exclude various kinds of items that, for
example, appreciate in value. Usually you have to declare all
jewel and often stuff like collectables, valuable antiques, etc.
aren't covered for anything more than purchase value.
This means that if you were so fortunate as to have picked up
a 57 Strat for $25 at a yard sale, you probably won't get more
than $25 for it on a claim without doing something special (a rider
of some kind, or at least declaring it).
I could imagine that the insurance agent told you that "expensive
equipment" is covered in good conscience if he didn't know that what
you were talking about was, say, a vintage instrument.
Unfortunately, the nitty gritties of insurance aren't easy for us
laymen to understand. And we can't even always ask the right questions
to find out. So what do you do? Like I say, cover as many bases as
you can.
db
|
1327.16 | Thanks! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | No, you're not there... | Mon Jun 05 1989 00:19 | 55 |
| Thanks Dave, I appreciate your comments and cautions. Like Jeff said,
it's best to keep your rear covered at all times. I just had a couple
of comments.
re: .14
>Like I said. Cover as many bases as possible, and get REAL
>information.
You make a very good point. A verbal agreement is pretty much
worthless these days. I will check back with them on this matter,
especially since the policy has changed companies since I acquired it.
re: .15
>I could imagine that the insurance agent told you that "expensive
>equipment" is covered in good conscience if he didn't know that what
>you were talking about was, say, a vintage instrument.
In my particular case, I don't have any vintage instruments. I could
understand how that would complicate things though. I'm just
interested in playing, not collecting. My late 70s Strat is just as
good, for my purposes, as a '57. I use the word "expensive" more in
laymans terms. Most people would consider buying a $700 Charvel
electric guitar extravagant. (obviously this is an incredible bargain
compared to what Commusic types have to spend for *their* toys... 8^)
>Unfortunately, the nitty gritties of insurance aren't easy for us
>laymen to understand. And we can't even always ask the right questions
>to find out. So what do you do? Like I say, cover as many bases as
>you can.
Isn't that the truth! I find insurance to be one of the more
confusing businesses around. It doesn't seem to follow the rules of
basic logic or common sense sometimes.
I guess what really angers me about the matter is that, because of the
nature of my hobby, I have to buy extra insurance to cover my
instruments and equipment, when it is already covered by my regular
policy, simply because 1) I choose to pursue a relatively expensive
hobby, one which can also be used as a career, 2) because a lot of
*other* people choose to file claims which they are not legitimately
entitled to, and because I choose to own high quality (sometimes
expensive) equipment.
Like I said before, if I am not legitimately entitled to coverage for
my musical equipment under my policy, I definately WANT to purchase the
additional coverage, however if I *AM* entitled to coverage under my
policy, I don't think that I should be penalized because of the type of
equipment I choose to own. (Yeah, I know...the real world isn't fair.
I *try* not to be so cynical, when I can avoid it. I have enough of a
problem with that anyway...).
Greg
|
1327.17 | Replacement value vs. depreciated value | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Mon Jun 05 1989 09:34 | 48 |
| re: <<< Note 1327.16 by CSC32::G_HOUSE "No, you're not there..." >>>
Over the weekend I thought of another point that at least some folks
might not be aware of: depreciated value vs. replacement value.
Even if your stuff is "covered" what does that mean in terms of
what you would recover in the event of a loss.
The vast majority of policies only give you depreciated value of
the items that you loss.
For example, you have a non-vintage guitar, say a 1980 BC Rich
that you paid $900 for in 1980. It's stolen/burnt/etc. Chances
are you will not get anything near $900 for it - even though that
same guitar might go for $1400 today.
The company will probably calculate its value based on some standard
depreciation table. There is a fairly good chance that you won't
get anything comparable to a 1980 BC Rich with what you get for
your claim. The liklihood of getting enough to get something
equivalent decreases with each year due to the depreciation.
So what good is the insurance then? That's a question you need
to ask yourself.
