[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | GUITARnotes - Where Every Note has Emotion |
Notice: | Discussion of the finer stringed instruments |
Moderator: | KDX200::COOPER |
|
Created: | Thu Aug 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3280 |
Total number of notes: | 61432 |
1301.0. "The Gibson L-5S" by MOSAIC::WEBER () Tue May 09 1989 17:04
In 1971, Gibson introduced a new solidbody guitar. Looking something
like a flashy Les Paul, priced higher than any other solidbody
at the time, the L-5S was an attempt by Gibson to capture an emerging
market for upscale instruments with a unique slant.
In 1965, the idea of a "jazz" solid would have been laughable. The
archtop sound of Wes, Kenny and Barney defined jazz guitar. By
the late 60's, players like Larry Coryell, Jerry Hahn and Mike
Bloomfield had intermixed jazz and rock sounds quite thoroughly.
Gibson's own Les Paul guitar had originally been designed for jazz
and blues playing, but in the '60's had become firmly entrenched
with a rock image, so Gibson decided to add "jazz" features to a
new instrument.
The body is 16.5" x 13.5" x 1". This is somewhat wider and shorter
than an LP, and half as deep at the rims. The front of the body
is highly arched and the back has a moderate arch. Despite its
thinness, the all-maple body makes it quite heavy. Top and back
are of two or three piece book-leafed, solid matched maple, often
stunningly curly: the best of these will put a '59 "Burst to shame.
Since the"rims" are really the edges of the top and back, these
have matching curl.
The control access panel on the back is a cut-out piece of the back
wood, inset and held in with gold-plated screws. This is quite thick
and tightly fitted so that removing it is often difficult and likely
to leave scars in the finish, but it is a lot prettier than the
usual plastic plate.
The neck is laminated, usually very curly, maple with an ebony
fretboard. Inlay matches the L-5 namesake, with an abalone flowerpot
and Gibson logo on the headstock, and abalone block position markers.
The scale length differs from the L-5 by being 24.75", like a Les
Paul. Neck width has been uniform at 1-11/16" at the nut and 2-1/16"
at the 12th fret. Early models tended to have deep, round necks
similar to those on a '50's L-5C, but from the mid-'70's had a flatter,
shallower, extremely comfortable profile. The neck joins the body
at the 17th fret, which, coupled with the thin body and deep cutaway,
produces outstanding upper fret access for such a conventional-looking
guitar. The fretboard extension past the neck joint is raised well
above the body on solid wood, unlike the L-5 archtop, which has
an unsupported end. The neck ends in the traditional L-5 point.
Virtually all of these guitars have volutes and many of these are
much larger than those typically found on an LP. I have a 1981 model
from the last production lot and it is the only one without a volute
that I've ever seen.
Body, headstock and neck binding are identical to that of the L-5.
The body side binding is the same width as L-5 binding, making the
sides appear to be wall-to-wall binding, especially in the cutaway.
The complete absence of a "fingerrest" (pickguard) is unusual for
a Gibson, and is about the only design flaw IMO, though the body
shape would require an extremely small one.
The original version of the L-5S used two low impedance stacked
humbuckers identical to those on the LP Recording, Professional,
and Personal, but with standard Gibson controls (2 tones, 2 volume,
toggle). The pickups were slanted and gold-plated. Since the lo-z
pickups were cased in plastic, when the gold wears off the result
is rather unattractive. I've already discussed the lo-z fiasco in
another note, but needless to say the squeaky-clean sound of these
was not what jazz (or any other) guitarists were looking for, and
by 1975 standard "Super" humbuckers were used.
The bridge is a "wide-travel" (Schaller) TOM and the original tailpiece
was an L-5 style trapeze, cut down to fit the narrow rim. This
tailpiece helped contribute to the "jazz" sound. Tuners matched
whatever was being used on Gibson's carved tops (Kluson Sealfasts,
followed by Schallers and finally "Cranks"). In 1978 the tailpiece
was changed to a TP-6. Knobs were top hats and the output jack was
face-mounted, since the rims were too thin for a standard jack.
Originally, the only finish offered was cherry sunburst, but eventually
antique sunburst, fireburst, natural, antique natural and ebony
were also available. Like the L-5, sunburst models had sunburst
sides, backs and necks .
