T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1293.1 | Volume Does Not = Presence | SPGOGO::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Wed May 03 1989 14:16 | 32 |
|
Im told if tons of volume isnt required the 75w simul class
with evm speaker is the one to go for for best tone - is this
true???
<<<<<<<<You can get "volume" out of just about any amp that is of decent
quality. (Especially the Boogie you mentioned.
However, lots of volume does not equal lots of "presence"
and it's the presence of your sound that (in my opinion) should be of
paramount importance to you. Here's my simple rule - presence is
directly proportional to the amount of cubic feet of air that you move
with your speaker(s). Turning up to eleven will not buy you anything
but volume. It's that combination of volume and presence that makes
for a respectable sound.
In a 3-piece environment would I be missing some 'fullness'
with only one 12inch speaker in the Mesa Boogie.
<<<<<<<<Fullness is another term for presence. The "big"/"full" sound is
achieved by moving more air (not by cranking the volume). But if
you're into quiet really low volume gigs, a single speaker amp should
do you just fine. And be advised that the Boogie amps with one 12"
speaker do a fine job of providing some presence/fullness, but not
enough for me - (personal opinion). Other lesser quality amps don't
even come close to the strength of a Boogie with a 200/400 watt EV.
Finally, are they what they're cracked up to be (for the money)?
<<<<<<<<YES - absolutely, but I'm bias, cause I own a Mesa Bass 400 and the
lead guitarist in my band (he can be reached at HAVOC::DESROCHERS -
you should probably get his opinion too) has a Mesa guitar amp and
while I respect the sound he achieves, I am routinely trying to get
him to add another cab.
<<<<<<<<<<Dan
|
1293.2 | my 2 cents worth | SQUID::GOODWIN | I've been drinkin' Gordons Gin | Wed May 03 1989 14:45 | 31 |
| . No idea where they're sold in the U.K. However, Mesa Boogie
does sell direct retail. I've been told that their
dealers actually have to pay list price, and therefore
they normally add a premium to the price for their profit.
. The 75 watt Mark III simulclass is *the* boogie of choice.
If you have a gig at Madison Square Garden, you might
go for the Coliseum simulclass, but otherwise 75 watts
is plenty enough to go deaf on.
. Speaker is a matter of taste. Personally I don't care for the
tone of the EVM. If it were me, I'd choose the 75 watt
head, and run it through a 4x12 celestion loaded cab.
There is less 'fullness' with a 1x12 configuration.
. The wood cab isn't pine, its oiled hardwood. It's only cosmetic.
. Lastly, IMO, they are *not* what they're cracked up to be.
They are great sounding amps, and I've got friends who
swear by them and wouldn't play through anything else.
But even they admit that Boogies can be tempermental,
and are not the most road-worthy amps. I came very
close to buying one, but in the end I simply could
not justify the expenditure. I remain happy with
my trusty fender :-). There are many amplifier
options between peavey on the low end and boogie
at the top.
Good luck!
Steve
|
1293.3 | THE BEST !!! | CASV01::PELLERIN | | Wed May 03 1989 15:41 | 35 |
| Well, you have now perked my interest. I am on my 6th Boogie. I
currently own two... 1) A colleseum simul-class (150w) and a Caliber
.50 (which I use for practice and to occasionally slave the power
amp section to run stereo).
I *LOVE* these amps. I don't care to use anything else, and IMO
they are worth every penny.
I run the 150w monster (it's 200w if you use all 6L6's) pretty loud,
and I'll say this... As this amp gets louder, it continues to sound
great, as opposed to say Fender Concerts (and others) I've played
that as you turn them up they loose the sweetness and begin to sound
just LOUD.
I HAVE owned a 75w Simul-Class model (it burned in a fire at a Club
I was playing at - I watched it burn) and it's a GREAT amp - and
all most folks will ever need. The only difference between that
and my colleseum is that the colleseum has just that much more of
everything that makes a Boogie what it is.
FYI - I believe in this product, and the company that stands behind
it. They still custom-make and test every amp - and they are superior
quality musical instruments. Try to deal with Fender if your Concert
(or whatever) is making a funny noise.
BTW - My .50 is for sale (this is not a formal 4-sale note), I'm
keeping the Colleseum FOREVER... but am moving toward (very soon)
making my gig setup the new Quad-Preamp/Stereo Simul-Class 400.
Now, after all that - do you think I'm biased?
If you have *any* questions about these amps - feel free to drop
me a note at CASPRO::PELLERIN
-BAP
|
1293.4 | Another biased endorsement | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 285-6248 | Wed May 03 1989 17:23 | 40 |
| I have a Mark III, 60 watt simulclass. I'm very happy with it
and it is plenty loud. I don't think there is anything that
has the snap and brightness of this Boogie, but that is subjective.
It is my last guitar amplifier!
Before I got it, I was very concerned about whether
it would be loud enough. I was playing in an 8 piece band,
that would sometimes get volume competative, if you know what I mean.
But I never had a problem breaking thru.
They didn't have a 100 watt unit in stock so I went with the
60. I have used the 100 watt rig, and it was outrageously loud
if you wanted it that way. I was able to destroy lightbulb
filaments by running the MKII 100 watt rig near 10 it in my
basement.
To get "fullness" I drive a marshall 4x12 slant cab with my MKIII
at 8 ohms. Fattens it up quite a bit, you are less likely to
get speaker distortion at high volume, and it seems warmer
to me. ( I have also used a Marshal 100watt head to drive the
4x12, and my little boogie blows it away)
I just went to a seminar on sound reinforcement. They instructor
from Peavy (Marty something) was very knowledgable, and
he said something about the difference between 100 watt and
200 watts is about 6db, if I recall correctly. Don't know if
I have my db's right, but I do recall that the concept was that
when you double the rated power, you get a very small increment
in add capability to increase loudness. He demonstrated a
5600 wattt PA setup, at pretty high volumes, in a 30x30 ft room,
and I can still hear, so that might give credence to the theory.
