T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1280.1 | They Really Work Well | AQUA::ROST | The closer I am to fine | Mon Apr 24 1989 17:22 | 63 |
|
I have never used the Rocktron Hush, but I own an old piece of hi-fi
gear called a De-noiser that Kenwood made some years back and use
this while recording.
These devices operate on similar principles, basically they adjust
a low-pass filter based on the level and frequency content of the
input. Some of these devices have more controls than others, but
basically they require a threshold adjustment, to set the maximum
signal level, and a noise reduction adjustment, to set the steepness
of the filtering.
The idea is that the noise is masked when a stong signal is present, so
the filter is kept open, and as the signal fades, the filter should
gradually close to prevent the hiss from being audible.
The unit I have was intended for hi-fi applications and in that use,
extreme settings cause "breathing". This is due to the filter action
working on the entire signal, therefore a sudden crescendo can cause
the filter to open suddenly. If total silence follows, you can
actually hear the hiss trail off as the filter begins to close again.
However, I have found that for guitar and bass recording, it works even
at extreme settings, since the input signal of a single instrument is
much less complex than the signal from a record or tape (i.e. only one
envelope to follow). In fact, I can do things like severe high
frequency EQ boosts and hear *no* increase in hiss when there is no
signal present. The unit has a "defeat" switch and the effect is quite
dramatic. Since this unit uses discrete transistors and was designed
almost 20 years ago, I would expect the newer units to work even
better.
It really does do the job. All the extraneous hiss and garbage
immediately disappears from the signal. I have found it possible to use
stomp box analog chorus, delay and spring reverb units in recording
that were too noisy before. It also gets rid of the "grunge" noise
from my Fuzz Face running full tilt in between notes.
I also own a noise gate. I prefer the De-noiser, as the noise gate
cuts the signal off abruptly, and there is no noise reduction happening
until the gate shuts off, so you have to trade off a little bit
of noise on the tail of notes versus having the note chop off early.
The Kenwood unit and similar devices from Phase Linear (Autocorrelator)
and Burwen (Noise Filter) would be suitable only for home studio
use. They can be found with some looking around for less than $100
(I paid $30 for mine).
I have seen units for instument applications from Rocktron, Boss,
Scholz and dBx. No doubt others will arrive soon.
The Rocktron Hush comes in a stomp box model at about $100, half racks,
full racks (stereo) full racks with combinations of
Hush/compressor/exciter, etc. The prices range up into the $400 range.
The Boss NS-2 stomp box is about $100. The dBx 563 is a half-rack unit
at about $250. The Scholz "Smart Gate" sounds like a similar unit and
sells for $100 list (it's new, no idea how heavy it will be
discounted),in the usual Scholz half-rack box (I find Rockman units
very quiet, if this is the circuit they use to keep hiss down, it's
probably worth looking into).
The dBx and Hush rack units can also be used at less extreme settings as
additional tape noise reduction for studio or home stereo applications
(tape collectors take note!).
|
1280.2 | | ASAHI::COOPER | Shattered Dreamz | Wed May 03 1989 17:27 | 5 |
| Come on Buck, tell us about your Roctron Hush 2C (?)
I was thinkin' about adding one to my Rack !
Buck ? Buck ? You there ?
|
1280.3 | Hush IICX...its ok | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I wish it was summertime all year! | Wed May 03 1989 17:37 | 17 |
| Hi JC,
Yes, I'm here. The HushIICX is a weird unit. I like it sometimes, and
other times I hate it. It comes with a weird 2 prong (ungrounded)
plug, and the unit can be noisy from time to time, or delpening what
you use it with. Its heat sensitive, so you can keep it near the power
amp. It hushes ok, but it cuts out the high end in the 10-15K range.
It makes for a warm sound, but sometimes the `squeek' isn't there. I
keep it in my rack last in line (before the power amp), and sometimes I
use it amd sometimes I don't.
I think for the service of `no noise', I may rather go with a very hip
noise gate instead...that way you wouldn't be cutting out your high end
(the hush works on the theory of expansion coupled with a deesser).
