T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1150.1 | Hot Air On A "G" String | AQUA::ROST | She's looking better every beer | Thu Feb 16 1989 13:48 | 16 |
|
Loss of volume on the upper part of the G string is not uncommon,
partially because the string is lighter gauge. Also many basses
have dead notes in the vicinity of the 5th to 12th fret on the G
string. Lastly, your amplification system may be set up so that
those notes are not reproduced as loudly.
One thing that can help is to adjust the pickup height so that it
is closest to the G string (gives more signal).
Using the on-board compressor should *help* even out the volume
differences from string to string, while the expander should make
it somewhat worse.
Good luck on the neck.
|
1150.2 | | RAINBO::WEBER | | Thu Feb 16 1989 14:07 | 12 |
| If the break is on the threaded end of the rod, it may be possible
to rethread it--this should cost less than $50. If the rod really
needs to be replaced, it would still be cheaper than having a neck
neck made, or installing a replacement neck. Be aware that the bass
is not particularly valuable (perhaps $450), so you might not want
to pour a few hundred into repairing it.
The pickups used with Gibson active electronics are high impedance,
low output that cannot be replaced with standard pickups without
pro
Danny W.
|
1150.3 | ???? | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Thu Feb 16 1989 14:45 | 8 |
| I'm not sure what you mean by having a neck re-done. Usually, a luthier
can pull the fret board off, replace the rod & re-glue it without too
much trouble (maybe not too cheaply however). On most Gibson's, there
simply is no other access to the truss rod. If the neck was broken,
Gibson suggests cutting the old neck off & replacing it (not always
necessary in my opinion).
Jens_who_has_done_this_before_on_a_Les_Paul_model_in_the_distant_past.
|
1150.4 | 2nd note | BPOV04::DERRICO | | Thu Feb 16 1989 15:00 | 13 |
| Back again,
The Truss Rod has only one exposed end (at the Headstock). I don't
think that the rod can be replaced unless the neck comes off. I
think the only value in getting this fixed is just to use it again.
There is no financial gain.
As far as the Pickup height, I may have tried to raise it as far
as was reasonable. I'd have to try this again.
Obrigado.
J.D.
|
1150.5 | | LEDS::ORSI | the road show from Deliverance | Fri Feb 17 1989 08:15 | 11 |
|
Removing the neck wouldn't serve any purpose. .3 has the right
idea. The truss rod is in a slot underneath the fretboard and
a good repair person can remove the fretboard, replace the truss
rod, and put the fretboard back on. As far as I know, Gibson uses
standard truss rods in their instruments, unlike Martin and Rick-
enbacker and some others. The question is not whether it can be
done or not, it's more like, can you afford it.
Neal
|