T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1283.1 | Quick Primer | AQUA::ROST | The closer I am to fine | Tue Apr 25 1989 08:27 | 46 |
|
OK, here goes:
1. Fuzz
What most people used to call fuzzboxes are now called distortions
and overdrives. Most manufacturers use the term "distortion" for
the more metallic sounding boxes and "overdrive" for more tube
sounding. There are even boxes with tubes in them these days! There
are literally hundreds of these boxes on the market. Some manufacturers
offer half a dozen different models!! Good luck...
2. Delay
Noone uses tape loops anymore, they either use analog or digital
delays. Analog is cheap ($100 or less) but somewhat noisy and not as
crisp sounding. Digital is more expensive ($150 and up), but most units
have quite high fidelity, much better than the old Echoplexes.
3. Flange/Chorus
These are delay based effects. Delay units with *modulation* controls
can also do these effects, or you can buy dedicated boxes. Flanging is
the whooshing noise that is heard all over Jimi Hendrix' "Axis: Bold As
Love", also "Itchycoo Park" by the Small Faces, "Listen to the Muisc"
by the Doobie Brothers, etc. Chorus is similar but produces more of a
chiming, watery sound. It's all over records these days, I don't think
I can describe it any better than that!
4. Compressor
This is an automatic gain control that allows you to keep your volume
more constant, i.e. it boosts gain as the note dies out. Used to
increase sustain on electric guitars and also useful for getting
a hot signal to tape when recording.
The other effects on the market are typically equalizers which are just
tone controls, noise gates/filters which are used to reduce the hiss
generated by all your other effects 8^) 8^) 8^) and combinations of
two or more effects in one box (a hot trend right now). Brands that
are most respected here in the US are Boss, Ibanez and DOD, more or
less in that order.
There are plenty of notes in here about each of these effect devices
and plenty of opinionated noters who will tell which one you should
buy 8^) 8^) 8^) 8^)
|
1283.2 | The bare essentials | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue Apr 25 1989 10:07 | 41 |
| I would assume that most people wouldn't try to beckon a heavy
metal sound from an acoustic/electric guitar. The effects that
I use with acoustic guitar would include delay, reverb, chorus,
flange, *mild* compression, aural exciter, pitch-shift/harmonizer,
phase shifters (most of these are old and clunky but neat for that
swooshing sound). Of course any effect should be used in moderation,
especially with an acoustic guitar.
The effects I would not use with an acoustic would be distortion/
overdrive, wah-wah (remember them), envelope followers, and heavy
compression.
In my mind you should avoid "over processing" the sound of an acoustic
guitar or else it loses that natural warmth.
Layering processors (effects that let you layer several effects
one on top of another simultaneously) are great, but may be overkill
for a simple setup with an acoustic guitar. I would recommend an
Alesis MidiverbII for your needs. They sell for around $250 and
provide 99 differant effects ranging from light digital reverb to
cavernous reverb, reverse reverb effects, gated reverb, delay ranging
from 70ms to 500ms, chorus, flange, and 10 special effects. Granted
you can only use one effect at a time, but two much processing can
spoil the acoustic sound, besides, most layering processors sell
for about double the price of a MidiverbII. Check one out next time
you are in the stores. While you are at it, check out sounds 45 and
49 (bloom), which are a special blend of reverb and reverse effects
(it will make you think you are playing your guitar in the catacombs.
I also like sound 91 (multi-tapped panning delay), which can really
only be appreciated in stereo. This sound is perfect for rock-a-billy
type stuff.
Good luck, and have fun shopping. I recommend you go into the stores
during an off hour (avoid weekends, and early evenings when the
stores are really crowded). Another thing is to ask a salesman to
set you up with a headphone rig so that you can play around with the
various effects without worrying about hearing yourself and others
customers.
Mark Jacques
|
1283.3 | Who needs food? | USWAV1::FINK | | Tue Apr 25 1989 10:40 | 14 |
| Yeah, definitely go to the music store on your lunch hour if possible.