All the lights look nice though. ;^)
a quick review from buck
|
1280.4 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | Stepping on the little people... | Wed May 03 1989 17:42 | 10 |
|
Whilst its not in the same league as rack mount units - I bought
a DOD Noise gate/loop stomp box, and it cuts out all the unwanted
crap. When I turned my fan on I used to get a buzz through my speaker
stack - but now with the unit on it even cuts that out. Only thing
is - when I have my amp on quiet I get a real slight delay between
the time I play a note and when it actually sounds. Any ideas
why ? any cures ?
-Tony
|
1280.5 | | AQUA::ROST | The closer I am to fine | Thu May 04 1989 11:36 | 15 |
|
Re: .3
How to get back your high end....I just boost the high EQ. The
his added by the EQ gets squashed by the NR box.
Re: .4
Noise gates are built around voltage comparator cicuits. Your inout
has to reach a certain level before the gate opens. This can cause
the attack of the note to get lopped off slightly. To your ear,
that makes the note sound delayed.
Have I just got a lousy gate or doesn't anyone else have problems
with the gate "chattering" on fading notes?
|
1280.6 | Is it adjustable? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu May 04 1989 16:13 | 18 |
| > Have I just got a lousy gate or doesn't anyone else have problems
> with the gate "chattering" on fading notes?
Does your gate allow you to set the signal level below which the
gate closes?
If not, you've got a gate that you can't use in your application
(don't know if that makes it lousy).
If so, I have always been able to find a setting that works and
doesn't chatter.
Another possibility is to be sure that your levels are matched
(the levels between the gate input and whatever your plugging
into it that is).
db
|
1280.7 | | AQUA::ROST | The closer I am to fine | Thu May 04 1989 18:08 | 14 |
|
No, my gate lets me set the threshold. It just has narrow hysteresis,
i.e. if the input level wavers around the threshold as the note dies,
the gate will turn on and off.
The other problem with gates (for me) is that to keep it from cutting
off the ends of my notes, I have to let a considerable amount of
noise through as notes fade. With a dynamic filter, I don't have
this problem.
Of course, the *real* problem is a noisy signal chain. If the chain
is *very* hissy, a dynamic filter will always outperform a gate.
Where gates shine is when the noise is primarily low-frequency stuff
(AC hum).
|
1280.8 | Silence is golden, but can I afford it?? | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue May 30 1989 10:49 | 31 |
| I am interested in getting dual compressor/limiters, and dual channel
single ended noise reduction. I have looked at DBX performor series
1/2 rack modules, the Rane DC24 dynamic controller, and lots of other
units. I would like to have two channels of both compression and noise
reduction to facilitate recording of vocals and instruments simultaneously,
and also in my PA system. I need to be able to strap the channels for
stereo mixdown. I assume having separate units would be the ultamate,
but in order to get good quality components, the cost would add
up and I would end up using lots of rack space. For example, two DBX
163X modules would be about $250, and two DBX 563X modules
would be at least $300, = $550, and these are bare bones units.
The Rane DC24 is $489 and it has a noise gate/expander as apposes
to single-ended noise reduction.
I am currently looking into a Rocktron unit. The one that sounds
like it would be the best choice is the model 360 stereo compressor/
limiter which includes the HushII single ended noise reduction.The
compressor can be defeted, so you can use just the noise reduction.
The two channels can operate independantly, or as a stereo pair.
EU Wurly (Boston) has these in stock and is selling them for $375.
I am going to see if the Worcester store has these in stock.
Can anyone comment on these units, or other alternatives ? How
reliable are Rocktron products ? By any chance, do they offer
a stereo unit that includes compressor/limiters, noise reduction,
AND an exciter ? I think they make a mono unit like this. Any
info would be appreciated.
Mark
|
1280.9 | dBx 166 | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Tue May 30 1989 11:06 | 5 |
|
Mark, an alternative to a pair of 163 units from dBx is their model
166, a dual channel compressor/limiter which also has a noise gate
function. You can run strapped for stereo or dual mono, single
rack space.
|
1280.10 | DBX 166 | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue May 30 1989 11:25 | 10 |
| I believe the DBX 166 is in the $400 to $500 range. I prefer
to stay away from noise gate because of the fact that they
gate on and off as the threshold is crossed. A good single-ended
nr unit should be more transparent, while effectively removing
unwanted hiss, and noise (from compressors, etc.)