If you don't get enough out of the amp itself, the direct out
or effects send can be sent directly to a PA.
Price performance is another thing. I think they get way too much
money for them, but I'm not planning on trading mine in either.
Go for it.
|
1293.5 | Boogies are special | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu May 04 1989 09:45 | 48 |
| I agree with all the endorsements so far.
They are outrageously expensive, but there's nothing else out there
that sounds as good to me and I *want* that sound.
I think the most endearing features of the Boogie to me are:
o That "singing" lead sound
o It has a very wide variety of great overdrive and crunch sounds
although they are not all immediately accesible (the Quad amp
sorta solves this problem.)
Boogie overdrive sounds very "pure" to my ears. Not as "edgy"
as, say, a Marshall. Of course, some people like that Marshall
edge, but to me it sounds too buzzy and Marshalls compress
far too much for my tastes.
o The Boogie is EXCEPTIONALLY responsive to the dynamics in
playing. There are things it does that just don't "happen"
on any other amp.
Even in an overdrive setting, you lay off the pick a little
bit and you get an almost rhythm mode type of sound.
o Wide variety of very sonorous warm rhythm tones. Lots of amps
are good only at one thing (lead or rhythm, even PARTICULARLY
sounds). I think the Boogie is the most versatile, although
as I've said, you can't get quickly from one sound to another
always.
o I couldn't disagree more about Boogies being unreliable. This
is counter to all I've read and experienced. In fact, the
company started out by taking Fender amps and making
modifications that made them more reliable. ALL Boogies go
through some pretty ridiculous tests (including taking a hammer
and knocking on various parts of the chasis and power supply!!!).
Part of the expense of Boogies is the special mounts for the
tubes, chasis and power supply, and the industrial strength
box which is suspended from the cabinet (rather than mounted).
It's all this extra stuff to make it rugged that make them
so damn heavy.
My Boogie a 1980 Mark IIB (wood cabinet) btw.
db
|
1293.6 | Did I say something wrong? | SQUID::GOODWIN | I've been drinkin' Gordons Gin | Thu May 04 1989 10:54 | 28 |
| Geez! With all of these hardcore boogie owners ganging up on me,
I feel like I've got to make a few additional points in my defense.
First, I don't mean to be bad-mouthing boogies. They are unquestionably
excellent amps. The price, however, is absurd. In an objective price/
performance analysis, I believe there are other amps that would come
out on top.
I can't help but think that boogie owners are to some extent afflicted
with the 'Mercedes Benz owner satisfaction' syndrome. Once you've paid
$1500.00 for a 1x12 combo amp, are you going to admit it if you later
feel that you could have been satisfied with an amp for $500-$1000 less?
Lastly, (and I'm sure I'm gonna get some flack about this) Boogie wasn't
around when rock & roll was being invented. 99 44/100% of the original,
influential sounds from the 50's and 60's which became known as rock&roll
were produced by Fenders and Marshalls. There's no accounting for taste,
but I was *very* impressed by many of those early sounds. The tri-mode
Mark III claims to be able to sound like a Fender or a Marshall or a
Boogie. It certainly sounds like a boogie, but in the other modes it
only sounds like a boogie imitating a Fender or a Marshall.
Don't get me wrong - if money meant nothing to me, I'd own a Boogie.
But as I said in .2, my Fender keeps me (and more importantly, others
who listen to me) happy.
Ciao,
Steve
|
1293.7 | they're cool, but with some limitations | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I wish it was summertime all year! | Thu May 04 1989 10:55 | 4 |
| The only gripe I have that's been said about boogies is "so responsive
to dynamics" The boogies I tried were so compressed in the distorted
mode it wasn't funny. Great sustain, but kinda noisy and compressed
to hell!
|
1293.8 | Mesa-Boogie .ge. $$$? | SIGVAX::KARRFALT | I'm a junky for you | Thu May 04 1989 10:59 | 13 |
|
How much does a 75 watt simul-class boogie retail for? What is
considered a "good" price? What is considered mega-bucks (besides the
Pensilvania state lottery)?
I know that I may be opening up a can of worms here, but is Daddy's
the only authorized Mesa-Boogie dealer around the northern Mass./southern NH
area? What is the gereral consensus on Daddy's sales/service/prices, etc.?
(This time I'm asking opinions, Dave, not giving them, ha ha!)
A potential Boogie owner (mortgagee?)
Brad
|
1293.9 | they don't do windows either :-) | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Thu May 04 1989 12:15 | 16 |
| I agree with Buck, the Boogies I've tried seemed to compress the
signal too much. It's interesting that others have the opposite
impression; obviously "responsiveness" means different things to
different people.
re distortion, I also find the Boogies buzzier than Marshalls,
again a difference in perception. I'm referring to the straight,
no frills, Marshalls with EL34s, not channel switchers or mods.
There's a sound that straight a Marshall gets, Eric Johnson calls
it the "100 lb. violin tone" that I've yet to hear duplicated by
a Boogie type amp; that, to me, is smooth distortion.
Of course, I agree Boogies are great amps. They just don't do
everything imo.
/rick
|
1293.10 | | CHBGUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | Windsock management | Thu May 04 1989 12:40 | 7 |
| I think boogies have a very distinctive sound and are great amps
if you only use one sound ie: singing leads...they bite for playing
clean or crunchy rhythm
IMHO
dbii
|
1293.11 | | AQUA::ROST | The closer I am to fine | Thu May 04 1989 12:43 | 32 |
|
I don't think Boogies are overpriced at all.