I happen to have a Fostex 4track cass deck, and I recommend them
highly, although they may have been discontinued. There's no need
to spend much money on something that makes cassette demos - you'll
come out with basically the same sound no matter which one you get,
after a little practice. And the less convenience involved, the
more proficient you can get at experimenting, coming up with the
sound you want.
If you are proficient at electronics, you can build most of these
boxes with great results at an average of 1/4th the cost of an effects
box. For instance, a distortion box costs a total of about $9.50
to build, yet they're about $80 to $90 in stores.
|
1283.4 | Schematics available??? | CLOSUS::GSMALLS | Hendrix lives! | Tue Apr 25 1989 13:24 | 8 |
| RE: note 1283.3
Where do I get schematics for these devices?
<Gordon>
|
1283.5 | Go for the delay... | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | We're part of the fire that is burning! | Wed Apr 26 1989 09:10 | 8 |
|
I would think that the one effect you'd want to go for, in layering
sounds on a 4 track with an acoustic, would be the "digital delay".
Some of these have modulation effects, which will give the sweeping,
phase shift or "flanging" effect along with -or besides- the delay.
Joe Jas
|
1283.6 | Some thoughts... | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Beware the boundries | Wed Apr 26 1989 11:46 | 17 |
| I'd agree with Joe on recommending the digital delay. They are
pretty flexable and can give you all the time delay effects (but
not at the same time).
Since I generally don't use a lot of effects, I think the one that
helped me most when using my 4-track was getting a little stomp box
compressor. I had trouble playing consistantly enough to keep a good
strong level without saturating the tape at times. Using the compressor
allows me a little more margin for error with my volume. I found it
especially useful when trying to record acoustic guitar, because if
you're mikeing it and you move a little bit, the volume level changes.
I have a hard time playing without moving at all. Keep in mind that
extreme settings on many compression effects will produce huge amounts
of noise (hissssss). You probably won't notice a tangible difference
in the sound though. Compression is very subtle.
Greg
|
1283.7 | It's like falling in love again... :-) | FOO::BHAVNANI | SYS$UNWIND - laid back VMS | Thu Apr 27 1989 16:03 | 15 |
| I would strongly recommend the Digitech Multi-Play digital delay.
I bought mine for $145 - it has slapback echo, long echo, flanging
and chorus and is *deathly* quiet. The regeneration control allows
you to fake a reverb effect when turned up with slap-back. Its speed
and width controls allow you to generate real wierd pitch shifts (if
you like that kind of stuff!). Oh, it has stereo outputs and an
infinite repeat feature also.
I play my Fender acoustic-electric thru the delay and use a Teac
TASCAM Porta-1 for recording. It has DBX instead of Dolby - much
quieter. I wouldn't trade my Porta-1 for all the tea in China!
I mix down my compositions onto a vanilla Nakamichi using DolbyB.
The end result is quite satisfying.
/ravi
|
1283.8 | | PNO::HEISER | Don't Bb, B# and you'll look # | Thu Apr 27 1989 20:08 | 3 |
| Has HX-Pro started appearing on instrument recording equipment yet?
Mike
|
1283.9 | I think this is a better place to ask. | SPKALI::BOILARD | | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:09 | 13 |
| Is there a programable foot controlled midi device on the market that is
capable of routing a signal (guitar) to two destinations (Boogie, Twin) and
that is capable of sending program change data to midi devices? Is the Midi
Patch Bayette capable of doing this?