Mark
|
1280.11 | | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Tue May 30 1989 12:22 | 12 |
| Re: .10
You're right on the price, however I have recorded with the 166
and was surprised when I found out that the basic bass tracks were
done by running the bass direct to the 166 then to tape, no other
EQ or processing. Bass tends to sound noisier anyway due to the
lack of high end to mask the hiss.
My own experiences at home with cheaper noise gates is the chattering
you mentioned (see my earlier replies), but this was noticeably absent
in the 166. At the price versus the Rocktron price, it's probably
worth listening to at least once.
|
1280.12 | Try this one | LEDS::ORSI | Cuz I felt like it, OK? | Tue May 30 1989 12:41 | 11 |
| Mark,
For $239 you can get the Audio Logic MT66 comp/limiter. It has a
noise gate as well as threshold, ratio, attack, release, input
level, output level on each channel. It can be linked for stereo,
and has side chain capability for ducking and other stuff. I have
one, it's quiet and INEXPENSIVE. I like the DBX 163X better for
sound reinforcement channel patching though, it's quick and simple
to set up.
Neal
|
1280.13 | Who carries Audio Logic ? | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue May 30 1989 14:23 | 8 |
| Niel, I'm not appossed to saving money. What dealers sell Audio
Logic ?
I'm not too familiar with the name brand. Where are these products
produced ? How reliable are they ?
Mark
|
1280.14 | | LEDS::ORSI | Cuz I felt like it, OK? | Tue May 30 1989 15:14 | 13 |
| Re- .13
I got mine at Steve's Quality Instruments in Danvers, but try
Daddy's. They were out of stock at the time I was looking to buy.
Also, the Music Emporium has 'em. I don't know if Wurly's carries
AudioLogic (DOD).
These units are quieter than the Yamaha GC2020, but maybe not
as easy to use. IMO, these are quality units. I've never had a
problem with mine. I don't know offhand where the line is manu-
factured.
Neal
|
1280.15 | DOD=DigiTech=AudioLogic=? | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Tue May 30 1989 15:37 | 8 |
|
Re: Audio Logic
As neal says, DOD is Audio Logic. They have come up with the new
name, like they did with DigiTech, to avoid scaring off folks who
don't like their stomp boxes.
As far as I know, all three DOD lines are U.S. made.
|
1280.16 | I believe DOD is based in Utah | CSC32::G_HOUSE | My dog ate it... | Wed May 31 1989 11:51 | 1 |
|
|
1280.17 | From a GC2020 owner | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu Jun 01 1989 18:42 | 26 |
| When I first tried a Yamaha GC2020, I rejected it on the basis
of it being too noisey.
However, I now own a GC2020B. It seems pretty much the same as
the first unit, only quieter.
I think it's advantages are mainly flexibility. It has XLR inputs
AND outputs in addition to regular phone plug outputs which makes
it handy for stage and PA work as WELL as studio work.
It also has adjustable impedance (on inputs and outputs), a variable
adjustment for input gain AND output gain (makes it easy to match
both input and output levels EXACTLY which makes it much easier to
get a quiet signal) and each channel has both a compressor/limiter AND
a noise gate.
I haven't had problem with "chatter" in the noise gates.
There's a graphic led read out for the amount of compression and each
noise gate has a in/out led (useful for setting the gate level).
Feature-wise, it's great. Sound-wise it's on-par with most of the
other units in its range, although if I had the extra bucks, I'd
definitely shoot for the Symetrix or Ashleys.
db
|
1280.18 | Peavey AMR ?? | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue Jun 06 1989 15:47 | 25 |
| Re .17
By the way, how much does a GC2020B sell for at average discount?
I am intersted in the Audio Logic MT66 suggested by Niel, but so
far, I haven't found any local dealers that carry it, and I don't
have the time to run to Danvers or Boston. If anyone knows a dealer
local to Worcester please let me know.