I only know about the bass gear (that's all I've priced) but check
this out:
Boogie Bass 400 Head $1299 list
Ampeg SVT head $1700 !!! list (at discount maybe $1100)
Cabinets:
Boogie 1 X 15 400 watt (EV) $379 (factory or dealer)
GK 1 X 15 200 watt (EV) $420 at EUW
EAW 1 X 15 200 watt $500 at Union
Joe's 1 X 15 200 watt (JBL) $450 at EUW
As far as the guitar stuff goes, how much cheaper is Marshall (which
seems to get no grief as being overpriced)?
What about raw speakers? Mesa will sell EVMs including UPS postage for
about %10-20 less than most MA EV dealers can do (also very cheap
"vintage" Celestions). One dealer showed me his cost sheet and he pays
more for the speaker than Mesa sells it for!
Daddy's, like most Mesa dealers, sell at the same price as the factory.
If you buy in Ma, you pay sales tax versus shipping from the factory.
In NH, you save the shipping. The selection is limited to what they
move the most of, i.e. single 15 bass cabs, Road Ready bass cabs, etc.
have to be ordered, you can get it faster by ordering it yourself.
|
1293.12 | Price - Service | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 285-6248 | Thu May 04 1989 12:55 | 45 |
|
Re...price
The MKII simul-class, 75w goes for $1495, the last time I
looked. I've seen them considerably cheaper in the want
advertiser.
I've been told that you can't get a new one at anything less
than about $100 under list, but I might have been hornswaggled.
Buy the way, about a month ago.. Daddies in Salem had A MKII
100 watt. It was real dirty, but I took it home for a week
as a loaner, and it really screamed. The speaker might have been
a bit worn. I think they were asking somewhere around $900-$1k.
re... Daddies repair
About a year after I got mine, I decided to
play bass thru it. I connected up a fender bassman 15",
disconnected the 12", and went at it. It got a real nice bass
sound, but to get any volume I had to run it at 10. It did
shake the windows, but I ate some tubes in the process.
Anyway, I took it into Daddys for service. They gave me
the MKII as a loaner, (After I tried out a Marshal and was
disappointed).
Anyway, the service department really went out of their way
to satisfy me. They had difficulty finding the problem, and
kept it on the burn-in-bench for a couple days. I talked
them into replacing a few of the tubes, even though they checked
out okay under test. The noise problem was gone when I got it
back, and has not surfaced since.
We agreed that it was fixed on friday evening around 6:00.
They missed the last truck for the weekend to take it to
the store, so the service manager personally drove it
to the store himself, after he got off work, so that I
could have it for the weekend. I though that that was
a pretty nice thing to do.
So, my experience is that the service was superb.
Rick
|
1293.13 | More opinion... | CASV05::PELLERIN | | Thu May 04 1989 13:22 | 38 |
| re: .6:
"The price, however, is absurd."
>Definately your OPINION. In my book, it is ABSURD to pay less for
an amp that I believe is not the best sounding amp for me. And BTW,
a 60 watt boogie (which will eat Marshall 100 watt for lunch) is
around the same price and you can talk with the guy WHO ACTUALLY
BUILT YOUR AMP !!!! Try *THAT* at Marshall!!
"Boogie wasn't around when...." Here comes your flak.
> Randal Smith (the founder and owner of MB) was around in San
Fransisco and playing then. He also was working in a repair shop
BEEFING up those "special sounding" Fenders for people who complained
that they simply didn't have enough Balls.
This note and its replies is all based on opinion. I happen to believe
that Boogies are worth the money, and *I* can get nearly any sound
I want out of mine (including a Marshall *crunch* sound). If you
go into a store and try a used Boogie that has had its tubes replaced
with Groove Tubes and has been beat to hell and is set up to sound
lousy so you'll buy one of the stores "own line" of amps, don't
run out and say "Boogies get a great lead tone but they bite at
crunch tone or clean tone or are too compressed.
If, on the other hand, you are willing to sit and learn how to operate
a Boogie (they are different animals) and play it for a while and
then decide it doesn't "float your boat" then fine, you're like
me when it comes to say... Brussel Sprouts. I hate the evil things.
I have walked up to a Marshall 50 watt and made it sound almost
identical to my Boogie. (Steve - if you're out there back me up
here). I think its a matter of getting "your" sound, and I always
come pretty close (for me). And when I sound good I play better.
-BAP
|
1293.14 | another rat jump's in the hole! | VIDEO::BUSENBARK | | Thu May 04 1989 13:43 | 57 |
| Well we are chasin tail again......
In the last three years I have owned a 68 Marshall,62 Fender twin
and now I'm using a Boogie preamp.
The points I'd like to make are based on my own personal experiance:
My 50 watt Plexie in a years time went through 2 set's of tubes and
had great tone,a week before the debut of the band I was playin with I blew a
fuse. Now I pretty much babied this amp with checkups,weekly to insure it
was road worthy. Why the fuse blew I don't know....I ocassionally noticed
other mystical anomalies.... I also used a Fender Vibrolux(70's) with 1 12
and had a 4 12 cab with 2 12's for the Marshall and 2 for the fender and
A/B switched to either amp.
From there I ended up with the vibrolux with 4 12's,but this was not
enough volume and back pains settle in occasionally with lugging the cab
around. This amp was also maintained regularly....It had it's problems but
very minor.
I used a Seymour Duncan 60 watt convert for a month and didn't like
it. And saw the other guitar player in the band have a host of problems,for
the most part and found a Fender Twin used to use.
The Fender Twin was a decent amp,however it was non-channel switching
and somewhat finicky...
I liked my Marshall,Fenders and like my Mesa Boogie.
My first point being is this if you intend to play in a "working" band
buy something that is roadworthy. New is always preferable not always
economical.
My second point is avoid hardware issues and problems as it is more
important you concentrate on the music.
My third point is these are all good peices of equipment and they all
cost money and what's more important is to satisfy your ear.
My fourth point is unless you are playing for musician's the general
public couldn't tell you the difference between a Marshall,Fender or a Boogie
I'm very picky about my equipment,sound and reliability. I've heard
stories and personal experiance on most of the amp's people have talked about.