What I read from the explanation of the Bayette from the Kitty Hawk file is
that it is a midi controlled device not a midi originating device. Is this
true, or am I wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
Tom Boilard
|
1283.10 | Similar Question.... | SMURF::BENNETT | from "Kingdom of the Bees" | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:54 | 36 |
|
AMP1 AMP2
CH1 & 2, PWR SLAVE CH3 & 4, CLASS A
/-----------------------\ /-----------------------\
| PRE OUT o |>----\ /----<| o LINE OUT |
| PWR IN o |<-\ | | | |
| o INPUT | | | | | o INPUT |
\-----------------------/ ^ V V \-----------------------/
^ | | | ^
| | o ! o SW1 |
| \----o |
| |
\-------------------------- o ! o-------/
o SW2
|
|
^
/---------------\
| INSTRUMENT |
\---------------/
Similar switching question. Is there an off the shelf box that can
handle it?
SW1 and SW2 share a throw - both move left or right at
the same time. Throwing switch to the left sends input signal
to AMP1 and loops AMP1 PRE OUT back to PWR IN. Throwing switch
right sends input signal into AMP2 and routes AMP2 LINE OUT to
AMP1 PWR IN.
This would preferably be a stomp box.
Thanks
Charlie B
|
1283.11 | GP-16 is up to that | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:45 | 7 |
| re: .9
The Roland GP-16 will do that (not the GP-8 however).
May be more bang and buck then you want to spend however.
db
|
1283.12 | | ASAHI::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Wed Feb 07 1990 09:49 | 33 |
| Your right. The Kitty Hawk Patch Bayette does not send patch
changing data. You'd need a controller for that. However, it does
have a MIDI IN and MIDI THRU jack so you just daisy-chain your MIDI
devices together.
The Kitty Hawk Patch Bayette II (I have on on order) is esentially
a MIDI controller A/B box that also has six function switches.
Here's what the Glossy sez about the Bayette II:
(Courtesy of John Reaume and DEC for use of the FAX network)
KHPB-2 MIDI Patch Bayette II $695.95
The Patch Bayette II is a rack mountable, single space programmable
switching unit which responds to MIDI Patch Change command. Itfeature
six function switches which can control and devices requiring momentary
or ON/OFF type foot switches. An A/B Selector switch allows the
signal to be sent to either of two outputs. Up to 128 combinations
of the six function switch settings and four A/B switch settings
can be programmed and selected via MIDI.
So in a nutshell it's a MIDI A/B box with six outs to change channels
on amps, Chandler Tube Drivers, etc...etc...
I'm buying it because I wanted a way to A/B my guitar between my
rack and my new Kitty M3 head, and at the same time switch channels
of the M3. Also, with the MIDI thru, I can pipe the patch change
info to my MP1 and DSP128.
Did I say that right John ??
jc
|
1283.13 | | ASAHI::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Wed Feb 07 1990 09:51 | 6 |
| BTW - I'm bummed that the picture I have is only of a Bayette I
and not the II that I ordered. The Bayette I has only a rear panel
input. I'll be plugging my guitar into it...Ack ! Thru the back
of my rack :(
jc
|
1283.14 | Wha-wha Pedal GREATLY Needed!!! | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cocked & Loaded! | Tue Jul 17 1990 09:53 | 8 |
| I'm looking for a Cry Baby-type Wha-wha pedal. New or used...I *need*
one!!!
Any information to the purchase of a new or used one would be greatly
appreciated!!!
Thanx,
Buck
|
1283.15 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Jonathan Livingston Cat Barf.. | Tue Jul 17 1990 10:28 | 6 |
|
Buck, one of my local heros is playing with onme now and the sound
is absolutely incredible... I'll find out what the brand and price is
at lunch and post it hear... you need to hear this pedal.. it's killer!
|
1283.16 | where else | SMURF::LAMBERT | Smile for the Camera! | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:06 | 6 |
| Daddy's in Manchester had one the last time I was there. Matter of fact
they had two - an new one and a beat up used one.
'Luck,
-- Sam
|
1283.17 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | I'm crushing your head! | Tue Jul 17 1990 12:43 | 6 |
|
Wah wahs are also available from all the mail order types. I believe I
paid around $50-$60 for a new one.