While not wildly popular, these guitars sold steadily throughout
the '70's, and were used by a diverse range of players: Kerry Livgren,
Paul Simon, Jorma Kaukonen, Pat Martino, Billy Butler, and both
of the Davies brothers are a few of the guitarists who used these
regularly on stage. The TP-6 models are extremely flexible guitars
which combine the muscle of a Les Paul with the bite of an SG, while
the L-5 tailpiece models have a warmer sound with less sustain.
The only identification of the model numbers on these guitars is
on the truss-rod cover and trapeze tailpiece. In typical Gibson
fashion , standard L-5 parts are used, so these guitars were often
mis-identified as a "Custom L-5 ". They are also sometimes confused
with the L-6S, which has a similar body shape, but is a much cheaper
and less desirable model.
When production ceased in 1981, the discounted selling price was
around $1000 new, and until recently, the price for a really nice
one was in the $800-$1000 range. Like many other Gibsons, prices
have been rising and have gone as high as $1750, with average ones
around $1000. Condition is extremely important, as is the model
type: those with humbuckers and L-5 tailpiece have been the most
expensive, followed by the TP-6 models, with the lo-z models a distant
third. Personally, I prefer the TP-6 models from a players point
of view, but the ones with the L-5 tailpiece are the most attractive.
These are greatly underrated guitars that combine outstanding sound
and playability with unusually sumptuous trim for a solidbody,
and are well worth considering as an alternative to another boring
Les Paul. ((((:-))))
Danny W.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1301.1 | Never cease to amaze me !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Mon May 15 1989 10:34 | 18 |
| Interesting note. I have always found these guitars very striking.
Every time I read one of your notes, I can't help but wondering
just how many guitars you own.
The ones I remember you mentioning include
2 ES355's
Ovations solidbody
Les Paul Recording Bass
Heritage archtop
Les Paul equipped with Roland synth
Care to enlighten us as to the rest of your collection ??
Mark
|
1301.2 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Merry Merry, Joy Joy | Wed Dec 08 1993 12:36 | 4 |
| Danny, what's the difference between an L-5S and an L-6S? (I've never
seen an L-5S; are they even similar?) Thanks.
Dave
|
1301.3 | touche! | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Wed Dec 08 1993 12:41 | 5 |
| >> what's the difference between an L-5S and an L-6S?
that would be L-1S or in this case 20%!
:)
|
1301.4 | no relation | RAINBO::WEBER | | Wed Dec 08 1993 14:16 | 6 |
| There's little relationship between the L-6S and the L-5S except a
vaguely similar body shape. The L-6S has an uncarved body,
no binding, dot inlay, different electronics, different headstock and
almost no value.
Danny W.
|
1301.5 | and where are those L5-S's anyway? | RICKS::CALCAGNI | kant sheck dees bluze | Wed Dec 08 1993 14:56 | 5 |
| I regularly comb vintage lists, mags and shops and I can't remember the
last time I saw an L5-S. Are people hoarding these? Are they so good
no one wants to sell?
/rick
|
1301.6 | They may be hoarding them | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Merry Merry, Joy Joy | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:06 | 6 |
| Thanks, Danny. Rick, my guitar teacher has an L-5S, and he likes it
(as much as he likes anything - he's Mr. Cynical). But I think he's
keeping it because its value seems to increase steadily; in other
words, it's an investment rather than a player.
Dave
|
1301.7 | re: .5 | RANGER::WEBER | | Fri Dec 10 1993 06:37 | 13 |
| I see L-5S's for sale every few months or so. Gruhn has had several
this year, and some of the other dealers I regularly talk with have had
one.
Most of the ones I come across are from private parties (i.e.:
collectors). These guitars are enough off the beaten track that many
dealers don't know what to do with them.
Prices have been up somewhat: it's hard to find a decent one below
$1800 and I've seen them priced up to $2500 for one with humbuckers and
an L-5 tailpiece.
Danny W,
|
1301.8 | a bunch of 'em | RANGER::WEBER | | Thu Aug 04 1994 15:23 | 4 |
| Continuing the "where can I buy one" thread, Gruhn has 4 (!!) blonde
and one sunburst L-5S in his current list. Prices run 2-3kbucks.
Danny W.
|
1301.9 | take your pick | RICKS::CALCAGNI | This is a dream band: no guitars | Fri Aug 05 1994 13:23 | 4 |
| I gave Gruhn a call. The Cherry Sunburst is a low impedance model
(bummer). The Blondes (only 3 left) are all humbucker/TP-6, all around
$3k.
|