Comment's on Daddy's in Nashua follows:
Sales:
If you know what you want and they have it they are better than a
lot of other store's I've been in. I can site specifics if you want I have
had nothing but good experiance's with them. I drive out of my way to shop
there as there prices are better and they're trade in policy is fair. They
are knowledgable to a certain degree...They are corteous and will have my
buisness until this situation changes.
Service:
I've have not had any need for there repair service.....
I've always like Mesa stuff since I saw and used it in 1974,It's
good reliable equipment,but so can Marshall,Fender etc.
|
1293.15 | I dunno there Buck | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu May 04 1989 16:33 | 9 |
| > The boogies I tried were so compressed in the distorted
> mode it wasn't funny. Great sustain, but kinda noisy and compressed
This description raises some flags. You have exactly described what
happens when your power tubes finally go.
But if you've heard this on SEVERAL Boogies....
db
|
1293.16 | I only question your conclusions | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu May 04 1989 17:11 | 51 |
| >The price, however, is absurd. In an objective price/
>performance analysis, I believe there are other amps that would come
>out on top.
I agree. This is absolutely true.
However the price/performance argument is but one consideration
in a sea of considerations. If it were regarded as the only
consideration, everyone would be driving Hyundai's and Porsche
would be out of business.
It's a question of "where you compromise". I have to compromise
and drive a Subaru instead of a Ferari because I don't have
$60,000 to spend on a car. If I did, I darn well might be driving
a Ferari.
Most of us can afford a Boogie even if we have other ways we'd like
to spend the money. So while Boogies may be outrageously expensive,
we want that sound and we can afford it.
>Lastly, (and I'm sure I'm gonna get some flack about this) Boogie wasn't
>around when rock & roll was being invented. 99 44/100% of the original,
>influential sounds from the 50's and 60's which became known as rock&roll
>were produced by Fenders and Marshalls.
You darn right your gonna get flack: Boogie *WAS* around when
much of the classic amp sounds you mentioned were becoming famous.
Randall Smith was the guy hot-rodding those classic amps to get
those sounds.
>I can't help but think that boogie owners are to some extent afflicted
>with the 'Mercedes Benz owner satisfaction' syndrome. Once you've paid
>$1500.00 for a 1x12 combo amp, are you going to admit it if you later
>feel that you could have been satisfied with an amp for $500-$1000 less?
This phenomena of behavior is called "Post-rationalization".
It's not something anyone can "deny" as a possibility because the
denial itself might be a post rationalization. However, even
non-Boogie owners rave about Boogies so there's good reason to believe
that Boogie owners have more legitimate reasons to rave about Boogies.
If a Boogie 'isn't worth the price' to you, that's fine. No Boogie
owner would deny that there ARE compromises you can make. I think
however, that you will find that Boogie owners are uncompromising.
That's been my consistent observation.
Peace.
db
|
1293.17 | more .02 | STAR::KMCDONOUGH | set kids/nosick | Thu May 04 1989 20:00 | 39 |
|
I don't own a boogie and am not likely to in the near future. I have
tried a few, though, and might as well throw my .02 in.
I agree with everyone who said that a 1 twelve combo (or sep. cab) will
never push as much air as 4 12's, 6 10's, etc. But, it may not have
to. If you mike your amp through the PA, you are only relying on the 12
for stage volume, which it will do easily. If you don't mike the amp,
well, IMHO 1 twelve just won't cut through the rest of the band. Sure,
it may be loud directly in front of it, but it won't disperse like a
4 twelve cab.
That's OK, though. The original reason for combo amps in the first
place must have been weight and bulk. Why carry around a Marshall
stack when you can carry a small (although HEAVY) combo and rely on the
PA. Ever lift an Ampeg SVT cabinet?
The major objection to the boogie seems to be changing sounds; it's not
always possible to quickly go from a good lead sound to a rythm sound.
That could be a problem if the rest of the band is waiting while you
twiddle knobs. Maybe the MK III solves this?
As for whether or not a boogie is worth the $$ seems to be a religious
question. I can honestly say that I have not heard another amp
anywhere near its size that sounds as good. All this noise about the
"singing lead" tone is true. I also think that the hardwood cabinet
and cane grill look real cool. But $1500 will buy you a lot of nice
stuff. You could get a new Fender Twin AND a nice Les Paul and still
have money left over. If the boogie sound is worth it to you, put your
check in the mail. If it's not, there are many other small/loud amps
that you could look at.
Kevin
|
1293.18 | English dealers | HAZEL::STARR | Like a fool, fell in love with you... | Thu May 04 1989 23:59 | 22 |
| > Does anybody know the address of THE Mase Boogie dealer(s) in
> England
According to the info that came with my Boogie (which is a list of 'repair
stations', whcih may or may not be actual dealers), there are two listed
for England:
Rocky Road Company
Simon Hart
Unit #1, Horshoe Close
West Hampstead
London, England NW2 7JJ
011-441-886-7513
and
Southern Music
Melvyn Taylor
194 Church Road
Hove
Alan S.
|
1293.19 | It takes time to tame your Boogie for your tastes | XERO::ARNOLD | t�te dans les nuages... | Fri May 05 1989 11:02 | 26 |
| I just wanted to jump in here and second the mention (a few notes
back) about learning to use a Boogie. When I got my MkIII, I fiddled
around and got some great sounds for my Gibson ES175T (a thin, hollow
body). A few years later I bought a Schecter Strat-ish guitar.
It sounded good in the store and stayed in tune. However, I didn't
bother to lug my Boogie to the shop to see how it sounded through
it.
For a few months, I was very disappointed with my choice of the
Schecter because my "tried-and-true" Boogie settings didn't sound
very good with the single coil sounds. Finally, I remembered that
it took me awhile to get those good sounds for the humbuckers and
invested the time to find the settings that sounded good (to me)
on the Schecter.