-pat
|
1283.18 | What's a good one? | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | No, I'm very, very shy. | Tue Jul 17 1990 13:18 | 10 |
| I've been thinking of getting a new Wah too. Anyone got any
recommendations for good makes/models?
Is there really much difference in how they sound/work?
I have an ancient Vox wah and it's pretty noisy and doesn't seem to
have a lot of range in the filter sweep. (maybe it just needs a new
battery)
Greg
|
1283.20 | Mine's a WhineBaby | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | No, I'm very, very shy. | Tue Jul 17 1990 13:30 | 9 |
| Yeah, my old VOX is like that too. I hate trying to figure out it it
switched or not...
I thought of something awhile back that would be cool, if you had a wah
that had a foot pressure switch, so that when you stick your foot on
it, it enabled the wah function and when you took your foot off, it
would bypass it. Seems like someone should build something like that.
Greg
|
1283.22 | led | RAVEN1::BLAIR | I'm crushing your head! | Tue Jul 17 1990 13:53 | 3 |
|
I read that Johnny Marr has a on/off indicator light on his wah
so you can see what's what.
|
1283.23 | Dunlop For The Cry Baby | AQUA::ROST | Get up and get hip to the trip | Tue Jul 17 1990 14:16 | 14 |
| As far as the reply about differnet makes, yes, they do sound
different. Cry Babies are currently made by Jim Dunlop. They also have
a bass version and one with a built-in fuzz (all RIGHT!). Purists say
they are not quite as good as the VOX originals, but they can be had
anywhere and are closest to the classic wah sound of Jimi, etc.
Morley wahs sound *much* different to my ears, but are built like
bricks and use no pots so they never grunge out and run on AC so no
more battery hassles. DOD has an inexpensive wah that also can be used
as a volume pedal, never heard it. Boss used to make a wah with
optical technology (like Morley), but I haven't seen one for awhile;
there was a matching volume pedal.
Brian
|
1283.24 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Jonathan Livingston Cat Barf.. | Tue Jul 17 1990 14:26 | 11 |
|
Buck (and others) the pedal I had in mind was a DOD FX-17 (I
think). It's a wah volume pedal, that sounds incredibly good to me. It
retails for 89.95, but my hunch is that one would wind up costing 50-60
bucks... I can't get over how cool this wah wah sounds as compared to
the cry-baby pedals.
Steve
|
1283.26 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cocked & Loaded! | Tue Jul 17 1990 14:39 | 6 |
| Yo Steve...
Just called my local music store...they have the DOD FX-17 in stock for
$99.99 "ON SALE..." I told them I thought it was retail at $89.99 and
he said they had it listed for $125.00...What;s the scoop...who's
getting ripped off here?
|
1283.27 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | I'm crushing your head! | Tue Jul 17 1990 15:02 | 4 |
|
Ahem. My Dunlop Wah came with a an AC adapter input. My peavey
adapters work fine with it. Also, when I have used a battery,
it seemed to last forever.
|
1283.28 | | UPWARD::HEISER | trimmed & burnin' | Tue Jul 17 1990 15:03 | 8 |
| Some mail order prices for the DOD FX-17 (they have it listed at
$129.95 now):
PMI (of New Jersey (201) 863-2200) - $77.95
Sam Ash ((800) 4-SAM ASH) - $74.95
Musician's Friend ((800) 777-5173) - $89.88
Mike
|
1283.29 | More sources | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | No, I'm very, very shy. | Tue Jul 17 1990 15:10 | 9 |
| The current catalog from American Musical Supply (800-458-4076) lists
the FX-17 for $77.95 and The Brass and Woodwind (800-348-5003) lists it
for 75.50
J. So has an FX-17, but I don't really remember what it sounds like.
He doesn't use it very much. We should get together and compare it to
my Vox.