Is anyone familiar with Peavey's new line of AMR recording gear?
They offer a dual channel compressor/limiter/de-esser in a single
rack space package for ~$189 (Daddy's price), as well as Noise
gates, and other effects. This series is in an ugly light grey
colored package, but for the price, if it does the job well, and
is quiet, I just might go for it. In my opinion, compressors
are a necessity, but not so exciting that I care to break the
bank to buy the absolute best in the world model. Since I will
be using it with a Tascam porta one and/or a small Peavey PA
system, I can't see spending $500 for a compressor. I have an
AMR PMA200 power amp at home, and while it is not the most powerful
amp in the world, it does the job, and I have had no problems with
it in 2 years of moderate use.
Mark
|
1280.19 | re: .18 | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Jun 06 1989 16:12 | 3 |
| I paid about $300 for a GC2020B.
db
|
1280.20 | Still looking !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:08 | 43 |
| I went back to Daddy's Friday night to try out the Peavey AMR
compressor/limiter/de-esser. The saleman started hooking it
into a keyboard rig, with a mixer, etc but I explained that
I play guitar and prefered to try it with a guitar and an
amp both stright in line, and in an effects loop. He set me
up with a Jackson/Charvel with humbuckers, and a small Peavey
combo.
The first thing that struck me is that this thing is very
noisy. We tried it both ways with excessive noise either
way. He claimed it was probably quieter in a line level
efx loop on a mixer, but we tried and it was still noisy
either way. Besides the noise the compressor was not smooth
at all. It sounded really choppy. I didn't bother to try
and critique the de-esser, since the thing was clearly
unsuitable.
I asked them what else they carried. They offered me DOD,
and I said, "Thanks, but no thanks". I asked if they sold
Audio Logic, and after doing a computer search, they said
they had one in the chain and could get it by Tuesday. I
told them I would come back Tuesday and demo it. They claim
they are selling for $279, with a list of $349. I told them
they would have to do better than that since (according to
Niel) they could be had elsewhere for $239. They said to
come in and try it and "We'll work out something".
Union Music just picked up the Symmetrix franchise and are
offering a top-of-the-line dual channel model with noise
gate for $349 (regularly about $449). I haven't checked it
out yet, but I believe Symmetrix makes real good stuff, so
I am hopeful.
Does anyone have any experience with the Alesis micro series
effects. They offer a 1/3 rack space "micro-limiter", "micro-
enhancer", "micro-que-amp", "micro-equalizer", and of course
the "micro-verbII". The thing is if I bought one, I would want
to buy 3 units to fill a full rack space. Which units are "hot"?
Mark
|
1280.21 | I'm so confused?! | NRPUR::DEATON | | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:30 | 11 |
| RE < Note 1280.20 by ANT::JACQUES >
Why would you want to set up a comp/limiter in an effects loop? Doesn't
that defeat the purpose of using a comp/limiter? It's my understanding that an
effects loop is set up to ADD (reverb,delay,chorus,etc) to a sound. A
compressor needs to be set up not to ADD but to CONTROL a sound.
Am I missing something?
Dan
|
1280.22 | Take your pick | LEDS::ORSI | Cuz I felt like it, OK? | Tue Jun 13 1989 10:59 | 8 |
|
The effect loop is for either or both Dan. You might have a Quadra-
verb in the loop and a 1 octave graphic EQ is series if you wish.
Keep in mind that the loop is line level, so stomp boxes with
instrument level in's and out's shouldn't be used.
Neal
|
1280.23 | whatever | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:30 | 22 |
|
I agree with Niel, with one slight nit. Some equipment has a
buffered effects loop with a pot, or selector switch which
allows you to choose what level you are driving into the
effects. My fender Twin reverb (1988 "The Twin) for example
has a three level effects loop which allows you to match it
to the effect you are using. Regardless, I generally place
stomp boxes between the guitar and amp input, and place rack-
mount (line level) effects in the loop. Likewise, my Peavey
701R Mixer has a rts effect send jack, which runs on line
level when plugged in all the way, and instrument level when
plugged in half way.