The lesson I learned was that the Boogie gives you lots of control
options and that to get that great sound, you'll have to experiment
more than I had with any of my previous amps.
I love my Boogie but one must realize that it takes a bit of time
and trouble to get "your" version of that singing tone.
Buy what is right for you; don't justify $1000+ on someone else's
experience. Good luck!
- John -
|
1293.20 | I'm not an expert, but my observation confirms what Kevin said | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Fri May 05 1989 11:19 | 19 |
| On the issue of how much stuff to have on stage, I agree
whole-heartedly with Kevin.
Awhile back I noticed that without exception, the best sounding bands
I'd heard all had very minimal onstage amplification - only what was
needed for monitoring. Instead of lugging around enormous expensive
cabinets, they buy a few SM57s and direct boxes and run everything to
the PA. Doing this allows you to control the house mix, which what's
most important.
Back in the 70's when everyone had stacks and stacks of Marshall
cabs, I remember seeing this NJ band, "Sam the Band", that had
almost nothing onstage and being totally blown away by how well
I could hear everything. It was the first band I had seen go
with minimal onstage volume. And their 4-part vocals were always
incredible because they singers didn't have to compete with
stack and stacks of cabs just to hear themselves.
db
|
1293.21 | thanks for the inputs... | GAOV05::GLYNN | | Fri May 05 1989 12:50 | 25 |
| Thanks for all the inputs guys.
didn't mean to start a riot ... and by all means carry on after
Im finished.
.. but from what I gather the general consenses is that most
Boogie owners are pleased with their purchase... and after all
$1500 isnt outrageous... a bit more for us over here Im afraid..
Most of you use 4*12 or 2*12 cabs for a 'fuller' sound ... but
than again your gigs/venues are probably 4 times the size of
ours (here in the west of Ireland : Galway).
A lot of you praised the tonal qualities of the boogie, that
'singing sound' .... Can you reproduce the Mark Knophfler (sp)
sound with the boogie ??? I use a 73 strat with standard pickups.
Id be interested to hear if this sound can be produced??
also, as an aside - Ive recently sent away for a 'Riff-o-matic'
as advertised in Guitar Player (a floor mounting cassette player
with foot pedals!). Has anyone used/got one....
Any comments.
Ray
|
1293.22 | Knoffler - yeah | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 285-6248 | Fri May 05 1989 17:17 | 17 |
| >> A lot of you praised the tonal qualities of the boogie, that
>> 'singing sound' .... Can you reproduce the Mark Knophfler (sp)
>> sound with the boogie ??? I use a 73 strat with standard pickups.
>> Id be interested to hear if this sound can be produced??
Knophfler sound! You bet. Mark was over my place last night
doin' it on my 73 "straight and natural" strat. Oh, wait
a second, that was me! (Don't I wish I had Knoffler down
that good, but the sound is right there, if you take the time
to diddle with the knobs a bit)
I use a pick, so I don't quite get the Knoffler thing exact
on the button, but team up a strat with a Boggie, and
you abilities are the only thing to stand in your way.
Rick
|
1293.23 | | PNO::HEISER | Cold Rock the Groove! | Mon Aug 21 1989 18:40 | 4 |
| Do Boogie dealers discount much? What is the best price you've
seen for a 295 Simul-Class?
Mike_who's_curious
|
1293.24 | No Discounts, Folks | AQUA::ROST | My mind is on vacation | Tue Aug 22 1989 08:05 | 6 |
|
In general, Boogie dealers do not discount one penny. You pay the
factory price, period. Depending on where you live, sales tax may
or may not balance shipping from the factory. I have heard of some
dealers charging over list to cover freight costs, particularly
on special orders.
|
1293.25 | Not only that but... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Tue Aug 22 1989 11:27 | 8 |
|
Yup... as a matter of fact Boogie dealers who do discount can lose
their franchise... passion for customers and all that rot!
|
1293.26 | Only In Canada Eh? | OTOO01::ELLACOTT | Freddie's Revenge | Fri Aug 25 1989 14:36 | 6 |
|
Up here in Canada that's called price fixing and is illegal
but it's still done a bit. They also cannot have exclusive dealerships
here either. A wonder there's not more mail order houses up here
|
1293.27 | where's plug 'n' play when you need it? | PNO::HEISER | Rude Dog's Trainer | Thu Nov 09 1989 11:03 | 4 |
| I tried the Boogie MKIII 60wt combo over the weekend. Nice little amp
but I thought it was a pain to mess with all the knobs, etc.
Mike
|
1293.28 | Cool tone from a Boogie! ;^) | ICS::BUCKLEY | Get the FUNK out! | Fri Oct 12 1990 13:01 | 3 |
| After hearing Brian "Damage" Forsythe's Mark II live for the 4th time
this past week, I'm almost convinced to go out and buy one. He gets
such a cool, fat, R&R tone from it!!
|
1293.29 | | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Fri Oct 12 1990 19:23 | 6 |
|
Oh, my God! Can this be happening? Buck wanting a Boogie?
Nah! This must be a dream...
;^)
J.
|
1293.30 | Info on BOOGIE power amps?? | DRTBYK::COOPER | Ex-Squeeze Me ? Baking Powder ? | Wed Mar 17 1993 10:38 | 9 |
| Does anyone know the difference between the SimulClass 295
and the SimulClass 395? Is it just the "Switch Track" stuff,
or is there more...?
I've seen a few used 295's around the papers and such... Can
someone give me some specifics on output power, tube-type
(6L6, I assume), reviews or comments??
jc
|
1293.31 | ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Here all life abounds | Wed Mar 17 1993 12:15 | 5 |
| >Does anyone know the difference between the SimulClass 295
>and the SimulClass 395?
100.
|
1293.32 | | DRTBYK::COOPER | Ex-Squeeze Me ? Baking Powder ? | Wed Mar 17 1993 13:02 | 9 |
| *smack* !!!