Greg
|
1283.30 | Lower prices in the back woods?? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Jonathan Livingston Cat Barf.. | Tue Jul 17 1990 15:39 | 10 |
|
Buck, my friendly music dealer (Al Young, Capitol City Music,
207-622-6522) has one, I just double checked, with a 89.95 price tag on
it. He must discount deeper than those slick big city music places
that you go to... Give him a call, I'm sure he'd ba happy to ship it
to you (and if he won't I will).
regards,
Steve
|
1283.31 | FX-17 | SMURF::BENNETT | | Tue Jul 17 1990 16:03 | 7 |
|
Had mine out for a little ride last night. I paid $99 for mine
about 2 years ago at Daddy's. It's small and quiet and has a wide
tonal range. I haven't kicked it too many times so I can't speak
for ruggedness. There is an AC adapter for it but batteries seem
to be good for quite a while (> 40hrs).
|
1283.32 | cry me a river | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Tue Jul 17 1990 16:08 | 28 |
| I've been looking for a wah pedal myself for some time (it takes time
when you're too cheap to pay retail). here's a couple of opinions:
The DOD wah/volume pedal - sounds decent, but I have one big gripe
against it. You engage the wah action by bending over and flicking a
toggle switch on the side. If you play barefoot and have really
flexible toes you might be able to master doing this with your feet. I
couldn't.
The Cry-Baby plus distortion - I got some info from Jim Dunlop on
these. Like Brian said, they also come with distortion. Not only that,
you can get vanilla distortion or "Jimi Hendrix" distortion (one or the
other). The pedals with distortion go for almost $200 retail (they can
also take an AC adaptor as an option, as can the non-distortion
pedals). I haven't heard any of these, but I had a Cry-Baby many years
ago, and I thought it sounded fine. I didn't mind stomping on it to
engage the wah action, but then I was always more mechanical than
electrically oriented. My one gripe against the pedals with distortion
(oh yeah, second gripe counting the price) is that again, you select
whether the distortion is engaged with a switch on the side.
The bottom line is, I still haven't found the ideal wah-wah pedal. I
know what it would be - a rack-mounted unit with line power and a
remote foot pedal including a separate switch. But I'll settle for a
used Cry-Baby, as soon as I can find one for under $40 (it's possible,
I've seen them before as low as $20).
- Ram
|
1283.33 | | DEVO::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Tue Jul 17 1990 16:15 | 14 |
|
I really favor the old Cry Baby, but I'd have to side-by-side it with
the new Dunlop one to be able to tell a difference.
I always used my Cry Baby more as a step-on-the-cat pedal, and not
really for a wah-wah sound. If you remember Carlos Santana playing
"Them Changes" you get the idea. The tone all the way down, a big 1/2
inch or so, was a screaming treble sound. Backed all the way off was
cool, too.
Kevin
|
1283.34 | wappity-wappity-wappity | CAPNET::ZNAMIEROWSKI | I'm worth a million in prizes | Tue Jul 17 1990 16:48 | 18 |
| re: .-1
> I always used my Cry Baby more as a step-on-the-cat pedal, and not
Same here. I found that if and when you kicked it on, to keep it back
(I'm not saying this well), switch end up? where it cut all the high
end off, you got a peculiar effect that just loved to feed back. I
couldn't find much other use for it, except for the erstwhile sweep
while you were chugging along on chords, or to play cheesy disco.
As a side note, not sure if it's been discussed - but does anyone
know what the ART SGE MachII's are going for currently?
Thanks, regards, good dinners, all that-
/craig
|
1283.35 | To digress slightly | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | No, I'm very, very shy. | Tue Jul 17 1990 17:17 | 6 |
| Last I heard the SGE Mach IIs were going for around $600 or so.
American Musical Supply lists it for $579.00 and Musicians Friend lists
it for $599.88 if that helps.
Greg
|
1283.36 | a boosted clean sound,no distortion | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Tue Jul 17 1990 17:28 | 6 |
| Can someone recommend a pedal to boost a clean sound(slightly
overdriven?) Something besides a graphic eq or a compressor or volume
pedal....