However, you can get a policy that calls for "replacement value"
instead of depreciated value. What that's intended to means is
that they will pay you whatever it takes (with certain exceptions)
to replace your BC Rich with something "equivalent" (the quotes
are deliberate).
Clearly there's room for loopholes in so-called "replacement value"
policies. I think it's important to read the policy (which are
almost as readable as Dante's "Inferno" but not quite), and pay
particular attention to how "replacement value" is defined.
While each person should decide for himself, I came to the conclusion
that replacement value was necessary for me. I felt that without
it, the insurance on my stuff was just about worthless as it wouldn't
allow me to recover what I had lost.
I have often heard of stories where people get ripped-off by theives,
and then suffer great anguish when they get "ripped off" a 2nd time
by the insurance company (i.e., they feel the settlement on the claim
isn't what the stuff was worth even though it's consistent with what
the policy calls for.)
db
|
1327.18 | The key word is "pragmatic" | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Mon Jun 05 1989 09:43 | 33 |
| > Like I said before, if I am not legitimately entitled to coverage for
> my musical equipment under my policy, I definately WANT to purchase the
> additional coverage, however if I *AM* entitled to coverage under my
> policy, I don't think that I should be penalized because of the type of
> equipment I choose to own. (Yeah, I know...the real world isn't fair.
> I *try* not to be so cynical, when I can avoid it. I have enough of a
> problem with that anyway...).
Well, I don't look on it as being "cynical".
But I would consider it "unpragmatic" to leave yourself uncovered
based on some notion of principle.
But, I wouldn't ever dare to make a recommendation in your situation. It
might well be that your insurance company wouldn't give you any
trouble. I just want you to be aware of the risk you take by not
getting it.
It's up to you to figure out the "odds" and decide what to do.
db
p.s. BTW, *I* am also not making money with my stuff (not that I
wouldn't like to or that I'm not trying). But I bought the
Inland Marine rider cause $76 to give me piece of mind on
what might be a six figure investment seemed worth it.
It also wasn't clear from my reading of the policy that even just
advertising that I wanted to be in a gigging money-making band
might brand me as a "pro".
But don't misconstrue me telling you this as a "recommendation".
|
1327.19 | From experience | TIDES::JMINVILLE | To see her in that sweater... | Mon Jun 05 1989 18:07 | 20 |
| So, it seems pretty clear that we should all make sure our stuff
is covered (under any circumstances). The other important issue
hasn't been discussed much and that is: Buying stolen merchandise.
When I was a young pup of 19, my parents' house was broken into.
My room was hit the hardest (kinda makes sense, especially if the
thief was around my age). Everything of value was taken including
a 1963 Fender Jaguar that I had completely re-done and a vintage
Ampeg amplifier (only a 1x12" combo, but it had the neat vinyl covering
with the little squares). Also taken was a gold pocket watch that
my grandfather had given me and miscellaneous stuff of sentimental
value.
Up until that break-in I had never felt strongly one way, or the
other, about buying stolen goods. That one incident caused me to
develop very strong feelings about buying stolen property. If you
buy "hot" stuff, you're reinforcing the behavior of thieves. So,
boycott stolen goods!!
joe.
|
1327.20 | Town policy | ANT::JACQUES | | Thu Jun 08 1989 12:05 | 14 |
| I was in Daddys (Shrewsbury) the other night shopping for a price
on a Boss TU12 tuner. They had a used one that just came in that
they will sell me for 1/2 the price of a new one. According to the
saleman, they must hold all used equipment for a minimum of 30 days
due to a bylaw enforced by the town of Shrewsbury. During this 30
day period, the serial numbers are checked against police records.
This tuner will not be available until June 24, but I plan to give
them a deposit tonight so that they will hold it for me until then.
The ironic part is that a lot of small items are not even serialized.
As far as I know Boss effects, and tuners are not.
Mark
|
1327.21 | to kill a thief | MPGS::RJPELLETIER | only the lonley | Tue May 15 1990 03:49 | 35 |
| Hi All,
My oldest son of 19 years whom has been playing drums since he
was 8 years has just this past friday had his entire set of drums
stolen out of there pratice studio. The studio is in Leominster
Mass. His Drum set is a double bass Ludwig set and the color is
Red. It is valued at $5,000 dollars, (I signed for the loan) Gawd
this is awfull. Its 1 and 1/2 years old and had many symbols and stands.