I knew that, ya blarney keyboard-puke !!
:-)
jc (Celbrating St. Patty's day with the above commentary)
|
1293.33 | mother of all power amps - $1100+ | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Wed Mar 17 1993 17:06 | 11 |
| From my Mesa/Booger catalog:
"The Stereo 295 boasts all of the Simul-Class features of the Mark III
section including: 2 types of interchangeable power tubes, Class A
Triode operation, STR 6L6's and EL34's, with power levels of a
conservative 95 wpc independently switchable down to the tightest,
fiercest 30 watts you've heard!"
4 rack spaces high, contains 4x12AX7's, 4x6L6's, 4xEL34's, cooling fan.
Each channel has 2x4ohm and 2x8ohm speaker jacks, � inch input jack,
input level control, Class A/Simul-Class power switch, weight = 37 lbs.
|
1293.34 | | DRTBYK::COOPER | Ex-Squeeze Me ? Baking Powder ? | Thu Mar 18 1993 09:40 | 13 |
| Drool!!!!!!
I guess the 395 is similar, but does "Switch Track" stuff... Ergo, the
TriAxis will switch from one power amp channel to another (for volume
boosts and tonal changes..via presence).
I saw one recently for pretty cheap.
Hey Mike, whats the catalog say about the Strategy 500 series?? Can you
scan and send it to me ??
I thought the Boogie 50/50 amp was cute too. :-)
jc
|
1293.35 | haven't asked for a new one | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Thu Mar 18 1993 19:31 | 2 |
| My catalog is a couple years old so it's missing the 395 and Strategy
500 (only has 400).
|
1293.36 | Mesa heaven | RANGER::WEBER | | Wed Apr 20 1994 16:06 | 13 |
| After eating some great Mexican food in Santa Ana, CA, I drove into a strip
mall to find some frozen yogurt for dessert and saw a small music store
with a lot of Boogie amps in the window, Walking in for a better look,
I discovered it was a Mesa *factory store* , filled with virtually
everything in the catalog from the V-2 pedal to a monster Dual Recto
stack. I would have loved to have ruined my hearing trying everything
out, but I didn't have time for more than a quick look around.
If you're in the area, it's on the Santa Ana side of the South Coast
Mall
Danny W.
|
1293.37 | There's a Mesa Boogie store in there? | EZ2GET::STEWART | Fight fire with marshmallows | Wed Apr 20 1994 19:21 | 8 |
|
We locals actually refer to it as South Coast Plaza. But, yeah, it's a
mall...
Danny, if you're still around, there's a Leo Fender exhibit you should
catch while you're in town. Let me look around for the info...
|
1293.38 | "AND IT'S BUILT LIKE A TANK" | COMET::LAURICH | | Thu Apr 21 1994 02:21 | 8 |
|
Has anyone tried one of those v-2 pedals? The salesman said it
is awesome, but you know what that's worth. The thought of a pre-amp on
the floor is pretty cool.
Jeffy
|
1293.39 | Boogie Store/V-Twin pedal | RANGER::WEBER | | Thu Apr 21 1994 07:37 | 11 |
| The Boogie store isn't in the South Coast Plaza itself, but in the next
strip mall over. I was only in the area for a day.
The V-2 Pedal is better than I expected it to be. It has a bypass
switch which puts you right into your amp, so you can put it in front
of, say, a Fender Vibro-King, have that incredible Fender^2 sound
straight, and then get two flavors of Boogie overdrive when you want
it. If you've got a basic amp that has great sound and would like more
flexibility without doing a mod to it, this pedal is a good way to go.
Danny W.
|
1293.40 | In Memory Of Werner Von Braun | TECRUS::ROST | Motivation: what good is it? | Thu Apr 21 1994 07:51 | 4 |
| Huh? What is a V2 pedal? I don't read GP anymore, have I missed the
newest hot toy? How much does it cost?
Brian
|
1293.41 | at least MasterCard likes me... | EZ2GET::STEWART | Fight fire with marshmallows | Thu Apr 21 1994 08:55 | 7 |
|
OK, now I know where the store is...I bought my fiance's engagement
ring at a store in the same strip...which is why I haven't been in
there...
|
1293.42 | for those BOC covers | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:16 | 2 |
| coming soon, the ME262 pedal!
|
1293.43 | wrong name | RANGER::WEBER | | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:54 | 3 |
| Sorry, it's the V-Twin pedal. I just keep having brain flashes.
Danny W.
|
1293.44 | | LEDS::ORSI | Kinfolk said..move away from there | Thu Apr 21 1994 10:20 | 12 |
|
> coming soon, the ME262 pedal!
Yeah, and the ME163 Comet pedal, and the ME109, ME110......
Pedals of the Luftwaffe!!
I prefer the V1 Buzz-bomb pedal myself
8^)
Neal
|
1293.45 | Whatever that was... | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:39 | 4 |
| > -< for those BOC covers >-
> coming soon, the ME262 pedal!
For distortion like 7 screaming diz-busters.
|
1293.46 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | anti-EMM! anti-EMM! I hate expanded memory!- Dorothy | Thu Apr 21 1994 12:33 | 5 |
| Hey guys you can have all those me things, I'm sticking with the real winner:
my extortion pedal...
dbii
|
1293.47 | fwiw | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 21 1994 13:01 | 2 |
| Ty Tabor (of King's X) has been using the Dual Rectifier head on tour
and is reportedly very dissatisfied with them.
|
1293.48 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Thu Apr 21 1994 14:36 | 10 |
| Donno where you hear that, but in the current Guitar Player, there's an
interview with Ty where he says he likes the Dual Rectifier, used it to
record the latest album and is using it on stage too, with a 2:95 power
amp fed from it's line out, powering three Boogie 4x12 cabs.
Personally, I like his sound on the new album better then the older
albums. It's basically the same, but has just a little more edge and
clarity to it.