Rick
|
1283.37 | Another use for wah-wah pedals | STAR::DONOVAN | | Tue Jul 17 1990 18:03 | 9 |
|
On the subjects of wahs....Michael Schenker credits a lot of his
tone to engaging the wah and pushing the pedal part way down, and
leaving it there, as a sort of treble-enhancer.
Of course, the vintage Flying V's, the Marshall stack, and his playing
ability probably have a lot to do with his sound, too.
Brian
|
1283.38 | More FX17 (Re: Ram) | SMURF::BENNETT | | Tue Jul 17 1990 19:14 | 8 |
|
The switch in the side is for going from volume mode to wah mode.
Pedal on/off is done by rocking the pedal all the way back and
pressing HARD. This works to bypass the pedal regardless of what
mode it's in.
|
1283.39 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Jul 18 1990 00:45 | 11 |
| RE: wahs ....
I recently grabbed a Cry Baby from American Musical Supply for $56.
After trying to make the dynamic filter of the GP-8 *try* and do wah
stuff, I had to ! But, for SRV, Trower, and Hendrix tones, I love it.
Plus, I use batteries instead of an AC adapter, because I only use it
live, and I just pop in a cheap Everready each night - $1.99 for 2
nights, and I can use the used battereies for my tuner and stuff.
Works for me ...
Scary
|
1283.40 | oh, yeah | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Wed Jul 18 1990 12:03 | 18 |
| > <<< Note 1283.38 by SMURF::BENNETT >>>
> -< More FX17 (Re: Ram) >-
>
>
> The switch in the side is for going from volume mode to wah mode.
>
> Pedal on/off is done by rocking the pedal all the way back and
> pressing HARD. This works to bypass the pedal regardless of what
> mode it's in.
Yes, now that you mention it, I do recall that. My problem was I wanted
to be able to use the pedal in volume mode for normal playing, then
kick in wah mode when needed. It doesn't work this way.
- Ram
|
1283.41 | it may exist | RANGER::WEBER | | Wed Jul 18 1990 12:28 | 7 |
| re: .20
Chapman, of Stick fame, used to market a device called the Patch Of
Shades that used a pressure sensitive pad. I believe it worked in a
manner similar to what you have proposed.
Danny W.
|
1283.42 | Boss=THE BOSS | HAMER::KRON | I'm the Amoral Minority! | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:02 | 8 |
| boss's newer edition of the dynamic/envelope filter has an exp pedal
input for a 5volt control signal.....makes a nice wah-wah-with
adjustable range, Q , and depth...on Michael Schenker- he presses
his crybaby down about 1/2 way boosting the midrange-check out
strangers in the night or 0bsession which btwwas recorded thru a
pignose amp exclusively!!!!!yow!!!
-Bill
|
1283.43 | | UPWARD::HEISER | trimmed & burnin' | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:50 | 5 |
| What's this American Musical Supply everyone's talking about? Are they the
new price buster in mail order? How do I contact them?
Thanks,
Mike
|
1283.44 | got one! | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Thu Jul 19 1990 07:53 | 16 |
| Thanks to this note (and thanks Dan) I picked up a Cry-Baby wah last
night. This one is not made by Jim Dunlop, and not by VOX, but by
Thomas (a division of *Whirpool* - that's ok, so is my dishwasher!).
Hey Brian, any history on this unit? It looks just like the one I had
about 20 years ago. I don't remember who built that.
In any case, I checked out the bypass, and it is passive, so I plan to
modify this with a switch that will cut out the battery. That way I
can leave it hooked up all the time, but only turn the power on for
songs that I actually know I'm going to use it in (currently only about
2), and save the battery. This one doesn't have the AC adapter input
(I'm sure I could add one easily enough), but I really can't imagine
trailing a wall-bug cord across the floor to the pedal anyway. Maybe
I'll invest in a battery charger.