Over all its I believe its an 11 piece set not including the hardware
He is heart broken.
Along with that, the punks that stoled the set trashed one of the
guitars, a Cramer I believe and along with that they drove a
screwdrive through all of the amps, 2 Marshall stacks and a 300 watt
peavey bass as well as all of there PA columns. This Pa set up that was
trashed was worth $13,000 dollars.
My Son and his fellow band members were real serious about making it
big time and have spent a lot over the past couple of years as you
can see. As per their informmation for the police report, total
estimated damage $17,000...
Who ever did this knew what they were after since the door to enter
the building as well as the door into there studio were both alarmed.
Now get this, the broke a whole into the fucking wall with a crow
bar to get in. SOunds to me like it could be a rival band.
If anyone of you out there in our area hear of any hot drum sets or
rumors of someone having one Please let me know.
Thanks all.
Roger (Rj)
|
1327.22 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Tue May 15 1990 10:17 | 8 |
| Man, that is terrible. I hope they catch the little varmints and hang 'em
by their gnads... More importantly, I hope your son gets his stuff back.
Please tell me the stuff or the place was insured...
?
jc
|
1327.23 | | PELKEY::PELKEY | Love them Killer B's | Tue May 15 1990 12:01 | 11 |
| Geesh! I live in Leominster !!!
Where was this studio ? If it's where I'm thinking it is...
What bunhc of useless trash of a scum-sucking pigs !
If it's a rival band, then they just broke an age old code of ethics.
My guess is they were not musicians.
|
1327.24 | Cut their hands off!! | BSS::COLLUM | Oscar's only ostrich oiled an orange owl today | Tue May 15 1990 12:43 | 6 |
| You know, in Arabia, they still cut people's hands off for that kind of
sh*t.
I personally think it suits the scum!
Will
|
1327.25 | Was it insured? | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Claimin' | Tue May 15 1990 13:08 | 8 |
| Really sorry to hear that RJ. This kind of stuff really sucks!
I can't beleive there are people out there that have so LITTLE disregard
for anyone else on this earth.
>8(
Greg
|
1327.26 | | SMURF::LAMBERT | Putting out fires with gasoline | Tue May 15 1990 17:14 | 10 |
| Geez Roger, this s*cks. Really sorry to hear about it.
It's one level of scum-suckyness to steal someone else's equipment.
It's about 3 orders of magnitude worse just to wantonly destroy it.
I hope they find whoever did it, or better yet, if you and Steve
find 'em.
Somewhat shocked,
-- Sam
|
1327.27 | building insurance only | MPGS::RJPELLETIER | only the lonley | Wed May 16 1990 01:09 | 8 |
| The equipment itself was not insured, there just youngsters working
and trying to make ends meet. The building however was insured. I'm
not sure what this will get them but hopefully at least a restart.
Things like this have always really pissed me off. I just can't
understand how people can do this.
rj
|
1327.28 | A rival band? | DR::BLINN | Yesterday is a cancelled check | Wed May 16 1990 13:35 | 7 |
| It's interesting that you think it might have been a rival band.
I think it might have been junkies. Perhaps you can follow up
from time to time on the status of the police investigation, and
let us know if the culprits are ever brought to justice (or at
least caught, charged, and tried).
Tom
|
1327.29 | | PNO::HEISER | give me 7 pillars of wisdom | Wed May 16 1990 15:30 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 1327.28 by DR::BLINN "Yesterday is a cancelled check" >>>
> It's interesting that you think it might have been a rival band.
> I think it might have been junkies. Perhaps you can follow up
Tom, that hit close to home. Before we started locking up our mics
at our church, we had 3 stolen. It turned out that someone in the
church had a drug problem and stole them to support it.
Fortunately, the person is in rehab now and trying to get their feet on
the ground.