Greg0
|
1293.49 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:21 | 3 |
| He said it to someone after their appearance here last month. The guy
was shooting the breeze with him about his rig when Ty told him he
wasn't happy with it.
|
1293.50 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:26 | 4 |
| Sounds great on the album, that's all I know. Maybe he's had
reliability problems or something.
Greg
|
1293.51 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:41 | 2 |
| could be. just remember that the next time you tell me I need a
Booger.
|
1293.52 | I said that about the sound... | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:53 | 5 |
| I didn't say there *were* any, just something that might have been
happening. Most of the people I've known who had Boogers said they
were pretty reliable.
Greg
|
1293.53 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | Raptor -- Rules the Skies! | Thu Apr 21 1994 20:27 | 3 |
| -1
People like J-dot?
|
1293.54 | | DABEAN::REAUME | click -- buzz -- whirr | Thu Apr 21 1994 23:31 | 4 |
|
Sounds like shades of the KittyHawk / Winger thing. Yeah they sound
great, but what about durability? But my M1's are still chuggin' !!!!
|
1293.55 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Fri Apr 22 1994 10:13 | 6 |
| > People like J-dot?
The only problem with his was bad power tubes. After several years at
that. Hey, it's a tube amp, you have to do some maintenance on 'em.
Greg
|
1293.56 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Fri Apr 22 1994 11:21 | 1 |
| I can't get rid of my M1
|
1293.57 | my lunch with the V-Twin | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Wed Apr 27 1994 13:58 | 50 |
| I spent some time over lunch checking out the Mesa V-Twin pedal. Let
me start by saying the main thing I came away with was that I'd need to
spend more time with it to really give a fair review. I was rushed,
and it seemed like I could have gotten better results if I'd played
with it longer. On the other hand, this also implies that the beast
is probably not "point and shoot".
I must've spaced on the name, or thinking about buzzbombs or something.
Anyway, if it ain't obvious, the name V-Twin is a reference to Harleys;
this is made blatantly clear by the pseudo Harley logo on the front
(I think I like the "pedals of the Luftwaffe" series idea better,
myself :-).
The V-Twin must be one of the most rugged pedals in existence. It's
all diamond plate chrome armour and weighs a good 5 pounds at least.
You could probably run over it with your Hog during a solo and not miss
a note! There are two footswitch buttons, one for bypass and one to
toggle between 2 of 3 modes; either clean <-> solo or blues <-> solo.
The toggle pairs are selected by a third, more fragile switch,
obviously not meant to be controlled with your feet. There are outputs
for driving another amp, a power amp, and headphones. There are also
external jacks for controlling the two main switches. Controls are
what you'd expect; gain, bass, middle, treble, presence, and master.
The knobs are big, knurled, Tele style.
The V-Twin employs 2 12AX7s, clearly visible from above but well
protected by the pedal housing. The first sign of trouble is the power
supply, a 12 volt wall bug. I'm not convinced this idea of running
tubes at low DC voltage really cuts it (but of course, your mileage
may vary). Anyway, I guess I was hoping for a full-voltage design.
The test vehicle was a G&L Legacy Strat (maple board) and we ran it
through a) a Peavey Bandit and b) a Peavey Classic 1x12. Now here's
where it gets weird. Through the solid state Bandit, the thing was
incredibly bassy. Even on the bridge pickup, with treble and presence
all the way up and bass and mids all the way down, the tone still
had a dark, muffled quality. Cut to the all tube 1x12; here the sound
was too shrill and high endy, with not enough bottom. In both cases,
the bypass tone of just the amp was full and well balanced. Weird.
In general, despite the problems, I heard some good things in the clean
and blues modes. The solo mode didn't move me; I could get plenty of
distortion, but no tones I really liked. As stated earlier, it may
require time to really learn how to use this beast. Perhaps it's
necessary to really dial-in to match the particular amp being driven.
Or maybe it functions better as preamp, driving a power section or
the mixing board. Anyway, my first encounter was somewhat of a
disappointment.
/rick
|
1293.58 | Transmaniacon MC | TECRUS::ROST | From the dance hall to hell | Wed Apr 27 1994 14:18 | 4 |
| You forgot to say how many of my panheads I need to sell to buy one of
these muthas...
Little Fauss
|
1293.59 | re: .57 | RANGER::WEBER | | Wed Apr 27 1994 14:38 | 6 |
| Actually, the tubes run on high voltage from a DC-DC convertor.
I was able to get a decent sound using it in front of a Vibro-King. In
bypass, pure Fender, the other two modes gave the usual Boogie sounds.
DRW
|
1293.60 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Wed Apr 27 1994 14:41 | 2 |
| The tag said $369.
|
1293.61 | 90 watts... | STRATA::LUCHT | Spinner-induced stacking bites | Wed Dec 07 1994 21:01 | 6 |
| Can anyone offer info on the Mesa Simul-Class 90?
Thanks,
Kev --
|
1293.62 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Thu Dec 08 1994 08:05 | 11 |
| Kevin,
You asking about the rack-mounted 2:90 power amp??
If so - they induce mass hysteria and vomiting at full volume.
This is good, btw. These things ROCK! BUT... They aren't
Simul-class...
jc (Who loves loud)
|
1293.63 | New toyz from MB | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Jun 19 1995 10:36 | 28 |
| There sure are lot's of Mesa Booger notes. I just did a Dir/title="Mesa"
and got a long list. I just recieved a mailer from Mesa Boogie over the
weekend.They have just introduced several new products which look to be
pretty interesting.