- Ram
|
1283.45 | Thomas Organ?.... | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Thu Jul 19 1990 09:34 | 7 |
| Wasn't Thomas Organ,distributer for Vox? I remember reading
somewhere that they entered an agreement with Vox and just used
there name on equipment they sold and Vox thought they were going
to import there stuff to sell in America....
Rick
|
1283.46 | Thomas, Makers Of The Fabulous "Color-Glo" Organ System! | AQUA::ROST | Peavey=Mississippi Marshall | Thu Jul 19 1990 09:39 | 7 |
|
Thomas, which was an organ manufacturer, was the US distributor of VOX
for awhile (actually they ran it into the ground). A lot of old VOX
gear (especialy solid state stuff) here in the US will have their name
stamped on a panel somewhere.
Brian
|
1283.47 | | MRCSSE::LEITZ | have strat, will rock | Fri Jul 20 1990 15:29 | 7 |
|
geez, i can't believe this! the only reason i opened this notes file
was to leave a "wanted: 1 wah pedal" note.
so buckaroody, what did you end up getting? i'm going pedal hunting
this weekend.
|
1283.48 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cocked & Loaded! | Fri Jul 20 1990 15:32 | 2 |
| I picked up a used Cry-baby. I figured, aw, what the heck...if it's
good enuff for Tracii, it;s good enuff for me!
|
1283.49 | who's got the manual? | GLOWS::COCCOLI | where's Pokey? | Mon Jul 23 1990 20:47 | 17 |
|
I didn't want to start a new topic just for this one question,
so here goes.
I just bought a floor model Peavey PGP-20 from Sam Ash for $99.00
It's a "stereo instrument preamp". You know..distortion, eq, 2 fx
loops, and midi.
Does anyone out there have one?. I need a xerox of the manual.
OR I just need to know how to get the thing on a midi channel besides
ONE!!!. All my sequences use channel one for my main kbd control
channel and this PGP-20 is pi**ing me off.
But it sounds great through a PA......
RichC
|
1283.50 | Hmmmmm? | CSS::OLOUGHLIN | The fun begins at 80! | Fri Nov 09 1990 11:16 | 11 |
|
Has anyone tried that new Boss, (or DOD, or maybe Digitech) pedal
that shifts harmonies into different octaves? The price is high at
$179., but the idea sounds good.
Rick.
|
1283.51 | Haven't tried it, but here's some info | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:04 | 14 |
| It's by Digitech, called the "Whammy". I haven't tried one as my local
dealer doesn't have them.
It sounds like a specialized piece of the IPS-33 which allows you to do
pitch bends with it. Digitech has a IPS-33B demo tape that shows a guy
doing pedal steel type licks using a regular guitar with a foot
controller to the IPS-33 to control the pitch change. You get the
original signal plus the one with the intelligent pitch change.
Sounded kind of interesting, but I think it's got a pretty limited
utility. Sounds like they are trying to target that nitch market with
it.
Greg
|
1283.52 | I Know of a Boss PS-1 | ELWOOD::HERTZBERG | I'm the NEA | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:11 | 13 |
| Boss has a PS-1 pitch shift/delay stomp box in the price range you
mentioned. In addition to doing a reasonable digital delay, it has
modes to pitch shift up one octave, down one octave, or by a variable
amount up to � 1 octave. In the pitch bend mode, the processed signal
has quite a lot of noise in it (sounds like steel drums), but mixed
down quiet, it can sound reasonably good. I guess it's like a really
cheap harmonizer... they spend the other $3K to get the noise out! If
you detune very slightly so that the pitch shift is almost negligable,
it does a rather interesting flange effect with a rate equal to the
frequency difference between the dry and processed signal.
All in all, I'm not real pleased with the box... just too much noise to
make the pitch shifting tolerable for prolonged periods of listening.
|