Mike
|
1327.30 | ? | MPGS::RJPELLETIER | only the lonley | Thu May 17 1990 04:17 | 30 |
|
The reason I had mentioned the rivel band is that two nights before
the gear was stolen they had a couple uninvited visitor while
praticing whom somehow got into the building. The alarm was off
while they where there but the main entrance door was locked.
These 2 visitors were from another band who had a run in once
before with there now current Bassist and Lead guitarist. They
told them to get the hell out and 2 days later the incedent
happened. I just found out today that one of these two has been
picked up and is being prosecuted for the uninvited entrance on
breaking an entering charges. What the police believe since this
person has been busted for this kind of thing before, is that if
he diddn't do it he might know who did and or have been a part of
it to begin with. The entry was illeagal anyway so they think that
if they put enough pressure on him that he might scream.
As a rule I don't believe that musicians do this sort of thing but
ALL rules are subject to be broken. A couple of you mentioned that
its more likely to be Junkies, maybe they are, that is junkiemusicians.
Needless to say, I don't care who they are. I just would like to see
my son get his Drums back and hopefull some how the rest of the other
members of the band get something for their losses and last but not
least.
Hang the little bastards that did it and put them away so they can't
do it again. I myself have no mercey for this kind of person(s)...
rj
|
1327.31 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | E=mc� - the formula for beer bubbles ! | Thu May 17 1990 07:45 | 7 |
|
REAL musicians don't do this sort of thing. Good
luck and I hope they find the culprits !
Matt
(P.S. - Real Musicians are not poseurs)
|
1327.32 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Thu May 17 1990 08:08 | 12 |
| I think those of us that have been around the block a few times have a
different respect for each other's gear than the younger crowd does
today. From what I've seen, mosy young kids into music today have had
their gear bought for them - I had to buy ALL of my gear when I started
in 1973 .... so I can appreciate what it takes to get it. I know some
young kids that wouldn't rip off their friends gear, but would bag a
strangers stuff in a minute ! That's why I spend the extra time and
pack up everything remotely theivable after soundchecks and after gigs.
I also keep a pretty watchful eye during set breaks - microphones have
legs !
Scary
|
1327.33 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | E=mc� - the formula for beer bubbles ! | Thu May 17 1990 09:00 | 23 |
|
Very good point Scary. My brother and I loaned
our equipment to a Methodist Music camp one year
and he lost two stomp boxes out of the deal.
Since then, we don't loan ANYTHING out. (That's
also when the fuse holder on my SUNN Bass head
got destroyed.) They pleaded ignorance to any
problems or missing gear, and THESE were people
we KNEW ! We learned out lesson the HARD way,
but it was nothing like what happened with RJ's
son.
When I play somewhere, I take all my gear home
with me. It's easy to trust the gear at
someone you play withs home, but you also have to
remember that they have people that come over
too, therefore increasing your risk of gear
disappearing.
1973 ?!?!?!? I won't say it, I WON'T say it !
:^) heh heh heh (just kiddin' Scary)
Matt
|
1327.34 | | WEFXEM::COTE | What if someone sees us? Awwwwkk! | Thu May 17 1990 09:14 | 19 |
| I've done what I can to help prevent my stuff from getting ripped
off. Nothing will prevent it entirely, but...
My name is painted on the back of my amp in BIG letters. It's also
scratched in various places inside both the cabinet and the head.
My guitar case has my name painted on it.
My bass has my name burnt into the underside of the pickguard. I've
never been one to buy and sell equipment so this type of "destruction"
doesn't bother me.
I've customized my synths so that my name comes up on the LCD when
I turn them on.
...and of course, both my insurance company and I have a complete
list of hardware and serial numbers.
Edd
|
1327.35 | Yeah, me too.. | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | West down Ventura boulevard... | Thu May 17 1990 10:27 | 9 |
|
yeah, RJ, what these guys said... really sorry to hear about your
son's loss of equipment to a bunch of scum-bags (scumbag-ettes?). I'll
pass the word, in case any of it shows up this far north.