Baron - This is not a guitar amp product. It is an audiophile
tube power amplifier for use in home stereo applications or
perhaps pro-audio. It uses 6550's for the power stage, and
appears to be built like a Mack Truck. It is a pure dual mono
amp with separate power transformers and power cords for each
channel. It can be run in 3 differant modes, all class A, which
can provide upto 150 wpc. The front-panel meters can be set to
display power output or tube bias. My guess is if you have to
ask how much it costs, you can't afford one ;^)>
20/20 Power amp - This little single-space rack box features
20 wpc from EL84 power tubes. Finally, someone comes up with a
stereo power amp with just enough power, but not too much. I've
been dreaming of a 20 wpc tube power amp to complete my rack
system, and this appears to be just the ticket. I would have
preferred one with 6V6's but I wouldn't rule out this amp without
a thourough road test. I wonder how much these are selling for.
Mesa also has out several new combo amps including a few vintage
style amps with no channel switching.
Mark
|
1293.64 | Boogies on the Web | MSBCS::KALINOWSKI | | Thu Feb 22 1996 11:29 | 21 |
| Mesa Boogie has a web site (just in case anyone was wondering)
It's at http://www.mesaboogie.com (gee tough to guess)
It's in the process of being built but will include when done:
ARTICLES BY FOUNDER AND
PRESIDENT RANDALL SMITH
TALES FROM THE TONE LOUNGE
BY DOUG WEST
ARTIST INTERVIEWS AND TOUR
SCHEDULES
MESA PRODUCT INFO AND
TONE TWEAKING <---- Real Cool
Brian
|
1293.65 | Need information.... | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Fri Apr 05 1996 11:36 | 11 |
| I was amp shopping *again* this week and stumbled onto a Mesa Boogie
1x10 Subway Blues amp. After trying PV Classics and New retro Fenders
( Deville and Deluxe ), I was absolutely floored with this little amp.
It's apppearently 20w. Very basic: 3 band EQ, Reverb, and FAT switch.
Sounded like 50w 1x12...what's up wit dat?
So, I checked out their web site but there was not product info
available. The store had no literature either. Could anyone enlighten
me on this little Mesa Boogie?
Fwiw, it's retailing for $599.
-kev
|
1293.66 | almost bought one | GAVEL::DAGG | | Fri Apr 05 1996 12:05 | 21 |
| This is discussed elsewhere under another note also.
I had one of these for awhile, and it was OK, but
I ended up with a Studio Caliber (which cost about
what your price on the Subway is). I decided I
wanted master volume, plus the Subway I had
was humming, and didn't come on until the volume
was louder than I like to practice. Might have
just needed new tubes though. I think Daddy's had
Subway's on sale last summer, and Sam Ash sold them
for 449.00 plus shipping.
FYI the NAMM article in the recent GP says Boogie
showed the Subway Rocket - like the Subway Blues, but
with high gain and no reverb.
If I had to do it again I'd try the Studio Caliber head
plus a closed back cab with a 12.
Dave
|
1293.67 | Da' Mesa mesa'd me up! | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Fri Apr 05 1996 16:24 | 17 |
| Thnaks for the reply Dave.
I agree with the Master Volume being a necessity, for sure! I've been
running a Fender Bassman for a few years now (silverface w/ Marshall
4x10 cab).Great tone but it needs to be wound up to get it. The harp
player in my band wants it, so it's basically sold. I just need to find
*that* amp. You know, the one every body dreams of and no one makes...
I sure did like that litte Subway. I'll have to give it a real good
test drive before I decide. I'm afraid of losing the bottom end I crave
so much. What was that thing like as you increased the volume? Did the
tubes start to clip early or stay clean? Did it thin out? Could you
give it a hypothetical volume rating....sounded like 40w or about its
rated power. Is it class A? Should I stop this assult of questions now
or continue........?
thanks again,
-kev
|
1293.68 | don't know about playing it in a band | GAVEL::DAGG | | Sat Apr 06 1996 07:37 | 23 |
| I have n't tried that many amps, so I can't
offer much comparisons. I only turned the
Subway up past 5 a couple times, and it did get
crunchy, like a power chord would sound
pretty cool. I'd guess you'd get to the
overdrive level pretty easy if you were
playing rock with a drummer. But that was
too loud for me just noodling around in
the basement.
Also the mid control
is supposed to add gain at settings past
three (same as on the Studio Caliber). I really liked
the sound with mid all the way and the fat
switch on. And I can get a sound alot like
that on the Studio Caliber. Good blues sound to my ears,
still basicly clean, but lots of "tubiness".
There is a speaker out, so I think you could
get more clean volume with an extension spkr.(?)
Dave
|
1293.69 | | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Sat Apr 06 1996 09:22 | 6 |
| Thanks for getting back to me Dave. One more question: Would you think
this thing could hold it's own in a small club/gigging situation? You
mentioned it being quite loud but you also said you didn't know about
playing it in a band.
-kev [How bout a run down on yer SC?]
|
1293.70 | dunno dude | GAVEL::DAGG | | Sat Apr 06 1996 09:51 | 15 |
| That I really don't know. Last time I played in
a band (more than 10 years now) it was bass, through
an Acoustic 360 I wish I'd never sold. That thing rocked.
And when I was a kid I used a master volume twin, which
was also plenty loud.
Other noters with more band experience might be
able to suggest a minimum guitar tube amp
wattage. It probably depends if you're doing
much miking of the amp, the drums, etc.
Sorry,
Dave
|
1293.71 | Test drive's a must.... | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Sat Apr 06 1996 10:18 | 5 |
| No Problem...and thanks again for all the help Dave.
...And Happy Easter Man!
-kev
|
1293.72 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | just back'in over the cats | Mon Apr 08 1996 09:08 | 13 |
| just one data point for you. I've done gigs with a Fender Super Champ,
which is about the same power/volume as the Subway Blues. Usually
I was running it through a 4x10 and the amp was miked, but I had
*plenty* of stage volume with that rig and could've done small
clubs with no miking. Many small amps sound surprisingly loud when
put through a larger cab.
If it worked out this would be a great setup. The Subway alone would
be nice and portable for home/low-volume-band practice, and with the
added cab for stage work.
/rick
|