I agree that compressor/limiters, noise gates, exciters, etc.
should generally be placed in series, appearing after the
mixing board and before the recorder inputs in a recording
application, or before the power amp in a PA application.
For the sake of demonstration, I wanted to connect it into
a loop to see how it would work at line level.
Mark
|
1280.24 | Matching levels is very important in compressors | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Jun 13 1989 18:43 | 11 |
| > The first thing that struck me is that this thing is very
> noisy. We tried it both ways with excessive noise either
> way. He claimed it was probably quieter in a line level
The thing you should know about compressors is that the way
they are implemented is that they use the input signal as
an input to a circuit that controls the gain of a preamp.
Not suprisingly, they are EXTREMELY sensitive to level mismatches.
db
|
1280.25 | Hush thingamawhatzit | MPGS::LOISELLE | | Fri Jun 16 1989 17:39 | 7 |
| I got a little Rocktron Micro-hush C or something like that. It's
a 1/3rd rack space box that works great. It does take a little
of the high end out but I barely notice when everyone else is
playing. Wouldn't be without it.....
Regards Scott
|
1280.26 | food for thought | PNO::HEISER | waitin' on sundown | Wed Feb 13 1991 11:41 | 9 |
| I can't remember what note the Dolby flames were in, but...
Has anyone ever considered that Dolby B and C are more sensitive to
transport quality, head alignment, and head cleanliness than dbx?
Guitars aren't the only things that need attention. Plus you can't
expect a Nakamichi-like quality transport in a $400 multitrack deck.
Mike
|
1280.27 | How to quiet a noisy cooling fan ? | POWDML::GOFF | | Tue Feb 18 1997 21:01 | 7 |
| This isn't really about noise reduction gear but rather reduction of
noise in gear. Our bass player brought over a new Fender BXR 300C amp
last night. It sounded great in every respect except for a very noisy
fan. It's a two speed fan and if what we were hearing was the low
speed, I don't want to hear it at high speed. Way too loud. Any ideas
on what can be done to quiet a noisy cooling fan ? Thanks in advance
for any ideas.
|
1280.28 | An easy answer ? | POWDML::GOFF | | Thu Feb 20 1997 12:13 | 11 |
| Hi,
I was hoping that there would be an easy answer to the previous
question about how to quiet an amps very noisy cooling fan. It sounds
like a vacuum cleaner and you actually have to talk over it between
songs. Are the only two alternatives to return the amp or remove the
fan ? How risky would it be to disconnect the fan ? Where would one go
to buy a quiet fan to replace it with ? Any ideas would be _greatly_
appreciated. It's otherwise such a nice amp.
Mark
|
1280.29 | limit the output power! | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Thu Feb 20 1997 13:51 | 16 |
|
"quite fan" is an oxymoron. No fan will be quiet enough to
be tolerated in a studio. You may want to add a switch that
allows you to shut the fan off. With the fan shut off, you
should limit the amps output power by connecting a smaller
speaker load. If the amp normally drives a 4 ohm load with the
fan running, try driving an 8 ohm load without the fan. The
amp will produce less output power (and less heat) with the
8 ohm load and probably won't need the fan.
Check the manual and see if it makes any mention of this.
Mark
|
1280.30 | call Fender....? | NETCAD::BUSENBARK | | Thu Feb 20 1997 14:34 | 15 |
| First I would verify that this is characteristic of the amp by locating
another amp and listening to it. If the second amp is just as noisy
then I would call Fender and explain your problem. They may reccomend
a fan swap and if this doesn't fix the problem then you might want to
consider acoustically by isolating the current fan with foam rubber.
Since it is a two speed fan I assume that the speed increase's as the
amp gets hotter.
I had a Mesa Boogie MKII head which had the same noise problem which I
fixed by replacing the old fan with a new fan that blew less air... The
comprimise was that my power tube life was decreased a little.
Rick
|
1280.31 | Thanks | POWDML::GOFF | | Mon Feb 24 1997 08:40 | 7 |
| Thanks Mark and Rick. I passed on your ideas. It turned out that it was
the particular unit and not the model. He was able to return the one
with the loud fan and replace it with one that sounded fine.
Thanks again.
Mark
|