Regards, good luck,
Steve
|
1327.36 | a story, a motto, a suggestion.. | PELKEY::PELKEY | Love them Killer B's | Thu May 17 1990 13:23 | 77 |
| related story:
Some years ago,, (i'd have to say 10+) I was in a band where we were
the renters of a building that was no longer used by the company
that owned it (At the time, it was Hunters Sports Wear in Fitchburg, above
the unemployment office..)
Well anyhow, we were the sole renters of the building.. Add to that, Wayne
was good friends with one of Fitchburgs Police Officers, (It wasn't
an ungaurded occasion to hear a knock at the door, only to open the
door and enter two uniformed officers,, just to say hi,, believe it
or not, that made us feel good Since we weren't the type of guys who did the
chemical substance route... that wasn't problem for anyone, rather a welcomed
event...) The building aas alarmed and watched close. Given Hunters, and
the unemployment office shared the same building,,, that was to be expected.
Not to mention our room was not only furnished with sofas and chairs, it was
also air conditioned, all included in our rent.. (litteraly, one of the best
setups around..) plus it would have taken a fork lift to break the door down..
A few years go by and Hunters moves to a new location in Leomsinter off
Route 12. Some one looking for warehouse storage bought the property
when Hunters Co. put it up for sale. (minus the unemployement office.)
The new owner then started to sublent the entire building we were in to bands.
(There was easy, 8 large areas plus ours on the first floor..) not to mention
removed the alarms, not wanting to pay the price...
This is when the trouble began. Since our rehersals were just that (rehersals)
the only people there was us.. When the new owner opened the flood gates,
they're would be nights when the place was full. Friends and groupies
were all over the palce. We started to lock our door once we got in,
cuz many where the times when people (total strangers) would just barge in,
and try and hang out.. only to be ejected by us within 5 seconds of getting
in... They probably thought we were assholes, but with the only entrance
to our studio being a 3 inch sheet metal door on a brick frame, we
didn't care. The cops did how ever, and there was more and more incidents
upstairs in the other rooms... AT this time, we began to think we'd
worn out our welcome, and considered getting out of there before something
happened..
One night, one of the bands up stairs got hit, and hit bad. Evidently the
guitar players liked the seemed security of their space, and like the fact
that it was in an industrial section, so they could go there anytime,
day or night, make as much noise as they liked, and noone ever cared. Given
that, they left their guitars there. (BIG MISTAKE) They lost not only
their Mics, power-heads, and effects pedals, but add to that, their guitars.
(According to one of the guys, a few nice expensive babies to boot.)
No insurance... we walk up the to the studios to find out what happended, and
was greated by the drummer and one of the guitar players, with loaded shotguns,
intent on murding the first "M.F." they dind't recognize.. lucky for
us, they knew who we were...
Bottom line,, the people they brought into to let them groove to the
band, and party, were most likely the scum-sucking-peices-of-trash that
broke in. The thieves new where everything was, and what was hot and what
wasn't.. Some friends.. soon after, we were out of there,,
Suggestion:
And, that's where I'd look to first if I was one of the kids who just
got ripped off.. Who do they allow into their space ? who of them do
they know the least ? I'd start thinking about that, and asking questions.
Chance are better than not, it's an inside job.
Motto:
Typically, musicians are like pigeons. They'll stick together on this stuff.
(at least the ones worth their salt...)
They might not like you, or the stuff you play, or respect your talents,
but most know what it's like to eye a les paul, a strat, a marshall amp,,
for years, until you can afford it,, those guys wont do what they don't
want done to them.. (Most times..)
the ones who do, as far as I'm concerned, suck.
Lifes a hard road full of mean people... it stinks.. it's reality..
|
1327.37 | | FREEBE::REAUME | Oh no, not the torture rack! | Fri May 18 1990 11:00 | 10 |
| And I as well hope justice is served and some gear can be recovered.
It's a shame that in many incidents like this the scum that do this
get off light.
And I'll have to agree with the above. In most cases it's not
a total stranger that does this and the thieves know what they are
after.
Record serials numbers, mark your gear if possible, know who you
let in to your practice (and hope they don't have a drug habit!),
let the local music stores know what happened, and in general
just be cautious. Things like this shouldn't happen, but ...
|
1327.38 | Uk plumbers/drummers justice system | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Fri May 18 1990 12:06 | 30 |
|
This is sort of related....
My mate (drummer in our band) is a frelance contracting plumber
(heating & ventilating stuff).
He was working on a big job in London with a load of other guys
like himself just hired in to do the job. After a while it became
apparent that someone was stealing tools from their toolkits. Now I
guess it's the same in the States as over here proffessional tools are
expensive & it takes a while to build a comprhensive toolkit for a
trade like plumbers.
Well Moke (my mate) and a few other victims did a bit of detective
work and eventually confronted the suspect & he admitted he was guilty.
They broke his fingers on both hands with a hammer!
When Moke told me this I was a bit shocked & said I thought it was
a bit rough justice (thinking about how I'd feel if I could'nt play for
6-8 weeks or so), he just looked at me dead stern & said "stealing a
mans tools is stealing his living". Guess he's right.
Add me to the list of sorry people here...hope they get whats
comming to them (the thieves that is). If you like you can send them
to Moke....he'll know what size hammer to use (7lb lump sounds about
right to me)
Cheers
Pete.
|
1327.39 | Go visit an insurance Co. | 3625::OLOUGHLIN | The fun begins at 80! | Fri May 18 1990 13:42 | 25 |
|
Don't get me wrong here, I feel bad about what happened, but...
If it's *your* stuff than *you* had better protect it. This crap
happens all the time. Check out the note about that fire in, what was
it, Chicago? Take it home, or have it insured to the max.
While at work my car was "hit'n'run". The cops came by and I told
them I knew the color of the car and where they worked. Run a DMV on
the workers, get the color of their cars, go visit the ones who match
and 99.9% chance you would arrest someone. He told me that if he took
that much time on a little hit and run, ($2K damage) the his capt.
would have a fit. So why am I saying this? The cops are going to do
*NOTHING* for you.
If you are lucky enough to catch the ____, give them a plumbers
hand.
Rick.
PS: I will do my best to keep and eye and ear out.
|
1327.40 | | VAXWRK::SAKELARIS | | Fri May 18 1990 14:24 | 4 |
| yeah, and know why the sob's won't do anything? Cause they're too busy
harrassing the public with their damned speeding traps - the lizards!
"sakman" (who has a court date next week to protest a ticket!)
|
1327.41 | These days, insurance is NOT optional | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | This is your brain on Unix | Mon May 21 1990 14:21 | 13 |
| Stories like this are like a punch to the gut. It's awful.
On the general area of insurance, I think the sad truth is that
these days it's simply necessary unless you can stand to lose all
your equipment.
I take the attitude that if I can't afford to insure it, I can't
afford it. I view insurance as part of the cost of the instrument.
I know that if my stuff was stolen, and I didn't get money to replace
it, it would be much worse than never having had it at all.
db
|
1327.42 | some good news | MPGS::RJPELLETIER | only the lonley | Mon May 21 1990 20:46 | 22 |
| I want to thank you all for the eyes and ears and all of your concerns
with this theft shit. I also agree with just about all that is being
said about the non'friends that may have entered being the type that
would steel there gear. I know and have met most of Wayne's friends and
just could not imagine them doing that to him.
I also agree that the cops will probably do shit to get this resolved,
knowing full well that there to busy ticketing to cover up the states
errors. If they do, or ever catch them I like Pete's idea about sending
them to london to visit Moke..Yea!!!
Well My son stopped by yesterday to let me know that the building
insurance will be giving him $3'000 for his loss. I guess thats better
than nothing..Its s good restart.
What is weird about the law though that I don't understand very much is
that this building is a judicial building owned by the court. So why
are the cops sitting back.
Anyway, Wayne's happy to be getting back at least the three grand...
rj
|